A skill your agent uses when drafting or revising an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper — writing a self-standing two-page extended abstract for the…

MITAuto-check passedWriting & Content

Install Atc Writing Style

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill atc-writing-style -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills atc-writing-style --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/ATC-Skills/skills/atc-writing-style .claude/skills/atc-writing-style && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
atc-writing-style
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
612 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when drafting or revising an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper — writing a self-standing two-page extended abstract for the…

  • Works in 5 steps: The systems problem — a pain a builder… → Why the current design is inadequate —… → The contribution — the system or… → …
  • Revising an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference
  • SKILL.md covers The self-standing extended…, The full-paper arc, Report costs beside gains (the… and Page-budget discipline (two…, plus 3 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Atc Writing Style is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting or revising an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper — writing a self-standing two-page extended abstract for the round-one gate, structuring the implementation-and-measurement narrative, reporting costs beside gains, and holding the two-column 12-page budget.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Writing & Content, covering Brand voice and tone and Scientific writing. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Revising an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference
  • Formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper — writing a self-standing two-page extended abstract for the round-one gate
  • Structuring the implementation-and-measurement narrative
  • Reporting costs beside gains

Example prompts

  • “/atc-writing-style”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. The systems problem — a pain a builder or operator recognizes, in the first breath.
  2. Why the current design is inadequate — the specific limitation your work removes.
  3. The contribution — the system or technique, stated as what it does, not "novel."
  4. The evidence — the real testbed and the headline result (with the metric that matters, e.g.,
  5. The honest cost — what the design trades away, named not hidden.

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Atc Writing Style loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 85 tokens; SKILL.md has 612 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~85
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 612 words, ~1,300 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/atc-writing-style/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
atc-writing-style
description
Use when drafting or revising an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper — writing a self-standing two-page extended abstract for the round-one gate, structuring the implementation-and-measurement narrative, reporting costs beside gains, and holding the two-column 12-page budget.

ATC Writing Style

Write for two audiences in two rounds. In round one, two reviewers read only your two-page extended abstract; in round two, 3-4 reviewers read the full paper. The abstract is review-only, not published, and must stand alone. So ATC writing has a demand no single-round venue makes: the paper's core argument must fit, self-contained, into two pages and expand faithfully into twelve.

The self-standing extended abstract (round-one surface)

A round-one reviewer who reads only the abstract should finish knowing:

  1. The systems problem — a pain a builder or operator recognizes, in the first breath.
  2. Why the current design is inadequate — the specific limitation your work removes.
  3. The contribution — the system or technique, stated as what it does, not "novel."
  4. The evidence — the real testbed and the headline result (with the metric that matters, e.g., tail latency, throughput at matched cost).
  5. The honest cost — what the design trades away, named not hidden.

Test it: hand the two pages to a systems colleague without the paper and ask them to state the problem, contribution, testbed, and result. If they cannot, the abstract will lose round one no matter how strong the paper is. A trimmed introduction can work only if it already reads self-contained.

The full-paper arc

ATC papers are implementation-and-measurement narratives:

  • Introduction: problem → inadequacy → contribution as systems claims → real-testbed evidence → what changes in practice. Lead with the systems contribution, not a trend sentence.
  • Design: the mechanism and the reasons for each choice, tied to the deployment constraint. Reviewers reward a design justified by the problem over one justified by novelty.
  • Implementation: enough that a reader believes it was built and could be rebuilt — scale (lines, components), integration points, and what was hard.
  • Evaluation: questions first, then answers. End-to-end results and microbenchmarks that isolate the mechanism; baselines that are fair; tails and variance, not just means.
  • Costs and limitations: report the trade beside the gain, ideally in the same figure/table. ATC reviewers trust evaluations that volunteer their costs.

Report costs beside gains (the ATC trust move)

Every systems design trades something — CPU on the fast path, memory, write amplification, warm-up, compatibility. The fastest way to earn a systems reviewer's trust is to quantify the cost in the same breath as the win, at a matched operating point (same budget, same load). Concealing the cost is the fastest way to lose it.

Show full SKILL.md (216 more words)Show less

Page-budget discipline (two columns, 12 pages)

  • ≤ 12 pages full / ≤ 6 short, excluding references and appendices, in two-column 10pt. The two-column format is denser than single-column ACM layouts — a figure-heavy systems paper fills it fast.
  • Recover space editorially, never by shrinking the font or margins (a desk-reject ground): cut redundant background, merge overlapping figures, and move non-decision-critical detail to an appendix (reviewers are not required to read appendices — see atc-supplementary).
  • Keep every claim that decides acceptance inside the body; the appendix and artifact hold support, not load-bearing evidence.

Systems-prose specifics

  • Name the testbed early — hardware (CPU/NIC/SSD models), OS/kernel versions, and workloads — so results are legible.
  • Quantify, don't adjective — "reduces p99 by X at matched throughput" beats "significantly faster."
  • Third-person self-citation for double-blind — never "our earlier system X"; write it as prior work by others.
  • Figures earn their space — each should answer an evaluation question a reviewer would ask.

Anti-patterns (ATC-specific)

  • A dependent extended abstract that only makes sense after reading the paper — a round-one loss.
  • Average-only evaluation with no tail or variance — reads as hiding the interesting cases.
  • Novelty-as-argument — asserting "novel" instead of motivating the design from the problem.
  • Costs quarantined in a late limitations paragraph instead of reported with the gains.
  • Template tampering to fit the page budget — recover space by cutting, not shrinking.

Output format

text
[Extended abstract] self-standing? problem/contribution/testbed/result/cost all present in 2 pages? yes/no
[Arc] problem -> inadequacy -> contribution -> real-testbed evidence -> what changes: complete? gaps?
[Evidence shape] end-to-end + microbenchmarks? tails + variance? fair baselines? costs beside gains?
[Budget] pages used (body/refs), two-column compliance, editorial cuts available
[Rewrite queue] <ordered edits, highest-leverage first — usually the abstract>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in ATC-Skills/skills/atc-writing-style of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Atc Writing Style next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Atc Writing Style compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Atc Writing Style this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Academic Venue Researchjoshua-zyy/academic-paper-writer115—~626Automated safety check: PassMIT
Scholar Polishjoshzyj/open-scholar-skill168—~12kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Anti Defensive WritingAdkid-Zephyr/anti-defensive-writing-Skill2.5k2 repos~535Automated safety check: PassMIT
Anti-Defensive Writing EditorKiterlin/anti-defensive-writing875—~3.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Academic Writing Assistantdonghuixin/AI-Vibe-Writing-Skills497—~616Automated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Academic Venue Research

    joshua-zyy/academic-paper-writer

    Research target venue requirements and writing style for CS/AI/ML papers.

    115 GitHub stars~626 tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Scholar Polish

    joshzyj/open-scholar-skill

    Personalize and refine academic manuscript writing style by injecting distinctive authorial micro-patterns (tiny topos).

    168 GitHub stars~12k tokensUpdated 22 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Anti Defensive Writing

    Adkid-Zephyr/anti-defensive-writing-Skill

    论文写作、修改、压缩和实验组织全流程中阻止【防御性写作】。把论文视为一场学术发布会, 而不是项目总结、实验日志或自我审查报告:识别这项工作最值得发表的价值,围绕它建立 最有利、最完整、最有说服力的叙事。不平均展示、不主动示弱、不写实验流水账、不替审稿人 攻击自己。

    2.5k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~535 tokens
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Anti-Defensive Writing Editor

    Kiterlin/anti-defensive-writing

    Edits drafts to strip needless caveats, hedges and disclaimers while keeping the limits that matter for accuracy, ethics, law, safety and method.

    875 GitHub stars~3.5k tokensUpdated 10 days ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Academic Writing Assistant

    donghuixin/AI-Vibe-Writing-Skills

    Drafts and revises academic prose in the author's voice, repairs sentence flow, traces systems-paper claims to evidence and prepares reviewer responses.

    497 GitHub stars~616 tokensUpdated 28 days ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed
  • Academic Paper Polish

    HKUSTDial/Supervisor-Skills

    Polishes academic prose without changing its meaning: grammar and flow fixes, tone matched to the evidence, AI-tone removal and Chinese-to-English rewriting for submission.

    8.8k GitHub stars~3.1k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Writing & ContentAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Atc Writing Style

What does Atc Writing Style do?

A skill your agent uses when drafting or revising an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper — writing a self-standing two-page extended abstract for the…. Atc Writing Style is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting or revising an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper — writing a self-standing two-page extended abstract for the round-one gate, structuring the implementation-and-measurement narrative, reporting costs beside gains, and holding the two-column 12-page budget.

When should I use Atc Writing Style?

Atc Writing Style fits situations like: revising an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference; formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper — writing a self-standing two-page extended abstract for the round-one gate; structuring the implementation-and-measurement narrative; reporting costs beside gains.

How do I install Atc Writing Style in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill atc-writing-style -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (ATC-Skills/skills/atc-writing-style in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/atc-writing-style in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Atc Writing Style in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill atc-writing-style -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (ATC-Skills/skills/atc-writing-style in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/atc-writing-style in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Atc Writing Style in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill atc-writing-style -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/atc-writing-style, .gemini/skills/atc-writing-style, .github/skills/atc-writing-style and .opencode/skills/atc-writing-style in your project.

What does Atc Writing Style need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Atc Writing Style is instructions for the agent only.

Does Atc Writing Style access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Atc Writing Style safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Atc Writing Style use?

Atc Writing Style is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Atc Writing Style use?

About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.2k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Atc Writing Style?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Atc Writing Style: Academic Venue Research (joshua-zyy/academic-paper-writer, 115 stars), Scholar Polish (joshzyj/open-scholar-skill, 168 stars), Anti Defensive Writing (Adkid-Zephyr/anti-defensive-writing-Skill, 2.5k stars) and Anti-Defensive Writing Editor (Kiterlin/anti-defensive-writing, 875 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Atc Writing Style?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.