Nature Paper Card
Yuan1z0825/nature-skills
Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.
Agent skill
Revedres Proposal And Commissioning
by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when writing the protocol, fixing scope and eligibility, and (where applicable) preregistering a systematic review or meta-analysis before searching, for a Review of…
Install Revedres Proposal And Commissioning
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-proposal-and-commissioning -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills revedres-proposal-and-commissioning --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning .claude/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "revedres-proposal-and-commissioning" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning into .claude/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "revedres-proposal-and-commissioning", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioningType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-proposal-and-commissioning -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills revedres-proposal-and-commissioning --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning .agents/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "revedres-proposal-and-commissioning" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning into .agents/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "revedres-proposal-and-commissioning", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-proposal-and-commissioning -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills revedres-proposal-and-commissioning --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning .cursor/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "revedres-proposal-and-commissioning" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning into .cursor/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "revedres-proposal-and-commissioning", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-proposal-and-commissioning -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills revedres-proposal-and-commissioning --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning .gemini/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "revedres-proposal-and-commissioning" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning into .gemini/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "revedres-proposal-and-commissioning", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills revedres-proposal-and-commissioningInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-proposal-and-commissioning -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning .github/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "revedres-proposal-and-commissioning" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning into .github/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "revedres-proposal-and-commissioning", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-proposal-and-commissioning -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills revedres-proposal-and-commissioning --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning .opencode/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "revedres-proposal-and-commissioning" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning into .opencode/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "revedres-proposal-and-commissioning", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
revedres-proposal-and-commissioning- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.6k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 710 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when writing the protocol, fixing scope and eligibility, and (where applicable) preregistering a systematic review or meta-analysis before searching, for a Review of…
- Works in 7 steps: Question in PICO/PICOS form. Population… → Eligibility criteria. Inclusion and… → Information sources & search strategy.… → …
- Writing the protocol
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, RER is SUBMITTED, not…, The protocol: decisions to fix… and Preregistration: register the…, plus 4 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Revedres Proposal And Commissioning is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when writing the protocol, fixing scope and eligibility, and (where applicable) preregistering a systematic review or meta-analysis before searching, for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript. Produces the a-priori plan; it does not run the search (revedres-literature-synthesis) or impose the conceptual spine (revedres-organizing-framework).
Its SKILL.md is about 1.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Literature review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Writing the protocol
- Fixing scope and eligibility
- (where applicable) preregistering a systematic review
- Meta-analysis before searching
Example prompts
- “/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning”
Workflow steps
7 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Question in PICO/PICOS form. Population (learners/settings), Intervention/exposure or construct, Comparison, Outcomes, Study designs. This…
- Eligibility criteria. Inclusion and exclusion on population, constructs, designs, outcomes, language, publication type (peer-reviewed?…
- Information sources & search strategy. Databases (ERIC, PsycINFO, Education Source, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations)…
- Screening procedure. Two independent screeners at title/abstract and full-text; how disagreements are resolved; the reliability statistic…
- Data extraction & coding scheme. What you will code from each study (design, sample, measures, effect sizes, moderators, risk-of-bias) and…
- Synthesis plan. Meta-analytic model (fixed/random/multilevel/robust variance), effect-size metric, planned moderator and sensitivity…
- Risk-of-bias / quality appraisal tool chosen in advance (e.g. a design-appropriate instrument).
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Revedres Proposal And Commissioning loads about 1.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 99 tokens; SKILL.md has 710 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 710 words, ~1,577 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- revedres-proposal-and-commissioning
- description
- Use when writing the protocol, fixing scope and eligibility, and (where applicable) preregistering a systematic review or meta-analysis before searching, for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript. Produces the a-priori plan; it does not run the search (revedres-literature-synthesis) or impose the conceptual spine (revedres-organizing-framework).
Protocol & Preregistration (revedres-proposal-and-commissioning)
When to trigger
- Topic selection cleared the four RER fit tests and it is time to lock the plan
- You are about to search but have not written down inclusion/exclusion rules
- You want a PROSPERO / OSF registration so the search is demonstrably a-priori
- A reviewer is likely to ask "were these inclusion rules set before or after you saw the results?"
RER is SUBMITTED, not commissioned — the protocol replaces the commission
Annual Reviews invite their authors; RER reviews are submitted and peer-reviewed, so no editor pre-blesses your scope. The credibility that an invitation would have signaled must instead come from a transparent, a-priori protocol. For a systematic review or meta-analysis this is not optional polish — it is the difference between a synthesis and a fishing expedition. (RER occasionally publishes solicited analytic reviews of special topics, but the default and the bar is a strong unsolicited submission — 检索于 2026-06；以官网为准.)
The protocol: decisions to fix BEFORE you search
Write these down first; a reviewer who senses they were chosen after seeing results will distrust the whole review.
- Question in PICO/PICOS form. Population (learners/settings), Intervention/exposure or construct, Comparison, Outcomes, Study designs. This is the scope.
- Eligibility criteria. Inclusion and exclusion on population, constructs, designs, outcomes, language, publication type (peer-reviewed? grey literature? dissertations?), and date range — each with a reason.
- Information sources & search strategy. Databases (ERIC, PsycINFO, Education Source, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations), grey-literature sources, and at least one full search string to be reported verbatim.
- Screening procedure. Two independent screeners at title/abstract and full-text; how disagreements are resolved; the reliability statistic you will report.
- Data extraction & coding scheme. What you will code from each study (design, sample, measures, effect sizes, moderators, risk-of-bias) and the codebook.
- Synthesis plan. Meta-analytic model (fixed/random/multilevel/robust variance), effect-size metric, planned moderator and sensitivity analyses, and publication-bias diagnostics — or the explicit qualitative/narrative synthesis method for a non-poolable literature.
- Risk-of-bias / quality appraisal tool chosen in advance (e.g. a design-appropriate instrument).
Preregistration: register the plan, then deviate transparently
- Systematic reviews / meta-analyses: register the protocol on PROSPERO (health-adjacent) or OSF before screening; cite the registration in the manuscript. Use PRISMA-P as the protocol-reporting checklist.
- A registration is a commitment, not a cage — you may change the plan, but you must flag and justify every deviation in the paper (planned vs. exploratory analyses kept distinct).
- Purely conceptual/critical syntheses are not "registered" the same way, but they still need an explicit, written scope and search logic that the paper reports.
Show full SKILL.md (293 more words)Show less
Why a-priori discipline pays off at RER specifically
A protocol is not bureaucratic overhead — it is what lets a submitted review be trusted the way an invited one is. Three concrete payoffs:
- It pre-empts the "fishing expedition" objection. A reviewer who sees that inclusion rules, the model, and the moderators were fixed before screening cannot claim they were chosen to produce a clean result.
- It makes the PRISMA flow honest. Counts flow from rules set in advance, so the diagram reports what the search found rather than what survived after-the-fact pruning.
- It separates confirmatory from exploratory. Anything not in the protocol is labeled exploratory in the paper — which protects the headline result and still lets you report interesting surprises.
A common failure is treating the protocol as a draft of the paper. It is not prose; it is a set of decision rules a stranger could execute and reach your corpus. Write it as rules, register it, then let the search run against it.
Checklist
- Question in PICO/PICOS; scope bounded the same way the search will be
- Eligibility criteria written with a reason for each inclusion/exclusion rule
- Databases + grey-literature sources listed; at least one full search string drafted
- Dual independent screening defined; reliability statistic chosen
- Coding scheme / codebook drafted before extraction
- Synthesis plan fixed (meta-analytic model + moderators + bias diagnostics, or narrative method)
- Risk-of-bias tool chosen a-priori
- Registered on PROSPERO/OSF (or scope/search logic written for a conceptual synthesis)
Anti-patterns
- Searching first, then writing inclusion rules to fit the studies you liked
- "Random-effects, REML" chosen after seeing heterogeneity rather than in advance
- No codebook — coders improvise, and reliability cannot be defended later
- Treating registration as a formality, then silently changing the question or outcomes
- Promising an exhaustive search but planning only one database
Output format
【Question (PICOS)】<population / intervention-construct / comparison / outcomes / designs>
【Eligibility】<key inclusion + exclusion rules, each with a reason>
【Sources + search】<databases + grey lit; one full search string drafted? Y/N>
【Screening】dual independent? Y/N; reliability stat = <kappa/agreement>
【Coding scheme】codebook drafted before extraction? Y/N
【Synthesis plan】<meta-analytic model + moderators + bias diagnostics | narrative method>
【Risk-of-bias tool】<instrument, chosen a-priori>
【Registration】PROSPERO/OSF id or "conceptual synthesis — scope written"
【Next step】→ revedres-literature-synthesis (run the search to a PRISMA flow)© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Revedres Proposal And Commissioning next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revedres Proposal And Commissioning this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills | 47k | 2 repos | ~2.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Systematic Review ScreenerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~8.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Literature Reviewneflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent | 126 | 20 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Preprint Search on bioRxivLigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper | 739 | 12 repos | ~3.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence |
Similar skills
Systematic Review Screener
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Screens records for systematic, scoping and rapid reviews against fixed eligibility rules, using two blinded AI reviewers and a third adjudicator, with traceable PRISMA counts.
Literature Review
neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).
Preprint Search on bioRxiv
LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper
Searches bioRxiv life sciences preprints by keyword, author, date range or category with a Python script, returning JSON metadata and optional PDF downloads.
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Deep Research Workflow
TokenRhythm/opensquilla
Runs multi-round research in three stages with a persisted state file, evidence tracking and a long-form report with per-claim citations.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Revedres Proposal And Commissioning
What does Revedres Proposal And Commissioning do?
A skill your agent uses when writing the protocol, fixing scope and eligibility, and (where applicable) preregistering a systematic review or meta-analysis before searching, for a Review of…. Revedres Proposal And Commissioning is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when writing the protocol, fixing scope and eligibility, and (where applicable) preregistering a systematic review or meta-analysis before searching, for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript.
When should I use Revedres Proposal And Commissioning?
Revedres Proposal And Commissioning fits situations like: writing the protocol; fixing scope and eligibility; (where applicable) preregistering a systematic review; meta-analysis before searching.
How do I install Revedres Proposal And Commissioning in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-proposal-and-commissioning -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Revedres Proposal And Commissioning in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-proposal-and-commissioning -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Revedres Proposal And Commissioning in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-proposal-and-commissioning -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning, .gemini/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning, .github/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning and .opencode/skills/revedres-proposal-and-commissioning in your project.
What does Revedres Proposal And Commissioning need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Revedres Proposal And Commissioning is instructions for the agent only.
Does Revedres Proposal And Commissioning access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Revedres Proposal And Commissioning safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Revedres Proposal And Commissioning use?
Revedres Proposal And Commissioning is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Revedres Proposal And Commissioning use?
About 1.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Revedres Proposal And Commissioning?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Revedres Proposal And Commissioning: Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars), Systematic Review Screener (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars), Literature Review (neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent, 126 stars) and Preprint Search on bioRxiv (LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper, 739 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Revedres Proposal And Commissioning?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.