Nature Paper Card
Yuan1z0825/nature-skills
Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review by at least two…
Install Govern Review Process
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill govern-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills govern-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-review-process .claude/skills/govern-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "govern-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-review-process into .claude/skills/govern-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "govern-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill govern-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills govern-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-review-process .agents/skills/govern-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "govern-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-review-process into .agents/skills/govern-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "govern-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill govern-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills govern-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-review-process .cursor/skills/govern-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "govern-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-review-process into .cursor/skills/govern-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "govern-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill govern-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills govern-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-review-process .gemini/skills/govern-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "govern-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-review-process into .gemini/skills/govern-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "govern-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills govern-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill govern-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-review-process .github/skills/govern-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "govern-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-review-process into .github/skills/govern-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "govern-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill govern-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills govern-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-review-process .opencode/skills/govern-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "govern-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-review-process into .opencode/skills/govern-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "govern-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
govern-review-process- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.4k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 568 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review by at least two…
- Works in 5 steps: Double-blind. Referees do not know the… → Desk screening first (scope fit). The… → External review by ≥ 2 referees. Papers… → …
- You need to understand how Governance: An International Journal of Policy
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, How Governance review works, How comparative-institutional… and What an R&R signals, plus 4 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Govern Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when you need to understand how Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review by at least two referees, desk screening for scope (corporate governance and literature reviews are desk-rejected), the reject / R&R / accept decision categories, and how comparative-institutional reviewers judge. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Literature review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- You need to understand how Governance: An International Journal of Policy
- Institutions evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review by at least two referees
- Desk screening for scope (corporate governance and literature reviews are desk-rejected)
- The reject / R&R / accept decision categories
Example prompts
- “/govern-review-process”
Workflow steps
5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Double-blind. Referees do not know the authors and authors do not know referees. Anonymize the
- Desk screening first (scope fit). The editors screen for fit before external review. Two scope
- External review by ≥ 2 referees. Papers passing the desk go to at least two referees who
- Decision categories: reject, revise and resubmit (R&R), or accept. As at peer venues,
- Editor's role. The editors-in-chief (Paolo Graziano and Adam Sheingate, verified 2026-06-22;
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Govern Review Process loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 121 tokens; SKILL.md has 568 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 568 words, ~1,401 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/govern-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- govern-review-process
- description
- Use when you need to understand how Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review by at least two referees, desk screening for scope (corporate governance and literature reviews are desk-rejected), the reject / R&R / accept decision categories, and how comparative-institutional reviewers judge. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.
Review Process (govern-review-process)
Knowing how Governance screens and decides lets you pre-empt the failure modes before submitting. Governance is double-blind and screens at the desk for scope fit before sending a paper to at least two referees, who judge it as a contribution to comparative public policy, administration, and the organization of the state — not as a single-country administrative report.
When to trigger
- Before submitting, to stress-test against desk-rejection grounds (especially scope)
- Interpreting a decision letter and setting expectations
- Understanding what comparative-institutional referees are likely to weigh
- Deciding how much to invest after an R&R signal
How Governance review works
- Double-blind. Referees do not know the authors and authors do not know referees. Anonymize the
manuscript and supply a separate title page (see
govern-submission). - Desk screening first (scope fit). The editors screen for fit before external review. Two scope
failures are reliably desk-rejected:
- Corporate governance (firm boards, shareholders, corporate compliance) — hard out of scope.
- Literature reviews / state-of-the-field essays / pure bibliometric studies — typically not published here. Also screened: is there a clear, original intervention that travels comparatively/institutionally, or is it a competent single-country description with no general contribution?
- External review by ≥ 2 referees. Papers passing the desk go to at least two referees who review anonymously. (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准.)
- Decision categories: reject, revise and resubmit (R&R), or accept. As at peer venues, a first-round outright accept is rare; the realistic good outcome is an R&R.
- Editor's role. The editors-in-chief (Paolo Graziano and Adam Sheingate, verified 2026-06-22; re-verify the masthead before submission) adjudicate the referee reports, weigh fit and contribution, and write the decision letter that sets the revision agenda.
How comparative-institutional referees judge
A Governance referee tends to press on whether the claim really travels:
- Case selection. Why these countries/cases? Are they a defensible sample for the inference, or
chosen on the outcome? (See
govern-research-design.) - Generalizability across countries. Does the mechanism hold beyond the studied cases, and are the scope conditions stated honestly?
- Measurement of institutions. Are bureaucratic autonomy, state capacity, accountability, or regime type measured in a way that is comparable across cases?
- Alternative institutional explanations. Are rival institutional/political accounts considered and ruled out, not just the favored one?
- Contribution to understanding the state. Does the paper change how we understand governing, or just add a data point?
Show full SKILL.md (186 more words)Show less
What an R&R signals
An R&R means the referees see a real comparative/institutional contribution worth saving. It is an
invitation, not an acceptance: the revision must satisfy the substantive concerns (usually case
selection, generalizability, measurement) and the response letter must convert each referee while keeping
the editor confident the revision is convergent (see govern-rebuttal).
Checklist
- Manuscript anonymized for double-blind review; separate title page prepared
- Scope clears the desk: not corporate governance, not a literature review/bibliometric study
- A clear, original intervention that travels comparatively/institutionally is stated up front
- Case selection is defensible and not on the outcome
- Generalizability and scope conditions stated; rival institutional explanations addressed
- Institutional measures are comparable across cases
- Data Availability Statement ready (referees increasingly look for it; see
govern-transparency-and-data)
Anti-patterns
- Submitting a corporate-governance paper or a literature review (desk-rejected on scope)
- A competent single-country description with no comparative/institutional contribution
- Case selection on the dependent variable with no defense
- Ignoring obvious rival institutional explanations
- Expecting a first-round accept; the realistic good outcome is an R&R
Output format
【Desk-scope check】not corporate gov / not lit-review-bibliometric? [Y/N]
【Comparative contribution】clear original intervention that travels? [Y/N]
【Referees】prepared for ≥ 2 anonymous comparative-institutional reviews? [Y/N]
【Likely pressure points】case selection / generalizability / measurement / rivals
【Realistic outcome】reject / R&R / (rare) accept
【Next】govern-submission (or govern-rebuttal once a decision arrives)Supplementary resources
../../resources/external_tools.md— comparative-governance data and method aids referees expect../../resources/official-source-map.md— Governance peer-review policy, scope statement, editors
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Govern Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Govern Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills | 47k | 2 repos | ~2.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Systematic Review ScreenerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~8.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Literature Reviewneflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent | 126 | 20 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Preprint Search on bioRxivLigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper | 739 | 12 repos | ~3.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence |
Similar skills
Systematic Review Screener
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Screens records for systematic, scoping and rapid reviews against fixed eligibility rules, using two blinded AI reviewers and a third adjudicator, with traceable PRISMA counts.
Literature Review
neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).
Preprint Search on bioRxiv
LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper
Searches bioRxiv life sciences preprints by keyword, author, date range or category with a Python script, returning JSON metadata and optional PDF downloads.
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Deep Research Workflow
TokenRhythm/opensquilla
Runs multi-round research in three stages with a persisted state file, evidence tracking and a long-form report with per-claim citations.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Govern Review Process
What does Govern Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review by at least two…. Govern Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when you need to understand how Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review by at least two referees, desk screening for scope (corporate governance and literature reviews are desk-rejected), the reject / R&R / accept decision categories, and how comparative-institutional reviewers judge.
When should I use Govern Review Process?
Govern Review Process fits situations like: you need to understand how Governance: An International Journal of Policy; institutions evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review by at least two referees; desk screening for scope (corporate governance and literature reviews are desk-rejected); the reject / R&R / accept decision categories.
How do I install Govern Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill govern-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/govern-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Govern Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill govern-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/govern-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Govern Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill govern-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/govern-review-process, .gemini/skills/govern-review-process, .github/skills/govern-review-process and .opencode/skills/govern-review-process in your project.
What does Govern Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Govern Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Govern Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Govern Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Govern Review Process use?
Govern Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Govern Review Process use?
About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Govern Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Govern Review Process: Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars), Systematic Review Screener (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars), Literature Review (neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent, 126 stars) and Preprint Search on bioRxiv (LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper, 739 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Govern Review Process?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.