A skill your agent uses when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Aaai Experiments

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaai-experiments -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aaai-experiments --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-experiments .claude/skills/aaai-experiments && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
aaai-experiments
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
583 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation…

  • Auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee
  • SKILL.md covers Experiment audit, Claim-to-evidence ledger, AAAI-specific review pressure and Pre-rebuttal freeze rule, plus 4 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Including baselines

What it does

Aaai Experiments is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Reproducible research and A/B testing. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee
  • Including baselines
  • Statistical significance
  • Human evaluation

Example prompts

  • “/aaai-experiments”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Aaai Experiments loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 83 tokens; SKILL.md has 583 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~83
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 583 words, ~1,292 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/aaai-experiments/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
aaai-experiments
description
Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

AAAI Experiments

Use this before submission to ensure empirical evidence supports the AI contribution. AAAI reviewers may come from adjacent AI subfields, so experiments must be interpretable beyond one benchmark community.

Experiment audit

  • Map every experimental block to a claim in the introduction.
  • Compare against strong, recent, and fairly tuned baselines.
  • Include ablations that isolate mechanisms rather than removing multiple components at once.
  • Report uncertainty, variance, and statistical tests when small differences matter.
  • Test robustness to data split, prompt, seed, environment, user population, or distribution shift when relevant.
  • For human evaluation, document task, instructions, annotator pool, quality control, aggregation, and ethics/IRB status.
  • Report compute, hardware, data access, model size, and training/inference cost.

Claim-to-evidence ledger

Build this table before adding new experiments. It keeps the AAAI evidence package aligned with the main text and with the reproducibility checklist.

Manuscript claimRequired evidencePhase-1 risk if missingChecklist hook
New AI capabilitybenchmark + qualitative failure casesbroad reviewer sees only engineeringdatasets, metrics, baselines
Better mechanismsingle-factor ablationsgain looks like tuning luckablation and hyperparameter answers
Robust deploymentshift / seed / subgroup stress testresult seems brittlevariance, compute, environment
Social-impact or safety claimstakeholder, harm, and misuse analysisethical claim looks assertedethics, limitations, data access

For each row, mark ready / weak / missing and name the fastest fix that can be run before the supplementary-material deadline. Do not leave a claim in the abstract if its evidence row is weak.

AAAI-specific review pressure

  • Phase 1 reviewers need a fast reason to trust the evidence.
  • The reproducibility checklist must match the experiment descriptions.
  • AI for Social Impact and AI Alignment claims require stronger treatment of stakeholders, harms, risk mitigation, and scope.
  • New results usually cannot rescue the paper in rebuttal, so submit complete evidence upfront.
  • The AI-assisted review pilot is non-decisional, but it may surface checklist mismatches; make result provenance, seeds, data splits, and limits machine-readable enough that a human SPC/AC can quickly audit them.
Show full SKILL.md (260 more words)Show less

Pre-rebuttal freeze rule

Before submission, decide which experiments would be impossible to add later under AAAI's rebuttal constraints: missing baselines, missing seeds, missing supplement files, or missing reproducibility checklist answers. Treat those as pre-submission blockers, not rebuttal TODOs. The author response can explain and clarify submitted evidence; it should not depend on new results, URLs, or repaired supplementary files.

Evidence triage table

Because an AAAI reviewer from an adjacent subfield must trust your numbers quickly, classify each experimental block by how much weight it can bear and what would strengthen it.

BlockCarries the claim whenReviewer doubtCheap reinforcement
Headline benchmarkbeats tuned recent baselines"lucky seed"seeds, variance bars
Ablationisolates one mechanism"joint removal"single-factor toggles
Robustnessholds across split/shift"one setting"extra split or perturbation
Human evalprotocol is documented"rater bias"IRB note, inter-rater agreement

Common AAAI experiment rejects

  • Benchmark bump with no mechanism analysis, which a broad committee reads as engineering, not AI insight.
  • Baselines weaker than current open-source systems, so the comparison looks unfair.
  • A Social-Impact or alignment claim with no stakeholder, harm, or risk-mitigation evidence.
  • Results that rely on a closed API with no reproducible substitute for the checklist.

Worked vignette

A planning paper reports a single-seed win on one domain. Audit: the headline block "needs robustness" and "needs variance", so the fix before the deadline is five seeds with confidence intervals plus one extra IPC-style domain. Because new results cannot rescue this in rebuttal, the team runs both before submission and aligns the checklist's seed answer to the supplement.

Output format

text
[Claim] <paper claim>
[Evidence status] sufficient / needs baseline / needs ablation / needs robustness / unclear
[Fairness issue] <compute, tuning, data, prompt, metric, human eval>
[Checklist dependency] <what checklist answer this supports>
[Pre-rebuttal blockers] <missing evidence that must be run before submission>
[Fast fix] <experiment or analysis feasible before deadline>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-experiments of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Aaai Experiments next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Aaai Experiments compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Aaai Experiments this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Craft Experiment Designamplitude/builder-skills159—~522Automated safety check: PassNone
Hypothesis Testerjeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.8k—~2.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Modeling Strategy Guidewentorai/research-plugins2981 repos~2.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Experiment Designermohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.4k—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer2.4k2 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Craft Experiment Design

    amplitude/builder-skills

    Write a hypothesis, define success metrics, and plan a holdout strategy.

    159 GitHub stars~522 tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Hypothesis Tester

    jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace

    Structured hypothesis formulation, experiment design, and results interpretation for Product Managers.

    2.8k GitHub stars~2.6k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Modeling Strategy Guide

    wentorai/research-plugins

    Strategic statistical modeling, experimentation, and causal inference

    298 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.2k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Experiment Designer

    mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

    Design statistically rigorous A/B tests and interpret experiment results.

    1.4k GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Peer Review

    K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer

    Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.

    2.4k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Agent Research Aggregator

    Ar9av/PaperOrchestra

    Pre-pipeline aggregator that scans AI agent cache directories (.claude, .cursor, .antigravity, .openclaw) or any user-specified directory for experimentation logs, extracts insights and numeric…

    679 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.5k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Aaai Experiments

What does Aaai Experiments do?

A skill your agent uses when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation…. Aaai Experiments is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

When should I use Aaai Experiments?

Aaai Experiments fits situations like: auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee; including baselines; statistical significance; human evaluation.

How do I install Aaai Experiments in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaai-experiments -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-experiments in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/aaai-experiments in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Aaai Experiments in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaai-experiments -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (AAAI-Skills/skills/aaai-experiments in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/aaai-experiments in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Aaai Experiments in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaai-experiments -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/aaai-experiments, .gemini/skills/aaai-experiments, .github/skills/aaai-experiments and .opencode/skills/aaai-experiments in your project.

What does Aaai Experiments need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Aaai Experiments is instructions for the agent only.

Does Aaai Experiments access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Aaai Experiments safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Aaai Experiments use?

Aaai Experiments is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Aaai Experiments use?

About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.2k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Aaai Experiments?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Aaai Experiments: Craft Experiment Design (amplitude/builder-skills, 159 stars), Hypothesis Tester (jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace, 2.8k stars), Modeling Strategy Guide (wentorai/research-plugins, 298 stars) and Experiment Designer (mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills, 1.4k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Aaai Experiments?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.