Responsive Units
thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist
A skill your agent uses when reviewing stylesheets, component styles, and responsive behavior related to Use relative units for responsive layouts.
A skill your agent uses when a CSCW paper draws Revise and Resubmit or Revise for External Review — triaging reviewer requests, running the weeks-long revision as a project, and writing the…
MITAuto-check passed
Install Cscw Author Response
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-author-response -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cscw-author-response --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-author-response .claude/skills/cscw-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "cscw-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-author-response into .claude/skills/cscw-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cscw-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-author-responseType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-author-response -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cscw-author-response --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-author-response .agents/skills/cscw-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "cscw-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-author-response into .agents/skills/cscw-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cscw-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-author-response -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cscw-author-response --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-author-response .cursor/skills/cscw-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "cscw-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-author-response into .cursor/skills/cscw-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cscw-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-author-response--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-author-response -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cscw-author-response --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-author-response .gemini/skills/cscw-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "cscw-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-author-response into .gemini/skills/cscw-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cscw-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cscw-author-responseInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-author-response -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-author-response .github/skills/cscw-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "cscw-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-author-response into .github/skills/cscw-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cscw-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-author-response -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cscw-author-response --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-author-response .opencode/skills/cscw-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "cscw-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-author-response into .opencode/skills/cscw-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cscw-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
cscw-author-response- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.2k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 522 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when a CSCW paper draws Revise and Resubmit or Revise for External Review — triaging reviewer requests, running the weeks-long revision as a project, and writing the…
- A CSCW paper draws Revise and Resubmit
- SKILL.md covers Triage: sort requests before…, Running the revision as a…, The response letter and Revise-for-External-Review…, plus 1 more section
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- Revise for External Review — triaging reviewer requests
What it does
Cscw Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when a CSCW paper draws Revise and Resubmit or Revise for External Review — triaging reviewer requests, running the weeks-long revision as a project, and writing the point-by-point response letter that the same reviewers will read before they reread anything else.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- A CSCW paper draws Revise and Resubmit
- Revise for External Review — triaging reviewer requests
- Running the weeks-long revision as a project
- Writing the point-by-point response letter that the same reviewers will read before they reread anything else
Example prompts
- “/cscw-author-response”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Cscw Author Response loads about 1.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 72 tokens; SKILL.md has 522 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 522 words, ~1,216 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/cscw-author-response/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- cscw-author-response
- description
- Use when a CSCW paper draws Revise and Resubmit or Revise for External Review — triaging reviewer requests, running the weeks-long revision as a project, and writing the point-by-point response letter that the same reviewers will read before they reread anything else.
CSCW Author Response
There is no rebuttal box at CSCW. The venue's response instrument is the revision plus response letter of a journal: you get weeks or months, you may change anything in the manuscript, and the people reading the result are the reviewers who wrote the critiques. That combination — real time, real changes, remembered context — makes the response letter the highest-leverage document of the whole pipeline.
Triage: sort requests before touching the manuscript
Extract every distinct request from every review into a ledger, then classify:
| Class | Definition | Response posture |
|---|---|---|
| Do | Legitimate, feasible in the window | Do it fully; show where |
| Do differently | Legitimate concern, wrong prescription | Fix the underlying concern; explain the substitution explicitly |
| Decline | Would harm the paper or exceed the study's license | Decline once, with reasons — never silently |
| Cannot | Requires data/access that no longer exists | Say so plainly; offer the honest partial (new limitation text, added analysis of existing data) |
Two CSCW-specific triage realities:
- Cross-tradition requests are common. A quantitative reviewer may ask an interpretive study for reliability statistics; a qualitative reviewer may ask a trace study for member voice. Handle these as "do differently": meet the underlying worry (analytic credibility; human grounding) within your tradition's own rigor, and teach the standard you are meeting in one respectful sentence.
- New-data requests need early decisions. More interviews or another deployment wave may be impossible mid-revision. Decide in week one whether to collect, substitute, or descope a claim — this decision gates everything else.
Running the revision as a project
- Assign each ledger row an owner and a due date inside the window stated in the decision letter (confirm the date; under rolling it is set per paper).
- Sequence: analysis-changing work first, prose second, response letter third — a letter written before the changes stabilize will misdescribe them.
- Freeze a diffable copy of the round-one manuscript; you will need honest before/after references, and reviewers may check.
Show full SKILL.md (207 more words)Show less
The response letter
Structure that survives a skeptical same-reviewer read:
Dear Editor and Reviewers,
Summary of changes (½ page max):
the 3-5 revisions that changed the paper's substance, plainly stated.
Per-reviewer, per-point:
R1.1 [quote or faithfully paraphrase the request]
Response: what we did / why we did something else / why we declined.
Location: §4.2, ¶3; Appendix C, Table 7.
R1.2 ...
R2.1 ...
Changes not requested by any reviewer:
list them — silent edits discovered later cost trust.Letter discipline:
- Answer the request that was made, then stop. Padding a response with re-argued contributions signals evasion to someone who has read it all before.
- Point to locations, not to effort. "We substantially revised Section 4" is unverifiable; "§4.2 now reports the attrition counts (new Table 3)" is.
- Keep the tone collegial and unwounded. The reviewer rereads your paper with this letter's tone in their ear.
- Preserve anonymity — the revision round is still anonymized: no names in the letter, no identifying artifacts in newly added materials.
- Concede real hits explicitly. "The reviewer is right that our round-one framing overclaimed; we have rescoped the claim to the six communities studied" converts a weakness into demonstrated judgment.
Revise-for-External-Review responses
The internal-round variant is smaller but the same shape: a short letter, the specific repairs, done fast. Its purpose is to make the paper worth reviewers' time — fix exactly what the screeners flagged and resist the urge to renovate.
Exit check before resubmission
[Ledger] every request answered exactly once (no orphans, no repeats)? y/n
[Locations] every claimed change verified at its cited section/page? y/n
[Diff] unrequested changes listed? y/n
[Tone] letter read aloud by a co-author not involved in drafting it? y/n
[Anonymity] new text, tables, and supplements swept? y/n
[Deadline] resubmission date and format confirmed against the decision letter? y/nIn the last verified cycle roughly four of five R&R papers that resubmitted were accepted (152 of 196; checked 2026-07-08) — the loop rewards teams that treat it as the venue's main event rather than an appeal.
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-author-response of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Cscw Author Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cscw Author Response this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Responsive Unitsthedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist | 74k | — | ~472 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Author Response Builderaipoch/medical-research-skills | 1.9k | — | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Hermes Agent Skill AuthoringNousResearch/hermes-agent | 252k | — | ~3.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Nature Reviewer ResponseYuan1z0825/nature-skills | 47k | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Edbt Author Responsebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
Author Response Builder
aipoch/medical-research-skills
Turns reviewer comments into structured, professional point-by-point responses linked to manuscript revisions, clarifications, rebuttals, and additional analyses.
Hermes Agent Skill Authoring
NousResearch/hermes-agent
Author in-repo SKILL.md files: frontmatter and structure. An agent skill from NousResearch/hermes-agent.
Nature Reviewer Response
Yuan1z0825/nature-skills
Drafts, audits and revises responses to peer review: point-by-point replies, revision cover letters and marked-manuscript or LaTeX revision packages.
Edbt Author Response
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting EDBT author responses across the two turns of a cycle — the short author-feedback reply on the initial reviews, and the in-cycle revise-and-resubmit change…
Fast Author Response
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting USENIX FAST author responses, covering the short pre-notification rebuttal during the author-response period and — distinctively — the one-shot-revision change…
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Questions about Cscw Author Response
What does Cscw Author Response do?
A skill your agent uses when a CSCW paper draws Revise and Resubmit or Revise for External Review — triaging reviewer requests, running the weeks-long revision as a project, and writing the…. Cscw Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when a CSCW paper draws Revise and Resubmit or Revise for External Review — triaging reviewer requests, running the weeks-long revision as a project, and writing the point-by-point response letter that the same reviewers will read before they reread anything else.
When should I use Cscw Author Response?
Cscw Author Response fits situations like: A CSCW paper draws Revise and Resubmit; revise for External Review — triaging reviewer requests; running the weeks-long revision as a project; writing the point-by-point response letter that the same reviewers will read before they reread anything else.
How do I install Cscw Author Response in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-author-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/cscw-author-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Cscw Author Response in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-author-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/cscw-author-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Cscw Author Response in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-author-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/cscw-author-response, .gemini/skills/cscw-author-response, .github/skills/cscw-author-response and .opencode/skills/cscw-author-response in your project.
What does Cscw Author Response need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Cscw Author Response is instructions for the agent only.
Does Cscw Author Response access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Cscw Author Response safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Cscw Author Response use?
Cscw Author Response is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Cscw Author Response use?
About 1.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Cscw Author Response?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Cscw Author Response: Responsive Units (thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist, 74k stars), Author Response Builder (aipoch/medical-research-skills, 1.9k stars), Hermes Agent Skill Authoring (NousResearch/hermes-agent, 252k stars) and Nature Reviewer Response (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Cscw Author Response?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.