Agent skill

Competitive Analysis

by w95 in w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills

Framework for competitive landscape analysis across any industry.

MITAuto-check passedMarketing & SEO

Install Competitive Analysis

skills CLI
$ npx skills add w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills --skill competitive-analysis -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills competitive-analysis --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/01-executive-leadership/competitive-analysis .claude/skills/competitive-analysis && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
competitive-analysis
GitHub stars
235
Used in
1 other repo
Token cost
~4k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,778 words
Files
3 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
43
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Framework for competitive landscape analysis across any industry.

  • Works in 12 steps: Clarify Requirements → Research → Outline → Review → Create → Identify Industry-Defining Metrics → …
  • Creating competitor analysis
  • SKILL.md covers CRITICAL STANDARDS - APPLY TO…, WORKFLOW PHASES, ANALYSIS WORKFLOW and QUALITY CHECKLIST
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Competitive Analysis is an agent skill from w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills. Framework for competitive landscape analysis across any industry. Use when creating competitor analysis, market positioning assessments, investment memos, strategic reviews, or any analysis requiring systematic evaluation of competitive dynamics. Triggers include requests for competitive landscape decks, peer comparisons, market structure analysis, strategic positioning assessments, and investment recommendations.

Its SKILL.md is about 4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 3 other files, including reference files (for example `references/frameworks.md` and `references/schemas.md`).

It sits in Marketing & SEO, covering Competitor analysis and Positioning and messaging. The repository describes itself as: 166 production-ready Claude AI skills organized by corporate role — executive leadership, finance, HR, marketing, sales, legal, operations, engineering, product, data, customer…. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Creating competitor analysis
  • Market positioning assessments
  • Investment memos
  • Strategic reviews

Example prompts

  • “/competitive-analysis”

Workflow steps

12 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Clarify Requirements
  2. Research → Outline → Review → Create
  3. Identify Industry-Defining Metrics
  4. Market Context
  5. Industry Economics
  6. Target Company Profile
  7. Competitor Mapping
  8. Positioning Visualization
  9. Competitor Deep Dives
  10. Comparative Analysis
  11. Strategic Context
  12. Synthesis

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 78dbc7c. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Competitive Analysis loads about 4k tokens when it runs, and up to ~4.5k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 110 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,778 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~110
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~4.5k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills at commit 78dbc7c, republished under its MIT licence (© w95). 1,778 words, ~3,972 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/competitive-analysis/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 2 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
competitive-analysis
description
Framework for competitive landscape analysis across any industry. Use when creating competitor analysis, market positioning assessments, investment memos, strategic reviews, or any analysis requiring systematic evaluation of competitive dynamics. Triggers include requests for competitive landscape decks, peer comparisons, market structure analysis, strategic positioning assessments, and investment recommendations.

Competitive Landscape Mapping


CRITICAL STANDARDS - APPLY TO EVERY ANALYSIS

Source File Primacy

When source files (Excel/CSV) are provided:

  • Extract values DIRECTLY — Do not perform your own calculations; use the numbers as they appear
  • Maintain consistency — When the same metric appears in multiple places, ensure identical values throughout
  • Verify calculations — If the prompt asks you to calculate something, verify your result matches related data in the source
  • Round only as shown — Use the same decimal precision as the source file
Prompt Fidelity

When the prompt specifies exact requirements, follow them verbatim:

Slide Titles & Section Names:

  • If prompt says "Overview and Competitive Scope" slide — use EXACTLY that title, not a paraphrase
  • If prompt says within the "Segment Mix" section — use EXACTLY "Segment Mix" as the section header
  • Never substitute with creative alternatives (e.g., don't use "FY2024 Segment Contribution Analysis" when "Overview and Competitive Scope" was specified)

Chart vs Table:

  • If prompt says embedded chart — create an actual PowerPoint chart object, NOT a table
  • If prompt says data labels must display — these go on chart elements (bars, slices, lines), not table cells
  • Tables and charts are NOT interchangeable — use exactly what's specified

Complete Data Series:

  • If prompt lists 7 competitors, include ALL 7 — not 5 or 6
  • If prompt shows data for years 2015-2025, include ALL years — not a subset
  • If prompt specifies 6 series in a chart (Uber, Lyft, DiDi, Bolt, Grab, Gojek), include ALL 6 — not 4

Exact Values & Phrasing:

  • If prompt says Revenue: $43.98B (+18% YoY) — display exactly that format
  • If prompt says surpasses DoorDash 4:1, Lyft 8:1 — use those exact ratios, not "7.6x Lyft"
  • If prompt gives specific percentages (e.g., "Uber 30%, DiDi 35%"), use exactly those numbers

When in doubt: Re-read the prompt. If it specifies something explicitly, that's not a suggestion — it's a requirement.

Reference Files

This skill includes reference files in the references/ folder. Use them as follows:

  • references/schemas.md — Table templates for M&A transactions, scenario analysis, and slide structure. Reference when building financial tables or investment scenarios.
  • references/frameworks.md — 2x2 matrix axis pairs by industry. Reference when choosing positioning visualization dimensions.
Source Quality Hierarchy

When sources conflict, prioritize in this order:

  1. 10-Ks / Annual Reports — Audited, highest reliability
  2. Earnings Calls / Investor Presentations — Management commentary, forward guidance
  3. Sell-Side Research — Analyst estimates, useful for private company sizing
  4. Industry Reports (McKinsey, Gartner, etc.) — Market sizing, trends
  5. News Articles — Use only for recent developments, verify against primary sources
Data Comparability
  • Time periods must match — All competitor metrics from same fiscal year. Flag exceptions: "(FY24)" vs "(H1 2024)"
  • Metric definitions must match — Same calculation methodology across competitors
  • Currency normalization — Convert all figures to USD for international comparisons; note exchange rate and date used
  • Use "-" for missing data — Never leave cells blank; for private companies, use "N/A" or estimates with "[E]" flag
  • Cite every number — Format: "[Company] [Document] ([Date])"
  • Source file fidelity — When Excel/CSV files are provided, use values exactly as given; do not recalculate or round differently than shown
Design & Formatting
  • Slide titles = insights — "Scale leaders pulling away from niche players" not "Competitive Analysis"
  • Slide titles must fit — One or two lines fine, but no overflow; reduce font size if needed (min 24pt)
  • Signposts = quantified — "margin below 40%" not "margins decline"
  • Ratings include actuals — "●●● $160B" not just "●●●"
  • Slide numbers required — Every slide must have a page number
Presentation-Specific Requirements
  • Actual embedded charts required — Pie charts, bar charts, and line graphs must be real PowerPoint chart objects (created via pptx skill), NOT text/ASCII representations
  • Match prompt structure — If prompt specifies slide structure, follow it
  • Competitor tables — For comprehensive analysis: metrics table + qualitative table per competitor. For rapid assessments: single combined table is acceptable.
  • Segment financials — Include both Revenue AND EBITDA when available. For private competitors or limited disclosure, revenue-only tables are acceptable; note "[EBITDA not disclosed]"
Visual Reference

Review examples/Toast_Embedded_Payments_Competitive_Landscape_v3.pptx and match its professional quality:

Spacing & Overflow Prevention:

  • Title-to-content gap — Minimum 0.4" between slide title bottom and first content element
  • Section header gaps — Minimum 0.25" between section headers and content below
  • Element buffers — Minimum 0.2" between any two elements (tables, text boxes, charts)
  • Margin safety — Keep all content at least 0.5" from slide edges
  • Text overflow — If text doesn't fit, reduce font size or split across slides; never let text clip or overlap

Slide Titles:

  • Must fit within slide width — One or two lines is fine, but text must not overflow or clip
  • If title is too long — Shorten wording or reduce font size (minimum 24pt)
  • Front-load the insight — Put the key point first, details second

Chart Formatting:

  • Legend inside layout — Always set include_in_layout=True so legends don't overlap chart area
  • Legend position — Use RIGHT for pie charts (≤6 items), BOTTOM for line/bar charts (≤4 series)
  • Too many series — If >6 series, consider splitting into multiple charts or using a table instead
  • Data labels — For pie charts, show percentages on slices rather than relying solely on legend

Typography (set explicitly, never use defaults):

  • Slide title: 28-32pt bold
  • Section headers: 16-20pt bold
  • Body text: 11-14pt regular
  • Table text: 10-12pt regular
  • Sources/footnotes: 8-10pt, gray
  • Consistency rule: Same element type = same font size throughout deck

Layout:

  • Clean grid alignment — tables and text blocks align to consistent margins
  • Generous whitespace — don't crowd slides; let content breathe
  • Visual hierarchy — most important insight is largest/most prominent
  • One key message per slide — supporting detail below

Color:

  • Limited palette — 2-3 colors max (one accent color for emphasis)
  • Muted tones — avoid bright/saturated colors; use navy, gray, muted blue
  • Consistent application — same color meanings throughout (e.g., accent for key metrics)

Tables:

  • Light gray header row with bold text
  • Alternating row shading (subtle) or clean white with thin borders
  • Right-align numbers, left-align text
  • Adequate cell padding — text shouldn't touch borders

Rating visuals:

  • ●●● / ●●○ / ●○○ system with actual metric alongside
  • Consistent placement in comparative tables

Adapt structure and metrics to fit your industry — but maintain this level of polish.

What's STRICT vs FLEXIBLE
STRICT (Every Time)FLEXIBLE (Case-by-Case)
Exact titles/sections when prompt specifiesCreative titles when prompt doesn't specify
Chart when prompt says chart; table when prompt says tableVisualization type when prompt doesn't specify
All data points/competitors listed in promptNumber of competitors when prompt doesn't specify
Exact values/ratios when prompt specifies themRounding when prompt doesn't specify precision
Titles fit without overflowNumber of competitor categories
Minimum spacing between elementsWhich dimensions to compare
Chart legends inside layoutNumber of competitors profiled
No overlapping text/elementsVisualization type (2x2, radar, tier)

WORKFLOW PHASES

Show full SKILL.md (718 more words)Show less
Phase 1: Clarify Requirements

Before starting, confirm:

  • Scope: Single company deep-dive or multi-company comparison?
  • Output: Presentation or written memo?
  • Focus areas: Specific competitors, dimensions, or strategic questions?
  • Investment context: Need scenarios/signposts?
  • Source files: What data files are provided and what values should be extracted?
Phase 2: Research → Outline → Review → Create

Do NOT create final output until outline is reviewed.

The 10-step Analysis Workflow below (Steps 0-9) is executed during Phase 2. Complete research and outlining before creating final slides or documents.


ANALYSIS WORKFLOW

Step 0: Identify Industry-Defining Metrics

Before diving into analysis, identify 3-5 metrics that matter most for this industry:

IndustryKey Metrics
SaaSARR, NRR, CAC payback, LTV/CAC, Rule of 40
PaymentsGPV, take rate, attach rate, transaction margin
MarketplacesGMV, take rate, buyer/seller ratio, repeat rate
RetailSame-store sales, inventory turns, sales per sq ft
LogisticsVolume, cost per unit, on-time delivery %, capacity utilization

For industries not listed, identify the 3-5 metrics that investors and operators use to benchmark performance.

Use these metrics consistently across all competitor comparisons.

Step 1: Market Context
  • Market size (current and projected) with source
  • Growth drivers and headwinds
  • Key trends reshaping the industry

CORRECT: "The embedded payments market is $80-100B in 2024, growing at 20-25% CAGR (McKinsey 2024)" WRONG: "The market is large and growing rapidly"

Step 2: Industry Economics

Map value flows. Approach varies by industry type:

  • Vertically-structured — Value chain layers with typical margin at each
  • Platform/network — Ecosystem participants and value flows between them
  • Fragmented — Consolidation dynamics and margin differences by scale
Step 3: Target Company Profile
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Revenue | $4.96B |
| Growth | +26% YoY |
| Gross Margin | 45% |
| Profitability | $373M Adj. EBITDA |
| Customers | 134K |
| Retention | 92% |
| Market Share | ~15% |

For multi-segment companies, add segment breakdown:

| Segment | Revenue | Rev YoY | Rev % | EBITDA | EBITDA YoY | Margin |
|---------|---------|---------|-------|--------|------------|--------|
| Seg A   | $25.1B  | +26%    | 57%   | $6.5B  | +31%       | 26%    |
| Seg B   | $13.8B  | +31%    | 31%   | $2.5B  | +64%       | 18%    |
| Seg C   | $5.1B   | -2%     | 12%   | -$74M  | -16%       | -1%    |
| Total   | $44.0B  | +18%    | 100%  | $6.5B* | -          | 15%    |

*Note corporate costs if applicable

Step 4: Competitor Mapping

Group competitors using the framework that fits:

  • By business model — Platform vs. vertical vs. horizontal
  • By segment — Enterprise vs. SMB vs. consumer
  • By posture — Direct vs. adjacent vs. emerging
  • By origin — Incumbents vs. disruptors vs. new entrants
Step 5: Positioning Visualization
VisualizationBest For
2x2 MatrixTwo dominant competitive factors
Radar/SpiderMulti-factor comparison
Tier DiagramNatural clustering/strategic groups
Value Chain MapVertical industries
Ecosystem MapPlatform markets
Step 6: Competitor Deep Dives

Table 1 — Metrics:

| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Revenue | $X.XB |
| Growth | +XX% YoY |
| Gross Margin | XX% |
| Market Cap | $X.XB |
| Profitability | $XXXM EBITDA |
| Customers | XXK |
| Retention | XX% |
| Market Share | ~XX% |

Table 2 — Qualitative:

| Category | Assessment |
|----------|------------|
| Business | What they do (1 sentence) |
| Strengths | 2-3 bullets |
| Weaknesses | 2-3 bullets |
| Strategy | Current priorities |
Step 7: Comparative Analysis
| Dimension | Company A | Company B | Company C |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
| Scale | ●●● $160B | ●●○ $45B | ●○○ $8B |
| Growth | ●●○ +26% | ●●● +35% | ●●○ +22% |
| Margins | ●●○ 7.5% | ●○○ 3.2% | ●●● 15% |
Step 8: Strategic Context
  • M&A transactions (multiples, strategic rationale)
  • Partnership and integration trends
  • Capital raising patterns
  • Regulatory developments
Step 9: Synthesis

Competitive Moat Assessment: Evaluate each competitor's durable advantages using these categories:

Moat TypeWhat to Assess
Network EffectsStrength of user/supplier flywheel; cross-side vs. same-side effects
Switching CostsTechnical integration depth, contractual lock-in, behavioral habits
Scale EconomiesUnit cost advantages at volume; minimum efficient scale
Intangible AssetsBrand value, proprietary data, regulatory licenses, patents

Rate each as Strong / Moderate / Weak with supporting evidence.

Required Synthesis Elements:

  • Durable advantages (hard to replicate) — map to moat categories above
  • Structural vulnerabilities (hard to fix)
  • Current state vs. trajectory

For investment contexts:

| Scenario | Probability | Key Driver |
|----------|-------------|------------|
| Bull | 30% | Market share gains, margin expansion |
| Base | 50% | Current trajectory continues |
| Bear | 20% | Competitive pressure, margin compression |

QUALITY CHECKLIST

Before finalizing, verify:

Prompt Fidelity:

  • ✅ Slide titles match prompt exactly (not paraphrased)
  • ✅ Section names match prompt exactly
  • ✅ Charts used where prompt says "chart"; tables where prompt says "table"
  • ✅ All competitors/data points included (if prompt lists 7, include 7)
  • ✅ All years/periods included (if prompt shows 2015-2025, include all)
  • ✅ Exact values and formats used as specified in prompt
  • ✅ Commentary uses exact phrasing when prompt specifies it

Source File & Data Consistency:

  • ✅ All values from source files extracted directly (not recalculated)
  • ✅ Same metric shows identical value across all slides
  • ✅ Calculated percentages match source data or related figures
  • ✅ Numbers use same decimal precision as source

Layout & Spacing:

  • ✅ Minimum 0.4" gap between slide title and first content element
  • ✅ No text or elements overlapping
  • ✅ All content within 0.5" margin from slide edges
  • ✅ Text fits within containers (no clipping or overflow)
  • ✅ Slide titles fit within slide width (1-2 lines, no overflow)

Charts:

  • ✅ Legends set to include_in_layout=True (no overlap with chart)
  • ✅ Legend position appropriate (RIGHT for pie, BOTTOM for line/bar)
  • ✅ No more than 6 series per chart; if more, split or use table

Typography:

  • ✅ Font sizes explicitly set (not default)
  • ✅ Same element type uses same font size across all slides
  • ✅ Titles 28-32pt, headers 16-20pt, body 11-14pt, sources 8-10pt

Data & Sources:

  • ✅ Every number has a source citation
  • ✅ All competitor metrics from same fiscal period (flag exceptions)
  • ✅ Same metric definitions across all competitors

Presentation Format:

  • ✅ Slide titles state insights, not topics
  • ✅ All slides have page numbers
  • ✅ Charts are actual embedded PowerPoint objects (not ASCII/text)
  • ✅ Segment tables include EBITDA where available; revenue-only acceptable for private companies

© w95, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 2 other files (references) in 01-executive-leadership/competitive-analysis of w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • references/frameworks.md
  • references/schemas.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 78dbc7c

Used in 1 other repository

We found 2 copies of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 1 other GitHub owner. This page covers the copy in w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.

Compare with similar skills

Competitive Analysis next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Competitive Analysis compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Competitive Analysis this skillw95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills2351 repos~4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Startup Designferdinandobons/startup-skill1.2k—~8.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Competitor Teardownirinabuht12-oss/marketing-skills3.8k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Competitor Researcherhanzili/hanzi-browse177—~4.7kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Competitive Cartographercuriositech/some_claude_skills2431 repos~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Yao Positioning Skillyaojingang/yao-open-skills1.3k—~805Automated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Startup Design

    ferdinandobons/startup-skill

    Design, validate, and plan a startup from scratch. An agent skill from ferdinandobons/startup-skill.

    1.2k GitHub stars~8.1k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Competitor Teardown

    irinabuht12-oss/marketing-skills

    Systematic competitive analysis covering positioning, messaging hierarchy, objection handling, and CTA strategy from landing page URLs or screenshots.

    3.8k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Competitor Researcher

    hanzili/hanzi-browse

    Research SaaS and AI-tool competitors in a real browser. An agent skill from hanzili/hanzi-browse.

    177 GitHub stars~4.7k tokensUpdated 5 mo ago
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Competitive Cartographer

    curiositech/some_claude_skills

    Strategic analyst that maps competitive landscapes, identifies white space opportunities, and provides positioning recommendations.

    243 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.3k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Yao Positioning Skill

    yaojingang/yao-open-skills

    Generate evidence-aware positioning reports for personal IPs, courses, products, services, brands, or companies by combining positioning theory, course-marketing analysis, user intent, competitor…

    1.3k GitHub stars~805 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Competitor Analysis Local

    gmapsscraper/google-maps-agent-skills

    Analyze local competitors from a Google Maps CSV export. An agent skill from gmapsscraper/google-maps-agent-skills.

    131 GitHub stars~1k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed

More from w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills

All 43 skills in this repo
  • Data Context Extractor

    w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills

    Generate or improve a company-specific data analysis skill by extracting tribal knowledge from analysts.

    235 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.8k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Account Research

    w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills

    Research a company using Common Room data. An agent skill from w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills.

    235 GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated 7 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Call Prep

    w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills

    Prepare for a customer or prospect call using Common Room signals.

    235 GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated 7 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Compose Outreach

    w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills

    Generate personalized outreach messages using Common Room signals.

    235 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 7 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • SQL Queries

    w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills

    Write correct, performant SQL across all major data warehouse dialects (Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks, PostgreSQL, etc.).

    235 GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~2.8k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Contact Research

    w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills

    Research a specific person using Common Room data. An agent skill from w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills.

    235 GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 7 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Categories

Questions about Competitive Analysis

What does Competitive Analysis do?

Framework for competitive landscape analysis across any industry. Competitive Analysis is an agent skill from w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills. Framework for competitive landscape analysis across any industry.

When should I use Competitive Analysis?

Competitive Analysis fits situations like: creating competitor analysis; market positioning assessments; investment memos; strategic reviews.

How do I install Competitive Analysis in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills --skill competitive-analysis -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (01-executive-leadership/competitive-analysis in w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills) into .claude/skills/competitive-analysis in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Competitive Analysis in Codex?

Run `npx skills add w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills --skill competitive-analysis -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (01-executive-leadership/competitive-analysis in w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills) into .agents/skills/competitive-analysis in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Competitive Analysis in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills --skill competitive-analysis -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/competitive-analysis, .gemini/skills/competitive-analysis, .github/skills/competitive-analysis and .opencode/skills/competitive-analysis in your project.

What does Competitive Analysis need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Competitive Analysis is instructions for the agent only.

Does Competitive Analysis access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Competitive Analysis safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Competitive Analysis use?

Competitive Analysis is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Competitive Analysis use?

About 4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 16k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 571 tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Competitive Analysis?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Competitive Analysis: Startup Design (ferdinandobons/startup-skill, 1.2k stars), Competitor Teardown (irinabuht12-oss/marketing-skills, 3.8k stars), Competitor Researcher (hanzili/hanzi-browse, 177 stars) and Competitive Cartographer (curiositech/some_claude_skills, 243 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Competitive Analysis?

w95 (a GitHub user) maintains it in w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills, which has 235 GitHub stars. The repository holds 43 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on February 26, 2026.

Source: w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.