Agent skill

Thinking Steel Manning

by tjboudreaux in tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

Before rejecting a proposal or reflexively agreeing, build the strongest faithful opposing case, state agreement conditions, then update or reaffirm.

MITAuto-check passed

Install Thinking Steel Manning

skills CLI
$ npx skills add tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills --skill thinking-steel-manning -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills thinking-steel-manning --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/thinking-steel-manning .claude/skills/thinking-steel-manning && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
thinking-steel-manning
GitHub stars
1.6k
Token cost
~842 tokens
SKILL.md length
385 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
26
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Before rejecting a proposal or reflexively agreeing, build the strongest faithful opposing case, state agreement conditions, then update or reaffirm.

  • Works in 5 steps: State the target claim or decision you… → Extract the core insight behind the… → Construct the strongest faithful case an… → …
  • SKILL.md covers When to Use, When NOT to Use, Procedure and Output, plus 1 more section
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Thinking Steel Manning is an agent skill from tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills. Before rejecting a proposal or reflexively agreeing, build the strongest faithful opposing case, state agreement conditions, then update or reaffirm.

Its SKILL.md is about 840 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: 28 eval-informed mental models and critical-thinking skills for Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Cursor, and other Agent Skills-compatible tools. The licence is MIT.

Example prompts

  • “/thinking-steel-manning”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. State the target claim or decision you are about to accept or reject, in one sentence. Name the real alternative if one exists.
  2. Extract the core insight behind the opposing position (or against your preferred path): the legitimate concern even if the proposed…
  3. Construct the strongest faithful case an informed advocate would make: best evidence, incentives, and failure modes — no mockery, no…
  4. State agreement / overturn conditions. Write one observation or result that would make you accept the opposing case (or abandon your…
  5. Engage that strong version, then decide. Respond to the steel-manned case on the merits. Output one of: accept opposing path, revise…

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 7b8fece. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Thinking Steel Manning loads about 842 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 43 tokens; SKILL.md has 385 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~43
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~842

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills at commit 7b8fece, republished under its MIT licence (© tjboudreaux). 385 words, ~842 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/thinking-steel-manning/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
thinking-steel-manning
description
Before rejecting a proposal or reflexively agreeing, build the strongest faithful opposing case, state agreement conditions, then update or reaffirm.
disable-model-invocation
true

Steel-Manning

Core rule: Engage the best form of the opposing case, not a weak one. If your position survives that, reaffirm; if not, update.

When to Use

  • About to reject a proposal, design, or alternative approach.
  • Inclined to agree with the user/plan and risk sycophancy — construct the best case against first.
  • Design review, architecture debate, or conflict where trade-offs are real.
  • Validating your own preferred decision before locking it (strongest-countercase check).

When NOT to Use

  • Settled fact, security anti-pattern, or violated hard requirement — correct it; do not invent a defense of what is wrong.
  • You already agree for stated, weighed reasons — do not perform a fake debate.
  • Trivial or fully reversible choices where deliberation cost exceeds downside.
  • Live emergency — act first; steel-man in the post-incident review.
  • Need definition/assumption cleanup, not opposition — use socratic.
  • Need failure scenarios for a plan — use pre-mortem; need attacker paths — use red-team.

Procedure

  1. State the target claim or decision you are about to accept or reject, in one sentence. Name the real alternative if one exists.
  2. Extract the core insight behind the opposing position (or against your preferred path): the legitimate concern even if the proposed solution is wrong.
  3. Construct the strongest faithful case an informed advocate would make: best evidence, incentives, and failure modes — no mockery, no cherry-picked weak version, no motive attacks. Include base rates or concrete alternatives that could overturn the preferred path when relevant.
  4. State agreement / overturn conditions. Write one observation or result that would make you accept the opposing case (or abandon your preferred path), and whether you have looked for it.
  5. Engage that strong version, then decide. Respond to the steel-manned case on the merits. Output one of: accept opposing path, revise synthesis, or reaffirm original with explicit residual risks. Naming the countercase without accept/revise/reaffirm is incomplete. Stop once the decision updates or is reaffirmed with conditions.
Show full SKILL.md (73 more words)Show less

Output

text
claim: <decision or proposal under test>
core_insight: <legitimate concern behind the opposition>
steel_man: <strongest faithful opposing argument>
overturn_if: <concrete observation that would change your mind>
looked_for_overturn: yes | no | partial
response_to_steel_man: <engagement on the merits>
decision: accept_opposing | revise | reaffirm
update: <what changed in belief or plan, or why reaffirm stands>
residual_risks: <what remains even after reaffirm/revise>

Verification

  • Falsify / stop: If the "steel man" is weaker than the original or attacks a caricature, rebuild it. If no overturn condition is stated, the check is incomplete. If evidence meets the overturn condition, you must update — reaffirmation is then false.
  • Over-application guard: Do not steel-man factual errors or hard constraints. Do not run a full adversarial brief for near-zero-cost reversible choices. Do not use this skill to delay an emergency response.

© tjboudreaux, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in skills/thinking-steel-manning of tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 7b8fece

Compare with similar skills

Thinking Steel Manning next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Thinking Steel Manning compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Thinking Steel Manning this skilltjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills1.6k—~842Automated safety check: PassMIT
Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluationaffaan-m/ECC277k1 repos~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Geo Proposalsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills47k1 repos~3.2kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Better Proposals AutomationComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills77k3 repos~764Automated safety check: PassNone
Review Proposalsanthropics/claude-for-legal9.6k2 repos~410Automated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Contract And Proposal Writeralirezarezvani/claude-skills28k2 repos~3.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Structured scholarly-work evaluation for papers, proposals, literature reviews, methods sections, evidence quality, citation support, and research-writing feedback.

    277k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.2k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Geo Proposal

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Auto-generate a professional, client-ready GEO service proposal from audit data.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.2k tokens
    Sales & SupportAuto-check: notes
  • Better Proposals Automation

    ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills

    Automate Better Proposals tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). An agent skill from ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills.

    77k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~764 tokens
    Productivity & AutomationAuto-check passed
  • Review Proposals

    anthropics/claude-for-legal

    Official

    Review and approve (or reject) pending playbook update proposals from the playbook-monitor agent and apply approved changes to the practice profile.

    9.6k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~410 tokens
    Sales & SupportAuto-check passed
  • Contract And Proposal Writer

    alirezarezvani/claude-skills

    Generate professional, jurisdiction-aware business documents: freelance contracts, project proposals, SOWs, NDAs, and MSAs.

    28k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.4k tokens
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Proposal

    Chorus-AIDLC/Chorus

    Chorus Proposal workflow on Hermes — create proposals with document and task drafts, manage dependency DAG, validate, submit, and run the read-only proposal reviewer via delegatetask.

    1.2k GitHub stars~5.5k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Sales & SupportAuto-check passed

More from tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

All 26 skills in this repo
  • Thinking Bounded Rationality

    tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

    A skill your agent uses when search or investigation could run forever.

    1.6k GitHub stars~703 tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Thinking Circle Of Competence

    tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

    A skill your agent uses when a specific claim may lack grounding.

    1.6k GitHub stars~733 tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Thinking Lindy Effect

    tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

    A skill your agent uses when longevity of a non-perishable option matters.

    1.6k GitHub stars~650 tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Thinking Via Negativa

    tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

    A skill your agent uses when the reflex is to add a feature, layer, or process.

    1.6k GitHub stars~735 tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Thinking Cynefin

    tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

    When the right response mode is unclear, classify the cause-effect domain first; decompose disorder.

    1.6k GitHub stars~651 tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Thinking Five Whys Plus

    tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

    When a fault is localized and the proximate cause is known but the systemic root is not, chain evidence-linked whys with a counterfactual stop and a countermeasure.

    1.6k GitHub stars~881 tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Thinking Steel Manning

What does Thinking Steel Manning do?

Before rejecting a proposal or reflexively agreeing, build the strongest faithful opposing case, state agreement conditions, then update or reaffirm. Thinking Steel Manning is an agent skill from tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills. Before rejecting a proposal or reflexively agreeing, build the strongest faithful opposing case, state agreement conditions, then update or reaffirm.

How do I install Thinking Steel Manning in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills --skill thinking-steel-manning -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/thinking-steel-manning in tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills) into .claude/skills/thinking-steel-manning in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Thinking Steel Manning in Codex?

Run `npx skills add tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills --skill thinking-steel-manning -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/thinking-steel-manning in tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills) into .agents/skills/thinking-steel-manning in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Thinking Steel Manning in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills --skill thinking-steel-manning -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/thinking-steel-manning, .gemini/skills/thinking-steel-manning, .github/skills/thinking-steel-manning and .opencode/skills/thinking-steel-manning in your project.

What does Thinking Steel Manning need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Thinking Steel Manning is instructions for the agent only.

Does Thinking Steel Manning access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Thinking Steel Manning safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Thinking Steel Manning use?

Thinking Steel Manning is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Thinking Steel Manning use?

About 842 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 3.4k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Thinking Steel Manning?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Thinking Steel Manning: Scientific Thinking Scholar Evaluation (affaan-m/ECC, 277k stars), Geo Proposal (sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, 47k stars), Better Proposals Automation (ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills, 77k stars) and Review Proposals (anthropics/claude-for-legal, 9.6k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Thinking Steel Manning?

tjboudreaux (a GitHub user) maintains it in tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills, which has 1,613 GitHub stars. The repository holds 26 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on August 7, 2026.

Source: tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.