Agent skill

Partnerships Architect

by borghei in borghei/Claude-Skills

Design strategic partnerships — technology, channel, co-marketing — and the programs that scale them.

MITAuto-check passedMarketing & SEO

Install Partnerships Architect

skills CLI
$ npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill partnerships-architect -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install borghei/Claude-Skills partnerships-architect --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/business-growth/partnerships-architect .claude/skills/partnerships-architect && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
partnerships-architect
GitHub stars
886
Token cost
~4k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,497 words
Files
7 (incl. scripts, references)
Skills in repo
354
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Design strategic partnerships — technology, channel, co-marketing — and the programs that scale them.

  • Works in 5 steps: What does success look like in 12… → What's their commitment level? Headcount… → What's the realistic pipeline in next 12… → …
  • Evaluating a partner
  • SKILL.md covers When to use this skill, Partnership types — the…, Partner evaluation framework and Partnership deal structures, plus 8 more sections
  • Runs Python scripts from its folder

What it does

Partnerships Architect is an agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills. Design strategic partnerships — technology, channel, co-marketing — and the programs that scale them. Use when evaluating a partner, picking a partnership type, designing a partner program, structuring a deal, or modeling ROI.

Its SKILL.md is about 4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 8 other files, including scripts and reference files (for example `references/partner-program-design.md`, `references/partnership-deal-structures.md` and `references/partnership-types.md`).

It sits in Marketing & SEO. The repository describes itself as: 385 AI skills, 77 expert agents, and 900 stdlib Python tools for every team: engineering, PM, marketing, C-level, compliance, business ops, research, and a LinkedIn toolkit… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Evaluating a partner
  • Picking a partnership type
  • Designing a partner program
  • Structuring a deal

Example prompts

  • “/partnerships-architect”

Requirements

  • Python 3

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. What does success look like in 12 months? If both sides can't articulate the same answer, you don't have alignment.
  2. What's their commitment level? Headcount assigned? Budget? Executive sponsorship?
  3. What's the realistic pipeline in next 12 months? Specific accounts? Or vague "we have customers"?
  4. Who's the day-to-day owner on each side? Names + tenure + reporting line.
  5. What happens if we don't hit our shared metrics? Course-correct? Wind down? Renegotiate?

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 4a698e8. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Ships 3 files in scripts/ (Python), which the agent can run.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Partnerships Architect loads about 4k tokens when it runs, and up to ~15k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 62 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,497 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~62
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~15k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); the scripts in this folder are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from borghei/Claude-Skills at commit 4a698e8, republished under its MIT licence (© borghei). 1,497 words, ~3,950 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/partnerships-architect/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 6 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
partnerships-architect
description
Design strategic partnerships — technology, channel, co-marketing — and the programs that scale them. Use when evaluating a partner, picking a partnership type, designing a partner program, structuring a deal, or modeling ROI.
license
MIT + Commons Clause
metadata.version
1.0.0
metadata.author
borghei
metadata.category
commercial
metadata.domain
business-growth
metadata.updated
2026-05-27
metadata.tags
partnerships, strategic-alliances, channel-strategy, tech-partnerships, partner-program, partnership-design, gtm

Partnerships Architect

End-to-end strategic partnership design and scaling: partnership type selection (tech integration vs channel vs OEM vs strategic), deal structures, partner program design (tiers, benefits, requirements), partner evaluation, and ROI modeling that justifies (or kills) a partnership investment.

This skill is provider-agnostic and works across SaaS, infrastructure, marketplace, and platform companies.


When to use this skill

SituationSkill applies
Evaluating a potential partnerYes — use scripts/partner_evaluation_scorer.py + evaluation framework
Picking partnership type for a specific opportunityYes — see partnership type decision tree
Designing a partner program from scratchYes — see partner program design + scripts/partner_program_designer.py
Structuring a specific partnership dealYes — see partnership deal structures
Modeling partnership ROIYes — scripts/partnership_roi_modeler.py
Auditing existing partner portfolioYes — use evaluation scorer across all partners
Per-deal partner economicsUse business-growth/channel-economics
Per-deal partner approvalUse business-growth/deal-desk
Writing the partner contractUse business-growth/contract-and-proposal-writer

Partnership types — the decision tree

Five primary partnership types. Different goals; different structures; different success metrics.

What's the primary goal of this partnership?

Grow our distribution reach
├── Customer-pays-them, they-pay-us → Reseller / Distributor / VAR
├── Customer-pays-us, we-pay-them → Affiliate / Referral
└── Joint sale to mutual customer → Co-sell

Embed our product in their offering
├── Customer doesn't see us (white-label) → OEM
├── Customer sees us as embedded → Embedded ISV / Powered-by
└── We're an option in their marketplace → Marketplace listing

Combine our product with theirs (better together)
├── Pre-integrated, certified → Tech / Integration Partner
├── Bundled offering → Solution Partner
└── Joint product (rare) → Joint Venture

Build market presence together
├── Joint events, content, PR → Co-marketing Partner
├── Industry positioning → Strategic Alliance
└── Standards / consortium → Standards Partner

Achieve a specific strategic goal
├── Block a competitor → Defensive partnership
├── Enter a new market → Market entry partnership
└── Acquire capability → Strategic alliance (often pre-acquisition)

See references/partnership-types.md for each type in depth: economic structure, contract patterns, KPIs, when each works / fails.


Partner evaluation framework

Not every potential partner is worth the investment. Use this framework before committing.

Six evaluation dimensions
DimensionWhat to assessScore (1-5)
Strategic fitDoes this partnership advance our strategy? Customer base overlap / vertical / region?
Economic potentialRealistic pipeline / revenue contribution over 24 months?
Partner credibilityBrand, financial stability, technical capability, customer references
Mutual commitmentAre they investing equally? Senior sponsor on their side? Resources committed?
Operational fitCan our systems / processes / culture work together?
Exit-abilityIf it doesn't work, can we wind down cleanly? Are we creating dependencies we can't reverse?
Scoring rubric
  • 5 — strong yes
  • 4 — yes with minor caveats
  • 3 — mixed; substantial uncertainty
  • 2 — weak; significant concerns
  • 1 — no; deal-breaker

Total 25-30: green-light; invest with confidence Total 18-24: yellow; structure carefully; small pilot first Total < 18: red; decline or substantially restructure

Use scripts/partner_evaluation_scorer.py --partner partner.yaml to score a specific potential partner.

Killer questions to ask

Before signing any significant partnership:

  1. What does success look like in 12 months? If both sides can't articulate the same answer, you don't have alignment.
  2. What's their commitment level? Headcount assigned? Budget? Executive sponsorship?
  3. What's the realistic pipeline in next 12 months? Specific accounts? Or vague "we have customers"?
  4. Who's the day-to-day owner on each side? Names + tenure + reporting line.
  5. What happens if we don't hit our shared metrics? Course-correct? Wind down? Renegotiate?

If you can't get clear answers, the partnership is wishful thinking.


Partnership deal structures

Different deal types call for different structures. Standard patterns:

Structure A: Standard reseller agreement
  • Term: 1-3 years, auto-renew
  • Discount: per published tier matrix
  • Exclusivity: usually non-exclusive
  • Termination: 90-day notice both sides
  • Use when: typical channel relationship
Structure B: Co-sell agreement (mutual customer)
  • Term: 1-2 years
  • Compensation: shared commission OR referral fee
  • Joint marketing commitment: optional
  • Use when: complementary offerings; existing or target shared customers
Structure C: OEM agreement
  • Term: 3-7 years (long; relationship-heavy)
  • Royalty / rev-share: % of partner revenue OR per-instance fee
  • Exclusivity: often partial (specific use case / market)
  • Source code escrow: usually required
  • Termination: complex (typically 12-24 months notice; transition rights)
  • Use when: deeply embedded technical relationship; high mutual investment
Structure D: Strategic alliance
  • Term: open-ended; reviewed annually
  • Resources committed: explicit (e.g., 2 FTEs per side, $X budget per year, joint roadmap session quarterly)
  • Governance: steering committee (executive sponsors meet quarterly)
  • Specific deliverables: joint product features, joint customer wins, joint thought leadership
  • Use when: 5+ year strategic relationship; not transactional
Structure E: Tech / integration partnership
  • Term: 1-3 years
  • Compensation: typically none direct; mutual value from joint customers
  • Certification process: defined (testing, documentation)
  • Marketplace listing: typically included
  • Co-marketing: optional but common
  • Use when: integration creates joint customer value; no direct revenue flow

See references/partnership-deal-structures.md for the full deal-structure templates with negotiation guides.


Partner program design

When you scale beyond a few partners, you need a program.

Three pillars of a partner program
PillarComponents
RecruitmentTarget partner profile; outreach motion; intake / qualification; onboarding
EnablementTraining; certification; technical resources; sandbox; partner portal; marketing materials
ActivationDeal registration; lead sharing; MDF / co-marketing; co-selling motion; quarterly business reviews
Standard program elements
  • Partner agreement (master): tenant-of-the-relationship
  • Tier structure (Authorized → Silver → Gold → Platinum): different benefits + requirements per tier
  • Deal registration: protect partner-developed opportunities
  • Certification program: train + test partners on your product
  • Partner portal: deal reg, MDF, training, marketing materials, lead sharing
  • MDF (Marketing Development Funds): co-funded marketing
  • Channel manager(s): 1 per 10-15 active partners
  • Annual partner conference: community building + recognition

See references/partner-program-design.md for the full program template including tier definitions, benefit / requirement matrices, and the "Year 1 / Year 2 / Year 3" maturity model.

Use scripts/partner_program_designer.py --org-spec org.yaml to generate a baseline program design based on company stage + ICP + target partner volume.


Partnership ROI modeling

Partnerships consume real investment. Headcount, MDF, technology, executive time. Model the ROI before committing.

ROI model template
3-year cumulative partnership P&L

Year 1 (investment year):
  Revenue from partnership: $X
  Costs:
    Partnership manager headcount: $200k
    Engineering integration (one-time): $300k
    Marketing / co-launch: $50k
    Partner enablement (content, training): $50k
    Travel / events: $30k
    TOTAL Y1 cost: $630k
  Y1 net: $X - $630k

Year 2:
  Revenue from partnership: $Y (growth)
  Costs:
    Partnership manager: $200k
    Engineering ongoing: $100k
    Marketing: $80k
    Enablement: $30k
    Travel / events: $40k
    TOTAL Y2 cost: $450k
  Y2 net: $Y - $450k

Year 3:
  Revenue: $Z (mature)
  Costs: $400k (stable)
  Y3 net: $Z - $400k

3-year cumulative net: ($X + $Y + $Z) - $1,480k

If 3-year cumulative net is negative, the partnership doesn't pay back. Common reasons:

  • Revenue estimates too optimistic
  • Forgotten costs (executive time, opportunity cost)
  • Partner under-performs on commitments
  • Market shift makes the partnership less relevant

Use scripts/partnership_roi_modeler.py --partnership partnership.yaml for the full model.


Clarify First

Before designing the partnership, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:

  • Partnership goal + type — distribution, embed (OEM/ISV), better-together (tech/integration), market presence, or strategic (selects the decision-tree branch and deal structure)
  • Single deal vs scaled program — structuring one partnership vs designing tiers/portfolio (determines deal-structure vs program-design output)
  • Partner specifics for evaluation — their pipeline expectation, commitment, and credibility (feeds the 6-dimension scorer and green/yellow/red call)
  • ROI inputs — expected revenue and the real costs (headcount, integration, MDF) (drives the 3-year P&L payback)

Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the deliverable.

Show full SKILL.md (543 more words)Show less

End-to-end workflows

Workflow: Evaluate a new partner opportunity
  1. Initial conversation with potential partner — understand their pitch
  2. Gather data for evaluation: their company, their pipeline expectations, their commitment
  3. Score using evaluation framework — scripts/partner_evaluation_scorer.py
  4. If score < 18: decline or pilot-scope only
  5. If score 18-24: pilot scope (3-6 months, limited investment)
  6. If score 25+: standard partnership agreement; full investment
Workflow: Stand up a partner program
  1. Define target partner profile (TPP): ideal partner attributes (size, vertical, region, capability)
  2. Pick partnership types in scope (resellers? OEM? tech partners?)
  3. Design tier structure — scripts/partner_program_designer.py
  4. Build foundational tools: partner portal, deal-reg, certification
  5. Recruit pilot cohort (3-5 partners) — manual, high-touch
  6. Iterate based on pilot feedback — usually 6 months
  7. Scale recruitment — content marketing, outbound, partner events
  8. Add channel managers as portfolio grows (1 per 10-15 active partners)
Workflow: Structure a specific partnership deal
  1. Identify partnership type using the decision tree
  2. Score the partner — scripts/partner_evaluation_scorer.py
  3. Pick deal structure matching the type
  4. Model ROI — scripts/partnership_roi_modeler.py
  5. Draft term sheet (key business terms)
  6. Negotiate — alignment on commitment, timelines, exit
  7. Legal review + contract — business-growth/contract-and-proposal-writer
  8. Internal approval — Deal Desk + CRO/CFO/CEO depending on scale
Workflow: Audit existing partner portfolio
  1. List all active partners + key data: revenue, costs, deals, tier
  2. Score each against evaluation framework — scripts/partner_evaluation_scorer.py
  3. Identify low-ROI partners — bottom quartile by contribution per investment hour
  4. Decide per partner:
    • Invest more (top quartile, expand commitment)
    • Maintain (middle, status quo)
    • Wind down (bottom; explicit timeline to exit gracefully)
  5. Quarterly review of portfolio with CRO

Anti-patterns

  • "Strategic" partnership that's actually transactional. If the only thing exchanging is money, it's transactional; call it that. Strategic means joint goals + shared roadmap + executive commitment.
  • Partner stack with no portfolio strategy. Signing every partner that asks. Quality > quantity. 10 productive partners beat 100 zombies.
  • No partnership owner. Partnership exists in nobody's job. It withers.
  • Resource asymmetry. You commit 3 FTEs; they commit 0.5. The partnership skews to their convenience.
  • Promises without commitments. "We'll do joint webinars." When? With what budget? Whose role to organize?
  • Open-ended exclusivity. "Exclusive in this region forever" without performance gates. Lose flexibility for nothing in return.
  • OEM deal with no source-code escrow. Customer-impact risk if your company goes away.
  • Strategic alliance with no governance. No quarterly review = no executive engagement = partnership drifts.
  • Partner program with no enablement. Partners can't sell what they don't understand.
  • Tier benefits that aren't worth tier requirements. Partners don't advance because there's no incentive.
  • Co-marketing dollars wasted on activities without pipeline. Great event, zero attribution.

Tooling outputs

ScriptInputOutput
scripts/partner_evaluation_scorer.pyPartner spec YAML6-dimension score (1-5 each), total, recommendation (green-light / yellow / red)
scripts/partnership_roi_modeler.pyPartnership spec YAML3-year P&L, payback period, sensitivity analysis
scripts/partner_program_designer.pyOrg spec YAMLRecommended program structure: tiers, benefits, requirements, headcount needed

All scripts: stdlib only, argparse CLI, JSON or markdown output.


References


  • business-growth/channel-economics — per-deal financial mechanics underneath partnership structure
  • business-growth/deal-desk — per-deal approval mechanics for partner-mediated deals
  • business-growth/pricing-strategy — pricing flexibility / floor for partner deals
  • business-growth/contract-and-proposal-writer — partner contracts (MSA, partner agreement, OEM agreement)
  • c-level-advisor/cs-cro-advisor — strategic-level partnership decisions
  • c-level-advisor/cs-ceo-advisor — board-level alliance decisions

© borghei, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 6 other files (scripts, references) in business-growth/partnerships-architect of borghei/Claude-Skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • references/partner-program-design.md
  • references/partnership-deal-structures.md
  • references/partnership-types.md
  • scripts/partner_evaluation_scorer.py
  • scripts/partner_program_designer.py
  • scripts/partnership_roi_modeler.py

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 4a698e8

Compare with similar skills

Partnerships Architect next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Partnerships Architect compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Partnerships Architect this skillborghei/Claude-Skills886—~4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Geo Fundamentalswasp-lang/wasp19k9 repos~861Automated safety check: PassMIT
Ab Testingcoreyhaines31/marketingskills54k3 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Hreflang and International SEOAgriciDaniel/claude-seo19k5 repos~3.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Referralscoreyhaines31/marketingskills54k2 repos~2.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
SEO GeoReScienceLab/opc-skills1.8k4 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0

Similar skills

  • Geo Fundamentals

    wasp-lang/wasp

    Generative Engine Optimization for AI search engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity).

    19k GitHub starsUsed in 9 repos~861 tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Ab Testing

    coreyhaines31/marketingskills

    When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program.

    54k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~3.1k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Hreflang and International SEO

    AgriciDaniel/claude-seo

    Audits, validates and generates hreflang tags for multi-language and multi-region sites in HTML, HTTP headers or XML sitemaps, flagging common code and return-tag mistakes.

    19k GitHub starsUsed in 5 repos~3.4k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Referrals

    coreyhaines31/marketingskills

    When the user wants to create, optimize, or analyze a referral program, affiliate program, or word-of-mouth strategy.

    54k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.6k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • SEO Geo

    ReScienceLab/opc-skills

    SEO & GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) for websites. An agent skill from ReScienceLab/opc-skills.

    1.8k GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~2.1k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Ad Creative

    LeoYeAI/openclaw-marketing-skills

    When the user wants to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative — headlines, descriptions, primary text, or full ad variations — for any paid advertising platform.

    1k GitHub starsUsed in 8 repos~3.4k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed

More from borghei/Claude-Skills

All 354 skills in this repo
  • Agent Harness

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Test and evaluation harness for AI agents — scenario suites, deterministic replay, regression diffing, cost and latency budgets.

    886 GitHub stars~3.1k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Agents In The Team

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Run delivery when AI coding and ops agents take tickets. An agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills.

    886 GitHub stars~4.2k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • AI Content Disclosure

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Check AI-generated marketing content and reviews for required disclosures under the EU AI Act, FTC rules and platform AI-label policies.

    886 GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • AI Prototyping

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Idea to AI-generated prototype to customer validation to engineering handoff.

    886 GitHub stars~3.6k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Analytics Engineer

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Analytics engineering across data modeling, dbt, transformation, and semantic layers.

    886 GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ansoff Matrix

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Ansoff Matrix — 4-quadrant framework for growth options: market penetration, market/product development, and diversification.

    886 GitHub stars~2.2k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Categories

Questions about Partnerships Architect

What does Partnerships Architect do?

Design strategic partnerships — technology, channel, co-marketing — and the programs that scale them. Partnerships Architect is an agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills. Design strategic partnerships — technology, channel, co-marketing — and the programs that scale them.

When should I use Partnerships Architect?

Partnerships Architect fits situations like: evaluating a partner; picking a partnership type; designing a partner program; structuring a deal.

How do I install Partnerships Architect in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill partnerships-architect -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (business-growth/partnerships-architect in borghei/Claude-Skills) into .claude/skills/partnerships-architect in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Partnerships Architect in Codex?

Run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill partnerships-architect -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (business-growth/partnerships-architect in borghei/Claude-Skills) into .agents/skills/partnerships-architect in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Partnerships Architect in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill partnerships-architect -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/partnerships-architect, .gemini/skills/partnerships-architect, .github/skills/partnerships-architect and .opencode/skills/partnerships-architect in your project.

What does Partnerships Architect need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Partnerships Architect needs Python for the scripts in its folder. Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Partnerships Architect access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Partnerships Architect safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. The check reads SKILL.md only: the scripts in the folder are not scanned, so read them before running anything.

What licence does Partnerships Architect use?

Partnerships Architect is published under the MIT licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Partnerships Architect use?

About 4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 16k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 11k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Partnerships Architect?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Partnerships Architect: Geo Fundamentals (wasp-lang/wasp, 19k stars), Ab Testing (coreyhaines31/marketingskills, 54k stars), Hreflang and International SEO (AgriciDaniel/claude-seo, 19k stars) and Referrals (coreyhaines31/marketingskills, 54k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Partnerships Architect?

borghei (a GitHub user) maintains it in borghei/Claude-Skills, which has 886 GitHub stars. The repository holds 354 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 7, 2026.

Source: borghei/Claude-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.