By tjboudreaux

A skill your agent uses when search or investigation could run forever.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

A skill your agent uses when a specific claim may lack grounding.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

A skill your agent uses when longevity of a non-perishable option matters.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

A skill your agent uses when the reflex is to add a feature, layer, or process.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

When the right response mode is unclear, classify the cause-effect domain first; decompose disorder.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

When a fault is localized and the proximate cause is known but the systemic root is not, chain evidence-linked whys with a counterfactual stop and a countermeasure.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

Deciding what to build or why adoption fails. An agent skill from tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

A skill your agent uses when a selective defect needs IS/IS-NOT difference analysis or a consequential option choice needs must/want weighting and adverse-consequence comparison.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

When a claim, doc, test, metric, or assumption conflicts with observed behavior, stop theorizing from the map and verify the live code or data; let territory overrule.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

When provisioning, setting a limit, or committing an estimate under uncertainty, size a buffer to residual error and the cost of breach—not to the optimistic edge.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

When one mental model leaves a material blind spot on a multi-domain or high-stakes problem, sequence complementary models with named roles and a conflict rule.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

When unsure which thinking skill fits, map domain and problem type, then return NONE or one primary skill by default (at most three complementary).

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

Before committing scarce time, people, or money, name the best forgone use of those resources and the value delta of the chosen path versus that alternative.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

A skill your agent uses when forecasting, estimating, or sizing risk — anchor on base rates, give ranges, update prior→likelihood→posterior on evidence, and factor unmeasured quantities into…

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

Before heavy deliberation, classify the decision as cheap or costly to undo; decide two-way doors fast and stage one-way doors to preserve options.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

When a symptom has several plausible causes, rank falsifiable hypotheses and run the cheapest discriminating observation first; prefer least-assumptive survivors only after evidence fit.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

When a change has effects past the immediate fix—incentives, scale, feedback—trace consequence chains with timing and probability before committing.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

When a request is vague, assumption-laden, or "obvious," ask the few load-bearing questions that expose hidden requirements before building or committing.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

Before rejecting a proposal or reflexively agreeing, build the strongest faithful opposing case, state agreement conditions, then update or reaffirm.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

When behavior is emergent across components—fixes elsewhere break, loops/delays dominate—map boundary, stocks/flows, feedback, archetypes, then rank leverage.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

Under genuine uncertainty with no reliable forecast, inventory means, cap downside at affordable loss, act for commitments, and let goals emerge from controllable moves.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

When a constraint is treated as fixed, separate physics from convention, keep only independently supported primitives, and rebuild the simplest solution that satisfies real constraints.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

Use under time pressure when the situation is still changing and you must act before certainty — cycle Observe→Orient→Decide→Act on ~70% confidence, then re-observe.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

Before committing to a plan or launch, assume it already failed and reason backward through concrete causes — convert failure paths into mitigations, gates, and stop checks.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

When a real test is too rare, large, or irreversible, run a controlled counterfactual: isolate one variable, fix conditions, trace the mechanistic chain, and bound what the result implies.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

When two design requirements seem mutually exclusive, name the contradiction, separate conflicting states, then invent a concrete no-compromise resolution.

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills