A skill your agent uses when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a Journal-of-Finance-and-Economics (《财经研究》) manuscript.

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Cfe Literature Review

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cfe-literature-review -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cfe-literature-review --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Finance-and-Economics-Skills/skills/cfe-literature-review .claude/skills/cfe-literature-review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
cfe-literature-review
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~658 tokens
SKILL.md length
115 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a Journal-of-Finance-and-Economics (《财经研究》) manuscript.

  • Works in 3 steps: 第一层:理论文献(英文为主,少量经典中文)——建立问题的理论坐标 → 第二层:实证文献(中英并重)——梳理已有实证发现与分歧 → 第三层:本文位置——明确指出"本文与现有研究的差异"
  • Revising the literature-review section for a Journal-of-Finance-and-Economics (《财经研究》) manuscript
  • SKILL.md covers 触发时机, 结构规范, 中英文献配比 and 必引避坑清单, plus 6 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Cfe Literature Review is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a Journal-of-Finance-and-Economics (《财经研究》) manuscript. 使用时机:综述缺经典理论文献、中英文献配比失衡、写成罗列式而非对话式、"本文位置"段落空泛、或未与本刊近 3 年同主题文章对话时。Covers the three-layer structure(理论—实证—本文位置)、中英配比经验值、对话式改写对照、检索本刊近文的固定动作,以及综述向边际贡献段的衔接模板。

Its SKILL.md is about 660 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Literature review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Revising the literature-review section for a Journal-of-Finance-and-Economics (《财经研究》) manuscript
  • Tasks that involve Literature review

Example prompts

  • “/cfe-literature-review”

Workflow steps

3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. 第一层:理论文献(英文为主,少量经典中文)——建立问题的理论坐标
  2. 第二层:实证文献(中英并重)——梳理已有实证发现与分歧
  3. 第三层:本文位置——明确指出"本文与现有研究的差异"

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Cfe Literature Review loads about 658 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 74 tokens; SKILL.md has 115 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~74
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~658

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 115 words, ~658 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/cfe-literature-review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
cfe-literature-review
description
Use when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a Journal-of-Finance-and-Economics (《财经研究》) manuscript. 使用时机:综述缺经典理论文献、中英文献配比失衡、写成罗列式而非对话式、"本文位置"段落空泛、或未与本刊近 3 年同主题文章对话时。Covers the three-layer structure(理论—实证—本文位置)、中英配比经验值、对话式改写对照、检索本刊近文的固定动作,以及综述向边际贡献段的衔接模板。

财经研究文献综述(cfe-literature-review)

触发时机

  • 综述缺中文经典,或全部是英文文献
  • 综述缺理论文献(《财经研究》审稿人常挑这一点)
  • 综述写成了"罗列式"而非"对话式"
  • 没有与近 3 年同主题中文文献(含本刊)对话

结构规范

《财经研究》偏好三层结构的综述:

  1. 第一层:理论文献(英文为主,少量经典中文)——建立问题的理论坐标
  2. 第二层:实证文献(中英并重)——梳理已有实证发现与分歧
  3. 第三层:本文位置——明确指出"本文与现有研究的差异"
与纯理论期刊的差异

《财经研究》是综合性财经期刊,综述既要理论文献到位,又要与同领域中文实证文献充分对话。一篇按方向归属(如公司财务、公共财政、产业组织)该引的经典理论或经典实证若缺位,会被审稿人挑出"理论定位不清"。

中英文献配比

经验法则(具体以稿件方向为准):

  • 总引文约 50–100 条
  • 中文文献占比 30%–50%(不能 <20%)
  • 理论文献占比 ≥ 20%(不是实证应用,是理论推导或综述)
  • 五年内文献占比 ≥ 40%
  • 高水平期刊文献占比 ≥ 35%(顶级英文期刊 + 经济研究 / 管理世界 / 经济学(季刊)/ 财经研究本刊等)

必引避坑清单

  • 是否引用了所属理论分支的经典理论文献?(不是教科书,而是原始 paper)
  • 是否引用了近 3 年高水平期刊的同主题论文?
  • 是否引用了相关的中文经典 / 综述?(含《财经研究》同主题近文)
  • 引用是否覆盖三类:理论、方法、本土实证?
  • 是否避免了"自引扎堆"?(自引 ≤ 3 条)

综述句式模板

[作者 (年份)] 利用[数据 / 方法]研究了[问题],发现……。
然而,该研究[局限],未考虑[本文要补的空白]。
与之相比,本文……。

每段综述至少出现一次"与之相比 / 区别于 / 本文延伸了 / 本文补充了"。

对话式 vs 罗列式

《财经研究》偏好对话式综述(研究之间相互回应),而非罗列式(按作者顺序点名)。

错误(罗列式)

张三(2020)研究了减税政策,李四(2021)研究了企业投资,王五(2022)研究了融资约束。

正确(对话式 — 按主题分组、表明分歧、给出本文位置)

减税政策如何影响企业投资是近年的研究热点(张三,2020;李四,2021),但这类研究多假设融资约束外生,对减税通过缓解融资约束影响投资的渠道关注有限。少数研究尝试从融资约束切入(王五,2022),但其数据局限于上市公司大样本。本文沿这一思路,使用工企与税收调查匹配数据,进一步考察了非上市中小企业的投资响应。

判断标准:把作者名都隐去后,综述还能读出"研究 A 怎么说、研究 B 怎么反驳、本文怎么定位",就是对话式。

与本文贡献阐述衔接

综述末尾必须导出本文的差异化定位,模板:

本文与现有文献的重要区别体现在以下几个方面: 第一,[识别策略上的差异]; 第二,[数据或样本上的差异]; 第三,[机制或异质性上的差异]。 与《财经研究》近期发表的 XXX(作者,202X)一文相比,本文 ……

与本刊已发表文章对比是审稿人的关注点——综述若不提近 3 年本刊同主题文章,会被视为"未充分对话"。

检索本刊近文的固定动作
  • 到上海财经大学期刊社官网(qks.sufe.edu.cn 的 CJYJ 目录)或知网按主题词检索近 3 年本刊目录;
  • 至少通读 2–3 篇同主题近文的引言与机制部分,记下其数据、识别来源与结论方向;
  • 对话时写差异而非优劣——从数据覆盖、识别来源、机制层次三个维度择一展开即可;
  • 若本刊近 3 年确无同主题文章,改与栏目内相邻主题对话,并点明该主题在本刊尚属空白——这本身就是投本刊的理由之一。

"本文位置"段改写对照

定位段是综述的落点,最忌"已有研究丰富但仍有不足"式虚写:

改写前:综上所述,已有文献对该问题进行了丰富的研究,但仍存在一定不足,本文在此基础上进行了拓展。

改写后:已有研究在两点上尚未达成一致:其一,该效应的方向在上市公司样本与全行业样本中相反;其二,机制证据多止步于相关性。本文利用政策推开的时点差异重新识别该效应,并把机制检验前移到"处理→机制变量"的因果链上;与《财经研究》近年刊发的同主题研究相比,本文样本从上市公司扩展到规模以上工业企业,结论可外推的企业范围明显扩大。

判断标准:定位段的每个分句都应指向一个可检验的差异(样本、识别、机制),而不是形容词。

反模式

  • 把综述写成"教科书式知识介绍"
  • 综述完全围绕实证,无理论文献
  • 中文文献只引一两条凑数
  • 综述里出现 [27, 28, 29, 30, 31] 这种 5 个并列引用 —— 拆开按贡献分述
  • 自引超过 5 条

输出格式

【结构】三层 / 两层 / 一层
【中英配比】中文 X% / 英文 Y%
【理论文献占比】X%
【五年内文献比例】X%
【高水平期刊比例】X%
【本刊同主题对话】有 / 无
【缺漏清单】[...]
【下一步】cfe-identification

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-Finance-and-Economics-Skills/skills/cfe-literature-review of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Cfe Literature Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Cfe Literature Review compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Cfe Literature Review this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~658Automated safety check: PassMIT
Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills47k2 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Systematic Review ScreenerImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~8.4kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Literature Reviewneflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent12620 repos~5.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Preprint Search on bioRxivLigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper73912 repos~3.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~16kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence

Similar skills

  • Nature Paper Card

    Yuan1z0825/nature-skills

    Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Systematic Review Screener

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Screens records for systematic, scoping and rapid reviews against fixed eligibility rules, using two blinded AI reviewers and a third adjudicator, with traceable PRISMA counts.

    51k GitHub stars~8.4k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Literature Review

    neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent

    Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).

    126 GitHub starsUsed in 20 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Preprint Search on bioRxiv

    LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper

    Searches bioRxiv life sciences preprints by keyword, author, date range or category with a Python script, returning JSON metadata and optional PDF downloads.

    739 GitHub starsUsed in 12 repos~3.7k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Academic Paper Writing Pipeline

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.

    51k GitHub stars~16k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Deep Research Workflow

    TokenRhythm/opensquilla

    Runs multi-round research in three stages with a persisted state file, evidence tracking and a long-form report with per-claim citations.

    7.1k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Cfe Literature Review

What does Cfe Literature Review do?

A skill your agent uses when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a Journal-of-Finance-and-Economics (《财经研究》) manuscript. Cfe Literature Review is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a Journal-of-Finance-and-Economics (《财经研究》) manuscript.

When should I use Cfe Literature Review?

Cfe Literature Review fits situations like: revising the literature-review section for a Journal-of-Finance-and-Economics (《财经研究》) manuscript; tasks that involve Literature review.

How do I install Cfe Literature Review in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cfe-literature-review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Finance-and-Economics-Skills/skills/cfe-literature-review in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/cfe-literature-review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Cfe Literature Review in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cfe-literature-review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Finance-and-Economics-Skills/skills/cfe-literature-review in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/cfe-literature-review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Cfe Literature Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cfe-literature-review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/cfe-literature-review, .gemini/skills/cfe-literature-review, .github/skills/cfe-literature-review and .opencode/skills/cfe-literature-review in your project.

What does Cfe Literature Review need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Cfe Literature Review is instructions for the agent only.

Does Cfe Literature Review access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Cfe Literature Review safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Cfe Literature Review use?

Cfe Literature Review is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Cfe Literature Review use?

About 658 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 2.6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Cfe Literature Review?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Cfe Literature Review: Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars), Systematic Review Screener (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars), Literature Review (neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent, 126 stars) and Preprint Search on bioRxiv (LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper, 739 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Cfe Literature Review?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.