Cto Advisor
Ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor
Technical leadership guidance for engineering teams, architecture decisions, and technology strategy.
CTO-level advisory - build vs buy decisions, tech debt quantification, team scaling, ADRs, technology evaluation (RICE), budget planning, TCO, vendor management, DORA/SPACE metrics
$ npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill cto-advisor -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install majiayu000/claude-skill-registry cto-advisor --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/business/cto-advisor .claude/skills/cto-advisor && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "cto-advisor" agent skill from https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/business/cto-advisor into .claude/skills/cto-advisor/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cto-advisor", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/business/cto-advisorType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill cto-advisor -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install majiayu000/claude-skill-registry cto-advisor --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/business/cto-advisor .agents/skills/cto-advisor && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "cto-advisor" agent skill from https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/business/cto-advisor into .agents/skills/cto-advisor/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cto-advisor", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill cto-advisor -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install majiayu000/claude-skill-registry cto-advisor --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/business/cto-advisor .cursor/skills/cto-advisor && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "cto-advisor" agent skill from https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/business/cto-advisor into .cursor/skills/cto-advisor/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cto-advisor", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry.git --path skills/business/cto-advisor--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill cto-advisor -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install majiayu000/claude-skill-registry cto-advisor --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/business/cto-advisor .gemini/skills/cto-advisor && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "cto-advisor" agent skill from https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/business/cto-advisor into .gemini/skills/cto-advisor/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cto-advisor", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install majiayu000/claude-skill-registry cto-advisorInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill cto-advisor -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/business/cto-advisor .github/skills/cto-advisor && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "cto-advisor" agent skill from https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/business/cto-advisor into .github/skills/cto-advisor/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cto-advisor", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill cto-advisor -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install majiayu000/claude-skill-registry cto-advisor --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/business/cto-advisor .opencode/skills/cto-advisor && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "cto-advisor" agent skill from https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/business/cto-advisor into .opencode/skills/cto-advisor/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cto-advisor", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
cto-advisorCTO-level advisory - build vs buy decisions, tech debt quantification, team scaling, ADRs, technology evaluation (RICE), budget planning, TCO, vendor management, DORA/SPACE metrics
Cto Advisor is an agent skill from majiayu000/claude-skill-registry. CTO-level advisory - build vs buy decisions, tech debt quantification, team scaling, ADRs, technology evaluation (RICE), budget planning, TCO, vendor management, DORA/SPACE metrics
Its SKILL.md is about 3.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 1 other file (for example `metadata.json`).
It sits in Development, covering Architecture decision records, Technical debt and Budgeting and forecasting. The repository describes itself as: Searchable Claude Code skills catalog with source-linked guides and generated registry artifacts. The licence is MIT.
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 2d14a69. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are markdown).
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Cto Advisor loads about 3.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 48 tokens; SKILL.md has 613 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
The full file from majiayu000/claude-skill-registry at commit 2d14a69, republished under its MIT licence (© majiayu000). 613 words, ~3,340 tokens.
.claude/skills/cto-advisor/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 1 other file; get the full folder from GitHub.## Build vs Buy Analysis: [Feature/System Name]
### Scoring (1-5 each)
| Factor | Build | Buy | Weight |
|--------|-------|-----|--------|
| Core competency alignment | [1-5] | [1-5] | 3x |
| Time to market | [1-5] | [1-5] | 2x |
| Total cost (3 year) | [1-5] | [1-5] | 2x |
| Customization needs | [1-5] | [1-5] | 2x |
| Maintenance burden | [1-5] | [1-5] | 1x |
| Data control | [1-5] | [1-5] | 1x |
| Integration complexity | [1-5] | [1-5] | 1x |
| Vendor risk | [1-5] | [1-5] | 1x |
| **Weighted Total** | [sum] | [sum] | |
### Decision: BUILD / BUY / HYBRID| Condition | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Core differentiator | BUILD (competitive advantage) |
| Commodity capability | BUY (focus on core) |
| Strict compliance / data sovereignty | BUILD (control) |
| Team has no domain expertise | BUY (faster, less risk) |
| Vendor lock-in risk > 7/10 | BUILD or multi-vendor |
| Time to market < 3 months | BUY (speed) |
| Budget constrained, long-term | BUILD (lower TCO) |
| Anti-Pattern | Neden Yanlis | Dogru Yol |
|---|---|---|
| "Not invented here" | Wasted engineering time | Evaluate vendors objectively |
| "We'll build it in 2 weeks" | Always takes 5x longer | Realistic estimation with buffer |
| Buying everything | No differentiation | Build core, buy commodity |
| Ignoring maintenance cost | Build looks cheaper initially | Include 3-5 year maintenance TCO |
| No exit strategy from vendor | Lock-in trap | Evaluate migration cost upfront |
| Type | Description | Impact | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code debt | Poor code quality | Developer velocity | No types, huge functions, no tests |
| Architecture debt | Wrong architectural decisions | Scalability | Monolith that should be microservice |
| Test debt | Insufficient test coverage | Reliability | No integration tests, flaky tests |
| Dependency debt | Outdated dependencies | Security | 3 major versions behind, CVEs |
| Documentation debt | Missing/outdated docs | Onboarding | No API docs, stale README |
| Infrastructure debt | Manual processes, legacy infra | Reliability | No CI/CD, manual deployments |
| Design debt | UX inconsistencies | User experience | 5 different button styles |
## Tech Debt Assessment: [Project Name]
| Area | Score (1-10) | Trend | Priority |
|------|-------------|-------|----------|
| Code quality | [X] | [up/down/flat] | [H/M/L] |
| Test coverage | [X%] | [up/down/flat] | [H/M/L] |
| Dependency freshness | [X] | [up/down/flat] | [H/M/L] |
| Build/deploy time | [X min] | [up/down/flat] | [H/M/L] |
| Documentation | [X] | [up/down/flat] | [H/M/L] |
| Security posture | [X] | [up/down/flat] | [H/M/L] |
### Cost of Delay
[If we don't address debt area X, what happens in 6 months?]
### Investment Request
| Initiative | Effort | Impact | ROI Period |
|-----------|--------|--------|------------|
| [debt 1] | [weeks] | [description] | [months] |
| [debt 2] | [weeks] | [description] | [months] |Priority Score = (Impact * Urgency * Spread) / Effort
Impact (1-5): How much does it slow the team?
Urgency (1-5): How quickly will it get worse?
Spread (1-5): How many areas does it affect?
Effort (1-5): How hard is it to fix? (inverse: 1=hard, 5=easy)RULE: 20% of sprint capacity reserved for tech debt reduction
Sprint capacity: 10 story points
├── 8 points: Feature work
└── 2 points: Tech debt reduction (ZORUNLU, negotiable degil)## Hiring Plan: [Quarter/Year]
### Current State
| Role | Headcount | Capacity | Gap |
|------|-----------|----------|-----|
| Backend | [X] | [Y features/quarter] | [shortfall] |
| Frontend | [X] | [Y features/quarter] | [shortfall] |
| DevOps | [X] | [Y deploys/week] | [shortfall] |
| QA | [X] | [Y tests/sprint] | [shortfall] |
### Ratios
- Engineer : Manager = 6-8 : 1
- Senior : Mid : Junior = 2 : 3 : 1
- Backend : Frontend = project-dependent
- Engineer : QA = 4-6 : 1
### Onboarding Milestones
| Day | Milestone |
|-----|-----------|
| 1 | Dev environment running, first commit |
| 7 | First PR merged |
| 14 | First feature shipped to staging |
| 30 | Independent task completion |
| 60 | Contributing to architecture discussions |
| 90 | Fully productive, mentoring others || Pattern | When to Use | Size |
|---|---|---|
| Stream-aligned | Product features | 5-8 people |
| Platform | Internal tooling, infrastructure | 3-5 people |
| Enabling | Coach other teams, remove blockers | 2-3 people |
| Complicated subsystem | Deep expertise (ML, security) | 2-4 people |
# ADR-[number]: [decision title]
## Status
[Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated | Superseded by ADR-XXX]
## Context
[What is the issue? What forces are at play?]
[Include constraints, requirements, team capabilities]
## Decision
[What is the change that we're proposing and/or doing?]
## Alternatives Considered
### Option A: [name]
- Pros: [list]
- Cons: [list]
### Option B: [name]
- Pros: [list]
- Cons: [list]
## Consequences
### Positive
- [benefit 1]
- [benefit 2]
### Negative
- [tradeoff 1]
- [tradeoff 2]
### Risks
- [risk 1]: [mitigation]
- [risk 2]: [mitigation]
## Decision Date
[YYYY-MM-DD]
## Decision Makers
[names/roles]## Architecture Decision Log
| # | Decision | Status | Date | Impact |
|---|---------|--------|------|--------|
| 001 | Use PostgreSQL over MongoDB | Accepted | 2025-01-15 | High |
| 002 | Adopt microservices for billing | Accepted | 2025-02-01 | High |
| 003 | Use React over Vue | Accepted | 2025-02-15 | Medium |
| 004 | Monolith-first for MVP | Deprecated | 2025-03-01 | High |## Technology Evaluation: [Technology Name]
### RICE Score
| Factor | Score | Weight | Weighted |
|--------|-------|--------|----------|
| **Reach** (how many people/teams affected) | [1-10] | 1x | [X] |
| **Impact** (how much improvement per person) | [1-3: minimal/medium/massive] | 2x | [X] |
| **Confidence** (how sure are we) | [50-100%] | 1x | [X] |
| **Effort** (person-months) | [X] | divisor | [X] |
**RICE Score = (Reach * Impact * Confidence) / Effort = [score]**## Vendor/Technology Comparison
| Criteria | Weight | Option A | Option B | Option C |
|----------|--------|----------|----------|----------|
| Performance | 20% | [1-5] | [1-5] | [1-5] |
| Community/support | 15% | [1-5] | [1-5] | [1-5] |
| Learning curve | 15% | [1-5] | [1-5] | [1-5] |
| Cost | 15% | [1-5] | [1-5] | [1-5] |
| Scalability | 10% | [1-5] | [1-5] | [1-5] |
| Security | 10% | [1-5] | [1-5] | [1-5] |
| Integration | 10% | [1-5] | [1-5] | [1-5] |
| Maturity | 5% | [1-5] | [1-5] | [1-5] |
| **Weighted Total** | | [sum] | [sum] | [sum] |
### Recommendation: [Option X]
### Reasoning: [1-2 sentences]| Anti-Pattern | Risk | Dogru Yol |
|---|---|---|
| Resume-driven development | Wrong tool for the job | Evaluate against actual needs |
| Hype-driven adoption | Immature ecosystem | Wait for version 2.0+ |
| Single vendor evaluation | No comparison baseline | Always evaluate 3+ options |
| Ignoring exit cost | Future lock-in | Calculate migration cost |
| No POC/prototype | Unknown unknowns | Build spike before committing |
## Total Cost of Ownership: [System/Technology]
### Year 1 (Setup + Operations)
| Category | Cost |
|----------|------|
| Licenses/subscriptions | $[X] |
| Infrastructure (cloud/hardware) | $[X] |
| Implementation/migration | $[X] |
| Training | $[X] |
| Integration development | $[X] |
| **Year 1 Total** | **$[X]** |
### Year 2-3 (Ongoing)
| Category | Annual Cost |
|----------|------------|
| Licenses/subscriptions (+ annual increase) | $[X] |
| Infrastructure | $[X] |
| Maintenance engineering (FTE fraction) | $[X] |
| Support contracts | $[X] |
| Upgrades/patches | $[X] |
| **Annual Ongoing** | **$[X]** |
### 3-Year TCO: $[Year 1 + Year 2 + Year 3]
### Hidden Costs (often missed)
- Context switching overhead
- On-call/incident response time
- Documentation maintenance
- Vendor management overhead
- Compliance/audit costs| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vendor acquired/shutdown | Low | Critical | Data export procedure, backup vendor |
| Price increase > 30% | Medium | High | Multi-year contract, alternative evaluation |
| SLA breach | Medium | High | Credits, contractual remedies |
| Data breach at vendor | Low | Critical | Encryption, contractual liability |
| Feature deprecation | Medium | Medium | API abstraction layer |
| Metric | Elite | High | Medium | Low |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deployment Frequency | On-demand (multiple/day) | Daily-weekly | Weekly-monthly | Monthly-6monthly |
| Lead Time for Changes | < 1 hour | 1 day - 1 week | 1 week - 1 month | 1 - 6 months |
| Change Failure Rate | 0-15% | 16-30% | 16-30% | 16-30% |
| Mean Time to Recovery | < 1 hour | < 1 day | 1 day - 1 week | > 1 week |
| Dimension | Metrics | How to Measure |
|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction | Developer satisfaction survey | Quarterly survey (1-5 scale) |
| Performance | Code review turnaround, incident resolution | Tooling metrics |
| Activity | PRs merged, deploys, commits | Git/CI data (NOT for evaluation) |
| Communication | Knowledge sharing, documentation | Survey + doc metrics |
| Efficiency | Dev environment setup time, build time | Measure and track |
## Engineering Health: [Quarter]
### DORA Metrics
| Metric | Target | Actual | Status |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| Deploy frequency | Daily | [X/week] | [on/off track] |
| Lead time | < 1 day | [X hours] | [on/off track] |
| Change failure rate | < 15% | [X%] | [on/off track] |
| MTTR | < 1 hour | [X min] | [on/off track] |
### Team Health
| Area | Score (1-10) | Trend |
|------|-------------|-------|
| Developer satisfaction | [X] | [up/down/flat] |
| On-call burden | [X] | [up/down/flat] |
| Tech debt sentiment | [X] | [up/down/flat] |
| Tooling satisfaction | [X] | [up/down/flat] |
### Actionable Insights
1. [Insight + recommended action]
2. [Insight + recommended action]## Technology Report: Q[X] [Year]
### Executive Summary
[2-3 sentences: key wins, risks, requests]
### Key Metrics
| Metric | Q-1 | Q0 | Target | Trend |
|--------|-----|-----|--------|-------|
| Uptime | [X%] | [X%] | 99.9% | [arrow] |
| Page load time | [Xs] | [Xs] | < 2s | [arrow] |
| Active users | [X] | [X] | [target] | [arrow] |
| Deploy frequency | [X/mo] | [X/mo] | Daily | [arrow] |
### Achievements
1. [Milestone/launch/improvement]
2. [Milestone/launch/improvement]
### Risks & Challenges
| Risk | Severity | Mitigation | Status |
|------|----------|-----------|--------|
| [risk] | [H/M/L] | [plan] | [active/mitigated] |
### Budget
| Category | Budget | Actual | Variance |
|----------|--------|--------|----------|
| Infrastructure | $[X] | $[X] | [+/-X%] |
| Licenses | $[X] | $[X] | [+/-X%] |
| Headcount | $[X] | $[X] | [+/-X%] |
### Next Quarter Focus
1. [Priority 1]
2. [Priority 2]
3. [Priority 3]
### Resource Request
[If applicable: what do we need and why]| Anti-Pattern | Neden Yanlis | Dogru Yol |
|---|---|---|
| Too much jargon | Board members aren't engineers | Translate to business impact |
| Only good news | Erodes trust | Honest + solution-oriented |
| No metrics | Unverifiable | Data-driven with trends |
| Feature list only | No business context | Connect features to revenue/growth |
| Asking for budget without ROI | Unlikely approval | Show expected return |
© majiayu000, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
SKILL.md and 1 other file in skills/business/cto-advisor of majiayu000/claude-skill-registry.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 2d14a69
We found 1 copy of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 1 other GitHub owner. This page covers the copy in majiayu000/claude-skill-registry, which our catalogue first saw on October 8, 2026.
Cto Advisor next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cto Advisor this skillmajiayu000/claude-skill-registry | 666 | 1 repos | ~3.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Cto AdvisorIbrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor | 380 | 4 repos | ~2.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Cto Advisoralirezarezvani/claude-skills | 28k | 1 repos | ~3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Oma Architecturefirst-fluke/oh-my-agent | 1.3k | — | ~2.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Architecture Decisionjwynia/agent-skills | 166 | 1 repos | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Modernization AssessmentEmeaAppGbb/spec2cloud | 100 | — | ~1.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor
Technical leadership guidance for engineering teams, architecture decisions, and technology strategy.
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Technical leadership guidance for engineering teams, architecture decisions, and technology strategy.
first-fluke/oh-my-agent
Architecture specialist for software/system design, module and service boundaries, tradeoff analysis, and stakeholder synthesis.
jwynia/agent-skills
Systematically evaluate architecture decisions, document trade-offs, and select appropriate patterns.
EmeaAppGbb/spec2cloud
Assess codebase for modernization opportunities — tech debt, deprecated dependencies, outdated patterns, architectural improvements.
manager-dot-dev/manager-skills
Helps engineering managers plan roadmaps, prioritize work, and communicate priorities effectively — produces the 20% tech debt framework (and its 5 traps), a phased release pressure-test, a…
majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
Multi-source deep research using firecrawl and exa MCPs. An agent skill from majiayu000/claude-skill-registry.
majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
Neural search via Exa MCP for web, code, and company research.
majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
Unified media generation via fal.ai MCP — image, video, and audio.
majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
Interact with Zotero reference management libraries using the pyzotero Python client.
majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
Search scientific papers and retrieve structured experimental data extracted from full-text studies via the BGPT MCP server.
majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
Perform pairwise sequence alignment using Biopython Bio.Align.PairwiseAligner.
Categories
CTO-level advisory - build vs buy decisions, tech debt quantification, team scaling, ADRs, technology evaluation (RICE), budget planning, TCO, vendor management, DORA/SPACE metrics. Cto Advisor is an agent skill from majiayu000/claude-skill-registry.
Cto Advisor fits situations like: tasks that involve Architecture decision records; tasks that involve Technical debt; tasks that involve Budgeting and forecasting.
Run `npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill cto-advisor -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/business/cto-advisor in majiayu000/claude-skill-registry) into .claude/skills/cto-advisor in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
Run `npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill cto-advisor -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/business/cto-advisor in majiayu000/claude-skill-registry) into .agents/skills/cto-advisor in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill cto-advisor -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/cto-advisor, .gemini/skills/cto-advisor, .github/skills/cto-advisor and .opencode/skills/cto-advisor in your project.
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Cto Advisor is instructions for the agent only.
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
Cto Advisor is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
About 3.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 13k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Cto Advisor: Cto Advisor (Ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor, 380 stars), Cto Advisor (alirezarezvani/claude-skills, 28k stars), Oma Architecture (first-fluke/oh-my-agent, 1.3k stars) and Architecture Decision (jwynia/agent-skills, 166 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
majiayu000 (a GitHub user) maintains it in majiayu000/claude-skill-registry, which has 666 GitHub stars. The repository holds 1,273 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 7, 2026.
Source: majiayu000/claude-skill-registry on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.