Markitdown
ImCa0/just-laws
Convert files and office documents to Markdown. An agent skill from ImCa0/just-laws.
A skill your agent uses when planning author-side communication for WSDM, a venue that historically runs no rebuttal - covers preemptive objection engineering inside the submitted PDF, the narrow…
Install Wsdm Author Response
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wsdm-author-response -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills wsdm-author-response --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-author-response .claude/skills/wsdm-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "wsdm-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-author-response into .claude/skills/wsdm-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "wsdm-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-author-responseType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wsdm-author-response -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills wsdm-author-response --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-author-response .agents/skills/wsdm-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "wsdm-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-author-response into .agents/skills/wsdm-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "wsdm-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wsdm-author-response -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills wsdm-author-response --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-author-response .cursor/skills/wsdm-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "wsdm-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-author-response into .cursor/skills/wsdm-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "wsdm-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-author-response--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wsdm-author-response -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills wsdm-author-response --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-author-response .gemini/skills/wsdm-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "wsdm-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-author-response into .gemini/skills/wsdm-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "wsdm-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills wsdm-author-responseInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wsdm-author-response -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-author-response .github/skills/wsdm-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "wsdm-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-author-response into .github/skills/wsdm-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "wsdm-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wsdm-author-response -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills wsdm-author-response --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-author-response .opencode/skills/wsdm-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "wsdm-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-author-response into .opencode/skills/wsdm-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "wsdm-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
wsdm-author-response- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.8k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 842 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when planning author-side communication for WSDM, a venue that historically runs no rebuttal - covers preemptive objection engineering inside the submitted PDF, the narrow…
- Works in 3 steps: Consensus objections (raised by 2+… → Misreadings are your fault at a… → Taste objections ("not exciting,"…
- Planning author-side communication for WSDM
- SKILL.md covers Preemptive rebuttal: the…, What channels do exist after…, Reading reviews you cannot… and The rejection fork, plus 3 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Wsdm Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when planning author-side communication for WSDM, a venue that historically runs no rebuttal - covers preemptive objection engineering inside the submitted PDF, the narrow legitimate channels to chairs after submission, reading reviews you cannot answer, and converting a rejection into a stronger next-cycle or sibling-venue submission.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.8k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Documents & Office, covering PDF. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Planning author-side communication for WSDM
- A venue that historically runs no rebuttal - covers preemptive objection engineering inside the submitted PDF
- The narrow legitimate channels to chairs after submission
- Reading reviews you cannot answer
Example prompts
- “/wsdm-author-response”
Workflow steps
3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Consensus objections (raised by 2+ reviewers) are the revision contract.
- Misreadings are your fault at a no-rebuttal venue: if a competent
- Taste objections ("not exciting," "incremental") signal venue or framing
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Wsdm Author Response loads about 1.8k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 91 tokens; SKILL.md has 842 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 842 words, ~1,775 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/wsdm-author-response/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- wsdm-author-response
- description
- Use when planning author-side communication for WSDM, a venue that historically runs no rebuttal - covers preemptive objection engineering inside the submitted PDF, the narrow legitimate channels to chairs after submission, reading reviews you cannot answer, and converting a rejection into a stronger next-cycle or sibling-venue submission.
WSDM Author Response
At most ML and data-mining venues this skill would script a rebuttal. WSDM is different: the venue historically runs no author response phase - a fact documented as far back as the 2017 reviewing experiment conducted at the conference itself, and consistent with the short review window (August submission, October notification in the 2026 cycle). Plan as if you will never speak to your reviewers. If the current edition's CFP announces a response phase, that instruction supersedes everything here; check it first.
Preemptive rebuttal: the objection inventory
Since answers must ship inside the PDF, build the rebuttal before submission. Two weeks out, run an adversarial read with coauthors playing three WSDM reviewer archetypes - the IR-methods specialist, the applied/industry reader, and the graph/social-data reader - and log every objection in an inventory:
# objection-inventory.md (one row per anticipated objection)
| # | Likely objection | Archetype | Answer exists? | Where in PDF | Action |
| 1 | Position bias not controlled in log data | IR methods | yes | §4.2 + Tab.3 | none |
| 2 | Baseline X (WSDM'25) missing | IR methods | no | - | add or scope claim |
| 3 | Gains may not survive online serving | industry | partial | §5.3 | add latency table |
| 4 | Graph sampled non-uniformly | graph | yes | App.A (in-budget) | keep |Then enforce the rule that makes this venue-specific: every "Answer exists?" row must resolve to yes + a location or to a claim reduction. "We would explain in the response" is not an available move at WSDM.
Placement discipline for the answers:
- Objections about validity (leakage, bias, confounds) get answered in the main evaluation text, not an appendix - reviewers who find the flaw first and the defense never will score on the flaw.
- Objections about scope get answered by narrowing the claim sentence itself.
- Objections about missing baselines get answered by running the baseline or by one honest sentence saying why it is out of scope - silence reads as evasion.
What channels do exist after submission
| Channel | Legitimate use | Never use for |
|---|---|---|
| EasyChair note / email to PC chairs | Withdrawal; a factual error you discovered (broken figure, corrupted PDF); a conflict-of-interest problem | Arguing merit, adding results, lobbying |
| Ethics/conduct contact | Reporting reviewer misconduct or a genuine breach | Disagreement dressed as misconduct |
| Camera-ready revision (if accepted) | Implementing reviewer-requested fixes the SPC noted | Adding claims reviewers never vetted |
The bar for contacting chairs is high and the message should be three sentences or fewer. A team that emails chairs to "clarify a misunderstanding" in a review is spending reputation at a small, single-track community venue where the same SPCs return every year.
Reading reviews you cannot answer
Notification arrives with reviews attached and no reply box. Triage them for the next version, not for argument:
- Consensus objections (raised by 2+ reviewers) are the revision contract. They almost always concern evaluation validity or missing comparisons at this venue - fix them with experiments, not prose.
- Misreadings are your fault at a no-rebuttal venue: if a competent specialist misread it, the paper afforded the misreading. Find the sentence that permitted it and rewrite that sentence in the next version.
- Taste objections ("not exciting," "incremental") signal venue or framing
mismatch - route through
wsdm-topic-selectionbefore resubmitting anywhere.
Show full SKILL.md (390 more words)Show less
The rejection fork
WSDM accepts roughly one in six submissions (2025: >100 of >600), so plan the fork in advance:
- Same work, next WSDM (12 months away): worth it when reviews attack execution, not fit. Fold in every consensus fix; expect PC overlap - reviewers remember resubmissions that ignored their reports.
- Sibling venue, sooner: SIGIR (typically January/February deadlines) for IR-centric work, KDD Cycle 2 (typically February) for general mining, CIKM (typically May) for a broad CIKM-shaped result, RecSys (spring) for recommendation, TheWebConf (typically October) for web-platform work. Re-frame for the destination - a WSDM-tuned paper is not automatically SIGIR-tuned.
- Short paper at the next WSDM: since 2026 the series has a short-paper track with September deadlines; a focused core finding can land there when the long version keeps losing on breadth.
Worked micro-example: rewriting an answer into the PDF
Suppose the inventory flags: "an IR reviewer will ask why gains shrink on head queries." At a rebuttal venue you would draft a reply; at WSDM you edit:
- Draft state: results table shows the shrinkage; text ignores it.
- Bad fix: delete head-query column (reviewers run the slice themselves, and hiding it converts a weakness into an integrity question).
- WSDM fix: one paragraph after the table: "Gains concentrate on tail queries (+4.1 nDCG@10) and shrink on head queries (+0.6), consistent with our mechanism - head queries already receive abundant feedback, so debiasing has little to correct. This is the intended behavior, not a failure mode." The objection now has a printed answer with a mechanism attached, and the SPC can quote it in the meta-review.
The pattern generalizes: locate the evidence that would have gone into the rebuttal, then write the two sentences of interpretation next to that evidence.
If the current edition adds a response phase
Editions can change process; if the CFP or a chairs' email announces author responses, adapt rather than assume:
- Re-read the announced format limits (word caps, scope rules) - do not import another venue's rebuttal habits.
- Recycle the objection inventory: rows that made it into the PDF get a one-line pointer ("§4.3 addresses this"); rows that did not get the evidence directly.
- Keep the no-links discipline typical of ACM-venue responses unless the instructions explicitly allow links.
- Answer reviewers in their own vocabulary and number the replies against review points - SPCs skim responses in minutes.
Output format
[WSDM response posture] no-rebuttal cycle confirmed? yes / no (source: current CFP)
[Objection inventory] N objections; unresolved rows: <list or none>
[In-PDF placements] <objection -> section/table map for the top 5>
[Chair-contact check] any legitimate reason to write? yes+draft / no
[Post-decision fork] resubmit WSDM / SIGIR / KDD / CIKM / RecSys / short paper, with re-framing note© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-author-response of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Wsdm Author Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wsdm Author Response this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| MarkitdownImCa0/just-laws | 781 | 14 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Gzh Designisjiamu/gzh-design-skill | 4k | — | ~2.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | AGPL-3.0 | |
| GenOffice Document CLIgenspark-ai/genoffice | 9.2k | — | ~19k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Harness Book Best Practicewquguru/harness-books | 3.2k | — | ~4.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | None | |
| Bookforge Korean Ebook PDF Makergongnyang/bookforge | 316 | 1 repos | ~1.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
Gzh Design
isjiamu/gzh-design-skill
微信公众号文章排版引擎，将 Markdown 转换为可直接粘贴到公众号编辑器的 HTML。主题风格从 references/theme-index.md 注册的自定义主题库中选取，自动章节编号、关键词下划线标记、引言卡片、目录导航、代码块、图片/GIF、作者签名。支持 Markdown / Word(.docx) / PDF / 纯文本输入（非 Markdown…
GenOffice Document CLI
genspark-ai/genoffice
Creates, converts, reads and edits real pptx, xlsx, docx and PDF files locally through the genoffice command line.
Harness Book Best Practice
wquguru/harness-books
Best practices for working on the Harness books repo. An agent skill from wquguru/harness-books.
Bookforge Korean Ebook PDF Maker
gongnyang/bookforge
Produces book-style Korean ebook PDFs from a topic or finished manuscript, with six design styles, real book parts and quality-check gates before output.
- Official
Instrument Data To Allotrope
aws-samples/amazon-bedrock-agents-healthcare-lifesciences
Convert laboratory instrument output files (PDF, CSV, Excel, TXT) to Allotrope Simple Model (ASM) JSON format or flattened 2D CSV.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Wsdm Author Response
What does Wsdm Author Response do?
A skill your agent uses when planning author-side communication for WSDM, a venue that historically runs no rebuttal - covers preemptive objection engineering inside the submitted PDF, the narrow…. Wsdm Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when planning author-side communication for WSDM, a venue that historically runs no rebuttal - covers preemptive objection engineering inside the submitted PDF, the narrow legitimate channels to chairs after submission, reading reviews you cannot answer, and converting a rejection into a stronger next-cycle or sibling-venue submission.
When should I use Wsdm Author Response?
Wsdm Author Response fits situations like: planning author-side communication for WSDM; A venue that historically runs no rebuttal - covers preemptive objection engineering inside the submitted PDF; the narrow legitimate channels to chairs after submission; reading reviews you cannot answer.
How do I install Wsdm Author Response in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wsdm-author-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/wsdm-author-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Wsdm Author Response in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wsdm-author-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/wsdm-author-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Wsdm Author Response in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wsdm-author-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/wsdm-author-response, .gemini/skills/wsdm-author-response, .github/skills/wsdm-author-response and .opencode/skills/wsdm-author-response in your project.
What does Wsdm Author Response need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Wsdm Author Response is instructions for the agent only.
Does Wsdm Author Response access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Wsdm Author Response safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Wsdm Author Response use?
Wsdm Author Response is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Wsdm Author Response use?
About 1.8k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.1k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Wsdm Author Response?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Wsdm Author Response: Markitdown (ImCa0/just-laws, 781 stars), Gzh Design (isjiamu/gzh-design-skill, 4k stars), GenOffice Document CLI (genspark-ai/genoffice, 9.2k stars) and Harness Book Best Practice (wquguru/harness-books, 3.2k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Wsdm Author Response?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.