Spec Peer Review
pedronauck/skills
Run one requested external review of an approved spec, design doc, RFC, or detailed PRD; produce findings for user-selected incorporation.
A skill your agent uses when explaining or planning around AAMAS peer review, covering OpenReview review release, the double-blind rebuttal on preliminary reviews, area-chair discussion, the mixed…
Install Aamas Review Process
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aamas-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process .claude/skills/aamas-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "aamas-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process into .claude/skills/aamas-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aamas-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aamas-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process .agents/skills/aamas-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "aamas-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process into .agents/skills/aamas-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aamas-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aamas-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process .cursor/skills/aamas-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "aamas-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process into .cursor/skills/aamas-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aamas-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aamas-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process .gemini/skills/aamas-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "aamas-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process into .gemini/skills/aamas-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aamas-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aamas-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process .github/skills/aamas-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "aamas-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process into .github/skills/aamas-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aamas-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aamas-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process .opencode/skills/aamas-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "aamas-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process into .opencode/skills/aamas-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aamas-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
aamas-review-process- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~894 tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 387 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when explaining or planning around AAMAS peer review, covering OpenReview review release, the double-blind rebuttal on preliminary reviews, area-chair discussion, the mixed…
- Planning around AAMAS peer review
- SKILL.md covers Process model, Who reviews here, Scoring leverage table and Stage-by-stage realism, plus 1 more section
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- Covering OpenReview review release
What it does
Aamas Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when explaining or planning around AAMAS peer review, covering OpenReview review release, the double-blind rebuttal on preliminary reviews, area-chair discussion, the mixed game-theory, MARL, and systems reviewer pool, the public posting of reviews and decisions, and how acceptance criteria weigh the interaction contribution.
Its SKILL.md is about 890 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review and User stories. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Planning around AAMAS peer review
- Covering OpenReview review release
- The double-blind rebuttal on preliminary reviews
- Area-chair discussion
Example prompts
- “/aamas-review-process”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Aamas Review Process loads about 894 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 88 tokens; SKILL.md has 387 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 387 words, ~894 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/aamas-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- aamas-review-process
- description
- Use when explaining or planning around AAMAS peer review, covering OpenReview review release, the double-blind rebuttal on preliminary reviews, area-chair discussion, the mixed game-theory, MARL, and systems reviewer pool, the public posting of reviews and decisions, and how acceptance criteria weigh the interaction contribution.
AAMAS Review Process
Use this to reason about review-stage strategy. Reopen the current CFP, OpenReview group, author and reviewer instructions, and the code of conduct before making process claims; AAMAS review specifics move between editions.
Process model
- AAMAS runs submission and review on OpenReview under the IFAAMAS namespace in recent cycles.
- Reviewers evaluate technical correctness, the significance of the interaction contribution, the reality and rigor of the multiagent evaluation, clarity, reproducibility, and fit with agents-and-multiagent-systems scope.
- A rebuttal lets authors respond to preliminary reviews before the final decision; area chairs then synthesize.
- Accepted papers and their reviews are published, so the review record is durable and public.
- The most useful rebuttal gives the area chair a clean rationale for acceptance, not a point-by-point defense of every comment.
Who reviews here
- The pool mixes game theorists, multiagent-RL researchers, mechanism-design and social-choice specialists, and systems-minded reviewers; expect at least one to read the game definition and solution concept line by line.
- Because AAMAS is specialized, a paper is likely to meet a reviewer who works on exactly its subarea, so a vague equilibrium claim or an under-specified opponent set gets caught rather than skimmed.
- Borderline interaction papers usually fail on one of three edges: the result turns out to be single-agent in disguise, the solution concept is never pinned down, or the multiagent evaluation is thin (self-play only, no seeds, no held-out opponents).
Show full SKILL.md (156 more words)Show less
Scoring leverage table
| Review dimension | What raises it | What sinks it |
|---|---|---|
| Correctness | A stated game, a named solution concept, and a body-level proof sketch | Hidden information structure; an equilibrium asserted but never defined |
| Significance | A finding that only exists because agents interact | An incremental single-agent gain wearing a multiagent label |
| Empirical support | Experiments that probe strategy: held-out opponents, deviation tests | Self-play-only curves disconnected from the claim |
| Clarity | One notation source and a legible game description | Notation and payoff conventions that shift between sections |
Stage-by-stage realism
- Initial reviews: triage by what the area chair would weigh, not by reviewer tone.
- Rebuttal: windows are short; an early, precise reply anchored in submitted evidence beats a late exhaustive one.
- Decision: the area chair synthesizes, and one unanswered correctness or interaction-reality objection outweighs several resolved clarity complaints.
- Public record: assume the reviews and your rebuttal will be visible with the paper, and keep the exchange professional and concrete.
Output format
[Current stage] submitted / reviews / rebuttal / decision / camera-ready
[Decision actors] <reviewers / area chair / program chairs>
[Likely leverage] <correctness / interaction-reality / significance / experiments / clarity>
[Forbidden moves] <identity leak / new results / revised-paper upload if disallowed>
[Next response move] <one action>© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Aamas Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aamas Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~894 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Spec Peer Reviewpedronauck/skills | 634 | — | ~794 | Automated safety check: Pass | None | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence |
Similar skills
Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Questions about Aamas Review Process
What does Aamas Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses when explaining or planning around AAMAS peer review, covering OpenReview review release, the double-blind rebuttal on preliminary reviews, area-chair discussion, the mixed…. Aamas Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when explaining or planning around AAMAS peer review, covering OpenReview review release, the double-blind rebuttal on preliminary reviews, area-chair discussion, the mixed game-theory, MARL, and systems reviewer pool, the public posting of reviews and decisions, and how acceptance criteria weigh the interaction contribution.
When should I use Aamas Review Process?
Aamas Review Process fits situations like: planning around AAMAS peer review; covering OpenReview review release; the double-blind rebuttal on preliminary reviews; area-chair discussion.
How do I install Aamas Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/aamas-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Aamas Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/aamas-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Aamas Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/aamas-review-process, .gemini/skills/aamas-review-process, .github/skills/aamas-review-process and .opencode/skills/aamas-review-process in your project.
What does Aamas Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Aamas Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Aamas Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Aamas Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Aamas Review Process use?
Aamas Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Aamas Review Process use?
About 894 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 3.6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Aamas Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Aamas Review Process: Spec Peer Review (pedronauck/skills, 634 stars), Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars) and Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Aamas Review Process?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.