A skill your agent uses when responding to reviewer and editorial-board reports for an 《经济研究》 (Economic Research Journal) R&R — sequencing manuscript revision before letter writing, drafting…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Er Rebuttal

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill er-rebuttal -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills er-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Economic-Research-Journal-Skills/skills/er-rebuttal .claude/skills/er-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
er-rebuttal
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~691 tokens
SKILL.md length
126 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when responding to reviewer and editorial-board reports for an 《经济研究》 (Economic Research Journal) R&R — sequencing manuscript revision before letter writing, drafting…

  • Drafting point-by-point replies in the accept / partial-accept / decline modes
  • SKILL.md covers 触发时机, 顺序原则, 回复信结构 and 三种回复模式, plus 7 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Prioritizing 编委 theory-positioning comments

What it does

Er Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when responding to reviewer and editorial-board reports for an 《经济研究》 (Economic Research Journal) R&R — sequencing manuscript revision before letter writing, drafting point-by-point replies in the accept / partial-accept / decline modes, prioritizing 编委 theory-positioning comments, and deciding whether new results go in the body or an appendix. 使用时机:收到《经济研究》外审或编委意见、准备修订正文并撰写逐条回复信、或多轮修改中回复与正文出现不一致时。

Its SKILL.md is about 690 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering OKRs and executive reporting and Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Drafting point-by-point replies in the accept / partial-accept / decline modes
  • Prioritizing 编委 theory-positioning comments
  • Deciding whether new results go in the body

Example prompts

  • “/er-rebuttal”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Er Rebuttal loads about 691 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 104 tokens; SKILL.md has 126 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~104
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~691

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 126 words, ~691 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/er-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
er-rebuttal
description
Use when responding to reviewer and editorial-board reports for an 《经济研究》 (Economic Research Journal) R&R — sequencing manuscript revision before letter writing, drafting point-by-point replies in the accept / partial-accept / decline modes, prioritizing 编委 theory-positioning comments, and deciding whether new results go in the body or an appendix. 使用时机:收到《经济研究》外审或编委意见、准备修订正文并撰写逐条回复信、或多轮修改中回复与正文出现不一致时。

修改回复(er-rebuttal)

触发时机

  • 收到《经济研究》R&R 通知
  • 已有 1–3 份审稿意见和编委意见
  • 准备开始修订正文 + 回复信

顺序原则

先修订正文,再写回复信。回复信是"导览图",必须基于已修订的正文版本。

颠倒会导致:

  • 回复信承诺了正文未真正做的修订
  • 正文修订过程中发现承诺无法兑现
  • 多稿来回不一致

回复信结构

总体结构
尊敬的主编、编委、各位审稿专家:

非常感谢编辑部和各位审稿专家在百忙之中对本文的审阅和宝贵意见。
我们已根据各位意见对论文进行了系统修订。下面我们逐条回复各位的意见。
为便于核对,我们在回复中标注了修订对应的正文位置(如"详见正文 P.X 第 Y 段")。

致主编 / 编委的回复(如有编委意见)
审稿人 1 的回复
审稿人 2 的回复
审稿人 3 的回复(如有)

再次感谢各位的宝贵意见。
作者
20XX 年 XX 月 XX 日
单条回复结构
意见 X:[原文照抄审稿意见]

回复:感谢审稿专家的宝贵意见。我们已[做了什么具体修改],理由如下:
(1)从理论角度,……
(2)从实证角度,……
(3)从写作角度,……
具体修改详见正文第 X 页第 Y 段(修订标记已用[蓝色字体 / 修订模式]标出)。

三种回复模式

A. 完全接受
  • 直接说明接受 + 描述修改 + 指明位置
  • 不要找理由
B. 部分接受
  • 先肯定审稿人的合理性
  • 说明部分接受的范围
  • 解释未接受部分的原因(给证据,不要狡辩)
C. 不接受(谨慎使用)
  • 先充分肯定审稿人的考虑
  • 给出严密的反驳论证(至少 3 段)
  • 必要时新增稳健性 / 补充分析作为旁证
  • 不接受的比例最多 1–2 条

经济研究 R&R 特别注意

  • 编委意见若关于理论定位,必须重点回应——这是《经济研究》最看重的
  • 审稿人若要求"补充识别策略稳健性",应额外加 2–3 个稳健性表格附在文末
  • 审稿人若要求"补充机制" → 优先在正文加机制小节,而非附录

新增结果放正文还是附录

审稿要求补做的分析,按"是否改变论文骨架"决定去处:

  • 进正文:触及理论定位的重构、新的机制小节、替换主识别策略的估计——这些是编委和二轮审稿人必看的内容,藏进附录会被视为敷衍。
  • 进文末补充表 / 附录:同方向的额外稳健性、替换度量、剔除子样本——正文一句话总结 + "详见附表 X"即可,避免正文膨胀冲淡主线。
  • 只进回复信:为回应质疑做的反事实演算、与审稿人商榷的文献梳理——若与论文主张无直接关系,写在回复信里比塞进正文更得体。

拿不准时问一句:**二轮审稿人只读修订版正文能否独立看懂这处修改的动机?**不能,就升格进正文。

回复措辞微型对照

❌ 改写前:"审稿人的这一担心是多余的,我们的工具变量显然满足排他性。"

✅ 改写后:"审稿专家对排他性的担心非常关键。我们从两方面补充了证据:其一,控制了可能构成直接渠道的 X 后系数基本不变(附表 3);其二,安慰剂检验显示工具变量对不受政策影响的 Y′ 无解释力。我们同时在正文 4.2 节补充了对排他性假设适用边界的讨论。"

原则:反驳靠新证据说话,不靠形容词;语气谦逊但立场清晰,避免"显然""多余"一类刺激性措辞。

意见—修订对照表(附在回复信首)

多轮、多审稿人的 R&R,建议在回复信开头放一张总览表,编辑部核对效率高、印象分好:

编号来源意见主题处理正文位置
1编委理论定位完全接受,重写 2.1 节P.5–7
2审稿人 1平行趋势完全接受,新增事件研究图图 2
3审稿人 2更换被解释变量部分接受,附表 4 + 正文说明P.18

必查清单

  • 每条审稿意见都有对应回复(不能遗漏)
  • 每条回复都指明正文修订位置
  • 回复信开头有致谢段
  • 不接受的意见有充分论证 + 旁证
  • 正文修订处有标记(蓝色字体 / 修订模式)
  • 修订版正文已通读,确保无前后矛盾
  • 理论定位类意见已优先回应

反模式

  • "感谢审稿人的意见,我们已修改"——一行回复
  • 回复信比正文还长 —— 多半在凑字数
  • 三个审稿人意见冲突,回复信里全部接受 —— 正文会自相矛盾
  • 把不接受的回复写得很 defensive
  • 忽视编委意见,只回复匿名审稿人

配套与范例

完整示例回复信(3 评审 / 多条意见 / 三种回复模式)见 resources/worked-examples/10-response-letter.md。

输出格式

【审稿人数】X 人
【意见总数】X 条
【完全接受】X 条
【部分接受】X 条
【不接受】X 条
【回复信字数】X
【正文修订段落数】X
【编委意见回应】完整 / 待补
【下一步】上传至投稿系统 → 等待二轮审稿

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Economic-Research-Journal-Skills/skills/er-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Er Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Er Rebuttal compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Er Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~691Automated safety check: PassMIT
Taipei Permit Drawing Standardsh30190/HJPLUS_Taiwan_Architect_KB158—~4.6kAutomated safety check: PassCC-BY-SA-4.0
Rebuttal Writing Guidewentorai/research-plugins2981 repos~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg3.9k17 repos~5.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg3.9k11 repos~3.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~16kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence

Similar skills

  • Taipei Permit Drawing Standards

    h30190/HJPLUS_Taiwan_Architect_KB

    This skill should be used when preparing, reviewing, or indexing Taipei City building permit drawing sets (A101-A7), verifying the 44-item application document checklist, setting up N-prefix…

    158 GitHub stars~4.6k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Rebuttal Writing Guide

    wentorai/research-plugins

    Write effective rebuttals to reviewer comments for journal submissions

    298 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.6k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Peer Review

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 17 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Scholar Evaluation

    spacering-net/codeg

    Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 11 repos~3.2k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Academic Paper Writing Pipeline

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.

    51k GitHub stars~16k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Academic Paper Reviewer

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.

    51k GitHub stars~11k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Er Rebuttal

What does Er Rebuttal do?

A skill your agent uses when responding to reviewer and editorial-board reports for an 《经济研究》 (Economic Research Journal) R&R — sequencing manuscript revision before letter writing, drafting…. Er Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when responding to reviewer and editorial-board reports for an 《经济研究》 (Economic Research Journal) R&R — sequencing manuscript revision before letter writing, drafting point-by-point replies in the accept / partial-accept / decline modes, prioritizing 编委 theory-positioning comments, and deciding whether new results go in the body or an appendix.

When should I use Er Rebuttal?

Er Rebuttal fits situations like: drafting point-by-point replies in the accept / partial-accept / decline modes; prioritizing 编委 theory-positioning comments; deciding whether new results go in the body.

How do I install Er Rebuttal in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill er-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Economic-Research-Journal-Skills/skills/er-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/er-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Er Rebuttal in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill er-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Economic-Research-Journal-Skills/skills/er-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/er-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Er Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill er-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/er-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/er-rebuttal, .github/skills/er-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/er-rebuttal in your project.

What does Er Rebuttal need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Er Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.

Does Er Rebuttal access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Er Rebuttal safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Er Rebuttal use?

Er Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Er Rebuttal use?

About 691 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 2.8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Er Rebuttal?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Er Rebuttal: Taipei Permit Drawing Standards (h30190/HJPLUS_Taiwan_Architect_KB, 158 stars), Rebuttal Writing Guide (wentorai/research-plugins, 298 stars), Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars) and Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Er Rebuttal?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.