A skill your agent uses when deciding which revedres- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a systematic review, meta-analysis, or critical integrative synthesis from question-scoping through…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Revedres Workflow

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-workflow -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills revedres-workflow --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-workflow .claude/skills/revedres-workflow && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
revedres-workflow
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.9k tokens
SKILL.md length
776 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when deciding which revedres- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a systematic review, meta-analysis, or critical integrative synthesis from question-scoping through…

  • Works in 11 steps: revedres-topic-selection — confirm the… → revedres-proposal-and-commissioning —… → revedres-literature-synthesis —… → …
  • Deciding which revedres- sub-skill to invoke next
  • SKILL.md covers Overview, When to trigger, Routing table and Default order, plus 3 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Revedres Workflow is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding which revedres- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a systematic review, meta-analysis, or critical integrative synthesis from question-scoping through revision for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.9k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Literature review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Deciding which revedres- sub-skill to invoke next
  • Sequencing a systematic review
  • Critical integrative synthesis from question-scoping through revision for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript

Example prompts

  • “/revedres-workflow”

Workflow steps

11 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. revedres-topic-selection — confirm the question is RER-scale (important, mature enough, needs synthesis)
  2. revedres-proposal-and-commissioning — protocol + (where applicable) PROSPERO/PRISMA-P preregistration
  3. revedres-literature-synthesis — systematic search, screening, PRISMA flow, data extraction
  4. revedres-organizing-framework — impose the conceptual spine that advances theory/policy
  5. revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance — exhaustiveness, risk-of-bias, heterogeneity, sensitivity
  6. revedres-tables-figures — PRISMA flow, forest/funnel plots, coding and evidence tables
  7. revedres-writing-style — the synthesizing RER voice in APA 7 (abstract + intro last)
  8. revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility — coding reliability, open data/code, MARS/PRISMA reporting
  9. revedres-editor-strategy — scope negotiation and reviewer expectations
  10. revedres-submission — Manuscript Central preflight (masking, APA 7, 150-word abstract)
  11. revedres-revision — after the editor/reviewer letter

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Revedres Workflow loads about 1.9k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 79 tokens; SKILL.md has 776 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~79
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.9k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 776 words, ~1,933 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/revedres-workflow/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
revedres-workflow
description
Use when deciding which revedres-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a systematic review, meta-analysis, or critical integrative synthesis from question-scoping through revision for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

RER Workflow Router (revedres-workflow)

Overview

This is the router. It tells you which revedres- skill to use at the current stage* of a review article aimed at the Review of Educational Research (RER) — the American Educational Research Association's (AERA) review journal of record, published by SAGE (founded 1931). RER publishes comprehensive, critical, integrative reviews of research bearing on education — systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and conceptual/critical syntheses — and does not publish original empirical research unless it is incorporated in a broader integrative review.

The decisive fact that shapes everything: unlike Annual Reviews, RER reviews are SUBMITTED and peer-reviewed, not invited. There is no commissioning editor handing you a slot. So the rigor of the review itself is the contribution — a documented systematic search and PRISMA flow, transparent inclusion/exclusion, reliable double-coding, defensible meta-analytic models (or a principled narrative synthesis), risk-of-bias and sensitivity analysis, and an organizing framework that advances theory or policy rather than tallying studies. The lifecycle is therefore: scope a synthesis-worthy question → write and (where applicable) preregister a protocol → search and screen systematically to a PRISMA flow → impose a conceptual framework → demonstrate comprehensiveness, code reliably, and probe robustness → make transparency/reproducibility provable → write in RER's masked APA-7 voice → submit and revise.

Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as RER and the artefact as a review (systematic / meta-analytic / critical-integrative), not a primary-research paper. Operational tells that you are at RER and not a sibling: the work synthesizes other people's studies rather than reporting your own; the natural early step is a protocol/PROSPERO registration, not an IRB-approved data collection; there is no identification strategy of your own (you appraise the designs of the studies you include). If the user has original empirical results, they want American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) or AERA Open, not RER — say so.

When to trigger

  • The user asks "what should I do next?" on a review/meta-analysis
  • A review draft reads like an annotated bibliography and needs an analytic spine
  • Work is ping-ponging between search, screening, coding, and framing
  • An RER editor/reviewer letter arrived and the user needs to switch into revision mode

Routing table

Current symptomNext skill
Unsure the question is synthesis-worthy / RER-scalerevedres-topic-selection
Need a protocol, scope, and (where applicable) preregistration before searchingrevedres-proposal-and-commissioning
Search/screening is unsystematic; PRISMA flow not builtrevedres-literature-synthesis
Corpus is a pile of studies, not an argument about the fieldrevedres-organizing-framework
Coverage, risk-of-bias, or robustness feels thinrevedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance
Need a PRISMA flow, forest plot, or evidence/coding tablerevedres-tables-figures
Prose summarizes study-by-study; reads narrow or jargon-heavyrevedres-writing-style
Coding reliability, open materials, reproducible meta-analysis to settlerevedres-transparency-and-reproducibility
Negotiating scope or handling reviewers of a reviewrevedres-editor-strategy
Ready to submit via Manuscript Central; need a preflightrevedres-submission
Received editor/reviewer feedback on the reviewrevedres-revision
Show full SKILL.md (324 more words)Show less

Default order

  1. revedres-topic-selection — confirm the question is RER-scale (important, mature enough, needs synthesis)
  2. revedres-proposal-and-commissioning — protocol + (where applicable) PROSPERO/PRISMA-P preregistration
  3. revedres-literature-synthesis — systematic search, screening, PRISMA flow, data extraction
  4. revedres-organizing-framework — impose the conceptual spine that advances theory/policy
  5. revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance — exhaustiveness, risk-of-bias, heterogeneity, sensitivity
  6. revedres-tables-figures — PRISMA flow, forest/funnel plots, coding and evidence tables
  7. revedres-writing-style — the synthesizing RER voice in APA 7 (abstract + intro last)
  8. revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility — coding reliability, open data/code, MARS/PRISMA reporting
  9. revedres-editor-strategy — scope negotiation and reviewer expectations
  10. revedres-submission — Manuscript Central preflight (masking, APA 7, 150-word abstract)
  11. revedres-revision — after the editor/reviewer letter

revedres-writing-style is a late-stage polish; do not rewrite the intro before the organizing framework and the corpus settle. The protocol comes early — a credible systematic review fixes its search and inclusion rules before screening, so revedres-proposal-and-commissioning precedes the heavy reading.

Anti-patterns

  • Searching and screening with no written protocol, then back-fitting inclusion rules to a convenient set — reviewers read this as a fishing expedition
  • Treating the review as an annotated bibliography (no framework) — the named RER failure mode
  • Vote-counting significant vs. non-significant studies instead of weighing by effect size, design quality, and estimand
  • Importing primary-research instincts: there is no "identification" or "replication package" of your own data — you appraise the included studies and report your synthesis's reproducibility
  • Confusing RER with AERJ / AERA Open (primary research), Educational Researcher (short commentary/policy), Review of Research in Education (commissioned thematic volumes), or Psychological Bulletin (psychology reviews)

Routing by review archetype

A "review" is not one thing; the bottleneck differs by type. Read the archetype, then enter the chain at the right link.

ArchetypeLikely first bottleneckEnter at
meta-analysis (pooled effect sizes)comparability of estimands + a defensible model and heterogeneity storyrevedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance
systematic review (PRISMA, qualitative synthesis)a complete, documented search and reliable screeningrevedres-literature-synthesis
critical/conceptual synthesisthe organizing framework that reframes the fieldrevedres-organizing-framework
emerging-area review (young, fast-moving)is the literature mature enough for RER yet?revedres-topic-selection

Minimal decision snippet

if editor_or_reviewer_letter:        -> revedres-revision
elif ready_to_submit:                -> revedres-submission
elif coding_or_reproducibility:      -> revedres-transparency-and-reproducibility
elif prose_summarizes_not_synth:     -> revedres-writing-style
elif need_prisma_or_forest_plot:     -> revedres-tables-figures
elif coverage_rob_or_robustness:     -> revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance
elif reads_like_a_list:              -> revedres-organizing-framework
elif search_unsystematic:            -> revedres-literature-synthesis
elif no_protocol_yet:                -> revedres-proposal-and-commissioning
else:                                -> revedres-topic-selection

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-workflow of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Revedres Workflow next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Revedres Workflow compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Revedres Workflow this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills47k2 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Systematic Review ScreenerImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~8.4kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Literature Reviewneflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent12620 repos~5.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Preprint Search on bioRxivLigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper73912 repos~3.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~16kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence

Similar skills

  • Nature Paper Card

    Yuan1z0825/nature-skills

    Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Systematic Review Screener

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Screens records for systematic, scoping and rapid reviews against fixed eligibility rules, using two blinded AI reviewers and a third adjudicator, with traceable PRISMA counts.

    51k GitHub stars~8.4k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Literature Review

    neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent

    Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).

    126 GitHub starsUsed in 20 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Preprint Search on bioRxiv

    LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper

    Searches bioRxiv life sciences preprints by keyword, author, date range or category with a Python script, returning JSON metadata and optional PDF downloads.

    739 GitHub starsUsed in 12 repos~3.7k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Academic Paper Writing Pipeline

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.

    51k GitHub stars~16k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Deep Research Workflow

    TokenRhythm/opensquilla

    Runs multi-round research in three stages with a persisted state file, evidence tracking and a long-form report with per-claim citations.

    7.1k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Revedres Workflow

What does Revedres Workflow do?

A skill your agent uses when deciding which revedres- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a systematic review, meta-analysis, or critical integrative synthesis from question-scoping through…. Revedres Workflow is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding which revedres- sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a systematic review, meta-analysis, or critical integrative synthesis from question-scoping through revision for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript.

When should I use Revedres Workflow?

Revedres Workflow fits situations like: deciding which revedres- sub-skill to invoke next; sequencing a systematic review; critical integrative synthesis from question-scoping through revision for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript.

How do I install Revedres Workflow in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-workflow -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-workflow in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/revedres-workflow in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Revedres Workflow in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-workflow -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-workflow in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/revedres-workflow in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Revedres Workflow in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-workflow -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/revedres-workflow, .gemini/skills/revedres-workflow, .github/skills/revedres-workflow and .opencode/skills/revedres-workflow in your project.

What does Revedres Workflow need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Revedres Workflow is instructions for the agent only.

Does Revedres Workflow access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Revedres Workflow safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Revedres Workflow use?

Revedres Workflow is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Revedres Workflow use?

About 1.9k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.7k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Revedres Workflow?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Revedres Workflow: Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars), Systematic Review Screener (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars), Literature Review (neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent, 126 stars) and Preprint Search on bioRxiv (LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper, 739 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Revedres Workflow?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.