A skill your agent uses when positioning an ITCS paper against the theory literature — writing the delta that proves the model/question is genuinely new, covering the right STOC/FOCS/SODA/CCC/TCC…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Itcs Related Work

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill itcs-related-work -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills itcs-related-work --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/ITCS-Skills/skills/itcs-related-work .claude/skills/itcs-related-work && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
itcs-related-work
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
720 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when positioning an ITCS paper against the theory literature — writing the delta that proves the model/question is genuinely new, covering the right STOC/FOCS/SODA/CCC/TCC…

  • Positioning an ITCS paper against the theory literature — writing the delta that proves the model/question is genuinely new
  • SKILL.md covers Delta-first positioning, Cover the right lanes, Honesty under lightweight… and Positioning the novelty claim…, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Covering the right STOC/FOCS/SODA/CCC/TCC lanes

What it does

Itcs Related Work is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when positioning an ITCS paper against the theory literature — writing the delta that proves the model/question is genuinely new, covering the right STOC/FOCS/SODA/CCC/TCC lanes, and staying honest under lightweight double-blind where the reference list is not anonymized.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Literature review, Citation management and Positioning and messaging. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Positioning an ITCS paper against the theory literature — writing the delta that proves the model/question is genuinely new
  • Covering the right STOC/FOCS/SODA/CCC/TCC lanes
  • Staying honest under lightweight double-blind where the reference list is not anonymized

Example prompts

  • “/itcs-related-work”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Itcs Related Work loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 74 tokens; SKILL.md has 720 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~74
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 720 words, ~1,414 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/itcs-related-work/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
itcs-related-work
description
Use when positioning an ITCS paper against the theory literature — writing the delta that proves the model/question is genuinely new, covering the right STOC/FOCS/SODA/CCC/TCC lanes, and staying honest under lightweight double-blind where the reference list is not anonymized.

At ITCS, related work carries a heavier burden than at a depth venue: since conceptual novelty is the selection criterion, your positioning must prove the contribution is genuinely new, not merely stronger. A reviewer's most damaging finding is not "someone proved a better bound" — it is "someone already asked this question" or "this is a known model under a new name." The related-work discussion is where you win or lose the novelty claim, so it is a load-bearing part of an ITCS paper, not an obligatory appendix.

Delta-first positioning

Lead each comparison with the delta, not the citation:

  • Name the closest prior model or question, state what it did, and then state precisely what it did not ask that you do. "Prior work bounds the prover's computation; none bounds its memory of the interaction" is a delta. "Many works study interactive proofs [3-19]" is a dump.
  • Distinguish new question from new answer. If the question existed and you answer it better, say so honestly — and reconsider whether ITCS is the right venue (see itcs-topic-selection); if the question is new, make that the headline of the paragraph.
  • Address independent and concurrent work plainly. In a small community with heavy arXiv/ECCC posting, a near-simultaneous related idea is common; acknowledging it and drawing the distinction reads as strength, not weakness.

Cover the right lanes

An ITCS paper usually sits at a seam between areas, so its related work must reach across lanes a single-area reader might miss:

LaneTypical venues to surveyWhy it matters at ITCS
Your core area's depth workSTOC, FOCS, the specialist venue (CCC/SODA/TCC)Shows you know the hard results your idea sits near
The other area you connect towherever that field publishesAn ITCS bridge is only novel if both banks are cited
Prior models/definitions near yoursITCS/ICS back-catalog, journalsThis is where "already asked" hides — search it hardest
Folklore and surveysmonographs, lecture notes, Dagstuhl reportsNew questions are often "known folklore"; pre-empt that charge

Scan the ITCS/ICS back-catalog (dblp conf/innovations, LIPIcs volumes) specifically: because ITCS is where new models are introduced, the venue most likely to already contain your idea is ITCS itself.

Show full SKILL.md (359 more words)Show less

Honesty under lightweight double-blind

ITCS review is lightweight double-blind: the PDF hides author names, affiliations, and emails, but the reference list is NOT anonymized, and authors are encouraged to post a non-anonymous full version to arXiv/ECCC/ePrint. Practical consequences for related work:

  • Cite your own prior work normally in the third person. Do not anonymize references or write "[removed for anonymity]." Refer to your own earlier papers as "[Author, YEAR] shows..." the way you would cite anyone — the reference stays in the list, the prose stays neutral.
  • Do not write "in our previous work [12] we..." — that first-person self-reference is the classic leak the anonymity sweep must catch (see itcs-submission).
  • Do not sabotage coverage to hide identity. Omitting the obviously-relevant paper by your own group to avoid a tell is worse than the tell: reviewers notice the gap, and it damages the novelty case. Cite it neutrally.

Positioning the novelty claim itself

Make the newness checkable, the way the rest of the paper makes theorems checkable:

  • State the novelty claim explicitly ("to our knowledge, no prior work models X as Y") rather than implying it — an explicit claim is one a reviewer can confirm or refute, which is the honest posture.
  • Bound the claim. "New, to our knowledge, in the unconditional setting" is safer and more credible than a blanket "first ever."
  • Credit the lineage. Showing your idea descends from a recognizable line ("this extends the non-malleability philosophy to ...") makes it legible and generous without weakening the delta.

Common failure modes

SymptomWhy it fails at ITCSFix
Citation dump with no deltasDoes not prove novelty, the selection axisLead each comparison with what prior work did not ask
Missed the closest prior model"Already asked" — fatal to a novelty paperSearch the ITCS/ICS back-catalog hardest
Anonymized/removed referencesViolates the not-anonymized reference ruleCite normally in the third person
"In our prior work [12] we..."Anonymity leak under lightweight double-blindRewrite as a neutral third-person citation
Blanket "first ever" claimOne counterexample sinks itBound the claim to a precise setting
Only your own area citedAn ITCS bridge needs both banksSurvey the connected area too

Output format

text
[ITCS positioning status] novelty-proven / at-risk / unclear
[Closest prior model] <named> ; delta: <what they did NOT ask that you do>
[Back-catalog check] searched ITCS/ICS + connected area for a prior version? yes/no
[Novelty claim] stated explicitly and bounded to a setting? yes/no
[Anonymity] references un-anonymized; no first-person self-cites? yes/no
[Fix queue] <ordered edits>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in ITCS-Skills/skills/itcs-related-work of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Itcs Related Work next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Itcs Related Work compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Itcs Related Work this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Ieee Paper ReaderCloudWave818/ieee-skills359—~591Automated safety check: PassMIT
Gec Literature Positioningfranklee16/academic-research-skills2231 repos~855Automated safety check: PassNone
Jpe Literature Positioningfranklee16/academic-research-skills2231 repos~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Systematic Review ScreenerImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~8.4kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Literature Reviewneflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent12620 repos~5.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Ieee Paper Reader

    CloudWave818/ieee-skills

    Read, decompose, and analyze IEEE-style papers using routed technical-reading workflows.

    359 GitHub stars~591 tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Gec Literature Positioning

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning a Global Environmental Change (GEC) manuscript against the relevant literatures.

    223 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~855 tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Jpe Literature Positioning

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    A skill your agent uses when writing or repairing the introduction and related-work framing for a Journal of Political Economy (JPE) manuscript — situating the contribution in the economics…

    223 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.1k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Systematic Review Screener

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Screens records for systematic, scoping and rapid reviews against fixed eligibility rules, using two blinded AI reviewers and a third adjudicator, with traceable PRISMA counts.

    51k GitHub stars~8.4k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Literature Review

    neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent

    Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).

    126 GitHub starsUsed in 20 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Preprint Search on bioRxiv

    LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper

    Searches bioRxiv life sciences preprints by keyword, author, date range or category with a Python script, returning JSON metadata and optional PDF downloads.

    739 GitHub starsUsed in 12 repos~3.7k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Itcs Related Work

What does Itcs Related Work do?

A skill your agent uses when positioning an ITCS paper against the theory literature — writing the delta that proves the model/question is genuinely new, covering the right STOC/FOCS/SODA/CCC/TCC…. Itcs Related Work is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when positioning an ITCS paper against the theory literature — writing the delta that proves the model/question is genuinely new, covering the right STOC/FOCS/SODA/CCC/TCC lanes, and staying honest under lightweight double-blind where the reference list is not anonymized.

When should I use Itcs Related Work?

Itcs Related Work fits situations like: positioning an ITCS paper against the theory literature — writing the delta that proves the model/question is genuinely new; covering the right STOC/FOCS/SODA/CCC/TCC lanes; staying honest under lightweight double-blind where the reference list is not anonymized.

How do I install Itcs Related Work in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill itcs-related-work -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (ITCS-Skills/skills/itcs-related-work in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/itcs-related-work in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Itcs Related Work in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill itcs-related-work -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (ITCS-Skills/skills/itcs-related-work in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/itcs-related-work in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Itcs Related Work in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill itcs-related-work -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/itcs-related-work, .gemini/skills/itcs-related-work, .github/skills/itcs-related-work and .opencode/skills/itcs-related-work in your project.

What does Itcs Related Work need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Itcs Related Work is instructions for the agent only.

Does Itcs Related Work access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Itcs Related Work safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Itcs Related Work use?

Itcs Related Work is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Itcs Related Work use?

About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.7k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Itcs Related Work?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Itcs Related Work: Ieee Paper Reader (CloudWave818/ieee-skills, 359 stars), Gec Literature Positioning (franklee16/academic-research-skills, 223 stars), Jpe Literature Positioning (franklee16/academic-research-skills, 223 stars) and Systematic Review Screener (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Itcs Related Work?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.