Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
Use before submission or when reviewing papers - provides evaluation checklists, bias detection, and self-review templates
Install Peer Review
$ npx skills add Norman-bury/research-writing-skill --skill peer-review -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install Norman-bury/research-writing-skill peer-review --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Norman-bury/research-writing-skill.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/peer-review .claude/skills/peer-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "peer-review" agent skill from https://github.com/Norman-bury/research-writing-skill/tree/main/skills/peer-review into .claude/skills/peer-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "peer-review", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/Norman-bury/research-writing-skill/tree/main/skills/peer-reviewType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add Norman-bury/research-writing-skill --skill peer-review -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install Norman-bury/research-writing-skill peer-review --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Norman-bury/research-writing-skill.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/peer-review .agents/skills/peer-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "peer-review" agent skill from https://github.com/Norman-bury/research-writing-skill/tree/main/skills/peer-review into .agents/skills/peer-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "peer-review", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add Norman-bury/research-writing-skill --skill peer-review -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install Norman-bury/research-writing-skill peer-review --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Norman-bury/research-writing-skill.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/peer-review .cursor/skills/peer-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "peer-review" agent skill from https://github.com/Norman-bury/research-writing-skill/tree/main/skills/peer-review into .cursor/skills/peer-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "peer-review", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/Norman-bury/research-writing-skill.git --path skills/peer-review--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add Norman-bury/research-writing-skill --skill peer-review -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install Norman-bury/research-writing-skill peer-review --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Norman-bury/research-writing-skill.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/peer-review .gemini/skills/peer-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "peer-review" agent skill from https://github.com/Norman-bury/research-writing-skill/tree/main/skills/peer-review into .gemini/skills/peer-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "peer-review", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install Norman-bury/research-writing-skill peer-reviewInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add Norman-bury/research-writing-skill --skill peer-review -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Norman-bury/research-writing-skill.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/peer-review .github/skills/peer-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "peer-review" agent skill from https://github.com/Norman-bury/research-writing-skill/tree/main/skills/peer-review into .github/skills/peer-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "peer-review", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add Norman-bury/research-writing-skill --skill peer-review -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install Norman-bury/research-writing-skill peer-review --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Norman-bury/research-writing-skill.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/peer-review .opencode/skills/peer-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "peer-review" agent skill from https://github.com/Norman-bury/research-writing-skill/tree/main/skills/peer-review into .opencode/skills/peer-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "peer-review", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
peer-review- GitHub stars
- 3.4k
- Token cost
- ~582 tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 107 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 20
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
Use before submission or when reviewing papers - provides evaluation checklists, bias detection, and self-review templates
- Tasks that involve Peer review
- SKILL.md covers Checklist, 一、同行评审工作流程, 二、审稿报告结构 and 三、批判性思维框架, plus 3 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Peer Review is an agent skill from Norman-bury/research-writing-skill. Use before submission or when reviewing papers - provides evaluation checklists, bias detection, and self-review templates
Its SKILL.md is about 580 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: 科研写作助手 (Research Writing Assistant). The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Tasks that involve Peer review
Example prompts
- “/peer-review”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 6f79595. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are markdown).
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Peer Review loads about 582 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 34 tokens; SKILL.md has 107 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from Norman-bury/research-writing-skill at commit 6f79595, republished under its MIT licence (© Norman-bury). 107 words, ~582 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/peer-review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- peer-review
- description
- Use before submission or when reviewing papers - provides evaluation checklists, bias detection, and self-review templates
同行评审与自审
本技能提供论文评审、自我审视和批判性分析的完整指南。
Checklist
- 初步评估：把握论文核心
- 逐节详细审查
- 方法论和统计严谨性评估
- 可重复性和透明度检查
- 撰写审稿报告
- 提供具体改进建议
一、同行评审工作流程
阶段1：初步评估
关键问题：
- 核心研究问题或假设是什么？
- 主要发现和结论是什么？
- 工作是否科学合理且有意义？
- 是否适合目标期刊/会议？
- 是否存在明显的重大缺陷？
输出：2-3句话的简要总结。
阶段2：逐节详细审查
摘要与标题
- 摘要是否准确反映研究内容和结论？
- 标题是否具体、准确、信息丰富？
引言
- 背景信息是否充分且最新？
- 研究问题是否有明确的动机和理由？
- 相关先前研究是否被适当引用？
方法
- 其他研究者能否根据描述复现研究？
- 方法是否适合解决研究问题？
- 统计方法是否适当？
结果
- 结果是否逻辑清晰地呈现？
- 图表是否适当、清晰且正确标注？
- 是否包含所有相关结果？
讨论
- 结论是否有数据支持？
- 研究局限性是否被承认和讨论？
- 推测是否与数据支持的结论明确区分？
阶段3：方法论和统计严谨性
统计评估：
- 统计假设是否满足？
- 是否报告效应量和p值？
- 是否适当应用多重检验校正？
- 样本量是否有功效分析支持？
实验设计：
- 对照是否适当和充分？
- 重复是否足够？
- 潜在混杂因素是否被控制？
二、审稿报告结构
总结陈述
## 总体评估
**研究概述**：[1-2句话概括]
**总体建议**：[接受/小修/大修/拒稿]
**关键优点**：
1. [优点1]
2. [优点2]
**关键缺点**：
1. [缺点1]
2. [缺点2]主要意见
显著影响论文有效性的关键问题：
- 基本方法论缺陷
- 不适当的统计分析
- 不支持或过度陈述的结论
- 缺少关键对照或实验
次要意见
改善清晰度和完整性的问题：
- 图表标签或图例不清晰
- 缺少方法细节
- 排版或语法错误
三、批判性思维框架
偏倚检测
| 偏倚类型 | 检查要点 |
|---|---|
| 确认偏倚 | 是否只强调支持性发现？ |
| 选择偏倚 | 样本是否代表目标人群？ |
| 发表偏倚 | 是否缺少阴性结果？ |
| P-hacking | 是否多次分析直到显著？ |
逻辑谬误识别
| 谬误类型 | 表现 |
|---|---|
| 事后归因 | "B跟在A后面，所以A导致了B" |
| 相关=因果 | 混淆关联与因果 |
| 草率泛化 | 从小样本得出广泛结论 |
| 挑选数据 | 只选择支持性证据 |
四、自我审稿提示词
投稿前自查
# Role
你是一位严苛的资深学术审稿人。
# Task
请深入阅读并分析我的论文，撰写严厉但建设性的审稿报告。
# 审查维度
1. **原创性**：实质性突破还是边际增量？
2. **严谨性**：推导是否有跳跃？实验对比是否公平？
3. **一致性**：声称的贡献是否得到验证？
# Output
- Part 1 [Review Report]：Summary, Strengths, Weaknesses, Rating
- Part 2 [Strategic Advice]：具体改进建议
# Input
投稿目标：[期刊/会议名]
论文内容：[粘贴]快速质量检查
# Task
快速检查论文是否存在以下问题：
1. 逻辑一致性：引言的声明是否在实验中得到验证？
2. 术语一致性：核心概念是否保持一致命名？
3. 数据支持：所有结论是否有数据支持？
4. 对照完整性：是否与足够的baseline比较？
5. 消融充分性：是否验证了每个关键模块？
# Output
- 无问题：[检测通过]
- 有问题：分点列出位置和具体问题五、审稿语气
最佳实践
- 建设性：将批评框架为改进机会
- 具体：提供具体例子和可操作建议
- 平衡：承认优点和缺点
- 尊重：记住作者投入了大量努力
- 客观：关注科学，而非科学家
避免事项
- 人身攻击或轻蔑语言
- 没有具体例子的模糊批评
- 要求超出范围的不必要实验
- 在双盲评审中暴露身份
六、审稿检查清单
- 总结陈述清楚传达整体评估
- 主要问题被清楚识别和论证
- 建议的修改具体且可操作
- 统计方法已被评估
- 可重复性和数据可用性已评估
- 图表已评估质量和完整性
- 全文语气建设性且专业
© Norman-bury, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in skills/peer-review of Norman-bury/research-writing-skill.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 6f79595
Compare with similar skills
Peer Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peer Review this skillNorman-bury/research-writing-skill | 3.4k | — | ~582 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from Norman-bury/research-writing-skill
All 20 skills in this repoEvidence Driven Writing
Norman-bury/research-writing-skill
A skill your agent uses when writing or revising Introduction, Related Work, background, literature synthesis, or any section where references must drive claims
Environment Setup
Norman-bury/research-writing-skill
A skill your agent uses when Python environment setup is needed for data visualization or conda installation is required
Experiment Results Planning
Norman-bury/research-writing-skill
A skill your agent uses when designing experiments, result tables, mock planning data, evaluation protocols, or results sections before real data are final
Figures Diagram
Norman-bury/research-writing-skill
A skill your agent uses when creating flowcharts, architecture diagrams, or conceptual diagrams - generates prompts for image AI
Figures Python
Norman-bury/research-writing-skill
A skill your agent uses when creating data visualizations for papers - generates publication-quality plots with top-journal color schemes
Latex Output
Norman-bury/research-writing-skill
A skill your agent uses when user requests LaTeX format output or has provided school/journal LaTeX templates
Related
Categories
Questions about Peer Review
What does Peer Review do?
Use before submission or when reviewing papers - provides evaluation checklists, bias detection, and self-review templates. Peer Review is an agent skill from Norman-bury/research-writing-skill.
When should I use Peer Review?
Peer Review fits situations like: tasks that involve Peer review.
How do I install Peer Review in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add Norman-bury/research-writing-skill --skill peer-review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/peer-review in Norman-bury/research-writing-skill) into .claude/skills/peer-review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Peer Review in Codex?
Run `npx skills add Norman-bury/research-writing-skill --skill peer-review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/peer-review in Norman-bury/research-writing-skill) into .agents/skills/peer-review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Peer Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add Norman-bury/research-writing-skill --skill peer-review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/peer-review, .gemini/skills/peer-review, .github/skills/peer-review and .opencode/skills/peer-review in your project.
What does Peer Review need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Peer Review is instructions for the agent only.
Does Peer Review access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Peer Review safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Peer Review use?
Peer Review is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Peer Review use?
About 582 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 2.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Peer Review?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Peer Review: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Peer Review?
Norman-bury (a GitHub user) maintains it in Norman-bury/research-writing-skill, which has 3,384 GitHub stars. The repository holds 20 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on June 10, 2026.
Source: Norman-bury/research-writing-skill on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.