A skill your agent uses when working with the Associate Editor and Editor of an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — scope alignment after a proposal is invited, what review-article…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Amann Editor Strategy

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-editor-strategy -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills amann-editor-strategy --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-editor-strategy .claude/skills/amann-editor-strategy && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
amann-editor-strategy
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
636 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when working with the Associate Editor and Editor of an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — scope alignment after a proposal is invited, what review-article…

  • What review-article referees evaluate
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, The editor relationship at…, How review differs for a… and Checklist, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Revision expectations

What it does

Amann Editor Strategy is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when working with the Associate Editor and Editor of an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — scope alignment after a proposal is invited, what review-article referees evaluate, and revision expectations. Plans the interaction; it does not run the portal preflight (amann-submission) or draft the response letter (amann-revision).

Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • What review-article referees evaluate
  • Revision expectations

Example prompts

  • “/amann-editor-strategy”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Amann Editor Strategy loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 91 tokens; SKILL.md has 636 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~91
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 636 words, ~1,405 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/amann-editor-strategy/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
amann-editor-strategy
description
Use when working with the Associate Editor and Editor of an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — scope alignment after a proposal is invited, what review-article referees evaluate, and revision expectations. Plans the interaction; it does not run the portal preflight (amann-submission) or draft the response letter (amann-revision).

Editor & Referee Strategy for a Review (amann-editor-strategy)

When to trigger

  • A proposal was invited and you are aligning the full review's scope with the editor
  • You want to anticipate what Annals referees of a review push on (different from a paper)
  • The editor has asked you to expand, cut, sharpen the framework, or rebalance coverage
  • You are calibrating revision depth and the twice-yearly cadence

The editor relationship at Annals is unusually direct

Annals' process makes the editor your central partner — more than at most journals. The proposal is reviewed double-blind by the Associate Editors, but once invited, the full review forgoes double-blind and is developed primarily with the Associate Editor and Editor (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准). You are effectively co-developing the review with an expert editor who already endorsed the idea. Use that:

  • The proposal is the scope contract. The four headings you committed to (Focus / Related reviews / Review scope and process / New insights) define what was invited. Departing from them silently is the fastest way to lose editor confidence — renegotiate explicitly if the literature pushes you elsewhere.
  • Lead with the framework in every editor exchange. The editor invited a new way of seeing the field. Decisions about coverage, length, and balance should be argued from whether they strengthen the framework and agenda.
  • Surface conflicts of interest early. If a likely referee is a central author you must critique, tell the editor; it protects the process and you.
  • Calibrate the cadence. Annals runs on a twice-yearly proposal cycle and publishes two issues a year; full-review development and revision can be substantial and multi-round. Plan for real revision effort, not cosmetic edits.

How review differs for a review article

Annals referees do not check an identification strategy or replicate results — there are none. They evaluate the review as a review:

Referee questionWhat they are really checking
Is there a genuine integrative framework?the spine vs. an annotated bibliography (amann-organizing-framework) — the acceptance bar
Does it have "attitude"?a critical, agenda-setting position grounded in evidence, not a neutral tour (amann-writing-style)
Is the coverage complete and systematic?saturation + transparent search; can they name an omitted stream? (amann-literature-synthesis)
Is it balanced and fair?even-handedness across schools; no self-promotion (amann-evidence-standards)
Are the appraisals accurate?does the author characterize each study and its limits correctly
Is it the right scope?broad enough for general interest, but coverable in one ~50-page article
Show full SKILL.md (243 more words)Show less

Referees of a review are often the reviewed authors themselves — the people whose work you weigh will read how you weighed it. Balance and accurate attribution are therefore strategic, not just ethical.

A useful frame: the editor recruits referees partly to test the framework, coverage, and fairness, not to re-run statistics. A referee who finds "no real framework," who can name an omitted stream, or who feels their school was caricatured is the single most common cause of a major-revision verdict — all preventable upstream by amann-organizing-framework, amann-literature-synthesis, and amann-evidence-standards.

Checklist

  • Full-review scope reconciled with the invited proposal's four headings; departures renegotiated explicitly
  • Every editor exchange argued from whether it strengthens the framework and agenda
  • Anticipated the six review-referee questions (framework, attitude, coverage, balance, appraisal, scope)
  • Coverage-expansion asks evaluated against the framework before agreeing
  • Conflicts of interest (referees who are reviewed authors) flagged to the editor
  • Attribution and appraisals double-checked, knowing reviewed authors may referee
  • Revision depth and the twice-yearly cadence calibrated from official pages (volatile)

Anti-patterns

  • Treating the editor as a gatekeeper rather than a co-developer of an invited review
  • Drifting from the invited proposal's scope without telling the editor
  • Accepting every "please also cover…" until the review loses its framework and finish-ability
  • Mischaracterizing a reviewed author's work when that author may be your referee
  • Hiding a conflict of interest instead of disclosing it
  • Assuming an invited review gets a light revise; budgeting for cosmetic edits when substantial rework is normal

Output format

text
【Scope vs. proposal】full review reconciled with invited four headings? Y/N
【Framework-first】editor exchanges argued from framework/agenda strength? Y/N
【Referee anticipation】framework / attitude / coverage / balance / appraisal / scope — prepared each? Y/N
【Coverage asks】evaluated against the framework; accept/push-back plan? Y/N
【COI】reviewed-author referees flagged to editor? Y/N
【Cadence】revision depth + twice-yearly timing calibrated from official pages? Y/N
【Next skill】→ amann-submission (preflight) → amann-revision (after the letter)

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-editor-strategy of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Amann Editor Strategy next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Amann Editor Strategy compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Amann Editor Strategy this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Claude Academy Guideanthropics/skills180k3 repos~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Handsontable Cell Editor Developerhandsontable/handsontable22k—~3.8kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Editor Test Harvesterudecode/plate17k—~7.6kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Editor Harvest Planudecode/plate17k—~3.5kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Add Editor Packageelementor/elementor7.1k—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassGPL-3.0

Similar skills

  • Claude Academy Guide

    anthropics/skills

    Official

    Adds a matching Claude Academy course, tutorial or use case to the end of an answer about learning to use Claude, but only when the match is strong.

    180k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~1.9k tokens
    EducationAuto-check passed
  • Handsontable Cell Editor Developer

    handsontable/handsontable

    Guides building a new Handsontable cell editor through its four-state lifecycle, DOM setup, viewport-aware positioning and async validation, matching the grid's existing editor classes.

    22k GitHub stars~3.8k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Mine external editor repositories for portable editor-behavior tests with ClawSweeper-style discipline: multi-pass exhaustive inventory, confidence scoring, framework-specific skip reasons…

    17k GitHub stars~7.6k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Editor Harvest Plan

    udecode/plate

    Turn an editor-test-harvester report into one lane-specific execution plan, e.g.

    17k GitHub stars~3.5k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Add Editor Package

    elementor/elementor

    External: Add an Editor V2 package from a third-party plugin that injects UI or in-editor MCP tools.

    7.1k GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Photopea Embedded Editor

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Embed Photopea in web apps using photopea.js. An agent skill from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.5k tokens
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Amann Editor Strategy

What does Amann Editor Strategy do?

A skill your agent uses when working with the Associate Editor and Editor of an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — scope alignment after a proposal is invited, what review-article…. Amann Editor Strategy is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when working with the Associate Editor and Editor of an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — scope alignment after a proposal is invited, what review-article referees evaluate, and revision expectations.

When should I use Amann Editor Strategy?

Amann Editor Strategy fits situations like: what review-article referees evaluate; revision expectations.

How do I install Amann Editor Strategy in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-editor-strategy -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-editor-strategy in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/amann-editor-strategy in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Amann Editor Strategy in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-editor-strategy -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-editor-strategy in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/amann-editor-strategy in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Amann Editor Strategy in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-editor-strategy -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/amann-editor-strategy, .gemini/skills/amann-editor-strategy, .github/skills/amann-editor-strategy and .opencode/skills/amann-editor-strategy in your project.

What does Amann Editor Strategy need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Amann Editor Strategy is instructions for the agent only.

Does Amann Editor Strategy access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Amann Editor Strategy safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Amann Editor Strategy use?

Amann Editor Strategy is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Amann Editor Strategy use?

About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Amann Editor Strategy?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Amann Editor Strategy: Claude Academy Guide (anthropics/skills, 180k stars), Handsontable Cell Editor Developer (handsontable/handsontable, 22k stars), Editor Test Harvester (udecode/plate, 17k stars) and Editor Harvest Plan (udecode/plate, 17k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Amann Editor Strategy?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.