A skill your agent uses when deciding whether a topic is review-worthy for Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) — a large, live, contested literature with real disciplinary stakes, not a gap-filling…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Phg Topic Selection

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill phg-topic-selection -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills phg-topic-selection --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Progress-in-Human-Geography-Skills/skills/phg-topic-selection .claude/skills/phg-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
phg-topic-selection
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.2k tokens
SKILL.md length
560 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when deciding whether a topic is review-worthy for Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) — a large, live, contested literature with real disciplinary stakes, not a gap-filling…

  • Deciding whether a topic is review-worthy for Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) — a large
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, The review-worthiness test…, The "so what has changed?" clock and Scope discipline (the cap is…, plus 6 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Contested literature with real disciplinary stakes

What it does

Phg Topic Selection is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding whether a topic is review-worthy for Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) — a large, live, contested literature with real disciplinary stakes, not a gap-filling empirical study. Tests fit and scope; it does not build the argument or gather sources.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Deciding whether a topic is review-worthy for Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) — a large
  • Contested literature with real disciplinary stakes
  • Not a gap-filling empirical study

Example prompts

  • “/phg-topic-selection”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Phg Topic Selection loads about 1.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 71 tokens; SKILL.md has 560 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~71
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.2k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 560 words, ~1,221 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/phg-topic-selection/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
phg-topic-selection
description
Use when deciding whether a topic is review-worthy for Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) — a large, live, contested literature with real disciplinary stakes, not a gap-filling empirical study. Tests fit and scope; it does not build the argument or gather sources.

Topic Selection & Review-Worthiness (phg-topic-selection)

PiHG's first gate is not "is this interesting?" but "is this review-worthy for the discipline?" The journal publishes critical reviews and theory, not empirical work, so a topic earns a PiHG essay only if there is a substantial, contested literature whose state a synthetic argument can usefully re-order — and if the essay would matter beyond one sub-field's specialists.

When to trigger

  • Choosing what to review, or narrowing a broad interest into an essay
  • Unsure whether a literature is big and live enough to sustain a review
  • A colleague said "this is just a summary" or "why does the field need this now?"
  • Deciding whether the piece is a review article or a scoped Progress Report

The review-worthiness test (all four must hold)

CriterionPass conditionFails when
VolumeA large enough body of work exists to synthesize, not just citeA handful of papers — too thin for a review
LivenessThe debate is active and unsettled nowA closed, historical, or consensus topic
ContestReal disagreement or unresolved tension to adjudicateEveryone already agrees; nothing to argue
StakesRe-ordering it matters beyond the nicheA parochial corner only insiders care about

If any fails, the topic is not yet a PiHG review — narrow it, wait for the literature to mature, or send an empirical study elsewhere.

The "so what has changed?" clock

PiHG reviews are timely. A review-worthy topic usually has a trigger: a burst of new work, a methodological turn, a real-world shift, or a concept that has quietly drifted. State why now — a review with no answer to "why this, why now?" reads as a textbook chapter, not an intervention.

Scope discipline (the cap is short)

A PiHG review is ~4,000–8,000 words inclusive of endnotes — short for a survey. Choose a scope you can synthesize into one argument, not everything ever written. A tightly-scoped essay with a clear thesis beats an exhaustive catalogue every time.

  • Prefer a contested seam between literatures over a whole sub-field.
  • Prefer a concept whose meaning is drifting over a topic with no conceptual tension.
  • If the scope needs 15,000 words to cover, it is two essays or the wrong scope.
Show full SKILL.md (199 more words)Show less

The empirical-trap check (PiHG-specific)

The most common misfit is an empirical study dressed as a review. Ask: if you deleted every "we find / the data show," is there still a review? If the piece's spine is your own findings, PiHG is the wrong venue — this is a study, and it belongs at an empirical journal.

Worked micro-example (illustrative)

Weak: "A review of research on gentrification." (whole sub-field, no tension, no "why now")
Review-worthy: "Gentrification research has split into a rent-gap camp and a consumption camp that no
  longer argue with each other; a decade of platform-mediated displacement now cuts across both — this
  essay asks what the split has hidden and what platform displacement reveals." (contested seam + trigger
  + stakes + synthesizable scope)

Checklist

  • The literature is large, live, contested, and has stakes beyond the niche
  • There is a clear answer to "why this review, why now?"
  • Scope is narrow enough to synthesize into ONE argument within the cap
  • The piece is a review, not an empirical study in disguise (delete-the-data test)
  • A generalist human geographer, not only specialists, would care

Anti-patterns

  • Reviewing a settled or consensus topic ("there is nothing left to argue")
  • Choosing a scope so broad it can only be catalogued, not argued
  • A review with no "why now?" — reads as a textbook, not an intervention
  • Smuggling in an empirical study and calling it a review
  • Confusing "under-reviewed" with "review-worthy" — some corners are small for a reason

Output format

【Topic】the contested literature/seam in one line
【Review-worthy?】volume / liveness / contest / stakes [Y/N each]
【Why now】the trigger
【Scope】what is in / out, and can it be synthesized in ~8,000 words?
【Not empirical?】passes delete-the-data test? [Y/N]
【Next】phg-theory-building

Supplementary resources

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Progress-in-Human-Geography-Skills/skills/phg-topic-selection of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Phg Topic Selection next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Phg Topic Selection compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Phg Topic Selection this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Progressive Jpegthedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist74k—~426Automated safety check: PassMIT
Progressive Buildingn8n-io/n8n207k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Progressive Web Appdavila7/claude-code-templates32k3 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
TopicsZimoLiao/scholaraio576—~294Automated safety check: PassMIT
Progressive Estimationsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills47k2 repos~863Automated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Progressive Jpeg

    thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist

    A skill your agent uses when reviewing image assets, markup, and CDN or build transforms related to Use progressive JPEG encoding.

    74k GitHub stars~426 tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Official

    Load before build-workflow and before scoping or planning new workflows and feature additions, including requests spanning multiple workflows.

    207k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated today
    Productivity & AutomationAuto-check passed
  • Progressive Web App

    davila7/claude-code-templates

    Build Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) with offline support, installability, and caching strategies.

    32k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~3.1k tokens
    Backend & APIsAuto-check passed
  • Topics

    ZimoLiao/scholaraio

    A skill your agent uses when the user asks about research themes, topic distribution, BERTopic clustering, topic overview, topic papers, topic merges, or HTML topic visualizations.

    576 GitHub stars~294 tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Progressive Estimation

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Estimate AI-assisted and hybrid human+agent development work with research-backed PERT statistics and calibration feedback loops

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~863 tokens
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed
  • Gsd Progress

    open-gsd/gsd-core

    Check progress, advance workflow, or dispatch freeform intent — the unified GSD situational command

    10k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~802 tokens
    Auto-check: warnings

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Phg Topic Selection

What does Phg Topic Selection do?

A skill your agent uses when deciding whether a topic is review-worthy for Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) — a large, live, contested literature with real disciplinary stakes, not a gap-filling…. Phg Topic Selection is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding whether a topic is review-worthy for Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) — a large, live, contested literature with real disciplinary stakes, not a gap-filling empirical study.

When should I use Phg Topic Selection?

Phg Topic Selection fits situations like: deciding whether a topic is review-worthy for Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) — a large; contested literature with real disciplinary stakes; not a gap-filling empirical study.

How do I install Phg Topic Selection in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill phg-topic-selection -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Progress-in-Human-Geography-Skills/skills/phg-topic-selection in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/phg-topic-selection in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Phg Topic Selection in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill phg-topic-selection -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Progress-in-Human-Geography-Skills/skills/phg-topic-selection in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/phg-topic-selection in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Phg Topic Selection in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill phg-topic-selection -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/phg-topic-selection, .gemini/skills/phg-topic-selection, .github/skills/phg-topic-selection and .opencode/skills/phg-topic-selection in your project.

What does Phg Topic Selection need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Phg Topic Selection is instructions for the agent only.

Does Phg Topic Selection access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Phg Topic Selection safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Phg Topic Selection use?

Phg Topic Selection is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Phg Topic Selection use?

About 1.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Phg Topic Selection?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Phg Topic Selection: Progressive Jpeg (thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist, 74k stars), Progressive Building (n8n-io/n8n, 207k stars), Progressive Web App (davila7/claude-code-templates, 32k stars) and Topics (ZimoLiao/scholaraio, 576 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Phg Topic Selection?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,219 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.