Scientific Thinking Literature Review
affaan-m/ECC
Systematic literature-review workflow for academic, biomedical, technical, and scientific topics, including search planning, source screening, synthesis, citation checks, and evidence logging.
A skill your agent uses when judging whether a management/organization literature is an Academy of Management Annals (Annals)-scale review topic — mature, important, fragmented, and integrable into…
MITAuto-check passed
Install Amann Topic Selection
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-topic-selection -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills amann-topic-selection --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection .claude/skills/amann-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "amann-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection into .claude/skills/amann-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "amann-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selectionType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-topic-selection -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills amann-topic-selection --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection .agents/skills/amann-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "amann-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection into .agents/skills/amann-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "amann-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-topic-selection -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills amann-topic-selection --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection .cursor/skills/amann-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "amann-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection into .cursor/skills/amann-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "amann-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-topic-selection -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills amann-topic-selection --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection .gemini/skills/amann-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "amann-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection into .gemini/skills/amann-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "amann-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills amann-topic-selectionInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-topic-selection -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection .github/skills/amann-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "amann-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection into .github/skills/amann-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "amann-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-topic-selection -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills amann-topic-selection --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection .opencode/skills/amann-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "amann-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection into .opencode/skills/amann-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "amann-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
amann-topic-selection- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.5k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 714 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when judging whether a management/organization literature is an Academy of Management Annals (Annals)-scale review topic — mature, important, fragmented, and integrable into…
- Works in 5 steps: Maturity. There is a body of research —… → Importance / breadth of interest. The… → Fragmentation / need for integration.… → …
- Judging whether a management/organization literature is an Academy of Management Annals (Annals)-scale review topic — mature
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, The five Annals-fit tests, Decision table and Framing the animating problem, plus 3 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Amann Topic Selection is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when judging whether a management/organization literature is an Academy of Management Annals (Annals)-scale review topic — mature, important, fragmented, and integrable into a new framework — rather than a narrow review. Decides fit and frames the review's animating problem; it does not gather the literature (amann-literature-synthesis) or write the proposal (amann-proposal-framing).
Its SKILL.md is about 1.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Judging whether a management/organization literature is an Academy of Management Annals (Annals)-scale review topic — mature
- Integrable into a new framework — rather than a narrow review
Example prompts
- “/amann-topic-selection”
Workflow steps
5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Maturity. There is a body of research — multiple research streams, accumulated findings, recognizable debates — not a handful of recent…
- Importance / breadth of interest. The questions matter to management and organization scholars broadly, and to allied audiences…
- Fragmentation / need for integration. The literature is scattered, siloed, contradictory, or conceptually muddled — rival constructs…
- Integrability. You can see a plausible new organizing logic that would make the fragments cohere — a framework, a typology, a process…
- Tractable scope. One author/team can read and weigh the whole relevant literature in a single ~50-page review (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). Annals…
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Amann Topic Selection loads about 1.5k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 103 tokens; SKILL.md has 714 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 714 words, ~1,515 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/amann-topic-selection/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- amann-topic-selection
- description
- Use when judging whether a management/organization literature is an Academy of Management Annals (Annals)-scale review topic — mature, important, fragmented, and integrable into a new framework — rather than a narrow review. Decides fit and frames the review's animating problem; it does not gather the literature (amann-literature-synthesis) or write the proposal (amann-proposal-framing).
Topic Selection for an Annals Review (amann-topic-selection)
When to trigger
- You have a candidate literature and need to know whether it is "Annals-shaped"
- A topic feels either too narrow (a single-construct review) or too sprawling (a whole discipline)
- You are deciding between Annals and a sibling outlet — AMR, AMJ, Journal of Management, Journal of Management Studies, or an Annual Review
- The domain is young/fast-moving and you suspect it is not yet mature enough to review for Annals
The five Annals-fit tests
A literature belongs in Annals when it passes all five. Fail one and route accordingly.
- Maturity. There is a body of research — multiple research streams, accumulated findings, recognizable debates — not a handful of recent studies. A domain still being born produces a premature review that dates within a year. (Fails → too young; wait, or place a focused piece elsewhere.)
- Importance / breadth of interest. The questions matter to management and organization scholars broadly, and to allied audiences (organizational psychology, sociology of organizations), not only to a dozen specialists. Annals reaches across the field. (Fails → too niche; a field journal's review section fits better.)
- Fragmentation / need for integration. The literature is scattered, siloed, contradictory, or conceptually muddled — rival constructs, parallel streams that never speak to each other, conflicting evidence. The review's value is the integration, not the inventory. (Fails → already well-synthesized; nothing to add.)
- Integrability. You can see a plausible new organizing logic that would make the fragments cohere — a framework, a typology, a process model, a reconciliation. If you cannot imagine the spine, you have a topic, not an Annals review. (Fails → keep reading, or it is not yet an Annals piece.)
- Tractable scope. One author/team can read and weigh the whole relevant literature in a single ~50-page review (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). Annals reviews are long but bounded. (Fails → carve a coherent sub-domain.)
Decision table
| Situation | Verdict | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Mature, broadly important, fragmented, integrable, tractable | Annals-shaped | → amann-proposal-framing |
| Important but immature | Not yet | revisit in 2–3 years; place a focused piece elsewhere |
| Mature but narrow / specialist | Wrong venue | field-journal review section, or Journal of Management |
| Mature, important, but enormous (whole discipline) | Rescope | pick a coherent axis; → amann-organizing-framework to test the cut |
| You have new theory, not a review | Wrong venue | Academy of Management Review (AMR) |
| You have new data / hypothesis tests | Wrong venue | Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) |
Show full SKILL.md (324 more words)Show less
Framing the animating problem
An Annals review is organized by a problem with the field, not a topic label. Before proposing, write one sentence of each:
- The state-of-knowledge problem: "This literature has accumulated a lot, but it is fragmented/contradictory/conceptually confused in this specific way."
- The integrative payoff: the new way of seeing the field your review will deliver (the seed of the framework).
- The agenda: what becomes researchable after the review that was not before — Annals expects a forward-looking agenda, not a closing summary.
- The "attitude": where you will take a critical, potentially provocative position grounded in the evidence (the Annals house signature), not neutral description.
Checklist
- The literature passes all five fit tests (maturity, importance, fragmentation, integrability, tractable scope)
- The animating problem with the field is written in one sentence (not a topic label)
- You can sketch a plausible new organizing logic — the integrability test is met
- The "why now" is concrete (a wave of new work, a method shift, a fractured debate), not "no review exists"
- The intended audience is broad (management + allied fields), and the agenda payoff is stated
- You can name the 3–6 research streams the review must cover (a coverage skeleton)
- Checked it is not an AMR (new theory) or AMJ (new data) piece, nor a narrow field-review
- You are not the dominant contributor to this literature — the review will not be a self-retrospective
Anti-patterns
- "No comprehensive review of X exists" as the sole justification — absence is not importance or integrability
- Reviewing your own research program under a neutral-sounding title (self-promotion; review referees punish this)
- Picking a domain so new the review freezes a moving target
- A scope so broad it becomes an inventory; a scope so narrow it is a field-journal review
- Mistaking a topic (a label) for an animating problem (what is wrong with how the field is organized)
- Proposing a descriptive map with no "attitude" — Annals wants critique and an agenda, not a tour
Output format
【Literature】<the body of research>
【Five tests】maturity / importance / fragmentation / integrability / tractable-scope — pass or fail each
【Animating problem】"This field is fragmented/contradictory in ___ way"
【Integrative payoff】<the new way of seeing the field — seed of the framework>
【Why now】<new work / method shift / fractured debate>
【Agenda】<what becomes researchable after the review>
【Coverage skeleton】<3–6 research streams the review must cover>
【Verdict】Annals-shaped / rescope / wrong-venue (→ AMR / AMJ / field-review)
【Next skill】→ amann-proposal-framing (write the ≤5-page proposal)© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Amann Topic Selection next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amann Topic Selection this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Scientific Thinking Literature Reviewaffaan-m/ECC | 276k | 1 repos | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Systematic Literature Review Builderbytedance/deer-flow | 84k | 2 repos | ~4.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Literature ReviewK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | 48k | 1 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Literature Discovery PipelineYuan1z0825/nature-skills | 47k | 2 repos | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Claude Academy Guideanthropics/skills | 180k | 3 repos | ~1.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 |
Similar skills
Systematic Literature Review Builder
bytedance/deer-flow
Searches arXiv across many papers on one topic, extracts each paper's methodology and findings in parallel, and synthesizes a cited literature review.
Literature Review
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
Runs systematic, scoping or narrative literature reviews across PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv and Semantic Scholar, with citation checks and Markdown or PDF output.
Literature Discovery Pipeline
Yuan1z0825/nature-skills
Runs a daily literature pipeline: multi-source search, six-dimension scoring, fine reading, formatted delivery to a chat channel and archival of the notes.
- Official
Claude Academy Guide
anthropics/skills
Adds a matching Claude Academy course, tutorial or use case to the end of an answer about learning to use Claude, but only when the match is strong.
Scientific Thinking Literature Review
affaan-m/ECC
学術、生物医学、技術、科学的なトピックに対するシステマティックな文献レビューワークフロー。検索計画、ソースのスクリーニング、統合、引用確認、証拠ログを含む。
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Questions about Amann Topic Selection
What does Amann Topic Selection do?
A skill your agent uses when judging whether a management/organization literature is an Academy of Management Annals (Annals)-scale review topic — mature, important, fragmented, and integrable into…. Amann Topic Selection is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when judging whether a management/organization literature is an Academy of Management Annals (Annals)-scale review topic — mature, important, fragmented, and integrable into a new framework — rather than a narrow review.
When should I use Amann Topic Selection?
Amann Topic Selection fits situations like: judging whether a management/organization literature is an Academy of Management Annals (Annals)-scale review topic — mature; integrable into a new framework — rather than a narrow review.
How do I install Amann Topic Selection in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-topic-selection -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/amann-topic-selection in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Amann Topic Selection in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-topic-selection -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-topic-selection in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/amann-topic-selection in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Amann Topic Selection in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-topic-selection -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/amann-topic-selection, .gemini/skills/amann-topic-selection, .github/skills/amann-topic-selection and .opencode/skills/amann-topic-selection in your project.
What does Amann Topic Selection need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Amann Topic Selection is instructions for the agent only.
Does Amann Topic Selection access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Amann Topic Selection safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Amann Topic Selection use?
Amann Topic Selection is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Amann Topic Selection use?
About 1.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.1k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Amann Topic Selection?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Amann Topic Selection: Scientific Thinking Literature Review (affaan-m/ECC, 276k stars), Systematic Literature Review Builder (bytedance/deer-flow, 84k stars), Literature Review (K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills, 48k stars) and Literature Discovery Pipeline (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Amann Topic Selection?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,228 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.