Agent skill

Revedres Organizing Framework

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when turning a screened, coded corpus into an analytic spine that advances theory or policy for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript.

MITAuto-check passed

Install Revedres Organizing Framework

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-organizing-framework -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills revedres-organizing-framework --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-organizing-framework .claude/skills/revedres-organizing-framework && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
revedres-organizing-framework
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.5k tokens
SKILL.md length
737 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when turning a screened, coded corpus into an analytic spine that advances theory or policy for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript.

  • Works in 3 steps: MECE-ish. Categories are reasonably… → Reconciling. The frame explains apparent… → Generative. The frame's thin or empty…
  • Turning a screened
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, The RER contribution is the…, Three tests a framework must… and Building the frame from the…, plus 3 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Revedres Organizing Framework is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when turning a screened, coded corpus into an analytic spine that advances theory or policy for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript. Builds the conceptual contribution beyond a tally; it does not run the search (revedres-literature-synthesis) or appraise robustness/risk-of-bias (revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance).

Its SKILL.md is about 1.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Turning a screened
  • Coded corpus into an analytic spine that advances theory
  • Policy for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript

Example prompts

  • “/revedres-organizing-framework”

Workflow steps

3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. MECE-ish. Categories are reasonably mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive — every included study has exactly one principled home…
  2. Reconciling. The frame explains apparent contradictions — studies that looked to disagree turn out to sit in different cells (different…
  3. Generative. The frame's thin or empty cells become the review's agenda for theory, research, or policy — the contribution that makes the…

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Revedres Organizing Framework loads about 1.5k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 92 tokens; SKILL.md has 737 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~92
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.5k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 737 words, ~1,490 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/revedres-organizing-framework/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
revedres-organizing-framework
description
Use when turning a screened, coded corpus into an analytic spine that advances theory or policy for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript. Builds the conceptual contribution beyond a tally; it does not run the search (revedres-literature-synthesis) or appraise robustness/risk-of-bias (revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance).

Organizing Framework (revedres-organizing-framework)

When to trigger

  • The corpus is complete and coded, but the draft reads as study-after-study
  • You can describe what each study found but not what the field, taken together, means
  • A reviewer is likely to say "this is a competent summary, but what is the contribution?"
  • You need section architecture and cannot decide how to carve the literature

The RER contribution is the framework, not the tally

The cardinal RER failure mode is the annotated bibliography: a competent, even exhaustive, study-by-study summary with no argument about the field. RER wants a comprehensive, critical, integrative review — integrative means the studies are reorganized under a frame that the reader could not have built from the abstracts alone, and that advances theory or policy. A meta-analysis is not exempt: a pooled number with no conceptual account of why effects vary is a calculation, not a synthesis.

A good framework is the lens through which scattered findings become a coherent claim. Candidate spines:

Spine typeWhen it fitsExample shape
Taxonomy / typologymany studies, no shared mapclassify studies by a 2–3 axis scheme so every study has a home
Theoretical modela mechanism organizes the fielda model whose links the literature does/doesn't support
Moderator architecturea meta-analysis with real heterogeneitythe framework is the explanation of variation
Developmental / stage accountthe field has moved through phaseswhat each phase established and left open
Tensions / competing perspectiveslive theoretical or methodological debatesteelman each camp; locate the evidence between them
Construct clarificationthe field conflates distinct ideasdisentangle the constructs, then re-read the evidence

Three tests a framework must pass

  1. MECE-ish. Categories are reasonably mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive — every included study has exactly one principled home, and there are no empty "misc" bins doing the real work.
  2. Reconciling. The frame explains apparent contradictions — studies that looked to disagree turn out to sit in different cells (different populations, constructs, designs), or genuinely conflict in a way the frame names.
  3. Generative. The frame's thin or empty cells become the review's agenda for theory, research, or policy — the contribution that makes the review worth citing.

Then make the section architecture mirror the framework's cells, so the structure of the paper enacts the argument rather than marching through databases or chronology.

Show full SKILL.md (356 more words)Show less

Building the frame from the coded corpus (not before it)

The frame must be earned from the evidence, not imposed on it. Work bottom-up from the coding dataset (revedres-literature-synthesis):

  1. Cluster the coded studies by what actually differentiates their findings — population, construct, design, mechanism, or context — and look for the axis along which the literature naturally separates.
  2. Name the axis (or axes) that does the most explanatory work; a 2- or 3-axis scheme usually beats a long flat list of themes.
  3. Test the frame against the hard cases — the studies that seemed to contradict each other. If the frame puts them in different cells and explains why, it is reconciling; if it just relabels them, it is not.
  4. Read the empty cells as the agenda. A cell with no studies is either an untested combination (a research gap) or an impossible one (a boundary condition) — both are contributions if you say which.

A frame discovered this way is defensible because a reviewer can trace it back to the coded studies; a frame asserted in the introduction and never grounded reads as the author's prior, not the field's structure.

Checklist

  • A one-sentence claim about the field stated up front (not withheld to the conclusion)
  • A named spine (taxonomy / model / moderator architecture / stages / tensions / constructs)
  • Every included study slots into the frame; no junk-drawer "other" category
  • The frame reconciles at least one apparent contradiction in the literature
  • Thin/empty cells are turned into a concrete theory/research/policy agenda
  • Section architecture mirrors the frame, not the search or the calendar
  • The framework advances theory or policy — it is not just a sorting convenience

Anti-patterns

  • An annotated bibliography dressed up with section headings (the named RER sin)
  • A "framework" that is really chronology ("early work / recent work") or by-database order
  • A meta-analysis that reports a pooled effect and moderators with no conceptual story of why
  • A taxonomy with a giant "miscellaneous" cell that hides the studies that do not fit
  • Centering the frame on the author's own program so it functions as self-promotion
  • A frame that sorts but never reconciles conflict or generates an agenda (sorting ≠ integrating)

Output format

【Field claim】<one sentence: what the literature, integrated, shows>
【Spine】<taxonomy | model | moderator architecture | stages | tensions | constructs>
【MECE check】every study has one home; no junk-drawer cell? Y/N
【Reconciles】<an apparent contradiction the frame resolves>
【Generative】<the theory/research/policy agenda the thin cells imply>
【Section map】<how sections mirror the frame's cells>
【Next step】→ revedres-comprehensiveness-and-balance (test coverage, risk-of-bias, robustness)

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-organizing-framework of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Revedres Organizing Framework next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Revedres Organizing Framework compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Revedres Organizing Framework this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Turning Engineering Analytics Into InsightsPostHog/posthog40k—~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Organizing Conversations CodePostHog/posthog40k—~503Automated safety check: PassCustom licence
Developer Code Organizationgithub/gh-aw5.4k—~4.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Code Reviewflutter/flutter179k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassBSD-3-Clause
Simplify CodeNousResearch/hermes-agent252k—~3.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Converts engineering analytics (PR / CI) data into saved PostHog insights, dashboards, and subscriptions, and explains how to query the product data directly with SQL.

    40k GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated today
    Testing & QAAuto-check passed
  • Official

    File layout for the conversations product. An agent skill from PostHog/posthog.

    40k GitHub stars~503 tokensUpdated today
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Official

    Code organization patterns, file structure guidelines, WASM build variants, and string processing conventions for gh-aw Go code.

    5.4k GitHub stars~4.6k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Code Review

    flutter/flutter

    Performs a comprehensive, multi-step code review of pull requests or local code changes, using iterative refinement (generation, critique, synthesis) to ensure high-quality, actionable feedback.

    179k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Simplify Code

    NousResearch/hermes-agent

    Parallel 4-agent cleanup of recent code changes. An agent skill from NousResearch/hermes-agent.

    252k GitHub stars~3.7k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Architectural Code Review

    Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios

    Performs an architectural review of code against coding standards, SOLID, testability and performance, and reports no verdict when the inputs are missing.

    26k GitHub stars~3.5k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Revedres Organizing Framework

What does Revedres Organizing Framework do?

A skill your agent uses when turning a screened, coded corpus into an analytic spine that advances theory or policy for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript. Revedres Organizing Framework is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when turning a screened, coded corpus into an analytic spine that advances theory or policy for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript.

When should I use Revedres Organizing Framework?

Revedres Organizing Framework fits situations like: turning a screened; coded corpus into an analytic spine that advances theory; policy for a Review of Educational Research (RER) manuscript.

How do I install Revedres Organizing Framework in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-organizing-framework -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-organizing-framework in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/revedres-organizing-framework in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Revedres Organizing Framework in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-organizing-framework -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Review-of-Educational-Research-Skills/skills/revedres-organizing-framework in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/revedres-organizing-framework in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Revedres Organizing Framework in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill revedres-organizing-framework -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/revedres-organizing-framework, .gemini/skills/revedres-organizing-framework, .github/skills/revedres-organizing-framework and .opencode/skills/revedres-organizing-framework in your project.

What does Revedres Organizing Framework need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Revedres Organizing Framework is instructions for the agent only.

Does Revedres Organizing Framework access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Revedres Organizing Framework safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Revedres Organizing Framework use?

Revedres Organizing Framework is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Revedres Organizing Framework use?

About 1.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Revedres Organizing Framework?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Revedres Organizing Framework: Turning Engineering Analytics Into Insights (PostHog/posthog, 40k stars), Organizing Conversations Code (PostHog/posthog, 40k stars), Developer Code Organization (github/gh-aw, 5.4k stars) and Code Review (flutter/flutter, 179k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Revedres Organizing Framework?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.