Marketing Psychology
nexu-io/open-design
Apply psychological principles and behavioral science to copy and design.
Agent skill
Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance
by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when appraising the credibility of the studies a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) piece synthesizes and calibrating comprehensiveness, balance, and fair treatment…
MITAuto-check passed
Install Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance .claude/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance into .claude/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balanceType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance .agents/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance into .agents/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance .cursor/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance into .cursor/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance .gemini/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance into .gemini/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balanceInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance .github/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance into .github/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance .opencode/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance into .opencode/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.7k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 767 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when appraising the credibility of the studies a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) piece synthesizes and calibrating comprehensiveness, balance, and fair treatment…
- Appraising the credibility of the studies a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) piece synthesizes and calibrating comprehensiveness
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Appraising evidence you did…, Weighing, not vote-counting and Comprehensiveness vs.…, plus 5 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- Fair treatment of competing camps — including reform-minded but evidence-based critique
What it does
Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when appraising the credibility of the studies a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) piece synthesizes and calibrating comprehensiveness, balance, and fair treatment of competing camps — including reform-minded but evidence-based critique. Weighs evidence and audits even-handedness; it does not design the spine (ppsych-organizing-framework) or run new analyses.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.7k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Appraising the credibility of the studies a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) piece synthesizes and calibrating comprehensiveness
- Fair treatment of competing camps — including reform-minded but evidence-based critique
Example prompts
- “/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance loads about 1.7k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 103 tokens; SKILL.md has 767 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 767 words, ~1,729 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance
- description
- Use when appraising the credibility of the studies a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) piece synthesizes and calibrating comprehensiveness, balance, and fair treatment of competing camps — including reform-minded but evidence-based critique. Weighs evidence and audits even-handedness; it does not design the spine (ppsych-organizing-framework) or run new analyses.
Comprehensiveness & Balance (ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance)
When to trigger
- The framework is set and you are filling cells with conflicting findings from different areas
- You must decide whether "the field finds X" is actually supported, or only loosely
- The topic has rival schools, a live controversy, or a replication/reform debate
- You are a contributor to this literature and worry the piece tilts toward your own work or your camp's reform agenda
Appraising evidence you did not produce
A PoPS piece runs no study of its own (unless it is a meta-analysis with a superordinate message). You act as the field's referee-of-record for cross-area readers: judge how much weight each study can bear so the synthesis weighs evidence correctly. Make the appraisal explicit:
- Power & sample. Is the cited effect from an adequately powered design, or a small-N study likely to be inflated? Underpowered originals support weaker claims.
- Replication status. Has it replicated (direct or close)? A failed-to-replicate headline cannot anchor a "the field knows X" claim — flag it.
- Preregistration & flexibility. Was the analysis preregistered, or could researcher degrees of freedom explain it? Exploratory ≠ confirmatory.
- Construct validity & generalizability. Does the measure capture the construct, and does the sample (often WEIRD) support the breadth of the claim?
- Publication bias. Is the effect from a literature with funnel asymmetry / p-curve problems? Weight accordingly.
You are not re-running these — you are rating their credibility in the evidence matrix so the piece's conclusions track the best evidence, not the loudest finding.
Weighing, not vote-counting
Conflicting results are reconciled by credibility and by what each study measures, never by tallying "9 studies positive, 4 null." Two effects that disagree often tap different constructs, populations, or moderators; say so, and let the framework's cells carry the distinction. A pooled "consensus" across non-comparable designs manufactures false agreement that PoPS's methodologically literate readers will catch.
Comprehensiveness vs. selectivity: the PoPS contract
A PoPS piece must be comprehensive in coverage yet selective in emphasis — and stay concise. Tier the corpus:
| Tier | Treatment |
|---|---|
| Foundational / field-defining | discussed in text, with what they established and their limits |
| Important contributions | grouped and weighed within framework cells; cited with their finding |
| Confirmatory / incremental | cited in clusters ("see also …") to show coverage without bloating prose |
| Tangential | cited only where they bear on a specific claim |
Comprehensiveness is proven by the citation set + saturation log (ppsych-literature-synthesis); selectivity is exercised in the prose.
Reform-minded but evidence-based
PoPS is a leading venue for methodological reform and meta-science — but the same standards apply to the reform argument itself. Being on the right side of open science does not license overclaiming:
- Critique with calibrated strength. Distinguish "this practice is demonstrably harmful" (with evidence) from "this practice is suboptimal" (an argument). Reform rhetoric without the prevalence data is exactly the overclaiming reform opposes.
- Steelman the practice you criticize. State why reasonable researchers adopted it before showing its costs.
- Avoid the methodological-purity trap. A reform piece that dismisses an entire literature on a single flaw is as one-sided as the inflation it critiques.
Show full SKILL.md (271 more words)Show less
Fairness and the self-citation trap
PoPS referees are frequently the surveyed authors or the camps being weighed, so balance is strategic as well as ethical:
- Steelman every camp in terms its proponents would accept before noting weaknesses.
- Attribute ideas to originators, not popularizers (a recurring referee complaint).
- Handle live controversies without resolving by fiat. Lay out the disagreement, what evidence would settle it, and where your read sits — labelled as your read.
- Audit self-citation and self-camp. Your work — and your reform faction — appears at the tier the evidence warrants, no more; a reader who does not know the author cannot tell from the emphasis.
Checklist
- Each pivotal study carries a credibility appraisal (power, replication, preregistration, validity, bias)
- Failed-to-replicate or underpowered findings flagged where the piece leans on them
- Conflicting findings reconciled by credibility + construct, not vote-counting
- Corpus tiered; prose emphasis matches tier; coverage provable from the saturation log
- Reform claims calibrated to evidence; criticized practices steelmanned first
- Every rival school/camp stated at its strongest before critique
- Idea attribution traces to originators
- Live controversies presented with what evidence would settle them; author's read labelled
- Self-citation and self-camp audited: own work/faction at warranted tier; emphasis identity-blind
Anti-patterns
- Citing a headline effect without noting it failed to replicate or was underpowered
- Vote-counting conflicting results instead of weighing credibility and construct
- Pooling non-comparable effects into one "the field shows…" magnitude
- Reform-as-rhetoric: sweeping methodological condemnation with no prevalence data
- Strawmanning the camp (or the "old guard") the author disagrees with
- A piece that doubles as the author's — or the reform movement's — CV
- Declaring a live controversy "resolved" by assertion rather than the evidentiary state
Output format
【Credibility appraisal】pivotal studies rated (power/replication/prereg/validity/bias)? Y/N
【Conflict handling】reconciled by credibility + construct (not vote-count)? Y/N
【Tiering】corpus split foundational/important/confirmatory/tangential? Y/N
【Comprehensiveness】saturation log supports "nothing important missing"? Y/N
【Reform calibration】claims matched to evidence; criticized practices steelmanned? Y/N
【Steelman】each rival camp stated at its strongest? Y/N
【Controversy】evidence-to-settle stated; author's read labelled? Y/N
【Self-citation/camp audit】own work + faction at warranted tier; emphasis identity-blind? Y/N
【Next step】→ ppsych-tables-figures (framework figure + summary/prevalence exhibits)© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Marketing Psychologynexu-io/open-design | 100k | — | ~317 | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Study Plananthropics/claude-for-legal | 9.6k | 3 repos | ~3.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Agent Load Balancerruvnet/ruflo | 74k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Load Balancingsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills | 47k | 2 repos | ~2.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Study BuddyLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills | 2.2k | — | ~5.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
- Official
Study Plan
anthropics/claude-for-legal
Build or update a long-term bar prep (or exam prep) study plan — phases, subjects weighted by weakness, daily session schedule, adaptive to session history in study-plan.yaml.
Agent Load Balancer
ruvnet/ruflo
Agent skill for load-balancer - invoke with $agent-load-balancer
Load Balancing
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
Configure load balancers and traffic distribution. An agent skill from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills.
Study Buddy
LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills
When user asks to study, create flashcards, take a quiz, make notes, revise, set study timer, track study hours, create study plan, explain a topic, test knowledge, do spaced repetition, summarize a…
Game Balance Check
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios
Checks game data and formulas for balance outliers, broken progression, degenerate strategies and economy problems, and answers 'could not run' when the data is missing.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Questions about Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance
What does Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance do?
A skill your agent uses when appraising the credibility of the studies a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) piece synthesizes and calibrating comprehensiveness, balance, and fair treatment…. Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when appraising the credibility of the studies a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) piece synthesizes and calibrating comprehensiveness, balance, and fair treatment of competing camps — including reform-minded but evidence-based critique.
When should I use Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance?
Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance fits situations like: appraising the credibility of the studies a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) piece synthesizes and calibrating comprehensiveness; fair treatment of competing camps — including reform-minded but evidence-based critique.
How do I install Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Perspectives-on-Psychological-Science-Skills/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance, .gemini/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance, .github/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance and .opencode/skills/ppsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance in your project.
What does Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance is instructions for the agent only.
Does Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance use?
Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance use?
About 1.7k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance: Marketing Psychology (nexu-io/open-design, 100k stars), Study Plan (anthropics/claude-for-legal, 9.6k stars), Agent Load Balancer (ruvnet/ruflo, 74k stars) and Load Balancing (sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, 47k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Ppsych Comprehensiveness And Balance?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.