Agent skill

Org Health Diagnostic

by borghei in borghei/Claude-Skills

Cross-functional organizational health check scoring 8 dimensions on a traffic-light scale.

MITAuto-check passedMarketing & SEO

Install Org Health Diagnostic

skills CLI
$ npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill org-health-diagnostic -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install borghei/Claude-Skills org-health-diagnostic --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/c-level-advisor/org-health-diagnostic .claude/skills/org-health-diagnostic && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
org-health-diagnostic
GitHub stars
891
Token cost
~4.9k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,912 words
Files
4 (incl. scripts)
Skills in repo
354
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Cross-functional organizational health check scoring 8 dimensions on a traffic-light scale.

  • Assessing company health
  • SKILL.md covers Keywords, Clarify First, The 8 Dimensions and Scoring System, plus 11 more sections
  • Runs Python scripts from its folder; calls python
  • Preparing for board reviews

What it does

Org Health Diagnostic is an agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills. Cross-functional organizational health check scoring 8 dimensions on a traffic-light scale. Use when assessing company health, preparing for board reviews, identifying at-risk functions, or diagnosing cross-functional problems.

Its SKILL.md is about 4.9k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 4 other files, including scripts (for example `scripts/engagement_benchmarker.py`, `scripts/org_health_scorer.py` and `scripts/span_of_control_analyzer.py`).

It sits in Marketing & SEO. The repository describes itself as: 385 AI skills, 77 expert agents, and 900 stdlib Python tools for every team: engineering, PM, marketing, C-level, compliance, business ops, research, and a LinkedIn toolkit… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Assessing company health
  • Preparing for board reviews
  • Identifying at-risk functions
  • Diagnosing cross-functional problems

Example prompts

  • “/org-health-diagnostic”

Requirements

  • Python 3

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 4a698e8. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Ships 3 files in scripts/ (Python), which the agent can run.

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • python

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Org Health Diagnostic loads about 4.9k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 62 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,912 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~62
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4.9k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); the scripts in this folder are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from borghei/Claude-Skills at commit 4a698e8, republished under its MIT licence (© borghei). 1,912 words, ~4,939 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/org-health-diagnostic/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 3 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
org-health-diagnostic
description
Cross-functional organizational health check scoring 8 dimensions on a traffic-light scale. Use when assessing company health, preparing for board reviews, identifying at-risk functions, or diagnosing cross-functional problems.
license
MIT + Commons Clause
metadata.version
2.0.0
metadata.author
borghei
metadata.category
c-level
metadata.domain
organizational-health
metadata.updated
2026-03-09
metadata.frameworks
health-benchmarks, 8-dimension-model, cascade-analysis, stage-adjusted-scoring, graceful-degradation
metadata.triggers
org health, organizational health, health diagnostic, health dashboard, health check, company health, functional health, team health, startup health, health…

Org Health Diagnostic

Eight dimensions. Traffic lights. Real benchmarks. Surfaces the problems you do not know you have and shows how problems in one dimension cascade to others.

Keywords

org health, organizational health, health diagnostic, health dashboard, health check, company health, functional health, team health, startup health, health scorecard, health assessment, risk dashboard, cross-functional health, dimension cascade, stage benchmarks


Clarify First

Before generating, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:

  • Company stage (Seed / Series A / B / C+) — sets both the dimension weighting and the stage-adjusted benchmarks; a Seed company is not held to Series C standards
  • Which dimensions have data and the actual metric values — the diagnostic degrades gracefully, but it must know what's measured vs. missing to avoid scoring on guesses
  • The purpose and audience (internal prioritization, board review, QoQ comparison) — determines depth, whether cascade analysis is included, and the output format
  • Any known problem areas or recent shocks — focuses cascade analysis on where failures are likely propagating

Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.


The 8 Dimensions

Dimension Overview
#DimensionC-Suite OwnerCore Question
1Financial HealthCFOCan we fund operations and invest in growth?
2Revenue HealthCROAre customers staying, growing, and recommending us?
3Product HealthCPODo customers love and use the product?
4Engineering HealthCTOCan we ship reliably and sustain velocity?
5People HealthCHROIs the team stable, engaged, and growing?
6Operational HealthCOOAre we executing our strategy with discipline?
7Security HealthCISOAre we protecting customers and maintaining compliance?
8Market HealthCMOAre we winning in the market and growing efficiently?

Dimension 1: Financial Health (CFO)
MetricGreen (7-10)Yellow (4-6)Red (1-3)
Runway (months)> 189-18< 9
Burn multiple< 1.5x1.5-2.5x> 2.5x
Gross margin> 70%55-70%< 55%
Revenue concentration (top customer)< 10%10-20%> 20%
MoM growth rateAbove benchmarkAt benchmarkBelow benchmark
Dimension 2: Revenue Health (CRO)
MetricGreen (7-10)Yellow (4-6)Red (1-3)
NRR> 110%100-110%< 100%
Logo churn (annual)< 5%5-10%> 10%
Pipeline coverage (next Q)> 3x2-3x< 2x
CAC payback< 12 months12-18 months> 18 months
Win rate> 25%15-25%< 15%
Dimension 3: Product Health (CPO)
MetricGreen (7-10)Yellow (4-6)Red (1-3)
NPS> 4020-40< 20
DAU/MAU ratio> 40%20-40%< 20%
Core feature adoption> 60%30-60%< 30%
Time to valueDecreasing QoQStableIncreasing QoQ
CSAT> 4.2/53.5-4.2< 3.5
Dimension 4: Engineering Health (CTO)
MetricGreen (7-10)Yellow (4-6)Red (1-3)
Deploy frequencyDailyWeeklyMonthly or less
Change failure rate< 5%5-15%> 15%
MTTR< 1 hour1-4 hours> 4 hours
Tech debt ratio (% of sprint)< 20%20-35%> 35%
P0/P1 incidents per month< 22-5> 5
Dimension 5: People Health (CHRO)
MetricGreen (7-10)Yellow (4-6)Red (1-3)
Regrettable attrition (annual)< 10%10-20%> 20%
eNPS> 300-30< 0
Time to fill (avg days)< 4545-90> 90
Manager:IC ratio1:5-1:81:3-1:5 or 1:8-1:12Outside range
Internal promotion rate> 30%15-30%< 15%
Dimension 6: Operational Health (COO)
MetricGreen (7-10)Yellow (4-6)Red (1-3)
OKR completion rate> 70%50-70%< 50%
Decision cycle time< 48 hours48hrs-1 week> 1 week
Meeting effectivenessClear outcomesMixedNo outcomes
Cross-functional initiative completion> 80% on time50-80%< 50%
Process documentation coverage> 70%40-70%< 40%
Dimension 7: Security Health (CISO)
MetricGreen (7-10)Yellow (4-6)Red (1-3)
Security incidents (90 days)01-2 minor1+ major
Compliance statusAll currentIn progressOverdue/lapsed
Critical vuln remediation SLA100% in SLA> 90%< 90%
Security training completion> 95%80-95%< 80%
Pen test recency< 12 months12-24 months> 24 months
Dimension 8: Market Health (CMO)
MetricGreen (7-10)Yellow (4-6)Red (1-3)
CAC trendImproving QoQStableWorsening QoQ
Organic vs paid lead mix> 50% organic30-50% organic< 30% organic
Win rate vs competitorsImprovingStableDeclining
Brand awareness (in ICP)> 40%20-40%< 20%
Pipeline contribution (marketing)> 40%20-40%< 20%

Scoring System

Individual Dimension Score

Each dimension scores 1-10 based on weighted metrics:

Dimension Score = Sum(metric_score x metric_weight) / Sum(weights)

Traffic Light:
  Green (7-10):  Healthy -- maintain and optimize
  Yellow (4-6):  Watch -- trend matters (improving or declining?)
  Red (1-3):     Action required -- address within 30 days
Overall Health Score

Weighted average by company stage:

DimensionSeed WeightSeries ASeries BSeries C+
Financial20%15%15%15%
Revenue10%20%20%20%
Product25%20%15%10%
Engineering15%15%15%10%
People10%10%15%15%
Operations5%10%10%15%
Security5%5%5%10%
Market10%5%5%5%
Stage-Adjusted Benchmarks

Different stages have different healthy ranges. A Seed company with 6-month runway is normal; a Series C company with 6-month runway is a crisis.

StageRunway TargetBurn MultipleTeam SizeRevenue Threshold
Seed> 12 monthsNot applicable2-10Pre-revenue acceptable
Series A> 18 months< 3x10-40> $500K ARR
Series B> 18 months< 2x30-100> $3M ARR
Series C+> 24 months< 1.5x80-300> $15M ARR

Cascade Analysis

How Dimension Failures Propagate

This is the most important part of the diagnostic. Problems in one dimension inevitably create problems in others.

If This Is Red...Watch These Next...Why
FinancialPeople -> Engineering -> ProductBudget cuts -> hiring freeze -> velocity drops -> product stalls
RevenueFinancial -> People -> MarketCash gap -> attrition risk -> positioning weakens
ProductRevenue -> Market -> PeopleNRR drops -> CAC rises -> top talent leaves
EngineeringProduct -> RevenueFeatures slip -> deals stall on missing features
PeopleEngineering -> Product -> RevenueVelocity drops -> quality drops -> churn rises
OperationsALL dimensions degrade over timeExecution failure cascades everywhere
SecurityRevenue (enterprise) -> FinancialEnterprise deals blocked -> revenue impact
MarketRevenue -> FinancialLead pipeline dries up -> sales suffers
Cascade Risk Decision Tree
START: Dimension scores calculated
  |
  v
[Any dimension RED?]
  |
  +-- NO  --> [Any dimension YELLOW with declining trend?]
  |            |
  |            +-- YES --> Monitor cascade. Check connected dimensions.
  |            +-- NO  --> Healthy. Maintain current approach.
  |
  +-- YES --> [Check cascade connections]
              |
              v
            [Are connected dimensions also Yellow/Red?]
              |
              +-- YES --> SYSTEMIC ISSUE. Root cause in the Red dimension.
              |           Address Red dimension first. Connected will improve.
              |
              +-- NO  --> ISOLATED ISSUE. Fix Red dimension before it cascades.
                          Timeline: 30 days or cascade begins.

Dashboard Output Format

ORG HEALTH DIAGNOSTIC -- [Company] -- [Date]
Stage: [Seed/A/B/C]   Overall: [Score]/10   Trend: [Improving/Stable/Declining]

DIMENSION SCORES
------------------------------------------------------------
  Financial     [G] 8.2  Runway 14mo, burn 1.6x
  Revenue       [Y] 5.8  NRR 104%, pipeline thin (1.8x)
  Product       [G] 7.4  NPS 42, DAU/MAU 38%
  Engineering   [Y] 5.2  Debt at 30%, MTTR 3.2h
  People        [R] 3.8  Attrition 24%, eNPS -5
  Operations    [Y] 6.0  OKR 65% completion
  Security      [G] 7.8  SOC 2 complete, 0 incidents
  Market        [Y] 5.5  CAC rising, win rate 22%
------------------------------------------------------------

TOP PRIORITIES (address in order)
[R] 1. People: attrition at 24%
       Impact: Engineering velocity drops in 60 days (cascade risk)
       Action: Retention audit + intervention for top 5 at-risk
       Owner: CHRO + CEO | Timeline: This week

[Y] 2. Revenue: pipeline at 1.8x
       Impact: Q+1 miss risk is high
       Action: Add 3 qualified opps in 30 days or adjust forecast
       Owner: CRO | Timeline: 30 days

[Y] 3. Engineering: tech debt at 30%
       Impact: Shipping velocity slows by Q3
       Action: Dedicated debt sprint plan
       Owner: CTO | Timeline: 45 days

CASCADE WARNING
  People [R] --> Engineering [Y] cascade risk
  If attrition continues: engineering velocity drops -> product delays
  -> revenue impact in 2 quarters

DATA GAPS
  [!] Market: Brand awareness data needed
  [!] Operations: Meeting effectiveness not measured

Graceful Degradation

Not all data is always available. The diagnostic handles partial data:

Data AvailabilityApproach
All metrics availableFull scoring, all dimensions
Missing 1-2 metrics per dimensionScore available metrics, flag gaps
Missing entire dimensionExclude from overall score, flag as "[data needed]"
Only 3-4 dimensions have dataPartial diagnostic, clearly marked

Diagnostic Cadence

FrequencyScopeAudience
WeeklyScorecard metrics only (2-3 per dimension)Leadership team
MonthlyFull 8-dimension assessmentCEO + direct reports
QuarterlyDeep diagnostic with cascade analysis + benchmarksBoard-ready report
AnnualFull diagnostic + year-over-year comparison + strategy implicationsBoard + investors

Red Flags

  • Any dimension Red for 2+ consecutive months -- systemic problem, not a blip
  • 3+ dimensions Yellow simultaneously -- organizational strain, prioritize ruthlessly
  • Overall score declining 3+ months -- strategic review needed
  • Cascade warning triggered and not addressed in 30 days -- will get worse
  • Data gaps persist for 2+ cycles -- measurement culture problem
  • Score improving but team sentiment declining -- measurement gaming
  • No dimension ever Red -- either the company is exceptional or standards are too low

Integration with C-Suite

DimensionOwner SkillDrill-Down
FinancialCFO Advisor (cfo-advisor)Deep financial analysis
RevenueCRO Advisor (cro-advisor)Pipeline and retention analysis
ProductCPO Advisor (cpo-advisor)PMF assessment and portfolio review
EngineeringCTO Advisor (cto-advisor)Technical health and debt analysis
PeopleCHRO Advisor (chro-advisor)Retention, engagement, org design
OperationsCOO Advisor (coo-advisor)Process maturity, execution cadence
SecurityCISO Advisor (ciso-advisor)Risk register, compliance status
MarketCMO Advisor (cmo-advisor)Positioning, channel effectiveness

Show full SKILL.md (759 more words)Show less

Output Artifacts

RequestDeliverable
"How healthy is the company?"Full 8-dimension dashboard with traffic lights
"What should we fix first?"Prioritized action list with cascade analysis
"Prepare health section for board"Board-ready health summary with trends
"Compare to last quarter"Quarter-over-quarter comparison with trend arrows
"Where are we at risk?"Cascade risk map with interconnected failures
"What data do we need?"Data gap analysis with collection recommendations

Troubleshooting

ProblemLikely CauseResolution
Scores consistently show all green but team sentiment is negativeMetrics being gamed or standards set too low; measurement doesn't capture realityCross-reference quantitative scores with qualitative signals (exit interviews, Glassdoor, skip-level conversations); raise benchmarks to industry-standard levels
Cascade analysis shows systemic issue but leadership disagreesRed dimension owners resistant to acknowledging problemsPresent cascade evidence with data: "People Red for 2 months → Engineering Yellow → Product delays in pipeline"; use McKinsey OHI principle of benchmarking against external data
Data gaps persist across multiple diagnostic cyclesNo measurement infrastructure; teams don't prioritize data collectionAssign data collection to specific owners with deadlines; start with proxy metrics where direct measurement is unavailable
Diagnostic takes too long to produce (> 2 weeks)Trying to measure everything perfectly instead of using available dataApply graceful degradation: score what you have, flag gaps, iterate; a partial diagnostic now beats a perfect one in 6 weeks
Different stakeholders interpret traffic light scores differentlyNo shared understanding of what Green/Yellow/Red means operationallyDocument specific thresholds for each metric in each dimension; share calibration examples ("Red runway = less than 9 months at current burn")
Quarterly diagnostic shows no change despite interventionsWrong interventions, or interventions not given enough time, or measuring lagging indicatorsVerify interventions target root cause not symptoms; check leading indicators alongside lagging ones; allow 2 quarters for structural changes to show in scores
Board wants a single number but diagnostic is multi-dimensionalBoard unfamiliar with the 8-dimension modelProvide the weighted overall score (1-10) as headline with stage-adjusted weighting; drill-down dimensions available on request

Success Criteria

  • All 8 dimensions scored with traffic lights within 5 business days of data collection start
  • Cascade analysis correctly predicts downstream impacts: when a Red dimension is not addressed, connected dimensions degrade within 2 quarters
  • Stage-adjusted benchmarks applied correctly: Seed company not held to Series C standards and vice versa
  • Top 3 priorities identified with specific owners, timelines, and verification methods
  • Data gaps reduced by at least 50% between first and second diagnostic cycle
  • Board-ready health summary produced quarterly with trend comparison to prior quarter
  • Overall health score trending stable or improving over 3 consecutive quarters

Scope & Limitations

  • In scope: 8-dimension organizational health scoring, traffic light dashboards, cascade analysis, stage-adjusted benchmarks, graceful degradation for partial data, diagnostic cadence recommendations, board-ready reporting
  • Out of scope: Deep functional diagnostics within a single dimension (use the respective C-suite advisor skill); employee engagement survey design and administration (use CHRO Advisor); financial auditing (use external auditors); security penetration testing (use CISO Advisor)
  • Limitation: Diagnostic quality depends on data accuracy; garbage in, garbage out applies -- verify data sources
  • Limitation: McKinsey OHI benchmarks are based on large enterprise data; early-stage companies may need adjusted benchmarks
  • Limitation: The 8-dimension model is a simplification; some organizations may need additional dimensions (e.g., ESG, regulatory) depending on industry
  • Limitation: Cascade predictions are based on common patterns; specific organizations may have unique cascade paths

Integration Points

SkillIntegrationData Flow
cfo-advisorFinancial Health dimension deep diveHealth financial score → CFO detailed analysis
cro-advisorRevenue Health dimension deep diveHealth revenue score → CRO pipeline review
cpo-advisorProduct Health dimension deep diveHealth product score → CPO PMF assessment
cto-advisorEngineering Health dimension deep diveHealth engineering score → CTO tech debt plan
chro-advisorPeople Health dimension deep diveHealth people score → CHRO retention strategy
coo-advisorOperational Health dimension deep diveHealth operations score → COO process review
ciso-advisorSecurity Health dimension deep diveHealth security score → CISO risk register
cmo-advisorMarket Health dimension deep diveHealth market score → CMO channel review
strategic-alignmentHealth scores inform alignment prioritiesHealth priorities → Alignment focus areas
executive-mentorRed dimensions trigger executive coaching focusHealth red flags → Mentor challenge areas

Python Tools

ToolPurposeUsage
scripts/org_health_scorer.pyScore all 8 dimensions with traffic lights, stage-adjusted weighting, and overall health calculationpython scripts/org_health_scorer.py --stage series-a --financial 7.5 --revenue 5.8 --product 7.2 --engineering 5.0 --people 3.5 --operations 6.0 --security 7.8 --market 5.5 --json
scripts/span_of_control_analyzer.pyAnalyze manager-to-IC ratios across the organization and flag unhealthy spanspython scripts/span_of_control_analyzer.py --org-file org_structure.csv --json
scripts/engagement_benchmarker.pyBenchmark engagement metrics against industry standards and flag gapspython scripts/engagement_benchmarker.py --enps 15 --attrition 18 --time-to-fill 60 --promotion-rate 20 --industry saas --json

© borghei, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 3 other files (scripts) in c-level-advisor/org-health-diagnostic of borghei/Claude-Skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • scripts/engagement_benchmarker.py
  • scripts/org_health_scorer.py
  • scripts/span_of_control_analyzer.py

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 4a698e8

Compare with similar skills

Org Health Diagnostic next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Org Health Diagnostic compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Org Health Diagnostic this skillborghei/Claude-Skills891—~4.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Geo Fundamentalswasp-lang/wasp19k9 repos~861Automated safety check: PassMIT
Ab Testingcoreyhaines31/marketingskills54k3 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Hreflang and International SEOAgriciDaniel/claude-seo19k5 repos~3.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Referralscoreyhaines31/marketingskills54k2 repos~2.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
SEO GeoReScienceLab/opc-skills1.8k4 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0

Similar skills

  • Geo Fundamentals

    wasp-lang/wasp

    Generative Engine Optimization for AI search engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity).

    19k GitHub starsUsed in 9 repos~861 tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Ab Testing

    coreyhaines31/marketingskills

    When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program.

    54k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~3.1k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Hreflang and International SEO

    AgriciDaniel/claude-seo

    Audits, validates and generates hreflang tags for multi-language and multi-region sites in HTML, HTTP headers or XML sitemaps, flagging common code and return-tag mistakes.

    19k GitHub starsUsed in 5 repos~3.4k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Referrals

    coreyhaines31/marketingskills

    When the user wants to create, optimize, or analyze a referral program, affiliate program, or word-of-mouth strategy.

    54k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.6k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • SEO Geo

    ReScienceLab/opc-skills

    SEO & GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) for websites. An agent skill from ReScienceLab/opc-skills.

    1.8k GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~2.1k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Ad Creative

    LeoYeAI/openclaw-marketing-skills

    When the user wants to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative — headlines, descriptions, primary text, or full ad variations — for any paid advertising platform.

    1k GitHub starsUsed in 8 repos~3.4k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed

More from borghei/Claude-Skills

All 354 skills in this repo
  • Agent Harness

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Test and evaluation harness for AI agents — scenario suites, deterministic replay, regression diffing, cost and latency budgets.

    891 GitHub stars~3.1k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Agents In The Team

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Run delivery when AI coding and ops agents take tickets. An agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills.

    891 GitHub stars~4.2k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • AI Content Disclosure

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Check AI-generated marketing content and reviews for required disclosures under the EU AI Act, FTC rules and platform AI-label policies.

    891 GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • AI Prototyping

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Idea to AI-generated prototype to customer validation to engineering handoff.

    891 GitHub stars~3.6k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Analytics Engineer

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Analytics engineering across data modeling, dbt, transformation, and semantic layers.

    891 GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ansoff Matrix

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Ansoff Matrix — 4-quadrant framework for growth options: market penetration, market/product development, and diversification.

    891 GitHub stars~2.2k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Categories

Questions about Org Health Diagnostic

What does Org Health Diagnostic do?

Cross-functional organizational health check scoring 8 dimensions on a traffic-light scale. Org Health Diagnostic is an agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills. Cross-functional organizational health check scoring 8 dimensions on a traffic-light scale.

When should I use Org Health Diagnostic?

Org Health Diagnostic fits situations like: assessing company health; preparing for board reviews; identifying at-risk functions; diagnosing cross-functional problems.

How do I install Org Health Diagnostic in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill org-health-diagnostic -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (c-level-advisor/org-health-diagnostic in borghei/Claude-Skills) into .claude/skills/org-health-diagnostic in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Org Health Diagnostic in Codex?

Run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill org-health-diagnostic -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (c-level-advisor/org-health-diagnostic in borghei/Claude-Skills) into .agents/skills/org-health-diagnostic in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Org Health Diagnostic in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill org-health-diagnostic -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/org-health-diagnostic, .gemini/skills/org-health-diagnostic, .github/skills/org-health-diagnostic and .opencode/skills/org-health-diagnostic in your project.

What does Org Health Diagnostic need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Org Health Diagnostic needs Python for the scripts in its folder and the command-line tools its instructions call (python). Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Org Health Diagnostic access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Org Health Diagnostic safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. The check reads SKILL.md only: the scripts in the folder are not scanned, so read them before running anything.

What licence does Org Health Diagnostic use?

Org Health Diagnostic is published under the MIT licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Org Health Diagnostic use?

About 4.9k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 20k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Org Health Diagnostic?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Org Health Diagnostic: Geo Fundamentals (wasp-lang/wasp, 19k stars), Ab Testing (coreyhaines31/marketingskills, 54k stars), Hreflang and International SEO (AgriciDaniel/claude-seo, 19k stars) and Referrals (coreyhaines31/marketingskills, 54k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Org Health Diagnostic?

borghei (a GitHub user) maintains it in borghei/Claude-Skills, which has 891 GitHub stars. The repository holds 354 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 7, 2026.

Source: borghei/Claude-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.