Agent skill

Edbt Author Response

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when drafting EDBT author responses across the two turns of a cycle — the short author-feedback reply on the initial reviews, and the in-cycle revise-and-resubmit change…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Edbt Author Response

skills CLI

$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill edbt-author-response -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills edbt-author-response --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-author-response .claude/skills/edbt-author-response && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Paste into Claude Code

Install the "edbt-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-author-response into .claude/skills/edbt-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "edbt-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.

Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

$skill-installer

$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-author-response

Type this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.

skills CLI

$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill edbt-author-response -a codex

Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills edbt-author-response --agent codex

Project scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-author-response .agents/skills/edbt-author-response && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.

Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/

Paste into Codex

Install the "edbt-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-author-response into .agents/skills/edbt-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "edbt-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.

Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

skills CLI

$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill edbt-author-response -a cursor

Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills edbt-author-response --agent cursor

Project scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-author-response .cursor/skills/edbt-author-response && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.

Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/

Paste into Cursor

Install the "edbt-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-author-response into .cursor/skills/edbt-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "edbt-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.

Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

gemini skills install

$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-author-response

--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.

skills CLI

$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill edbt-author-response -a gemini-cli

Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills edbt-author-response --agent gemini-cli

Project scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-author-response .gemini/skills/edbt-author-response && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.

Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/

Paste into Gemini CLI

Install the "edbt-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-author-response into .gemini/skills/edbt-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "edbt-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.

Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills edbt-author-response

Installs for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

skills CLI

$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill edbt-author-response -a github-copilot

Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-author-response .github/skills/edbt-author-response && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.

GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/

Paste into GitHub Copilot

Install the "edbt-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-author-response into .github/skills/edbt-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "edbt-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.

GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

skills CLI

$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill edbt-author-response -a opencode

OpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills edbt-author-response --agent opencode

Project scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-author-response .opencode/skills/edbt-author-response && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.

OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/

Paste into OpenCode

Install the "edbt-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-author-response into .opencode/skills/edbt-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "edbt-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.

OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

Facts

Skill name: edbt-author-response
GitHub stars: 1.2k
Token cost: ~1.2k tokens
SKILL.md length: 525 words
Files: 1
Skills in repo: 2,387
Repo updated: Sep 27, 2026
First seen: Oct 7, 2026
Licence: MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when drafting EDBT author responses across the two turns of a cycle — the short author-feedback reply on the initial reviews, and the in-cycle revise-and-resubmit change…

Drafting EDBT author responses across the two turns of a cycle — the short author-feedback reply on the initial reviews
SKILL.md covers Triage (both turns), Turn 1 — the author-feedback…, Turn 2 — the… and Reviewer pushback patterns…, plus 2 more sections
Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Edbt Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting EDBT author responses across the two turns of a cycle — the short author-feedback reply on the initial reviews, and the in-cycle revise-and-resubmit change letter that maps every reviewer request to a concrete revision re-read by the original reviewers under the OpenProceedings process.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

Drafting EDBT author responses across the two turns of a cycle — the short author-feedback reply on the initial reviews

Example prompts

“/edbt-author-response”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Edbt Author Response loads about 1.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 82 tokens; SKILL.md has 525 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it: ~82
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches: ~1.2k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 525 words, ~1,233 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/edbt-author-response/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).

name: edbt-author-response
description: Use when drafting EDBT author responses across the two turns of a cycle — the short author-feedback reply on the initial reviews, and the in-cycle revise-and-resubmit change letter that maps every reviewer request to a concrete revision re-read by the original reviewers under the OpenProceedings process.

EDBT Author Response

Use this after EDBT reviews are released. An EDBT cycle has two distinct speaking turns, and conflating them is a common mistake: a short author-feedback reply on the initial reviews, and — if you receive a revise — a full change letter accompanying a revised paper that the original reviewers re-read within the same cycle. The revision, not the letter, carries the argument.

Triage (both turns)

Answer what affects the decision: significance of the data-management contribution, technical soundness, evaluation fairness (real workloads, tuned baselines, realistic scale), reproducibility, and clarity.
Use evidence that already exists or that the revision will concretely add — never a vague promise.
Correct factual misreadings first; a reviewer who misread a figure or a configuration is often persuadable.
If the cycle is double-blind (待核实 per cycle), keep every word anonymous — no tool/repository names or affiliations that reveal identity.

Turn 1 — the author-feedback reply

Short and decision-focused. One decision-critical point per reviewer beats an exhaustive reply. Concede what is true, correct what is misread, and point to exactly where the answer lives in the submitted paper or artifact. Do not paste large new result tables the reviewers cannot yet verify; signal what the revision will add if a revise follows.

Turn 2 — the revise-and-resubmit change letter (the distinctive EDBT move)

A revise is a genuine in-cycle re-read. The letter is a change ledger: for every reviewer request, either make the change and show it, or decline it with a reason.

text

[R1.1] Reviewer request (quoted briefly)
       -> Action: DONE  | added the tuned <baseline> at 8-128 workers, §5.2, Table 3
       -> Where: §5.2, Table 3; artifact/exp/rq2/
[R1.2] Reviewer request
       -> Action: DECLINED (with reason) | the requested workload is not publicly redistributable;
          added a comparable public workload and stated the limit in §5.4
[R2.1] Reviewer request
       -> Action: PARTIAL | extended the scaling study to 128 workers; the 1024-worker run is
          beyond the cluster we can access this cycle and is noted as future work

The rule that turns a revise into an acceptance: no silent omissions. A request that is neither done nor explicitly declined is what the second read punishes. Because the same reviewers re-read the paper, the letter should let them find each change in seconds — quote the request, name the action, point to the section, table, and artifact path.

Show full SKILL.md (224 more words)Show less

Reviewer pushback patterns (database-systems flavor)

Pushback	What it signals	EDBT-ready response
"The baseline is not tuned / not the strongest"	Soundness doubt about the comparison	Re-run with an equal, documented configuration; report the new numbers, or justify the choice
"This scale is unrealistic / too small"	External-validity limit	Extend to realistic workloads and cluster sizes, or scope the claim and name the limit
"I cannot tell how the mechanism works"	Reproducibility / clarity gap	Add the missing algorithm/parameter detail; make it reimplementable
"The artifact does not run / is missing"	Reproducibility gap	Fix and re-upload the package; describe the run path in the letter
"Overlaps prior work X"	Novelty/delta doubt	Sharpen the delta sentence; add the missing comparison
"The measurement methodology is unsound" (E&A)	Core-contribution doubt	For an Experiments & Analysis paper this is decision-critical — fix the methodology, not just the prose

Calibration

Respond to the criterion the reviewer actually raised, not the one you would rather defend.
Length and format norms for both turns vary by cycle; confirm the current CMT instructions before sending.
Fit the revision to the in-cycle window — the revised paper is scored within the cycle, so scope the changes to what can genuinely be finished and verified in time.
The PC discussion decides; write the letter as evidence for an advocate, and make the revised paper — not the letter — carry the argument.

Output format

text

[Turn] author-feedback reply / revise-and-resubmit change letter
[Priority issue] <reviewer concern>
[Decision dimension] significance / soundness / evaluation / reproducibility / clarity
[Change ledger] <request -> DONE/PARTIAL/DECLINED + where in paper/artifact>
[In-cycle feasibility] <can the revision be completed and verified before the revised-paper deadline?>

Files

Just SKILL.md in EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-author-response of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Edbt Author Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Edbt Author Response compared with similar skills
Skill	Stars	Used in	Tokens	Auto-check	Licence	Repo updated
Edbt Author Response this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills	1.2k	—	~1.2k	Automated safety check: Pass	MIT	13 days ago
Responsive Unitsthedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist	74k	—	~472	Automated safety check: Pass	MIT	4 days ago
Author Response Builderaipoch/medical-research-skills	1.9k	—	~3.2k	Automated safety check: Pass	MIT	23 days ago
Hermes Agent Skill AuthoringNousResearch/hermes-agent	252k	—	~3.6k	Automated safety check: Pass	MIT	today
Socc Author Responsebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills	1.2k	—	~1.3k	Automated safety check: Pass	MIT	13 days ago
Icsme Author Responsebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills	1.2k	—	~1.3k	Automated safety check: Pass	MIT	13 days ago

Similar skills

Responsive Units
thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist
A skill your agent uses when reviewing stylesheets, component styles, and responsive behavior related to Use relative units for responsive layouts.
74k GitHub stars~472 tokensUpdated 4 days ago
Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
Author Response Builder
aipoch/medical-research-skills
Turns reviewer comments into structured, professional point-by-point responses linked to manuscript revisions, clarifications, rebuttals, and additional analyses.
1.9k GitHub stars~3.2k tokensUpdated 23 days ago
Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
Hermes Agent Skill Authoring
NousResearch/hermes-agent
Author in-repo SKILL.md files: frontmatter and structure. An agent skill from NousResearch/hermes-agent.
252k GitHub stars~3.6k tokensUpdated today
Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
Socc Author Response
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting an ACM SoCC author response (rebuttal) during a round's response window, covering the single written turn, answering both the systems and the data/measurement…
1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
Icsme Author Response
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting an IEEE ICSME author response during the double-anonymous author-response period, covering the early-decision cut that decides whether you respond at all…
1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
Auto-check passed
Fast Author Response
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting USENIX FAST author responses, covering the short pre-notification rebuttal during the author-response period and — distinctively — the one-shot-revision change…
1.2k GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
Auto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo

Aaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
Auto-check passed
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
Auto-check passed
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
Auto-check passed
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
Auto-check passed
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
Auto-check passed
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
Auto-check passed

Questions about Edbt Author Response

What does Edbt Author Response do?

A skill your agent uses when drafting EDBT author responses across the two turns of a cycle — the short author-feedback reply on the initial reviews, and the in-cycle revise-and-resubmit change…. Edbt Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting EDBT author responses across the two turns of a cycle — the short author-feedback reply on the initial reviews, and the in-cycle revise-and-resubmit change letter that maps every reviewer request to a concrete revision re-read by the original reviewers under the OpenProceedings process.

When should I use Edbt Author Response?

Edbt Author Response fits situations like: drafting EDBT author responses across the two turns of a cycle — the short author-feedback reply on the initial reviews.

How do I install Edbt Author Response in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill edbt-author-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/edbt-author-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Edbt Author Response in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill edbt-author-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (EDBT-Skills/skills/edbt-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/edbt-author-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Edbt Author Response in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill edbt-author-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/edbt-author-response, .gemini/skills/edbt-author-response, .github/skills/edbt-author-response and .opencode/skills/edbt-author-response in your project.

What does Edbt Author Response need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Edbt Author Response is instructions for the agent only.

Does Edbt Author Response access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Edbt Author Response safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Edbt Author Response use?

Edbt Author Response is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Edbt Author Response use?

About 1.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Edbt Author Response?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Edbt Author Response: Responsive Units (thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist, 74k stars), Author Response Builder (aipoch/medical-research-skills, 1.9k stars), Hermes Agent Skill Authoring (NousResearch/hermes-agent, 252k stars) and Socc Author Response (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Edbt Author Response?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.

Install Edbt Author Response

Facts

At a glance

What it does

When your agent uses it

Example prompts

What it can do on your machine

Tool permissions

Runs code

Network

Credentials

Context cost

Safety

SKILL.md

EDBT Author Response

Triage (both turns)

Turn 1 — the author-feedback reply

Turn 2 — the revise-and-resubmit change letter (the distinctive EDBT move)

Reviewer pushback patterns (database-systems flavor)

Calibration

Output format

Files

Compare with similar skills

Similar skills

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

Questions about Edbt Author Response