Agent skill

Arpsych Topic Selection

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when judging whether a psychology topic is mature, important, and synthesis-ready enough to warrant an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review.

MITAuto-check passed

Install Arpsych Topic Selection

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-topic-selection -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arpsych-topic-selection --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-topic-selection .claude/skills/arpsych-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
arpsych-topic-selection
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.2k tokens
SKILL.md length
547 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when judging whether a psychology topic is mature, important, and synthesis-ready enough to warrant an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review.

  • Judging whether a psychology topic is mature
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, The three gates a topic must…, Scoping the topic to the volume and Sibling-venue triage (route…, plus 3 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Synthesis-ready enough to warrant an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review

What it does

Arpsych Topic Selection is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when judging whether a psychology topic is mature, important, and synthesis-ready enough to warrant an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review. Tests topic fit; it does not pitch the topic to the Committee (arpsych-proposal-and-commissioning) or gather the literature (arpsych-literature-synthesis).

Its SKILL.md is about 1.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Judging whether a psychology topic is mature
  • Synthesis-ready enough to warrant an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review

Example prompts

  • “/arpsych-topic-selection”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Arpsych Topic Selection loads about 1.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 83 tokens; SKILL.md has 547 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~83
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.2k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 547 words, ~1,168 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/arpsych-topic-selection/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
arpsych-topic-selection
description
Use when judging whether a psychology topic is mature, important, and synthesis-ready enough to warrant an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review. Tests topic fit; it does not pitch the topic to the Committee (arpsych-proposal-and-commissioning) or gather the literature (arpsych-literature-synthesis).

Topic Selection — Is This an ARPsych Topic? (arpsych-topic-selection)

When to trigger

  • A user wants to write "a review" and needs to know whether ARPsych is the right home
  • An invitation is possible but the angle on the topic is undecided
  • The candidate topic feels either too narrow (one lab's program) or too vast (all of memory)
  • You must distinguish an ARPsych-scale survey from a Psychological Bulletin meta-analysis

The three gates a topic must pass

ARPsych commissions reviews that the whole field will read for a decade. A topic earns a slot only if it clears all three:

GateQuestionFails when
MaturityIs there enough accumulated, settled-enough work to synthesize?The area is 3 papers old and moving weekly — premature; the review would date in a year
ImportanceWill cognitive/social/developmental/clinical/neuro/I-O readers and adjacent fields care?The topic matters only to one specialty's insiders
Synthesis-readinessIs the literature fragmented in a way a framework could resolve?The field is already tidy (a textbook chapter covers it) — nothing to add

A topic that is mature + important but already well-synthesized does not need an ARPsych review; the value is the new organizing idea, not the recap.

Scoping the topic to the volume

ARPsych articles have a length assigned in the invitation letter (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准) — typically a focused subfield, not an entire domain. Calibrate scope so the review is:

  • Comprehensive within its frame — a reader trusts it covers the relevant work (see arpsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance)
  • Bounded — "X across the lifespan" or "the mechanisms of X", not "everything about X"
  • Current — ARPsych prizes the recent frontier plus the foundational anchors; a pure history belongs elsewhere
  • Forward-looking — the topic must support a genuine future-directions close, not just a wrap-up

A good test: can you name, in one phrase, the organizing question the review will answer (not the area it will cover)? "How do X and Y jointly shape Z?" beats "research on Z."

Show full SKILL.md (232 more words)Show less

Sibling-venue triage (route away if mismatched)

If the topic is really…The home is…Tell
a stand-alone meta-analysis you want to run and submitPsychological Bulletinyou have an effect to estimate, not a field to map
a clinical-psychology surveyAnnual Review of Clinical Psychology (sister)the audience is clinical scientists specifically
a short, provocative argument or commentaryPerspectives on Psychological Scienceit is an opinion essay, not a survey of record
an original study with new dataa primary journalyou ran the study yourself

Checklist

  • Topic clears Maturity, Importance, and Synthesis-readiness gates
  • One-phrase organizing question is written (not just an area label)
  • Scope is bounded to a plausible single-article length (per invitation norms)
  • The topic supports a real future-directions agenda, not a recap
  • Not better served by Psychological Bulletin / ARClinPsych / Perspectives
  • Recent frontier + foundational anchors both exist in the literature
  • The new contribution is an organizing idea, not a summary of known facts

Anti-patterns

  • Proposing an entire domain ("emotion", "memory") — unscopeable in one review
  • Pitching a topic that is one lab's research program dressed as a field
  • Choosing a topic so new it cannot yet be synthesized (review will be obsolete fast)
  • Choosing a topic already covered by a recent ARPsych/Annual Reviews article (check the archive)
  • Confusing "I want to publish a meta-analysis" with "the field needs a review" (→ Psych Bulletin)
  • No organizing question — only a subject heading

Output format

text
【Organizing question】"<the one question the review answers>"
【Maturity / Importance / Synthesis-readiness】pass/fail each + why
【Scope】subfield + boundary (in/out) + plausible length
【Future-directions potential】Y/N — what the open agenda would be
【Sibling check】not Psych Bulletin / ARClinPsych / Perspectives because…
【Next step】→ arpsych-proposal-and-commissioning (get it to the Editorial Committee)

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-topic-selection of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Arpsych Topic Selection next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Arpsych Topic Selection compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Arpsych Topic Selection this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Importasgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks69k—~3.5kAutomated safety check: PassCC0-1.0
Marketing Psychologynexu-io/open-design100k—~317Automated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Nx Importnrwl/nx29k6 repos~3.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Type Only Importsthedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist74k—~558Automated safety check: PassMIT
Import Memoryasgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks69k—~2.7kAutomated safety check: WarnCC0-1.0

Similar skills

  • Import

    asgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks

    Handle explicit /import requests for read-only transcript recovery and a resume checkpoint, or continue work from other coding agents and unnamed artifacts.

    69k GitHub stars~3.5k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Marketing Psychology

    nexu-io/open-design

    Apply psychological principles and behavioral science to copy and design.

    100k GitHub stars~317 tokensUpdated today
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Nx Import

    nrwl/nx

    Import, merge, or combine repositories into an Nx workspace using nx import.

    29k GitHub starsUsed in 6 repos~3.5k tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Type Only Imports

    thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist

    A skill your agent uses when auditing import statements in TypeScript files, setting up a new TypeScript project, or investigating unexpected bundle inclusions from type-only dependencies.

    74k GitHub stars~558 tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Import Memory

    asgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks

    Import a memory export from another AI assistant into Claude's memory — conversationally, additively, and with the content treated as data.

    69k GitHub stars~2.7k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check: warnings
  • Hermes Imports

    affaan-m/ECC

    Convert local Hermes operator workflows into sanitized ECC skills and release-pack artifacts.

    276k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~752 tokens
    Auto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Arpsych Topic Selection

What does Arpsych Topic Selection do?

A skill your agent uses when judging whether a psychology topic is mature, important, and synthesis-ready enough to warrant an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review. Arpsych Topic Selection is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when judging whether a psychology topic is mature, important, and synthesis-ready enough to warrant an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review.

When should I use Arpsych Topic Selection?

Arpsych Topic Selection fits situations like: judging whether a psychology topic is mature; synthesis-ready enough to warrant an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review.

How do I install Arpsych Topic Selection in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-topic-selection -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-topic-selection in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/arpsych-topic-selection in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Arpsych Topic Selection in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-topic-selection -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-topic-selection in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/arpsych-topic-selection in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Arpsych Topic Selection in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-topic-selection -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/arpsych-topic-selection, .gemini/skills/arpsych-topic-selection, .github/skills/arpsych-topic-selection and .opencode/skills/arpsych-topic-selection in your project.

What does Arpsych Topic Selection need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Arpsych Topic Selection is instructions for the agent only.

Does Arpsych Topic Selection access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Arpsych Topic Selection safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Arpsych Topic Selection use?

Arpsych Topic Selection is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Arpsych Topic Selection use?

About 1.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.7k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Arpsych Topic Selection?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Arpsych Topic Selection: Import (asgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks, 69k stars), Marketing Psychology (nexu-io/open-design, 100k stars), Nx Import (nrwl/nx, 29k stars) and Type Only Imports (thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist, 74k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Arpsych Topic Selection?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,228 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.