用于撰写或修改《管理世界》稿件的文献综述章节,建立国际脉络—本土研究—本文位置的三层对话式结构。Use when 中英文文献配比失衡、综述写成罗列式而非对话式、缺关键中文经典综述(《管理世界》《经济研究》《中国工业经济》同主题积累)、或审稿人指出本土文献覆盖不足时使用。锚定《管理世界》国务院发展研究中心主办、管理学与经济学并重、国家战略导向的三层综述规范、中英文配比阈值与本刊审稿期待,确保综述与…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Mw Literature Review

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill mw-literature-review -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills mw-literature-review --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Management-World-Skills/skills/mw-literature-review .claude/skills/mw-literature-review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
mw-literature-review
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~644 tokens
SKILL.md length
118 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

用于撰写或修改《管理世界》稿件的文献综述章节,建立国际脉络—本土研究—本文位置的三层对话式结构。Use when 中英文文献配比失衡、综述写成罗列式而非对话式、缺关键中文经典综述(《管理世界》《经济研究》《中国工业经济》同主题积累)、或审稿人指出本土文献覆盖不足时使用。锚定《管理世界》国务院发展研究中心主办、管理学与经济学并重、国家战略导向的三层综述规范、中英文配比阈值与本刊审稿期待,确保综述与…

  • Works in 3 steps: 第一层:国际主流脉络(英文文献为主)——建立问题的国际定位 → 第二层:中国本土研究(中文文献为主)——梳理中国情境下的已有发现 → 第三层:本文位置——清晰指出"本文与现有研究的差异"
  • Tasks that involve Literature review
  • SKILL.md covers 触发时机, 结构规范, 中英文献配比 and 必引避坑清单, plus 7 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Mw Literature Review is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. 用于撰写或修改《管理世界》稿件的文献综述章节,建立国际脉络—本土研究—本文位置的三层对话式结构。Use when 中英文文献配比失衡、综述写成罗列式而非对话式、缺关键中文经典综述(《管理世界》《经济研究》《中国工业经济》同主题积累)、或审稿人指出本土文献覆盖不足时使用。锚定《管理世界》国务院发展研究中心主办、管理学与经济学并重、国家战略导向的三层综述规范、中英文配比阈值与本刊审稿期待,确保综述与边际贡献四句式首尾呼应。 本技能服务于《管理世界》(Management World, MW)。

Its SKILL.md is about 640 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Literature review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Literature review

Example prompts

  • “/mw-literature-review”

Workflow steps

3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. 第一层:国际主流脉络(英文文献为主)——建立问题的国际定位
  2. 第二层:中国本土研究(中文文献为主)——梳理中国情境下的已有发现
  3. 第三层:本文位置——清晰指出"本文与现有研究的差异"

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Mw Literature Review loads about 644 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 67 tokens; SKILL.md has 118 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~67
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~644

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 118 words, ~644 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/mw-literature-review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
mw-literature-review
description
用于撰写或修改《管理世界》稿件的文献综述章节,建立国际脉络—本土研究—本文位置的三层对话式结构。Use when 中英文文献配比失衡、综述写成罗列式而非对话式、缺关键中文经典综述(《管理世界》《经济研究》《中国工业经济》同主题积累)、或审稿人指出本土文献覆盖不足时使用。锚定《管理世界》国务院发展研究中心主办、管理学与经济学并重、国家战略导向的三层综述规范、中英文配比阈值与本刊审稿期待,确保综述与边际贡献四句式首尾呼应。 本技能服务于《管理世界》(Management World, MW)。

管理世界文献综述(mw-literature-review)

触发时机

  • 综述章节全是英文文献,没有中文经典
  • 综述写成了"罗列式"而非"对话式"
  • 审稿人指出某中文经典文献未引

结构规范

《管理世界》偏好三层结构的综述:

  1. 第一层:国际主流脉络(英文文献为主)——建立问题的国际定位
  2. 第二层:中国本土研究(中文文献为主)——梳理中国情境下的已有发现
  3. 第三层:本文位置——清晰指出"本文与现有研究的差异"

避免一层结构(按时间线罗列)或两层结构("国外研究 / 国内研究"两段式但无对话)。

中英文献配比

经验法则:

  • 总引文 40–80 条
  • 中文文献占比 30%–50%(不能 <20%,也不宜 >60%)
  • 五年内文献占比 ≥ 40%
  • 顶刊文献占比 ≥ 30%(AER / QJE / JPE / Econometrica / RES / 管理世界 / 经济研究 / JF)

必引避坑清单

  • 是否有相关中文经典综述?(搜《经济研究》《管理世界》同主题综述)
  • 是否有近 3 年顶刊的同主题论文?
  • 引用是否覆盖三类:理论文献、方法文献、本土实证文献?
  • 是否避免了"自引扎堆"?(自引 ≤ 3 条)

综述句式模板

[作者 (年份)] 利用[数据 / 方法]研究了[问题],发现……。
然而,该研究[局限],未考虑[本文要补的空白]。
与之相比,本文……。

每段综述都应至少出现一次"与之相比 / 区别于 / 本文延伸了 / 本文补充了"。

反模式

  • 把综述写成"教科书式知识介绍"
  • 文末才指出本文位置,前面只有罗列
  • 中文文献只引一两条凑数
  • 综述里出现 [27,28,29,30,31] 这种 5 个并列引用 —— 拆开按贡献分述

本刊综述审稿期待表

《管理世界》由国务院发展研究中心主办,管理学与经济学并重,综述既要对接国际主流脉络,也要扎根中国本土研究传统。编委对"只引英文不引中文经典""把中国研究当国际研究的应用脚注"尤为敏感。下表锚定本刊审稿期待(顶刊清单与配比阈值以编辑部最新稿约为准):

维度本刊期待退稿高风险信号
结构三层(国际脉络—本土研究—本文位置)按时间罗列,无对话
本土文献中文经典与近 3 年本土实证齐备中文文献仅一两条凑数
对话性每段落出现"区别于/本文延伸了"综述与本文贡献脱节
战略对接点出问题与国家战略/政策议题的关联纯学术综述,无政策落点
常见退稿模式(综述维度)
  • 综述写成"教科书式知识介绍",看不出本文的边际位置
  • 把《经济研究》《中国工业经济》等本土顶刊的同主题积累漏引,被审稿人一眼识破
  • 5 个并列引用 [27-31] 不拆分,无法体现对各文献贡献的辨识
  • 国际文献堆到三十条、中文文献不足五条,与本刊"经济学与管理学并重、本土关怀"定位错配

微型走查示例:数字化转型与企业全要素生产率

虚构稿件,按三层结构走查(条目数为示意):

  • 第一层(国际脉络):引用信息技术与生产率、企业数字化与组织变革的国际文献约 18 条(示意),建立"数字技术如何影响企业绩效"的国际定位。
  • 第二层(本土研究):梳理中国情境下数字化转型测度(年报文本词频法)、与 TFP 关系的本土实证约 22 条(示意),其中《管理世界》《经济研究》《中国工业经济》同主题论文须覆盖。
  • 第三层(本文位置):明确"区别于已有以横截面相关为主的本土研究,本文利用'企业上云'试点政策构造准实验识别,并打开机制黑箱"。
  • 配比自检:中文占比约 48%(示意,落在 30%—50% 区间),五年内文献约 55%(示意,≥40%)。
  • 本刊语境校验:把数字化转型对接"数字中国""高质量发展"战略议题,使综述自然导向政策落点。

审稿人追问模式 + 本刊语境修法

  • 追问"为何忽略某篇《管理世界》近作?" → 修法:投稿前用主题词检索本刊与《经济研究》近 3 年目录,把同主题论文纳入第二层并做对话式区分。
  • 追问"综述只罗列结论,没说清方法演进?" → 修法:按"理论文献—方法文献—本土实证"三类分述,每类点明方法或识别的代际差异。
  • 追问"本文贡献到第三层才出现,前文像背景介绍?" → 本刊语境下,编委期待每段综述末尾即埋下"本文与之差异"的引线,而非集中堆在结尾。

校准锚点

本刊已刊实证论文的综述多为三层对话式结构,中文文献占比通常显著高于一般国际期刊,且综述结尾与边际贡献四句式(见 mw-topic-selection)严密呼应。具体配比与顶刊认定范围以编辑部最新稿约为准。

输出格式

完成时输出"综述质检报告":

【结构】三层 / 两层 / 一层
【中英配比】中文 X% / 英文 Y%
【五年内文献比例】X%
【顶刊比例】X%
【本土顶刊覆盖】管理世界/经济研究/中国工业经济 是否齐
【缺漏清单】...
【下一步】mw-institutional-background or mw-identification

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-Management-World-Skills/skills/mw-literature-review of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Mw Literature Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Mw Literature Review compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Mw Literature Review this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~644Automated safety check: PassMIT
Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills47k2 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Systematic Review ScreenerImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~8.4kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Literature Reviewneflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent12620 repos~5.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Preprint Search on bioRxivLigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper73912 repos~3.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~16kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence

Similar skills

  • Nature Paper Card

    Yuan1z0825/nature-skills

    Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Systematic Review Screener

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Screens records for systematic, scoping and rapid reviews against fixed eligibility rules, using two blinded AI reviewers and a third adjudicator, with traceable PRISMA counts.

    51k GitHub stars~8.4k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Literature Review

    neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent

    Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).

    126 GitHub starsUsed in 20 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Preprint Search on bioRxiv

    LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper

    Searches bioRxiv life sciences preprints by keyword, author, date range or category with a Python script, returning JSON metadata and optional PDF downloads.

    739 GitHub starsUsed in 12 repos~3.7k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Academic Paper Writing Pipeline

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.

    51k GitHub stars~16k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Deep Research Workflow

    TokenRhythm/opensquilla

    Runs multi-round research in three stages with a persisted state file, evidence tracking and a long-form report with per-claim citations.

    7.1k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Mw Literature Review

What does Mw Literature Review do?

用于撰写或修改《管理世界》稿件的文献综述章节,建立国际脉络—本土研究—本文位置的三层对话式结构。Use when 中英文文献配比失衡、综述写成罗列式而非对话式、缺关键中文经典综述(《管理世界》《经济研究》《中国工业经济》同主题积累)、或审稿人指出本土文献覆盖不足时使用。锚定《管理世界》国务院发展研究中心主办、管理学与经济学并重、国家战略导向的三层综述规范、中英文配比阈值与本刊审稿期待,确保综述与…. Mw Literature Review is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

When should I use Mw Literature Review?

Mw Literature Review fits situations like: tasks that involve Literature review.

How do I install Mw Literature Review in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill mw-literature-review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Management-World-Skills/skills/mw-literature-review in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/mw-literature-review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Mw Literature Review in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill mw-literature-review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Management-World-Skills/skills/mw-literature-review in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/mw-literature-review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Mw Literature Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill mw-literature-review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/mw-literature-review, .gemini/skills/mw-literature-review, .github/skills/mw-literature-review and .opencode/skills/mw-literature-review in your project.

What does Mw Literature Review need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Mw Literature Review is instructions for the agent only.

Does Mw Literature Review access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Mw Literature Review safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Mw Literature Review use?

Mw Literature Review is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Mw Literature Review use?

About 644 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 2.6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Mw Literature Review?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Mw Literature Review: Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars), Systematic Review Screener (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars), Literature Review (neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent, 126 stars) and Preprint Search on bioRxiv (LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper, 739 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Mw Literature Review?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.