Scientific Thinking Literature Review
affaan-m/ECC
Systematic literature-review workflow for academic, biomedical, technical, and scientific topics, including search planning, source screening, synthesis, citation checks, and evidence logging.
A skill your agent uses when judging whether a literature is an Annual Review of Economics (ARE)-scale review topic — mature, important, and genuinely in need of an authoritative, accessible…
MITAuto-check passed
Install Arecon Topic Selection
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-topic-selection -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arecon-topic-selection --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-topic-selection .claude/skills/arecon-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "arecon-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-topic-selection into .claude/skills/arecon-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arecon-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-topic-selectionType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-topic-selection -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arecon-topic-selection --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-topic-selection .agents/skills/arecon-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "arecon-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-topic-selection into .agents/skills/arecon-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arecon-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-topic-selection -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arecon-topic-selection --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-topic-selection .cursor/skills/arecon-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "arecon-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-topic-selection into .cursor/skills/arecon-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arecon-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-topic-selection--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-topic-selection -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arecon-topic-selection --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-topic-selection .gemini/skills/arecon-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "arecon-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-topic-selection into .gemini/skills/arecon-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arecon-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arecon-topic-selectionInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-topic-selection -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-topic-selection .github/skills/arecon-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "arecon-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-topic-selection into .github/skills/arecon-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arecon-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-topic-selection -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arecon-topic-selection --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-topic-selection .opencode/skills/arecon-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "arecon-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-topic-selection into .opencode/skills/arecon-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arecon-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
arecon-topic-selection- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.4k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 670 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when judging whether a literature is an Annual Review of Economics (ARE)-scale review topic — mature, important, and genuinely in need of an authoritative, accessible…
- Works in 4 steps: Maturity. There is a body of research —… → Broad importance. The questions matter… → Need for an accessible synthesis. A… → …
- Judging whether a literature is an Annual Review of Economics (ARE)-scale review topic — mature
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, What ARE is for, The four ARE-fit tests and Decision table, plus 4 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Arecon Topic Selection is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when judging whether a literature is an Annual Review of Economics (ARE)-scale review topic — mature, important, and genuinely in need of an authoritative, accessible synthesis — and framing the review's animating question. Decides fit; it does not gather the literature (arecon-literature-synthesis).
Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Judging whether a literature is an Annual Review of Economics (ARE)-scale review topic — mature
- Genuinely in need of an authoritative
- Accessible synthesis — and framing the reviews animating question
Example prompts
- “/arecon-topic-selection”
Workflow steps
4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Maturity. There is a body of research — multiple research lines, accumulated evidence, recognizable debates — not a handful of recent…
- Broad importance. The questions matter to economists generally, not only to a dozen specialists. ARE explicitly serves adjacent…
- Need for an accessible synthesis. A newcomer cannot currently get oriented without a guide, and existing entry points (a recent JEL…
- Tractable for ~25–40 pages. ARE reviews are substantial but not Handbook-length (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). One author/team must read and weigh…
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Arecon Topic Selection loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 82 tokens; SKILL.md has 670 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 670 words, ~1,387 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/arecon-topic-selection/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- arecon-topic-selection
- description
- Use when judging whether a literature is an Annual Review of Economics (ARE)-scale review topic — mature, important, and genuinely in need of an authoritative, accessible synthesis — and framing the review's animating question. Decides fit; it does not gather the literature (arecon-literature-synthesis).
Topic Selection for an ARE Review (arecon-topic-selection)
When to trigger
- You have a candidate field and need to know if it is "ARE-shaped"
- A topic feels either too narrow (a single-question review) or too sprawling (a whole subfield)
- You are deciding between ARE and a sibling outlet (JEL, JEP, a Handbook chapter, a field journal's review section)
- The literature is young/fast-moving and you suspect it is not yet ready for an annual-volume review
What ARE is for
ARE is the Annual Reviews economics survey series: a yearly volume of invited, authoritative review articles that are accessible to economists outside the subfield, not only to its specialists. The reader is a competent economist who wants to enter, teach, or locate the open questions of a field they do not currently work in. That reader profile — and the annual-volume cadence — sets the fit bar.
The four ARE-fit tests
A literature belongs in ARE when it passes all four. If it fails one, route accordingly.
- Maturity. There is a body of research — multiple research lines, accumulated evidence, recognizable debates — not a handful of recent working papers. A field still being born produces a premature review that dates within a volume cycle. (Fails → too young; wait.)
- Broad importance. The questions matter to economists generally, not only to a dozen specialists. ARE explicitly serves adjacent economists; a review that only its own subfield could love is a field-journal review, not an ARE article. (Fails → too niche.)
- Need for an accessible synthesis. A newcomer cannot currently get oriented without a guide, and existing entry points (a recent JEL survey, a Handbook chapter) have not already done the job. The value is the accessible map, not the list. (Fails → already synthesized; nothing to add.)
- Tractable for ~25–40 pages. ARE reviews are substantial but not Handbook-length (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). One author/team must read and weigh the relevant literature within that envelope. (Fails → carve a coherent axis, or it is a Handbook chapter.)
Decision table
| Situation | Verdict | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Mature, broadly important, needs accessible synthesis, fits ~25–40 pp | ARE-shaped | → arecon-proposal-framing |
| Important but immature | Not yet | revisit in a volume or two |
| Mature but narrow / specialist-only | Wrong venue | field-journal review section |
| Mature, important, but enormous and exhaustive | Wrong venue | Handbook chapter or JEL (deeper, longer) |
| Non-technical, policy-facing, short, lay-adjacent | Wrong venue | Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) |
Show full SKILL.md (282 more words)Show less
Framing the animating question
An ARE review is organized by a question about the field, not by a topic label. Before approaching the Committee, write one sentence of each:
- State-of-knowledge question: "What do we now know about X, and how confident should we be?"
- Why now: what makes a synthesis valuable for this volume — a wave of new evidence, a methodological shift, a policy debate, convergence or fracture of findings.
- Reader payoff: what an economist from an adjacent field can do after reading (enter the field, teach it, locate the open questions).
Checklist
- The field passes all four fit tests (maturity, broad importance, need, ~25–40 pp tractability)
- The animating question about the field is written in one sentence
- The "why now" is concrete (new evidence / method shift / policy salience), not "no one has reviewed this"
- The intended reader is the adjacent / non-specialist economist, and the payoff is stated
- You can name the 3–6 research lines the review must cover (a coverage skeleton)
- Checked it is not a JEP piece (non-technical, broad), a JEL survey (deeper/longer), or a Handbook chapter (exhaustive)
- You are not the field's only contributor — the review will not become a self-retrospective
Anti-patterns
- "No one has reviewed X" used as the sole justification — absence is not importance
- Reviewing your own research program under a neutral title (self-promotion; ARE referees punish this)
- Picking a field so new the review freezes a moving target before the volume prints
- A scope so broad it becomes a Handbook chapter; so narrow it is a field-journal review
- Confusing "topic" (a label) with "animating question" (what the review argues about the field)
- Planning to submit cold — ARE does not take unsolicited manuscripts (see
arecon-proposal-framing)
Output format
【Field】<the literature>
【Four tests】maturity / broad-importance / need-for-synthesis / ~25–40pp-tractable — pass or fail each
【Animating question】"What do we know about ___, and how sure are we?"
【Why now】<new evidence / method shift / policy salience>
【Reader payoff】<what an adjacent economist can do after reading>
【Coverage skeleton】<3–6 research lines the review must cover>
【Verdict】ARE-shaped / rescope / wrong-venue (→ JEL / JEP / Handbook / field review)
【Source status】verified URL / 待核实 / not asserted
【Next step】→ arecon-proposal-framing (get the topic to the Editorial Committee)© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-topic-selection of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Arecon Topic Selection next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arecon Topic Selection this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Scientific Thinking Literature Reviewaffaan-m/ECC | 276k | 1 repos | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Systematic Literature Review Builderbytedance/deer-flow | 84k | 2 repos | ~4.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Literature ReviewK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | 48k | 1 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Literature Discovery PipelineYuan1z0825/nature-skills | 47k | 2 repos | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Scientific Thinking Literature Reviewaffaan-m/ECC | 276k | — | ~734 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
Systematic Literature Review Builder
bytedance/deer-flow
Searches arXiv across many papers on one topic, extracts each paper's methodology and findings in parallel, and synthesizes a cited literature review.
Literature Review
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
Runs systematic, scoping or narrative literature reviews across PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv and Semantic Scholar, with citation checks and Markdown or PDF output.
Literature Discovery Pipeline
Yuan1z0825/nature-skills
Runs a daily literature pipeline: multi-source search, six-dimension scoring, fine reading, formatted delivery to a chat channel and archival of the notes.
Scientific Thinking Literature Review
affaan-m/ECC
学術、生物医学、技術、科学的なトピックに対するシステマティックな文献レビューワークフロー。検索計画、ソースのスクリーニング、統合、引用確認、証拠ログを含む。
Literature Search
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills
A skill your agent uses when the user asks to search for papers, review literature, find references on a topic, verify a paper exists, or build a bibliography.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Questions about Arecon Topic Selection
What does Arecon Topic Selection do?
A skill your agent uses when judging whether a literature is an Annual Review of Economics (ARE)-scale review topic — mature, important, and genuinely in need of an authoritative, accessible…. Arecon Topic Selection is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when judging whether a literature is an Annual Review of Economics (ARE)-scale review topic — mature, important, and genuinely in need of an authoritative, accessible synthesis — and framing the review's animating question.
When should I use Arecon Topic Selection?
Arecon Topic Selection fits situations like: judging whether a literature is an Annual Review of Economics (ARE)-scale review topic — mature; genuinely in need of an authoritative; accessible synthesis — and framing the reviews animating question.
How do I install Arecon Topic Selection in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-topic-selection -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-topic-selection in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/arecon-topic-selection in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Arecon Topic Selection in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-topic-selection -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Annual-Review-of-Economics-Skills/skills/arecon-topic-selection in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/arecon-topic-selection in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Arecon Topic Selection in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arecon-topic-selection -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/arecon-topic-selection, .gemini/skills/arecon-topic-selection, .github/skills/arecon-topic-selection and .opencode/skills/arecon-topic-selection in your project.
What does Arecon Topic Selection need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Arecon Topic Selection is instructions for the agent only.
Does Arecon Topic Selection access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Arecon Topic Selection safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Arecon Topic Selection use?
Arecon Topic Selection is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Arecon Topic Selection use?
About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Arecon Topic Selection?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Arecon Topic Selection: Scientific Thinking Literature Review (affaan-m/ECC, 276k stars), Systematic Literature Review Builder (bytedance/deer-flow, 84k stars), Literature Review (K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills, 48k stars) and Literature Discovery Pipeline (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Arecon Topic Selection?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,228 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.