Agent skill

Hiring Manager Deep Dive

by curiositech in curiositech/some_claude_skills

Prepares for hiring manager rounds at Staff+ (L6+) level — scope of impact, influence without authority, ambiguity navigation, mentorship, strategic thinking.

MITAuto-check passedBusiness, Finance & HR

Install Hiring Manager Deep Dive

skills CLI
$ npx skills add curiositech/some_claude_skills --skill hiring-manager-deep-dive -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install curiositech/some_claude_skills hiring-manager-deep-dive --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/curiositech/some_claude_skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/.claude/skills/hiring-manager-deep-dive .claude/skills/hiring-manager-deep-dive && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
hiring-manager-deep-dive
GitHub stars
243
Token cost
~3.5k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,755 words
Files
4 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
95
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Prepares for hiring manager rounds at Staff+ (L6+) level — scope of impact, influence without authority, ambiguity navigation, mentorship, strategic thinking.

  • Works in 3 steps: Scope: What was the problem space? Who… → Impact: What was the measurable outcome?… → Decisions: What were the key inflection…
  • Practicing HM rounds
  • SKILL.md covers When to Use, The 6 Dimensions of Staff+…, L5 vs L6+ Answer Comparison and Discussion Frameworks, plus 4 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Hiring Manager Deep Dive is an agent skill from curiositech/some_claude_skills. Prepares for hiring manager rounds at Staff+ (L6+) level — scope of impact, influence without authority, ambiguity navigation, mentorship, strategic thinking. Use when practicing HM rounds or calibrating story depth for target level. Activate on "hiring manager round", "HM screen", "staff level", "scope of impact". NOT for coding interviews, system design, behavioral/values rounds, or resume writing.

Its SKILL.md is about 3.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 5 other files, including reference files (for example `.claude-plugin/plugin.json`, `references/project-impact-calculator.md` and `references/staff-level-signals.md`).

It sits in Business, Finance & HR, covering Resume and CV writing. The repository describes itself as: Claude skills that make my life easier. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Practicing HM rounds
  • Calibrating story depth for target level

Example prompts

  • “hiring manager round”
  • “HM screen”
  • “staff level”
  • “/hiring-manager-deep-dive”

Requirements

  • Pre-approved tools (allowed-tools): Read, Write, Edit

Workflow steps

3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Scope: What was the problem space? Who was affected? Why did it matter?
  2. Impact: What was the measurable outcome? (See references/project-impact-calculator.md)
  3. Decisions: What were the key inflection points? What alternatives did you reject and why?

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 6713fc7. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves these tools, so the agent can use them without asking each time:

    • Read
    • Write
    • Edit

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are mermaid).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Hiring Manager Deep Dive loads about 3.5k tokens when it runs, and up to ~12k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 107 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,755 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~107
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~3.5k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~12k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from curiositech/some_claude_skills at commit 6713fc7, republished under its MIT licence (© curiositech). 1,755 words, ~3,510 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/hiring-manager-deep-dive/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 3 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
hiring-manager-deep-dive
description
Prepares for hiring manager rounds at Staff+ (L6+) level — scope of impact, influence without authority, ambiguity navigation, mentorship, strategic thinking. Use when practicing HM rounds or calibrating story depth for target level. Activate on "hiring manager round", "HM screen", "staff level", "scope of impact". NOT for coding interviews, system design, behavioral/values rounds, or resume writing.
allowed-tools
Read, Write, Edit
metadata.gated
true
metadata.category
Career & Interview
metadata.tags
interview, hiring-manager, leadership, staff-engineer, scope

Hiring Manager Deep Dive

The hiring manager round is the highest-signal evaluation of whether a candidate operates at the target level. It is less about technical depth and more about scope of impact, ability to navigate ambiguity, influence without direct authority, and strategic thinking. The HM is answering one question: "Would I trust this person to own a critical workstream independently?"

When to Use

Use this skill for:

  • Preparing for a hiring manager round at L6/Staff+ level
  • Calibrating story depth to demonstrate target-level scope
  • Structuring project narratives around leadership and impact
  • Practicing follow-up resilience (surviving 3 levels of "why?")
  • Understanding what separates L5 answers from L6+ answers

NOT for:

  • Coding interview preparation (use senior-coding-interview)
  • System design rounds (use ml-system-design-interview)
  • Behavioral/values fit rounds (use values-behavioral-interview)
  • Resume or CV writing (use cv-creator)
  • Career narrative extraction (use career-biographer)

The 6 Dimensions of Staff+ Signal

Hiring managers evaluate candidates across six dimensions. Every answer you give should register on at least 2-3 of these.

DimensionL5 (Senior) SignalL6+ (Staff) SignalWeight
Technical DepthSolves hard problems in their domainSets technical direction for a domain; others follow their lead15%
Scope of ImpactDelivers features for their teamDrives outcomes across teams or the org25%
Ambiguity NavigationExecutes well on defined problemsFinds the right problem to solve; creates clarity from chaos20%
Influence Without AuthorityConvinces teammatesAligns engineers, PMs, and leadership across orgs without reporting lines20%
Mentorship & Team GrowthHelps teammates with code reviewsDevelops engineers' careers; shapes team culture and hiring bar10%
Strategic ThinkingUnderstands their team's roadmapConnects technical decisions to business outcomes and multi-year strategy10%
mermaid
radar
    title Staff+ Signal Radar — Target Profile
    "Technical Depth" : 7
    "Scope of Impact" : 9
    "Ambiguity Navigation" : 8
    "Influence w/o Authority" : 9
    "Mentorship & Growth" : 7
    "Strategic Thinking" : 8

Key insight: At L5, technical depth carries you. At L6+, scope and influence carry you. Many candidates fail HM rounds by over-indexing on technical heroics and under-indexing on organizational impact.


L5 vs L6+ Answer Comparison

The same question produces fundamentally different answers at different levels. Study these contrasts.

QuestionL5 Answer (Senior)L6+ Answer (Staff)
"Tell me about your biggest project""I implemented the feature using X technology""I identified that our team was solving the wrong problem, proposed an alternative approach, and led the design review across 3 teams"
"Tell me about a performance win""I fixed the performance bug""I recognized a systemic performance issue, built a profiling framework, trained 4 engineers to use it, and reduced p99 latency by 40% across the org"
"How do you handle disagreements?""I presented data and my tech lead agreed""I wrote an RFC comparing 3 approaches, facilitated a design review with stakeholders from 2 orgs, incorporated feedback, and built consensus on an approach none of us had originally proposed"
"Tell me about mentoring""I helped a junior engineer debug their PR""I designed an onboarding curriculum, paired with 3 new hires through their first quarter, and two of them are now leading their own projects"
"How do you prioritize?""I work on what my manager says is highest priority""I maintain a priority framework based on business impact, technical risk, and team capacity. When our OKRs conflicted with a VP's request, I presented the tradeoff analysis and we agreed to defer one initiative"

The pattern: L6+ answers show ownership of problem selection, cross-team coordination, multiplier effects (making others more effective), and connection to business outcomes.


Discussion Frameworks

Framework 1: "Walk me through your biggest project"

The HM is evaluating: Scope + Impact + Decision Quality

Structure your answer using SCOPE-IMPACT-DECISION (SID):

  1. Scope: What was the problem space? Who was affected? Why did it matter?
  2. Impact: What was the measurable outcome? (See references/project-impact-calculator.md)
  3. Decisions: What were the key inflection points? What alternatives did you reject and why?

Follow-up survival guide:

  • "Why that approach?" -- Show you considered alternatives (name at least 2)
  • "What would you do differently?" -- Show self-awareness without undermining the result
  • "How did you get buy-in?" -- This is the influence question in disguise
  • "What happened after you left?" -- Tests whether you built something sustainable
Framework 2: "How do you handle disagreements?"

The HM is evaluating: Influence + Diplomacy + Judgment

Structure using SITUATION-STAKES-STRATEGY-SYNTHESIS (4S):

  1. Situation: Who disagreed about what? (Name roles, not people)
  2. Stakes: What was at risk if the wrong decision was made?
  3. Strategy: How did you navigate it? (Data, prototypes, facilitated discussion, escalation)
  4. Synthesis: What was the outcome, and what did the relationship look like afterward?

Critical rule: Never position yourself as the hero who was right all along. The best answers show you changed your own mind partway through, or the final solution was better than anyone's original proposal.

Framework 3: "Tell me about leading without authority"

The HM is evaluating: Cross-team Influence + Technical Leadership

Structure using CHALLENGE-COALITION-OUTCOME (CCO):

  1. Challenge: What needed to happen that no single team owned?
  2. Coalition: How did you identify stakeholders, align incentives, and build momentum?
  3. Outcome: What shipped, and how did you maintain alignment through execution?

Signal amplifiers:

  • Mention writing an RFC or design doc that became the authoritative reference
  • Describe creating a working group or regular sync that outlived the project
  • Show that you understood other teams' priorities and framed your proposal in their terms
Framework 4: "What's your approach to mentoring?"

The HM is evaluating: Team Growth + Culture Building

Structure using PHILOSOPHY-PRACTICE-PROOF (3P):

  1. Philosophy: What do you believe about developing engineers? (Not platitudes -- specific beliefs)
  2. Practice: What do you actually do? (1:1 structure, code review philosophy, stretch assignments)
  3. Proof: Who have you developed, and where are they now?

Level calibration: L5 mentoring is helping with tasks. L6+ mentoring is shaping careers and building team culture.

Framework 5: "How do you prioritize competing projects?"

The HM is evaluating: Strategic Thinking + Business Judgment

Structure using FRAMEWORK-FRICTION-FOLLOWTHROUGH (3F):

  1. Framework: What's your prioritization model? (Impact/effort, RICE, business criticality)
  2. Friction: When did the framework conflict with organizational pressure? What happened?
  3. Follow-through: How did you communicate the priority call to stakeholders who lost?

Calibrating the HM During the Conversation

The HM reveals their expectations through their questions. Read these signals:

HM SignalWhat It MeansHow to Adjust
Asks about team size and reportsEvaluating management scopeEmphasize leadership of people, not just projects
Asks "what did YOU specifically do?"Testing for scope inflationBe precise about your role vs team's role
Asks about failuresTesting self-awareness and growthOwn the failure fully, show systemic learning
Asks about 2-3 year visionEvaluating strategic thinkingConnect your technical perspective to business trajectory
Asks about tradeoffs repeatedlyTesting decision-making maturityShow you think in tradeoffs, not right/wrong
Keeps asking "why?"Probing for depth vs surface knowledgeGo deeper each time; if you bottom out, say so honestly

Show full SKILL.md (653 more words)Show less

Anti-Patterns

Anti-Pattern 1: IC Cosplay

Novice signal: Only describes individual contributions -- "I wrote the code", "I designed the model", "I shipped the feature" -- with no mention of team, organizational, or strategic impact. Every story is about personal technical heroics.

Expert signal: Naturally weaves in scope -- "I identified the need, proposed it to leadership, assembled a cross-functional team of 6 engineers across 2 orgs, owned the technical design, coached two junior engineers through implementation, and presented results to the VP." The technical work is there but embedded in organizational context.

Detection: When asked "how did this affect the broader org?", gives vague answers like "people liked it" or pivots back to technical details. Cannot articulate the counterfactual (what would have happened without their work).

Recovery: For each story, explicitly prepare the "zoom out" layer. Ask yourself: Who besides your immediate team was affected? What organizational capability did this create? What would the next 12 months have looked like without this work?

Anti-Pattern 2: Scope Inflation

Novice signal: Claims to have driven a project that was clearly team-driven. Uses "I" for everything. Under follow-up, cannot explain specific decisions they made vs decisions others made. The story changes or becomes vague under 2-3 levels of probing.

Expert signal: Is precise about their role -- "I was the tech lead for the ML pipeline; my peer led the serving infrastructure; our EM coordinated with the product team. My specific contributions were the architecture decision to use X over Y, the data pipeline design, and mentoring two engineers on the team." Credits others naturally without diminishing their own contribution.

Detection: Ask "who else was involved and what did they own?" -- a scope inflator either cannot answer or gives generic responses. Ask the same question from a different angle later; the story should be consistent.

Recovery: Map every story to a RACI-like structure before the interview. Know exactly what you were Responsible for, what you were Accountable for, and what you Consulted or Informed on. Precision builds trust.

Anti-Pattern 3: Strategy Vacuum

Novice signal: Can describe what they built in exhaustive technical detail but not WHY it mattered to the business. Cannot answer "what would have happened if you hadn't done this?" or "what's the 2-year vision for this area?" Treats strategy questions as irrelevant to their engineering role.

Expert signal: Connects technical decisions to business outcomes, competitive landscape, and long-term platform strategy. "We chose to build the inference pipeline in-house rather than using a vendor because our model iteration speed is a competitive advantage, and vendor lock-in would have cost us 2-3 weeks per model update cycle. The 2-year vision is a self-serve platform where researchers can deploy models without infra involvement."

Detection: Ask "why did this project matter more than other things you could have worked on?" A strategy vacuum gives answers like "my manager asked me to" or "it was the next thing on the roadmap."

Recovery: For every project story, prepare answers to: (1) Why this project over alternatives? (2) What was the business case? (3) What would the world look like in 2 years if this succeeds? (4) What are the risks if it fails?


HM Round Preparation Checklist

  1. Story bank: Prepare 5-7 stories that collectively cover all 6 dimensions
  2. Level calibration: For each story, write the L5 version and the L6+ version. Practice only the L6+ version
  3. Follow-up resilience: For each story, prepare 3 levels of "why?" answers
  4. Counterfactuals: For each project, know what would have happened without you
  5. Failure story: Have one genuine failure that shows self-awareness and systemic learning
  6. Questions for the HM: Prepare 3-5 questions that demonstrate strategic thinking about the role

Reference Files

  • references/staff-level-signals.md -- Detailed breakdown of L6/Staff+ expectations by dimension, with level calibration examples and company-specific patterns for Anthropic, Google, Meta, and OpenAI
  • references/project-impact-calculator.md -- Framework for quantifying and articulating project impact, with worked examples for 4 ML project types and audience-specific framing techniques

© curiositech, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 3 other files (references) in .claude/skills/hiring-manager-deep-dive of curiositech/some_claude_skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • .claude-plugin/plugin.json
  • references/project-impact-calculator.md
  • references/staff-level-signals.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 6713fc7

Compare with similar skills

Hiring Manager Deep Dive next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Hiring Manager Deep Dive compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Hiring Manager Deep Dive this skillcuriositech/some_claude_skills243—~3.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Reactive Resume Builderreactive-resume/reactive-resume44k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Career-Ops Job Search Centercareer-ops-hq/career-ops74k—~3.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Internship Project Preparation ToolLiuMengxuan04/shushu-internship-tool2.1k—~2.3kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Resume Tailoringvarunr89/resume-tailoring-skill7681 repos~8.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Good StoryRimagination/good-story1341 repos~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Reactive Resume Builder

    reactive-resume/reactive-resume

    Builds resumes as valid JSON for the open-source Reactive Resume app by interviewing you, and can track job applications through its MCP tools.

    44k GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Career-Ops Job Search Center

    career-ops-hq/career-ops

    Routes job-search requests to modes for evaluating offers, scanning portals, generating tailored CVs, tracking applications and drafting outreach, starting from a pasted job URL or description.

    74k GitHub stars~3.6k tokensUpdated today
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Internship Project Preparation Tool

    LiuMengxuan04/shushu-internship-tool

    Turns a target internship job description into a resume-ready, interview-ready project by finding and auditing GitHub projects and drafting resume bullets and interview Q&A.

    2.1k GitHub stars~2.3k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Resume Tailoring

    varunr89/resume-tailoring-skill

    A skill your agent uses when creating tailored resumes for job applications - researches company/role, creates optimized templates, conducts branching experience discovery to surface undocumented…

    768 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~8.9k tokens
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Good Story

    Rimagination/good-story

    A skill your agent uses when the user asks to find, sharpen, evaluate, rewrite, or explain the story in scientific or scholarly materials across disciplines, including manuscripts, grants, paper…

    134 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.9k tokens
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Job Application Assistant

    MadsLorentzen/ai-job-search

    Evaluates job postings against your profile, then tailors a LaTeX CV and cover letter and prepares interview answers for the roles you pursue.

    45k GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check: notes

More from curiositech/some_claude_skills

All 95 skills in this repo
  • Crisis Detection Intervention AI

    curiositech/some_claude_skills

    Detect crisis signals in user content using NLP, mental health sentiment analysis, and safe intervention protocols.

    243 GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.8k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Form Validation Architect

    curiositech/some_claude_skills

    End-to-end form handling with react-hook-form, Zod schemas, validation patterns, error messaging, field arrays, and multi-step wizards.

    243 GitHub stars~3.8k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • GitHub Actions Pipeline Builder

    curiositech/some_claude_skills

    Build production CI/CD pipelines with GitHub Actions. An agent skill from curiositech/some_claude_skills.

    243 GitHub stars~2.8k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check: notes
  • Background Job Orchestrator

    curiositech/some_claude_skills

    Expert in background job processing with Bull/BullMQ (Redis), Celery, and cloud queues.

    243 GitHub stars~3.2k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Competitive Cartographer

    curiositech/some_claude_skills

    Strategic analyst that maps competitive landscapes, identifies white space opportunities, and provides positioning recommendations.

    243 GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Computer Vision Pipeline

    curiositech/some_claude_skills

    Build production computer vision pipelines for object detection, tracking, and video analysis.

    243 GitHub stars~4k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Hiring Manager Deep Dive

What does Hiring Manager Deep Dive do?

Prepares for hiring manager rounds at Staff+ (L6+) level — scope of impact, influence without authority, ambiguity navigation, mentorship, strategic thinking. Hiring Manager Deep Dive is an agent skill from curiositech/some_claude_skills. Prepares for hiring manager rounds at Staff+ (L6+) level — scope of impact, influence without authority, ambiguity navigation, mentorship, strategic thinking.

When should I use Hiring Manager Deep Dive?

Hiring Manager Deep Dive fits situations like: practicing HM rounds; calibrating story depth for target level.

How do I install Hiring Manager Deep Dive in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add curiositech/some_claude_skills --skill hiring-manager-deep-dive -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (.claude/skills/hiring-manager-deep-dive in curiositech/some_claude_skills) into .claude/skills/hiring-manager-deep-dive in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Hiring Manager Deep Dive in Codex?

Run `npx skills add curiositech/some_claude_skills --skill hiring-manager-deep-dive -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (.claude/skills/hiring-manager-deep-dive in curiositech/some_claude_skills) into .agents/skills/hiring-manager-deep-dive in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Hiring Manager Deep Dive in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add curiositech/some_claude_skills --skill hiring-manager-deep-dive -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/hiring-manager-deep-dive, .gemini/skills/hiring-manager-deep-dive, .github/skills/hiring-manager-deep-dive and .opencode/skills/hiring-manager-deep-dive in your project.

What does Hiring Manager Deep Dive need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Hiring Manager Deep Dive is instructions for the agent only. Its frontmatter pre-approves these tools: Read, Write, Edit.

Does Hiring Manager Deep Dive access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Hiring Manager Deep Dive safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Hiring Manager Deep Dive use?

Hiring Manager Deep Dive is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Hiring Manager Deep Dive use?

About 3.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 14k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 8k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Hiring Manager Deep Dive?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Hiring Manager Deep Dive: Reactive Resume Builder (reactive-resume/reactive-resume, 44k stars), Career-Ops Job Search Center (career-ops-hq/career-ops, 74k stars), Internship Project Preparation Tool (LiuMengxuan04/shushu-internship-tool, 2.1k stars) and Resume Tailoring (varunr89/resume-tailoring-skill, 768 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Hiring Manager Deep Dive?

curiositech (a GitHub organization) maintains it in curiositech/some_claude_skills, which has 243 GitHub stars. The repository holds 95 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 6, 2026.

Source: curiositech/some_claude_skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.