Agent skill

Commres Theory Building

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when building the theoretical argument and hypotheses of a Communication Research (CR) manuscript into a testable, mechanism-level contribution.

MITAuto-check passedLegal & Compliance

Install Commres Theory Building

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill commres-theory-building -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills commres-theory-building --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Communication-Research-Skills/skills/commres-theory-building .claude/skills/commres-theory-building && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
commres-theory-building
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
637 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when building the theoretical argument and hypotheses of a Communication Research (CR) manuscript into a testable, mechanism-level contribution.

  • Works in 4 steps: Concept. Define the key constructs… → Mechanism. State the communication… → Boundary conditions. Name the moderators… → …
  • Building the theoretical argument and hypotheses of a Communication Research (CR) manuscript into a testable
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Build the argument (theory →…, The mediation/moderation core… and The theory-contribution bar at…, plus 5 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Commres Theory Building is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when building the theoretical argument and hypotheses of a Communication Research (CR) manuscript into a testable, mechanism-level contribution. CR rewards explicit constructs, a stated communication process, and numbered hypotheses with mediation/moderation, not a bare effect. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Legal & Compliance, covering Dispute resolution and Hypothesis generation. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Building the theoretical argument and hypotheses of a Communication Research (CR) manuscript into a testable
  • Mechanism-level contribution

Example prompts

  • “/commres-theory-building”

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Concept. Define the key constructs precisely (e.g., exposure, framing, presence, perceived
  2. Mechanism. State the communication process: who sends/receives what, through which channel,
  3. Boundary conditions. Name the moderators — which audiences, messages, and contexts strengthen
  4. Hypotheses. Translate the mechanism into explicit, numbered hypotheses (and research

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Commres Theory Building loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 89 tokens; SKILL.md has 637 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~89
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 637 words, ~1,440 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/commres-theory-building/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
commres-theory-building
description
Use when building the theoretical argument and hypotheses of a Communication Research (CR) manuscript into a testable, mechanism-level contribution. CR rewards explicit constructs, a stated communication process, and numbered hypotheses with mediation/moderation, not a bare effect. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses.

Theory & Hypotheses (commres-theory-building)

At CR a result is not a contribution until it is attached to a testable communication mechanism. This skill turns an idea into theory: precise constructs, an explicit process, and numbered hypotheses that the design will test. CR is a hypothetico-deductive journal — a paper that documents an effect without a tested mechanism rarely clears the bar.

When to trigger

  • The empirics are strong but the "so what / why" is thin
  • A reviewer said the paper is "atheoretical," "ad hoc," or "just a main effect"
  • You need to state constructs, mechanisms, and predictions explicitly before collecting data
  • Connecting your work to (or extending) an established communication theory

Build the argument (theory → mechanism → hypotheses)

  1. Concept. Define the key constructs precisely (e.g., exposure, framing, presence, perceived norms); distinguish each from its near neighbors so measurement is unambiguous.
  2. Mechanism. State the communication process: who sends/receives what, through which channel, with what cognitive/affective/social step that produces the outcome. This is the mediator.
  3. Boundary conditions. Name the moderators — which audiences, messages, and contexts strengthen or reverse the effect. CR rewards "for whom / when," not just "whether."
  4. Hypotheses. Translate the mechanism into explicit, numbered hypotheses (and research questions where theory is thin): H1 (effect), H2 (mediation path), H3 (moderation). These become the tests in commres-research-design and commres-data-analysis.

The mediation/moderation core (CR-specific)

CR is the home of process models — message → mediator → outcome, conditioned by moderators. State the causal ordering the model assumes and how the design licenses it: a mediator measured on the same cross-sectional wave as the outcome cannot carry a causal-process claim (defer the temporal warrant to design). Pre-specify the indirect-effect test; do not fit a PROCESS model post hoc and narrate it as theory.

The theory-contribution bar at CR (calibration anchor, hedged)

A common substantive rejection is "theory cited but not advanced." Citing a theory is not moving it. Calibrate where a paper sits:

LevelWhat the paper does to theoryCR verdict (typical)
Appliesuses an existing framing/priming/cultivation account as-israrely enough alone
Extendsadds a moderator/boundary condition to a known effectcompetitive if consequential
Specifiesopens a mediating process a prior account left as a black boxstrong fit
Adjudicatespits two mechanisms and lets the data choosehigh-end contribution

The bar is the tested theoretical move, not the method. A heuristic, not an editorial rule.

Show full SKILL.md (247 more words)Show less

Reviewer-pushback patterns and the theory-level fix

Referee commentUnderlying gapFix at the argument stage
"Theory cited but not advanced"applies, does not extendname the boundary or black box the study opens
"Effect without a mechanism"no mediatorstate the cognitive/affective/social step and a mediation hypothesis
"Why doesn't this travel?"boundary conditions absentspecify moderators where the effect holds and breaks
"Construct slippage"measured thing isn't the constructre-anchor the definition; split from neighbors; revisit the scale
"HARKing suspected"hypotheses look post hocpreregister; present theory before results, RQs where theory is thin

Worked micro-example: from effect to mechanism (illustrative)

A study finds gain-framed vaccine messages raise intention more than loss-framed ones — a bare effect. Lifted to a CR argument: framing shifts perceived response-efficacy (mediator, H2), which raises intention (H1); the path is stronger for low-prior-knowledge audiences (moderator, H3). The constructs are defined and distinguished from "perceived threat," the indirect effect is pre-specified with bootstrap CIs, and the moderator gives a "for whom" — a portable, tested mechanism rather than a re-documented framing effect.

Anti-patterns

  • "Hypothesizing after results are known" (HARKing) — state hypotheses before tests; preregister
  • A main effect with no mediator/moderator — CR wants the process and the boundary
  • Mechanisms named but never made into a testable, numbered hypothesis
  • Universal claims with no boundary conditions (which audiences? which messages? which contexts?)
  • A PROCESS model whose causal ordering the design cannot support

Output format

【Core claim】one sentence
【Mechanism】the communication process (the mediator)
【Constructs】defined + distinguished from neighbors
【Hypotheses】H1 (effect) / H2 (mediation) / H3 (moderation) → research-design
【Boundary conditions】which audiences / messages / contexts
【Causal-ordering warrant】how the design licenses the process claim
【Next】commres-research-design

Supplementary resources

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Communication-Research-Skills/skills/commres-theory-building of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Commres Theory Building next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Commres Theory Building compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Commres Theory Building this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Dispute Issue IdentificationTHUYRan/Legal-Skills-Chinese874—~2.4kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Rje Topic Selectionfranklee16/academic-research-skills2231 repos~792Automated safety check: PassNone
Litigation Deadline Calendarlawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills847—~4.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Moot Court Simulation Buildercat-xierluo/legal-skills721—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassCC-BY-NC-4.0
Intake To Draftstella/stella259—~537Automated safety check: PassApache-2.0

Similar skills

  • Dispute Issue Identification

    THUYRan/Legal-Skills-Chinese

    Dispute-issue identification means, after legal-element extraction, extracting the issues in dispute from the legal facts and further converting case relationships into questions of legal…

    874 GitHub stars~2.4k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Rje Topic Selection

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    A skill your agent uses to test whether a research question fits The RAND Journal of Economics (RJE) — the flagship industrial-organization journal with a deliberately narrow applied-microeconomics…

    223 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~792 tokens
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Litigation Deadline Calendar

    lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills

    Calendar litigation and arbitration deadlines from a scheduling order.

    847 GitHub stars~4.3k tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Moot Court Simulation Builder

    cat-xierluo/legal-skills

    Chinese-language skill that organizes a case file into a multi-role mock trial with judge, parties and clerk, producing a transcript, issue review and a to-strengthen list.

    721 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Intake To Draft

    stella/stella

    Collects the facts of an unpaid invoice, then drafts a payment demand letter.

    259 GitHub stars~537 tokensUpdated today
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Nla Arbitrate

    internet-court/internet-court-skill

    Manually arbitrate NLA escrow fulfillments as an alternative to the automated oracle.

    6.6k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~866 tokens
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Commres Theory Building

What does Commres Theory Building do?

A skill your agent uses when building the theoretical argument and hypotheses of a Communication Research (CR) manuscript into a testable, mechanism-level contribution. Commres Theory Building is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when building the theoretical argument and hypotheses of a Communication Research (CR) manuscript into a testable, mechanism-level contribution.

When should I use Commres Theory Building?

Commres Theory Building fits situations like: building the theoretical argument and hypotheses of a Communication Research (CR) manuscript into a testable; mechanism-level contribution.

How do I install Commres Theory Building in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill commres-theory-building -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Communication-Research-Skills/skills/commres-theory-building in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/commres-theory-building in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Commres Theory Building in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill commres-theory-building -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Communication-Research-Skills/skills/commres-theory-building in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/commres-theory-building in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Commres Theory Building in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill commres-theory-building -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/commres-theory-building, .gemini/skills/commres-theory-building, .github/skills/commres-theory-building and .opencode/skills/commres-theory-building in your project.

What does Commres Theory Building need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Commres Theory Building is instructions for the agent only.

Does Commres Theory Building access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Commres Theory Building safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Commres Theory Building use?

Commres Theory Building is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Commres Theory Building use?

About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Commres Theory Building?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Commres Theory Building: Dispute Issue Identification (THUYRan/Legal-Skills-Chinese, 874 stars), Rje Topic Selection (franklee16/academic-research-skills, 223 stars), Litigation Deadline Calendar (lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills, 847 stars) and Moot Court Simulation Builder (cat-xierluo/legal-skills, 721 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Commres Theory Building?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.