Agent skill

Decision Documentation

by Owl-Listener in Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills

Document accessibility decisions and the reasoning behind them so they survive team changes, redesigns, and time.

MITAuto-check passedFrontend & Design

Install Decision Documentation

skills CLI
$ npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill decision-documentation -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills decision-documentation --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/accessibility-decisions/skills/decision-documentation .claude/skills/decision-documentation && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
decision-documentation
GitHub stars
103
Token cost
~984 tokens
SKILL.md length
504 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
55
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Document accessibility decisions and the reasoning behind them so they survive team changes, redesigns, and time.

  • Works in 4 steps: Are accessibility decisions documented… → Can a new team member find out why… → Are tradeoffs explicitly recorded? → …
  • Making accessibility tradeoffs
  • SKILL.md covers Why This Matters, Decision Record Format, When to Document and Where to Store, plus 1 more section
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Decision Documentation is an agent skill from Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills. Document accessibility decisions and the reasoning behind them so they survive team changes, redesigns, and time. Use when making accessibility tradeoffs, choosing between approaches, or when a decision needs to be recorded for future reference. Triggers on: accessibility decision, why did we, tradeoff, decision record, ADR, architecture decision, accessibility rationale, why is it like this, document the decision, decision log.

Its SKILL.md is about 980 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Frontend & Design, covering Accessibility and Architecture decision records. The repository describes itself as: Inclusive design skills for AI coding agents — from cognitive accessibility to adaptive interfaces, inclusive research, and accessibility decision-making. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Making accessibility tradeoffs
  • Choosing between approaches
  • A decision needs to be recorded for future reference
  • : accessibility decision

Example prompts

  • “/decision-documentation”

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Are accessibility decisions documented with reasoning?
  2. Can a new team member find out why something was built a
  3. Are tradeoffs explicitly recorded?
  4. Is documentation stored where it won't be lost?

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 6e0740f. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Decision Documentation loads about 984 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 114 tokens; SKILL.md has 504 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~114
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~984

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills at commit 6e0740f, republished under its MIT licence (© Owl-Listener). 504 words, ~984 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/decision-documentation/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
decision-documentation
description
Document accessibility decisions and the reasoning behind them so they survive team changes, redesigns, and time. Use when making accessibility tradeoffs, choosing between approaches, or when a decision needs to be recorded for future reference. Triggers on: accessibility decision, why did we, tradeoff, decision record, ADR, architecture decision, accessibility rationale, why is it like this, document the decision, decision log.

Accessibility Decision Documentation

Record accessibility decisions so that future teams understand not just what was decided, but why — preventing the cycle where good decisions get reversed because nobody remembers the reasoning.

Why This Matters

Accessibility barriers accumulate quietly through redesigns, framework updates, staff turnover, and rushed deadlines. The most common cause isn't malice or ignorance — it's a new team member changing something without knowing why it was built that way.

Documentation is the immune system. It protects good decisions from being undone by people who weren't in the room.

Decision Record Format

For each significant accessibility decision, record:

Title

A clear, searchable name. "Form validation: inline errors instead of summary banner"

Date and Author

When was this decided and by whom.

Context

What situation prompted this decision? What were the constraints? "During user testing, 3 out of 5 participants with cognitive disabilities missed the error summary banner at the top of the page. They corrected individual fields but didn't scroll up to see the banner, so they didn't know the form hadn't submitted."

Decision

What was decided, specifically. "All form validation errors will appear inline directly below the field that needs correction. The error summary banner is removed. Errors are announced to screen readers via aria-describedby on each field."

Alternatives Considered

What other options were evaluated and why they were rejected. "We considered keeping the summary banner alongside inline errors, but testing showed it created confusion — users didn't know which error indication to follow."

Accessibility Impact

Who benefits from this decision and how. "Benefits users with cognitive disabilities (don't need to remember which fields had errors), screen reader users (errors announced in context), and all users (faster error correction)."

Show full SKILL.md (225 more words)Show less
Risks and Tradeoffs

What might go wrong or what was sacrificed. "If a form has many errors, the user sees them one at a time as they move through fields, rather than all at once. For long forms, this could mean more scrolling. We accept this tradeoff because contextual errors have higher fix rates in testing."

Evidence

What research, testing, or standards support this decision. "User testing session 2024-03-15 (5 participants, 3 with cognitive disabilities). WCAG 2.2 SC 3.3.1 (Error Identification)."

When to Document

Document a decision when:

  • You chose between two or more accessibility approaches
  • You made a tradeoff that reduces accessibility in one area to improve it in another
  • You decided NOT to fix something (and why)
  • You implemented something differently from WCAG techniques for a good reason
  • A design pattern was chosen specifically for accessibility reasons
  • User testing revealed an accessibility insight that changed direction

Where to Store

  • In the codebase alongside the code (preferred — travels with the implementation)
  • In a shared decision log (wiki, Notion, Confluence)
  • In design system documentation (for system-level decisions)
  • Never only in someone's head or in a Slack thread

Assessment Questions

  1. Are accessibility decisions documented with reasoning?
  2. Can a new team member find out why something was built a specific way?
  3. Are tradeoffs explicitly recorded?
  4. Is documentation stored where it won't be lost?

© Owl-Listener, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in accessibility-decisions/skills/decision-documentation of Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 6e0740f

Compare with similar skills

Decision Documentation next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Decision Documentation compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Decision Documentation this skillOwl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills103—~984Automated safety check: PassMIT
Typeui Fundamentalsbergside/typeui2k—~861Automated safety check: PassMIT
Design Standardsrampstackco/claude-skills940—~2.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Web Interface Guidelines Reviewervercel-labs/openreview1.7k98 repos~308Automated safety check: PassNone
Accessibility Reviewmarkmead/hyperui12k1 repos~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Web Animation DesignbaptisteArno/typebot.io11k2 repos~2.7kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence

Similar skills

  • Typeui Fundamentals

    bergside/typeui

    Universal UI/UX design principles covering visual hierarchy, interaction laws, typography foundations, and WCAG accessibility requirements.

    2k GitHub stars~861 tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Design Standards

    rampstackco/claude-skills

    Apply production-grade design standards when building or reviewing pages, components, or UI.

    940 GitHub stars~2.4k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Web Interface Guidelines Reviewer

    vercel-labs/openreview

    Official

    Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my…

    1.7k GitHub starsUsed in 98 repos~308 tokens
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Accessibility Review

    markmead/hyperui

    Run a WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility audit on a design or page. An agent skill from markmead/hyperui.

    12k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.1k tokens
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Web Animation Design

    baptisteArno/typebot.io

    Guides easing, timing and animation choices for UI motion, based on a web animation course, and reviews existing animations in a before-and-after table.

    11k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.7k tokens
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Accessibility Fixer

    ibelick/ui-skills

    Audits and fixes HTML accessibility problems such as ARIA labels, keyboard navigation, focus management, contrast and form errors with minimal changes.

    9.5k GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~1.2k tokens
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed

More from Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills

All 55 skills in this repo
  • Assistive Technology Scenarios

    Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills

    Writes usage scenarios, use cases and storyboards that show real people using screen readers, switches, voice control and other assistive technology to finish tasks.

    103 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Error Prevention and Recovery

    Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills

    Designs forgiving forms and flows: prevent input errors, write messages that say what happened and what to do, and add undo, confirmation and recovery paths.

    103 GitHub stars~739 tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Accessible Heading Structure

    Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills

    Designs heading hierarchies for screen reader navigation and cognitive accessibility on pages, articles, dashboards and forms.

    103 GitHub stars~763 tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ability Spectrum Mapping

    Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills

    Maps a feature across a range of vision, hearing, motor and cognitive ability to find where the design starts to fail, and to explain accessibility scope to stakeholders.

    103 GitHub stars~917 tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Accessibility Debt Tracking

    Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills

    Track and manage accessibility debt — known accessibility issues that have been deferred.

    103 GitHub stars~869 tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Accessibility Testing Strategy

    Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills

    Plan what to test, how to test, and who should test for accessibility.

    103 GitHub stars~1k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Decision Documentation

What does Decision Documentation do?

Document accessibility decisions and the reasoning behind them so they survive team changes, redesigns, and time. Decision Documentation is an agent skill from Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills. Document accessibility decisions and the reasoning behind them so they survive team changes, redesigns, and time.

When should I use Decision Documentation?

Decision Documentation fits situations like: making accessibility tradeoffs; choosing between approaches; A decision needs to be recorded for future reference; : accessibility decision.

How do I install Decision Documentation in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill decision-documentation -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (accessibility-decisions/skills/decision-documentation in Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills) into .claude/skills/decision-documentation in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Decision Documentation in Codex?

Run `npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill decision-documentation -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (accessibility-decisions/skills/decision-documentation in Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills) into .agents/skills/decision-documentation in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Decision Documentation in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill decision-documentation -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/decision-documentation, .gemini/skills/decision-documentation, .github/skills/decision-documentation and .opencode/skills/decision-documentation in your project.

What does Decision Documentation need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Decision Documentation is instructions for the agent only.

Does Decision Documentation access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Decision Documentation safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Decision Documentation use?

Decision Documentation is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Decision Documentation use?

About 984 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 3.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Decision Documentation?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Decision Documentation: Typeui Fundamentals (bergside/typeui, 2k stars), Design Standards (rampstackco/claude-skills, 940 stars), Web Interface Guidelines Reviewer (vercel-labs/openreview, 1.7k stars) and Accessibility Review (markmead/hyperui, 12k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Decision Documentation?

Owl-Listener (a GitHub user) maintains it in Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills, which has 103 GitHub stars. The repository holds 55 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on June 9, 2026.

Source: Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.