Nature Paper Card
Yuan1z0825/nature-skills
Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.
A skill your agent uses when deciding which revedres- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a systematic review, meta-analysis, or critical integrative synthesis from question-scoping through…
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-workflow -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills revedres-workflow --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-workflow .claude/skills/revedres-workflow && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "revedres-workflow" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-workflow into .claude/skills/revedres-workflow/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "revedres-workflow", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-workflowType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-workflow -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills revedres-workflow --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-workflow .agents/skills/revedres-workflow && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "revedres-workflow" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-workflow into .agents/skills/revedres-workflow/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "revedres-workflow", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-workflow -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills revedres-workflow --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-workflow .cursor/skills/revedres-workflow && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "revedres-workflow" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-workflow into .cursor/skills/revedres-workflow/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "revedres-workflow", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-workflow--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-workflow -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills revedres-workflow --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-workflow .gemini/skills/revedres-workflow && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "revedres-workflow" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-workflow into .gemini/skills/revedres-workflow/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "revedres-workflow", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills revedres-workflowInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-workflow -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-workflow .github/skills/revedres-workflow && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "revedres-workflow" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-workflow into .github/skills/revedres-workflow/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "revedres-workflow", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-workflow -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills revedres-workflow --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-workflow .opencode/skills/revedres-workflow && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "revedres-workflow" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-workflow into .opencode/skills/revedres-workflow/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "revedres-workflow", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
revedres-workflowA skill your agent uses when deciding which revedres- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a systematic review, meta-analysis, or critical integrative synthesis from question-scoping through…
Revedres Workflow is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding which revedres- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a systematic review, meta-analysis, or critical integrative synthesis from question-scoping through revision for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.9k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Literature review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
11 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Revedres Workflow loads about 1.9k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 79 tokens; SKILL.md has 776 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 776 words, ~1,933 tokens.
.claude/skills/revedres-workflow/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).This is the router. It tells you which revedres- skill to use at the current stage* of a review article aimed at the Review of Educational Research (RER) — the American Educational Research Association's (AERA) review journal of record, published by SAGE (founded 1931). RER publishes comprehensive, critical, integrative reviews of research bearing on education — systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and conceptual/critical syntheses — and does not publish original empirical research unless it is incorporated in a broader integrative review.
The decisive fact that shapes everything: unlike Annual Reviews, RER reviews are SUBMITTED and peer-reviewed, not invited. There is no commissioning editor handing you a slot. So the rigor of the review itself is the contribution — a documented systematic search and PRISMA flow, transparent inclusion/exclusion, reliable double-coding, defensible meta-analytic models (or a principled narrative synthesis), risk-of-bias and sensitivity analysis, and an organizing framework that advances theory or policy rather than tallying studies. The lifecycle is therefore: scope a synthesis-worthy question → write and (where applicable) preregister a protocol → search and screen systematically to a PRISMA flow → impose a conceptual framework → demonstrate comprehensiveness, code reliably, and probe robustness → make transparency/reproducibility provable → write in RER's masked APA-7 voice → submit and revise.
Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as RER and the artefact as a review (systematic / meta-analytic / critical-integrative), not a primary-research paper. Operational tells that you are at RER and not a sibling: the work synthesizes other people's studies rather than reporting your own; the natural early step is a protocol/PROSPERO registration, not an IRB-approved data collection; there is no identification strategy of your own (you appraise the designs of the studies you include). If the user has original empirical results, they want American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) or AERA Open, not RER — say so.
| Current symptom | Next skill |
|---|---|
| Unsure the question is synthesis-worthy / RER-scale | revedres-topic-selection |
| Need a protocol, scope, and (where applicable) preregistration before searching | revedres-proposal-and-commissioning |
| Search/screening is unsystematic; PRISMA flow not built | revedres-literature-synthesis |
| Corpus is a pile of studies, not an argument about the field | revedres-organizing-framework |
| Coverage, risk-of-bias, or robustness feels thin | revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance |
| Need a PRISMA flow, forest plot, or evidence/coding table | revedres-tables-figures |
| Prose summarizes study-by-study; reads narrow or jargon-heavy | revedres-writing-style |
| Coding reliability, open materials, reproducible meta-analysis to settle | revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility |
| Negotiating scope or handling reviewers of a review | revedres-editor-strategy |
| Ready to submit via Manuscript Central; need a preflight | revedres-submission |
| Received editor/reviewer feedback on the review | revedres-revision |
revedres-topic-selection — confirm the question is RER-scale (important, mature enough, needs synthesis)revedres-proposal-and-commissioning — protocol + (where applicable) PROSPERO/PRISMA-P preregistrationrevedres-literature-synthesis — systematic search, screening, PRISMA flow, data extractionrevedres-organizing-framework — impose the conceptual spine that advances theory/policyrevedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance — exhaustiveness, risk-of-bias, heterogeneity, sensitivityrevedres-tables-figures — PRISMA flow, forest/funnel plots, coding and evidence tablesrevedres-writing-style — the synthesizing RER voice in APA 7 (abstract + intro last)revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility — coding reliability, open data/code, MARS/PRISMA reportingrevedres-editor-strategy — scope negotiation and reviewer expectationsrevedres-submission — Manuscript Central preflight (masking, APA 7, 150-word abstract)revedres-revision — after the editor/reviewer letter
revedres-writing-styleis a late-stage polish; do not rewrite the intro before the organizing framework and the corpus settle. The protocol comes early — a credible systematic review fixes its search and inclusion rules before screening, sorevedres-proposal-and-commissioningprecedes the heavy reading.
A "review" is not one thing; the bottleneck differs by type. Read the archetype, then enter the chain at the right link.
| Archetype | Likely first bottleneck | Enter at |
|---|---|---|
| meta-analysis (pooled effect sizes) | comparability of estimands + a defensible model and heterogeneity story | revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance |
| systematic review (PRISMA, qualitative synthesis) | a complete, documented search and reliable screening | revedres-literature-synthesis |
| critical/conceptual synthesis | the organizing framework that reframes the field | revedres-organizing-framework |
| emerging-area review (young, fast-moving) | is the literature mature enough for RER yet? | revedres-topic-selection |
if editor_or_reviewer_letter: -> revedres-revision
elif ready_to_submit: -> revedres-submission
elif coding_or_reproducibility: -> revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility
elif prose_summarizes_not_synth: -> revedres-writing-style
elif need_prisma_or_forest_plot: -> revedres-tables-figures
elif coverage_rob_or_robustness: -> revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance
elif reads_like_a_list: -> revedres-organizing-framework
elif search_unsystematic: -> revedres-literature-synthesis
elif no_protocol_yet: -> revedres-proposal-and-commissioning
else: -> revedres-topic-selection© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Just SKILL.md in Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-workflow of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Revedres Workflow next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revedres Workflow this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills | 47k | 2 repos | ~2.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Systematic Review ScreenerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~8.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Literature Reviewneflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent | 126 | 20 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Preprint Search on bioRxivLigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper | 739 | 12 repos | ~3.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence |
Yuan1z0825/nature-skills
Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Screens records for systematic, scoping and rapid reviews against fixed eligibility rules, using two blinded AI reviewers and a third adjudicator, with traceable PRISMA counts.
neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).
LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper
Searches bioRxiv life sciences preprints by keyword, author, date range or category with a Python script, returning JSON metadata and optional PDF downloads.
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
TokenRhythm/opensquilla
Runs multi-round research in three stages with a persisted state file, evidence tracking and a long-form report with per-claim citations.
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Categories
A skill your agent uses when deciding which revedres- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a systematic review, meta-analysis, or critical integrative synthesis from question-scoping through…. Revedres Workflow is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding which revedres- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a systematic review, meta-analysis, or critical integrative synthesis from question-scoping through revision for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript.
Revedres Workflow fits situations like: deciding which revedres- sub-skill to invoke next; sequencing a systematic review; critical integrative synthesis from question-scoping through revision for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript.
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-workflow -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-workflow in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/revedres-workflow in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-workflow -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-workflow in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/revedres-workflow in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-workflow -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/revedres-workflow, .gemini/skills/revedres-workflow, .github/skills/revedres-workflow and .opencode/skills/revedres-workflow in your project.
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Revedres Workflow is instructions for the agent only.
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
Revedres Workflow is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
About 1.9k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.7k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Revedres Workflow: Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars), Systematic Review Screener (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars), Literature Review (neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent, 126 stars) and Preprint Search on bioRxiv (LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper, 739 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.