Crossframe Essay
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
A skill your agent uses when explicit CrossFrame work needs a Chinese critical insight essay, commentary, concept essay, public piece, or structure-to-article draft after diagnosis.
A skill your agent uses when anticipating how a Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) review essay will be judged — the double-anonymous review model, decision categories, and the desk-reject triggers…
MITAuto-check passed
Install Phg Review Process
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill phg-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills phg-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Progress-in-Human-Geography-Skills/skills/phg-review-process .claude/skills/phg-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "phg-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Progress-in-Human-Geography-Skills/skills/phg-review-process into .claude/skills/phg-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "phg-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Progress-in-Human-Geography-Skills/skills/phg-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill phg-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills phg-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Progress-in-Human-Geography-Skills/skills/phg-review-process .agents/skills/phg-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "phg-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Progress-in-Human-Geography-Skills/skills/phg-review-process into .agents/skills/phg-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "phg-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill phg-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills phg-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Progress-in-Human-Geography-Skills/skills/phg-review-process .cursor/skills/phg-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "phg-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Progress-in-Human-Geography-Skills/skills/phg-review-process into .cursor/skills/phg-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "phg-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Progress-in-Human-Geography-Skills/skills/phg-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill phg-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills phg-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Progress-in-Human-Geography-Skills/skills/phg-review-process .gemini/skills/phg-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "phg-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Progress-in-Human-Geography-Skills/skills/phg-review-process into .gemini/skills/phg-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "phg-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills phg-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill phg-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Progress-in-Human-Geography-Skills/skills/phg-review-process .github/skills/phg-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "phg-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Progress-in-Human-Geography-Skills/skills/phg-review-process into .github/skills/phg-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "phg-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill phg-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills phg-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Progress-in-Human-Geography-Skills/skills/phg-review-process .opencode/skills/phg-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "phg-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Progress-in-Human-Geography-Skills/skills/phg-review-process into .opencode/skills/phg-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "phg-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
phg-review-process- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.3k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 557 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when anticipating how a Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) review essay will be judged — the double-anonymous review model, decision categories, and the desk-reject triggers…
- Anticipating how a Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) review essay will be judged — the double-anonymous review model
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, What PiHG reviewers weigh, Desk-reject triggers… and Likely reviewer objections →…, plus 5 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- Decision categories
What it does
Phg Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when anticipating how a Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) review essay will be judged — the double-anonymous review model, decision categories, and the desk-reject triggers specific to a review journal. Explains what to expect; it does not draft the manuscript or the response letter.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Anticipating how a Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) review essay will be judged — the double-anonymous review model
- Decision categories
- The desk-reject triggers specific to a review journal
Example prompts
- “/phg-review-process”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Phg Review Process loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 77 tokens; SKILL.md has 557 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 557 words, ~1,333 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/phg-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- phg-review-process
- description
- Use when anticipating how a Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) review essay will be judged — the double-anonymous review model, decision categories, and the desk-reject triggers specific to a review journal. Explains what to expect; it does not draft the manuscript or the response letter.
Review Process (phg-review-process)
Understanding how PiHG judges a submission lets you pre-empt the objections a review essay draws. PiHG is double-anonymous, and its reviewers are typically senior figures in the sub-field who know the literature you are reviewing intimately. They ask a different question than an empirical journal's referees: not "are the methods sound?" but "does this command the field, and does it move it forward?"
When to trigger
- Before submission, to stress-test against likely reviewer objections
- Interpreting a decision letter's category and tone (then route to
phg-rebuttal) - Deciding whether a critique in review is fixable or fatal
- Calibrating how ambitious the intervention can be for this venue
What PiHG reviewers weigh
| Criterion | The question | Where to fix pre-submission |
|---|---|---|
| Command of the literature | Is coverage complete, current, fair, and correctly attributed? | phg-literature-positioning |
| Synthesis | Do the sources add up to one argument, or is this a list? | phg-argument-synthesis |
| Critical intervention | Does it say something the field does not already know? | phg-critical-intervention |
| Conceptual clarity | Is the organizing concept clear and load-bearing? | phg-theory-building |
| Forward contribution | Does it leave the field with a usable agenda? | phg-contribution-framing |
| Fit & genre | Is it a review, not an empirical study? Right length/style? | phg-topic-selection, phg-writing-style |
Desk-reject triggers (review-journal-specific)
An editor can decline before review. The common triggers for a review essay:
- An empirical study in disguise — findings are the spine; PiHG does not publish empirical results.
- A summary, not a synthesis — an annotated bibliography with no argument.
- No critical intervention — comprehensive but toothless; nothing the field learns.
- Parochial or dated coverage — a partial, Global-North-only, or years-behind literature.
- Out of scope / niche — a settled or narrow topic with no live debate or disciplinary stakes.
- An uncommissioned "Progress Report" — that genre is invited, not open.
- Over-length or wrong style — well past the ~8,000-word inclusive cap; non-Harvard.
Show full SKILL.md (262 more words)Show less
Likely reviewer objections → the pre-emption
| Objection | The fix before submission |
|---|---|
| "This is a summary, not a synthesis." | Rebuild the spine around sub-claims (phg-argument-synthesis). |
| "The critique is fair but adds nothing." | Sharpen the intervention and its "changes practice" test (phg-critical-intervention). |
| "You missed literature X / misattributed Y." | Widen and correct the corpus; steelman the camps (phg-literature-positioning). |
| "Coverage is Anglophone/Global-North only." | Engage work beyond the centers; name the limit honestly. |
| "The framework is unclear." | Make the concept load-bearing; add a conceptual exhibit (phg-theory-building, phg-tables-figures). |
| "So what for the field?" | Deliver a specific forward agenda (phg-contribution-framing). |
Decision categories (verify current wording on SAGE)
Typical outcomes: reject (often desk), major revision, minor revision, accept (rare on
first pass). A major revision is a scoped invitation, not a rejection — route to phg-rebuttal. As a
review journal, PiHG's revisions often ask you to strengthen the argument or widen the corpus, not to
run new analyses.
Checklist
- Coverage complete, current, fair, correctly attributed (command test)
- Synthesis, not summary; one-sentence thesis holds
- A genuine critical intervention that changes practice
- Organizing concept clear and load-bearing
- Forward agenda specific and portable
- Genre, length, and style correct — no desk-reject triggers left
Anti-patterns
- Treating PiHG referees as if they check methods rather than command of a field
- Submitting with a known coverage gap and hoping reviewers miss it (they wrote it)
- Reading a major revision as a rejection
- Assuming a review needs new data to answer reviewers — it usually needs a sharper argument
Output format
【Likely outcome risk】desk-reject / major / minor — and why
【Weakest criterion】command / synthesis / intervention / clarity / contribution / fit
【Desk-reject triggers present?】empirical-in-disguise / summary / toothless / parochial / scope [list]
【Pre-emptions】the fixes to make before submitting
【Next】phg-submission (if fixing) or phg-rebuttal (if decision received)Supplementary resources
../../resources/official-source-map.md— review model and decision categories, with 待核实 markers../../resources/exemplars/library.md— the command-of-field and intervention bar to benchmark against
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Progress-in-Human-Geography-Skills/skills/phg-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Phg Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phg Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Crossframe Essaysickn33/agentic-awesome-skills | 47k | 1 repos | ~2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Progressive Jpegthedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist | 74k | — | ~426 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Maps Geographyasgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks | 69k | — | ~717 | Automated safety check: Pass | CC0-1.0 | |
| Progressive Buildingn8n-io/n8n | 207k | — | ~1.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Progressive Web Appdavila7/claude-code-templates | 33k | 3 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
Progressive Jpeg
thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist
A skill your agent uses when reviewing image assets, markup, and CDN or build transforms related to Use progressive JPEG encoding.
Maps Geography
asgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks
Accurate maps from real geo data — use for any map, or whenever geography would make a good graphic for a deliverable
- Official
Progressive Building
n8n-io/n8n
Load before build-workflow and before scoping or planning new workflows and feature additions, including requests spanning multiple workflows.
Progressive Web App
davila7/claude-code-templates
Build Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) with offline support, installability, and caching strategies.
Progressive Estimation
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
Estimate AI-assisted and hybrid human+agent development work with research-backed PERT statistics and calibration feedback loops
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Questions about Phg Review Process
What does Phg Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses when anticipating how a Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) review essay will be judged — the double-anonymous review model, decision categories, and the desk-reject triggers…. Phg Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when anticipating how a Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) review essay will be judged — the double-anonymous review model, decision categories, and the desk-reject triggers specific to a review journal.
When should I use Phg Review Process?
Phg Review Process fits situations like: anticipating how a Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) review essay will be judged — the double-anonymous review model; decision categories; the desk-reject triggers specific to a review journal.
How do I install Phg Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill phg-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Progress-in-Human-Geography-Skills/skills/phg-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/phg-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Phg Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill phg-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Progress-in-Human-Geography-Skills/skills/phg-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/phg-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Phg Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill phg-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/phg-review-process, .gemini/skills/phg-review-process, .github/skills/phg-review-process and .opencode/skills/phg-review-process in your project.
What does Phg Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Phg Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Phg Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Phg Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Phg Review Process use?
Phg Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Phg Review Process use?
About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Phg Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Phg Review Process: Crossframe Essay (sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, 47k stars), Progressive Jpeg (thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist, 74k stars), Maps Geography (asgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks, 69k stars) and Progressive Building (n8n-io/n8n, 207k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Phg Review Process?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.