Nature Paper Card
Yuan1z0825/nature-skills
Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.
A skill your agent uses when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a 《财贸经济》 manuscript, when the Chinese / English reference balance is off, or when canonical fiscal / financial /…
Install Cte Literature Review
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cte-literature-review -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cte-literature-review --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Finance-and-Trade-Economics-Skills/skills/cte-literature-review .claude/skills/cte-literature-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "cte-literature-review" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Finance-and-Trade-Economics-Skills/skills/cte-literature-review into .claude/skills/cte-literature-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cte-literature-review", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Finance-and-Trade-Economics-Skills/skills/cte-literature-reviewType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cte-literature-review -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cte-literature-review --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Finance-and-Trade-Economics-Skills/skills/cte-literature-review .agents/skills/cte-literature-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "cte-literature-review" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Finance-and-Trade-Economics-Skills/skills/cte-literature-review into .agents/skills/cte-literature-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cte-literature-review", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cte-literature-review -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cte-literature-review --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Finance-and-Trade-Economics-Skills/skills/cte-literature-review .cursor/skills/cte-literature-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "cte-literature-review" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Finance-and-Trade-Economics-Skills/skills/cte-literature-review into .cursor/skills/cte-literature-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cte-literature-review", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Finance-and-Trade-Economics-Skills/skills/cte-literature-review--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cte-literature-review -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cte-literature-review --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Finance-and-Trade-Economics-Skills/skills/cte-literature-review .gemini/skills/cte-literature-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "cte-literature-review" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Finance-and-Trade-Economics-Skills/skills/cte-literature-review into .gemini/skills/cte-literature-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cte-literature-review", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cte-literature-reviewInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cte-literature-review -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Finance-and-Trade-Economics-Skills/skills/cte-literature-review .github/skills/cte-literature-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "cte-literature-review" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Finance-and-Trade-Economics-Skills/skills/cte-literature-review into .github/skills/cte-literature-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cte-literature-review", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cte-literature-review -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cte-literature-review --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Finance-and-Trade-Economics-Skills/skills/cte-literature-review .opencode/skills/cte-literature-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "cte-literature-review" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Finance-and-Trade-Economics-Skills/skills/cte-literature-review into .opencode/skills/cte-literature-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cte-literature-review", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
cte-literature-review- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~587 tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 95 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a 《财贸经济》 manuscript, when the Chinese / English reference balance is off, or when canonical fiscal / financial /…
- Works in 3 steps: 第一层：理论文献（中外并重）——建立问题的理论坐标（如财政联邦主义、最优税收、货币… → 第二层：财经领域实证文献（中文为主、英文为辅）——梳理已有的中国财税 / 金融… → 第三层：本文位置——明确指出"本文与现有研究的差异"，尤其相对于本刊及《金融研究》…
- Revising the literature-review section for a 《财贸经济》 manuscript
- SKILL.md covers 触发时机, 结构规范, 中外文献配比 and 必引避坑清单, plus 5 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Cte Literature Review is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a 《财贸经济》 manuscript, when the Chinese / English reference balance is off, or when canonical fiscal / financial / trade theory references are missing. 本技能服务于《财贸经济》(Finance & Trade Economics, CTE)。
Its SKILL.md is about 590 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Literature review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Revising the literature-review section for a 《财贸经济》 manuscript
- The Chinese / English reference balance is off
- Canonical fiscal / financial / trade theory references are missing
Example prompts
- “/cte-literature-review”
Workflow steps
3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- 第一层：理论文献（中外并重）——建立问题的理论坐标（如财政联邦主义、最优税收、货币政策传导、金融加速器、贸易与异质性企业）
- 第二层：财经领域实证文献（中文为主、英文为辅）——梳理已有的中国财税 / 金融 / 贸易微观与宏观实证发现
- 第三层：本文位置——明确指出"本文与现有研究的差异"，尤其相对于本刊及《金融研究》《世界经济》《财政研究》近年同主题文章的差异
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Cte Literature Review loads about 587 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 70 tokens; SKILL.md has 95 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 95 words, ~587 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/cte-literature-review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- cte-literature-review
- description
- Use when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a 《财贸经济》 manuscript, when the Chinese / English reference balance is off, or when canonical fiscal / financial / trade theory references are missing. 本技能服务于《财贸经济》(Finance & Trade Economics, CTE)。
财贸经济文献综述（cte-literature-review）
触发时机
- 综述缺财经领域中文权威文献，或全部是英文文献
- 综述缺理论文献（财政分权、货币传导、金融摩擦、贸易组织等理论根基）
- 综述写成了"罗列式"而非"对话式"
结构规范
《财贸经济》偏好三层结构的综述：
- 第一层：理论文献（中外并重）——建立问题的理论坐标（如财政联邦主义、最优税收、货币政策传导、金融加速器、贸易与异质性企业）
- 第二层：财经领域实证文献（中文为主、英文为辅）——梳理已有的中国财税 / 金融 / 贸易微观与宏观实证发现
- 第三层：本文位置——明确指出"本文与现有研究的差异"，尤其相对于本刊及《金融研究》《世界经济》《财政研究》近年同主题文章的差异
与综合经济学期刊综述的差异
《财贸经济》尤其看重财经领域文献是否到位、是否扣住中国制度：既要有国际理论与方法文献，也要充分对话国内财经学界的权威研究与政策文献。一篇只引国际顶刊、不引国内财经经典与制度背景的稿件，会被审稿人判为"未扎根本土文献 / 与中国制度脱节"。
中外文献配比
经验法则（导向是"中外并重 + 理论扎实 + 扣住中国制度"）：
- 总引文 40–80 条（投稿前到官网"投稿须知"核对当年参考文献条数上限）
- 中文文献占比 40%–60%（财经领域本土实证与制度文献不能缺位）
- 理论文献占比 ≥ 20%（理论推导 / 综述，不是实证应用）
- 五年内文献占比 ≥ 40%
- 既覆盖国际顶刊（AER / QJE / JPE / JF / RFS / JPubE / JIE 等），也覆盖国内权威（《经济研究》《管理世界》《金融研究》《世界经济》《财政研究》《数量经济技术经济研究》等）
必引避坑清单
- 是否引用了所属理论分支的经典理论文献（财政分权 / 最优税收 / 货币传导 / 金融摩擦 / 贸易组织的原始 paper）？
- 是否引用了财经领域的中文权威研究（不是只引国际文献）？
- 是否交代了相关中国财经制度 / 政策背景（改革时点、政策文件）？
- 是否引用了近 3 年本刊或相邻财经刊的同主题论文？
- 引用是否覆盖三类：理论、方法、本土财经实证？
综述句式模板
[作者 (年份)] 利用[企业 / 城市 / 银行数据 + 方法]研究了[财经问题]，发现……。
然而，该研究[局限]，未考虑[本文要补的空白，如政策内生 / 制度异质 / 传导机制]。
与之相比，本文……。每段综述至少出现一次"与之相比 / 区别于 / 本文延伸了 / 本文补充了"。
对话式 vs 罗列式
《财贸经济》偏好对话式综述（研究之间相互回应），而非罗列式（按作者顺序点名）。
错误（罗列式）
张三（2020）研究了减税，李四（2021）研究了企业投资，王五（2022）研究了融资约束。
正确（对话式 — 按主题分组、表明分歧、给出本文位置）
减税能否刺激企业投资，已有研究存在分歧（张三，2020；李四，2021）：一类研究认为减税通过放松现金流约束提高投资，另一类则强调预期不稳定削弱了减税的激励效果。两类判断的差异部分源于对政策内生性与企业预期的不同处理。本文沿这一思路，使用[数据]并构造[识别策略]，进一步考察了……。
判断标准：把作者名都隐去后，综述还能读出"研究 A 怎么说、研究 B 怎么反驳、本文怎么定位"，就是对话式。
与本文贡献阐述衔接
综述末尾必须导出本文的差异化定位：
本文与现有文献的重要区别体现在以下几个方面： 第一，[识别策略上的差异——如何处理政策内生 / 反向因果]； 第二，[数据或样本上的差异——更新 / 更细的企业 / 城市 / 银行数据]； 第三，[机制或异质性上的差异，落到中国财经制度]。
与本刊及相邻财经刊已发表文章对比是审稿人的关注点——综述若不提近 3 年同主题文章，会被视为"未充分对话"。
反模式
- 把综述写成"财税 / 金融政策背景介绍"而非学术对话
- 综述完全围绕国际文献，无国内财经权威研究与制度背景
- 中文文献只引一两条凑数
- 综述里出现一长串并列引用 —— 拆开按贡献分述
- 自引扎堆
输出格式
【结构】三层 / 两层 / 一层
【中外配比】中文 X% / 英文 Y%
【理论文献占比】X%
【财经本土权威文献】到位 / 缺位
【制度背景交代】到位 / 缺位
【五年内文献比例】X%
【缺漏清单】[...]
【下一步】cte-identification© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Finance-and-Trade-Economics-Skills/skills/cte-literature-review of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Cte Literature Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cte Literature Review this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~587 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills | 47k | 2 repos | ~2.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Systematic Review ScreenerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~8.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Literature Reviewneflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent | 126 | 20 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Preprint Search on bioRxivLigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper | 739 | 12 repos | ~3.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence |
Similar skills
Systematic Review Screener
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Screens records for systematic, scoping and rapid reviews against fixed eligibility rules, using two blinded AI reviewers and a third adjudicator, with traceable PRISMA counts.
Literature Review
neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).
Preprint Search on bioRxiv
LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper
Searches bioRxiv life sciences preprints by keyword, author, date range or category with a Python script, returning JSON metadata and optional PDF downloads.
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Deep Research Workflow
TokenRhythm/opensquilla
Runs multi-round research in three stages with a persisted state file, evidence tracking and a long-form report with per-claim citations.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Cte Literature Review
What does Cte Literature Review do?
A skill your agent uses when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a 《财贸经济》 manuscript, when the Chinese / English reference balance is off, or when canonical fiscal / financial /…. Cte Literature Review is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a 《财贸经济》 manuscript, when the Chinese / English reference balance is off, or when canonical fiscal / financial / trade theory references are missing.
When should I use Cte Literature Review?
Cte Literature Review fits situations like: revising the literature-review section for a 《财贸经济》 manuscript; the Chinese / English reference balance is off; canonical fiscal / financial / trade theory references are missing.
How do I install Cte Literature Review in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cte-literature-review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Finance-and-Trade-Economics-Skills/skills/cte-literature-review in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/cte-literature-review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Cte Literature Review in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cte-literature-review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Finance-and-Trade-Economics-Skills/skills/cte-literature-review in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/cte-literature-review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Cte Literature Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cte-literature-review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/cte-literature-review, .gemini/skills/cte-literature-review, .github/skills/cte-literature-review and .opencode/skills/cte-literature-review in your project.
What does Cte Literature Review need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Cte Literature Review is instructions for the agent only.
Does Cte Literature Review access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Cte Literature Review safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Cte Literature Review use?
Cte Literature Review is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Cte Literature Review use?
About 587 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 2.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Cte Literature Review?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Cte Literature Review: Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars), Systematic Review Screener (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars), Literature Review (neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent, 126 stars) and Preprint Search on bioRxiv (LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper, 739 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Cte Literature Review?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.