A skill your agent uses when working with the editor and referees of a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — scope negotiation, what survey referees evaluate, and revision expectations.

MITAuto-check passed

Install Jel Editor Strategy

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jel-editor-strategy -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jel-editor-strategy --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Economic-Literature-Skills/skills/jel-editor-strategy .claude/skills/jel-editor-strategy && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
jel-editor-strategy
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
609 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when working with the editor and referees of a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — scope negotiation, what survey referees evaluate, and revision expectations.

  • Working with the editor and referees of a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — scope negotiation
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, How review differs for a survey, Scope negotiation with the… and Checklist, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • What survey referees evaluate

What it does

Jel Editor Strategy is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when working with the editor and referees of a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — scope negotiation, what survey referees evaluate, and revision expectations. Plans the interaction; it does not run the submission preflight (jel-submission) or draft the response letter (jel-revision).

Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Working with the editor and referees of a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — scope negotiation
  • What survey referees evaluate
  • Revision expectations

Example prompts

  • “/jel-editor-strategy”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Jel Editor Strategy loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 80 tokens; SKILL.md has 609 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~80
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 609 words, ~1,276 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/jel-editor-strategy/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
jel-editor-strategy
description
Use when working with the editor and referees of a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — scope negotiation, what survey referees evaluate, and revision expectations. Plans the interaction; it does not run the submission preflight (jel-submission) or draft the response letter (jel-revision).

Editor & Referee Strategy for a Survey (jel-editor-strategy)

When to trigger

  • The editor encouraged the proposal and you are negotiating the survey's scope
  • You want to anticipate what JEL referees of a survey will push on (different from a paper)
  • The editor has asked you to expand, cut, or rebalance coverage
  • You are calibrating how many revision rounds and how long a JEL survey typically takes

How review differs for a survey

JEL referees do not check an identification strategy or replicate results — there are none of the author's own. They evaluate the survey as a survey:

Referee questionWhat they are really checking
Is the coverage complete?the saturation/comprehensiveness from jel-literature-synthesis — can they name an omitted literature?
Is it balanced?even-handedness across schools; no self-promotion (jel-comprehensiveness-and-balance)
Is there a real framework?the spine vs. an annotated bibliography (jel-organizing-framework)
Is it accessible?can a non-specialist (the JEL reader) follow it (jel-writing-style)
Are the appraisals fair and correct?does the author characterize each study's contribution and limits accurately
Is it the right scope?not too narrow (field-journal review) nor unfinishably broad

Referees of a survey are often the surveyed authors themselves — the people whose work is being weighed will read how you weighed it. This makes balance and accurate attribution not just ethical but strategic.

A useful frame: the editor recruits referees partly to test coverage and fairness, not to re-run statistics. A referee who can name an omitted literature, or who feels their school was caricatured, is the single most common cause of a major-revision verdict on a survey — both are preventable upstream by jel-literature-synthesis and jel-comprehensiveness-and-balance.

Scope negotiation with the editor

The editor is your primary partner on a survey. Use the relationship deliberately:

  • Lock scope early, in writing. The proposal stage (jel-proposal-and-commissioning) is where scope is cheapest to change. Get the editor's agreement on the boundaries before months of reading.
  • Negotiate, don't capitulate, on coverage asks. If the editor wants an added literature, assess whether it fits the spine; propose where it goes or explain why it is out of scope — a survey cannot grow without bound.
  • Surface conflicts of interest. If a likely referee is a central author you must critique, tell the editor; it protects both the process and you.
  • Calibrate timeline. JEL surveys are large; revision can be substantial and multi-round. Confirm current timelines on the AEA JEL pages (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准) and plan for real revision effort, not cosmetic edits.
  • Keep a coverage ledger for the editor. Maintain a short, sharable record of what is in scope and why (and what was deliberately excluded), so when the editor or a referee asks "why not X?", you can answer with a decision already made rather than scrambling.
Show full SKILL.md (159 more words)Show less

Checklist

  • Scope agreed with the editor in writing at the proposal stage
  • Anticipated the six survey-referee questions (coverage, balance, framework, accessibility, appraisal, scope)
  • Coverage-expansion asks evaluated against the spine before agreeing
  • Conflicts of interest (referees who are surveyed authors) flagged to the editor
  • Attribution and appraisals double-checked, knowing surveyed authors may referee
  • Timeline and likely revision depth calibrated from the official pages (volatile)
  • A plan for which asks you will accept vs. push back on, with reasons

Anti-patterns

  • Treating the editor as a gatekeeper rather than a scope partner on a commissioned-style article
  • Accepting every "please also cover…" until the survey loses its spine and finish-ability
  • Mischaracterizing a surveyed author's work when that author may be your referee
  • Hiding a conflict of interest instead of disclosing it to the editor
  • Assuming a survey gets a light revise; budgeting for cosmetic edits when substantial rework is normal
  • Asserting current timelines/process from memory rather than the live AEA pages

Output format

【Scope agreement】boundaries locked with editor in writing? Y/N
【Referee anticipation】coverage / balance / framework / accessibility / appraisal / scope — prepared each? Y/N
【Coverage asks】evaluated against the spine; accept/push-back plan? Y/N
【COI】surveyed-author referees flagged to editor? Y/N
【Timeline】revision depth + rounds calibrated from official pages? Y/N
【Next step】→ jel-submission (preflight) → jel-revision (after the letter)

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-Economic-Literature-Skills/skills/jel-editor-strategy of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Jel Editor Strategy next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Jel Editor Strategy compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Jel Editor Strategy this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Referee Reportbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.6k—~3.2kAutomated safety check: NotesCustom licence
Handsontable Cell Editor Developerhandsontable/handsontable22k—~3.8kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Editor Test Harvesterudecode/plate17k—~7.6kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Editor Harvest Planudecode/plate17k—~3.5kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Add Editor Packageelementor/elementor7.1k—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassGPL-3.0

Similar skills

  • Referee Report

    brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills

    Generate academic referee reports for economics/finance papers, followed by a 150-word letter to the editor with recommendation (Reject / Major Revision) and Kai Wu signature.

    4.6k GitHub stars~3.2k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Handsontable Cell Editor Developer

    handsontable/handsontable

    Guides building a new Handsontable cell editor through its four-state lifecycle, DOM setup, viewport-aware positioning and async validation, matching the grid's existing editor classes.

    22k GitHub stars~3.8k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Mine external editor repositories for portable editor-behavior tests with ClawSweeper-style discipline: multi-pass exhaustive inventory, confidence scoring, framework-specific skip reasons…

    17k GitHub stars~7.6k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Editor Harvest Plan

    udecode/plate

    Turn an editor-test-harvester report into one lane-specific execution plan, e.g.

    17k GitHub stars~3.5k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Add Editor Package

    elementor/elementor

    External: Add an Editor V2 package from a third-party plugin that injects UI or in-editor MCP tools.

    7.1k GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Respond To Referee

    brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills

    Structure point-by-point referee responses for the sewage-house-prices paper.

    4.6k GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Jel Editor Strategy

What does Jel Editor Strategy do?

A skill your agent uses when working with the editor and referees of a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — scope negotiation, what survey referees evaluate, and revision expectations. Jel Editor Strategy is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when working with the editor and referees of a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — scope negotiation, what survey referees evaluate, and revision expectations.

When should I use Jel Editor Strategy?

Jel Editor Strategy fits situations like: working with the editor and referees of a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — scope negotiation; what survey referees evaluate; revision expectations.

How do I install Jel Editor Strategy in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jel-editor-strategy -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Economic-Literature-Skills/skills/jel-editor-strategy in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jel-editor-strategy in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Jel Editor Strategy in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jel-editor-strategy -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Economic-Literature-Skills/skills/jel-editor-strategy in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jel-editor-strategy in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Jel Editor Strategy in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jel-editor-strategy -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jel-editor-strategy, .gemini/skills/jel-editor-strategy, .github/skills/jel-editor-strategy and .opencode/skills/jel-editor-strategy in your project.

What does Jel Editor Strategy need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jel Editor Strategy is instructions for the agent only.

Does Jel Editor Strategy access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Jel Editor Strategy safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Jel Editor Strategy use?

Jel Editor Strategy is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Jel Editor Strategy use?

About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.1k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Jel Editor Strategy?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jel Editor Strategy: Referee Report (brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills, 4.6k stars), Handsontable Cell Editor Developer (handsontable/handsontable, 22k stars), Editor Test Harvester (udecode/plate, 17k stars) and Editor Harvest Plan (udecode/plate, 17k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Jel Editor Strategy?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.