Agent skill

Litigation Hold Mgmt

by mukul975 in mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

Manages legal hold and data preservation processes including triggering events, custodian notification, hold-in-place technical implementation, release procedures, and interaction with retention…

Apache-2.0Auto-check passedLegal & Compliance

Install Litigation Hold Mgmt

skills CLI
$ npx skills add mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills --skill litigation-hold-mgmt -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills litigation-hold-mgmt --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/privacy/litigation-hold-mgmt .claude/skills/litigation-hold-mgmt && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
litigation-hold-mgmt
GitHub stars
301
Token cost
~3.6k tokens
SKILL.md length
935 words
Files
5 (incl. scripts, references, assets)
Skills in repo
280
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
Apache-2.0

At a glance

Manages legal hold and data preservation processes including triggering events, custodian notification, hold-in-place technical implementation, release procedures, and interaction with retention…

  • Works in 6 steps: Triggering Events → Hold Scope Definition → Custodian Notification → …
  • Tasks that involve Legal research
  • SKILL.md covers Overview, Legal Foundation, Litigation Hold Lifecycle and Litigation Hold Register, plus 1 more section
  • Runs Python scripts from its folder; calls gcloud

What it does

Litigation Hold Mgmt is an agent skill from mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills. Manages legal hold and data preservation processes including triggering events, custodian notification, hold-in-place technical implementation, release procedures, and interaction with retention schedules. Covers litigation hold registers, compliance monitoring, and Art. 17(3)(e) exception documentation. Activate for legal hold, litigation preservation, data freeze, e-discovery hold queries.

Its SKILL.md is about 3.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 7 other files, including scripts, reference files and assets (for example `assets/template.md`, `references/standards.md` and `references/workflows.md`).

It sits in Legal & Compliance, covering Legal research and Privacy and GDPR. The repository describes itself as: 282+ structured privacy & data protection skills for AI agents. GDPR, CCPA, EU AI Act, HIPAA, LGPD, PIPL, DPDP Act. The licence is Apache-2.0.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Legal research
  • Tasks that involve Privacy and GDPR

Example prompts

  • “Use the litigation-hold-mgmt skill to manage legal hold and data preservation processes including triggering events, custodian notification…”
  • “/litigation-hold-mgmt”

Requirements

  • Python 3

Workflow steps

6 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Triggering Events
  2. Hold Scope Definition
  3. Custodian Notification
  4. Technical Implementation (Hold-in-Place)
  5. Ongoing Compliance Monitoring
  6. Release Procedures

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 9b2ef9e. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Ships 1 file in scripts/ (Python), which the agent can run.

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • gcloud

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md. Its commands use gcloud, which can reach the network depending on how they are called.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Litigation Hold Mgmt loads about 3.6k tokens when it runs, and up to ~5.1k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 104 tokens; SKILL.md has 935 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~104
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~3.6k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~5.1k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); the scripts in this folder are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills at commit 9b2ef9e, republished under its Apache-2.0 licence (© mukul975). 935 words, ~3,612 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/litigation-hold-mgmt/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 4 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
litigation-hold-mgmt
description
Manages legal hold and data preservation processes including triggering events, custodian notification, hold-in-place technical implementation, release procedures, and interaction with retention schedules. Covers litigation hold registers, compliance monitoring, and Art. 17(3)(e) exception documentation. Activate for legal hold, litigation preservation, data freeze, e-discovery hold queries.
license
Apache-2.0
metadata.author
mukul975
metadata.version
1.0
metadata.domain
privacy
metadata.subdomain
data-retention-deletion
metadata.tags
litigation-hold, legal-preservation, e-discovery, data-freeze, legal-hold-management

Litigation Hold Management

Overview

A litigation hold (also called legal hold or preservation order) is a directive to preserve all data and documents relevant to pending or reasonably anticipated litigation, regulatory investigation, or audit. Litigation holds override normal retention schedules and automated deletion processes — data subject to a hold must NOT be deleted, modified, or destroyed until the hold is formally released. This skill provides the complete operational framework for issuing, tracking, implementing, and releasing litigation holds, including the critical interaction between holds and GDPR data retention and erasure obligations.

GDPR Article 17(3)(e) — Legal Claims Exception

The right to erasure does not apply where processing is necessary for the establishment, exercise, or defence of legal claims. This is the primary GDPR basis for retaining personal data under a litigation hold beyond its normal retention period.

Duty to Preserve (Common Law Jurisdictions)

In England and Wales, the duty to preserve documents arises when litigation is reasonably contemplated or has commenced:

  • CPR Part 31 (Civil Procedure Rules): Imposes disclosure obligations once proceedings are issued.
  • Practice Direction 31B: Electronic disclosure — requires parties to preserve electronic documents once litigation is reasonably anticipated.
  • Spoliation doctrine: Intentional or negligent destruction of relevant evidence after litigation is anticipated can result in adverse inferences, costs sanctions, or striking out of claims.
US Federal Rules (Cross-Reference for Multinational Operations)
  • FRCP Rule 37(e): Failure to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) can result in sanctions, adverse inference instructions, or case dismissal.
  • Zubulake v UBS Warburg (2003-2004): Established the duty to preserve begins when litigation is reasonably anticipated.
EU Regulatory Investigations

Regulatory bodies (European Commission, national competition authorities, financial regulators) may require preservation of documents relevant to an investigation. Failure to preserve can constitute obstruction.

Litigation Hold Lifecycle

Phase 1: Triggering Events

A litigation hold must be issued when any of the following events occur:

Trigger CategorySpecific EventsResponse Time
Litigation filedClaim form received; writ served; arbitration notice receivedImmediate (within 24 hours)
Litigation anticipatedPre-action protocol letter received; demand letter received; formal complaint indicating likely litigationWithin 48 hours
Regulatory investigationNotice of investigation; dawn raid; regulatory inquiry letter; request for information from supervisory authorityImmediate (within 24 hours)
Internal investigationWhistleblower report triggering formal investigation; fraud suspicion; compliance breach identifiedWithin 48 hours
DPA inquiryData protection authority opens formal investigation or requests information under GDPR Art. 58Within 48 hours
Tax auditHMRC opens formal enquiry; VAT inspection noticeWithin 48 hours
Employment disputeTribunal claim filed; formal grievance raising likelihood of tribunal proceedingsWithin 48 hours
Phase 2: Hold Scope Definition
LITIGATION HOLD SCOPE DEFINITION — Orion Data Vault Corp
---------------------------------------------------------
Hold Reference: LH-2026-0023
Matter: [Description of litigation/investigation]
Legal Counsel: [Internal/External counsel name]
Date Issued: 2026-03-14
Anticipated Duration: [Estimate — reassess quarterly]

SCOPE — DATA TO PRESERVE:
1. Date Range: [Start date] to [End date / ongoing]
2. Data Subjects: [Named individuals, departments, or "all"]
3. Data Categories:
   □ Email and electronic communications
   □ Documents (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, PDF)
   □ Financial records and transactions
   □ Customer/client records
   □ Employee records
   □ CCTV/surveillance footage
   □ Access logs and audit trails
   □ Database records (specify: _____________)
   □ Backup tapes/archives
   □ Mobile device data (text messages, call logs)
   □ Collaboration platforms (Teams, Slack, SharePoint)
   □ Other: _____________

4. Systems in Scope:
   □ Email system (Exchange/Gmail)
   □ File servers / network drives
   □ SharePoint / OneDrive / Google Drive
   □ CRM (Salesforce)
   □ ERP (SAP)
   □ HR system
   □ Financial system
   □ Cloud storage (AWS S3 / Azure / GCP)
   □ Backup systems
   □ Messaging platforms
   □ Other: _____________

5. Custodians (individuals who may hold relevant data):
   - [Name, Title, Department]
   - [Name, Title, Department]
   - [Name, Title, Department]

EXCLUSIONS:
- [Specify any data explicitly outside scope]

INTERACTION WITH RETENTION SCHEDULE:
- Normal retention schedule: SUSPENDED for all in-scope data
- Automated deletion: PAUSED for in-scope data categories
- Art. 17 erasure requests: EXCEPTION applies under Art. 17(3)(e)
Phase 3: Custodian Notification

Every individual identified as a custodian must receive a formal hold notice:

LITIGATION HOLD NOTICE — CONFIDENTIAL
Orion Data Vault Corp

To: [Custodian Name, Title]
From: [General Counsel / Legal Department]
Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Re: Litigation Hold — Reference LH-2026-0023

DIRECTIVE: PRESERVE ALL POTENTIALLY RELEVANT DATA

You are hereby directed to preserve all documents and electronically
stored information (ESI) that may be relevant to the above-referenced
matter. This obligation is effective IMMEDIATELY and supersedes all
existing retention schedules and deletion policies.

WHAT YOU MUST DO:
1. STOP all deletion, destruction, or modification of potentially
   relevant documents and data.
2. PRESERVE all emails, documents, files, messages, voicemails,
   text messages, and other records related to [description of
   subject matter].
3. DISABLE any auto-delete functions on your email or messaging
   accounts for the duration of this hold.
4. DO NOT move, rename, or reorganize files that may be relevant.
5. PRESERVE all physical documents (paper files, notebooks, etc.).

SCOPE:
- Time period: [Start date] to present
- Subject matter: [Description]
- Document types: All formats (electronic and physical)

THIS HOLD REMAINS IN EFFECT until you receive a formal written
release notice from the Legal Department. Do not assume the hold
has been lifted based on the passage of time or resolution of
the underlying matter.

QUESTIONS: Contact [Legal Department contact] immediately if you
have any questions about this notice or are unsure whether specific
documents fall within scope.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT REQUIRED: Please confirm receipt and understanding
of this notice by signing below and returning to the Legal
Department within 48 hours.

I acknowledge receipt and understanding of this Litigation Hold Notice.

Name: ________________________
Signature: ____________________
Date: ________________________
Phase 4: Technical Implementation (Hold-in-Place)
SystemHold Implementation Method
Email (Exchange Online)In-Place Hold or Litigation Hold via Exchange Admin Center / Compliance Center; applies to mailbox and archive
Email (Google Workspace)Google Vault — create a Matter and apply Hold to specified users and date range
SharePoint / OneDrivePreservation Hold via Microsoft Purview Compliance; applies at site, library, or folder level
Cloud Storage (AWS S3)Apply S3 Object Lock Legal Hold (s3:PutObjectLegalHold) to relevant objects
Cloud Storage (Azure Blob)Apply Legal Hold tags to containers via immutability policy
Cloud Storage (GCP)Apply temporary hold to objects (gcloud storage objects update --temporary-hold)
DatabasesDisable automated deletion jobs for in-scope records; flag records with hold reference
Backup systemsTag relevant backup sets for indefinite retention; exclude from rotation/overwrite
Automated deletion systemAdd hold reference to exclusion list in deletion orchestrator; all in-scope records bypass deletion queue
Collaboration (Teams/Slack)Microsoft Purview retention policy; Slack Enterprise Grid Legal Hold (via Compliance API)
Show full SKILL.md (335 more words)Show less
Phase 5: Ongoing Compliance Monitoring
ActivityFrequencyResponsible
Custodian compliance reminderQuarterly (or more frequently for active litigation)Legal Department
New custodian identificationOngoing — as new individuals are identified as relevantLegal Counsel
System hold verificationMonthly — verify holds remain active on all in-scope systemsIT + Legal
New data source assessmentWhen new systems are deployed or data is migratedIT + Legal
Hold scope reviewQuarterly — assess whether scope should be expanded or narrowedLegal Counsel
Interaction with Art. 17 requestsPer request — assess whether hold applies to data subject's dataDPO + Legal
Phase 6: Release Procedures
[Litigation/Investigation Concluded]
         │
         ▼
[Legal Counsel Authorizes Release]
   - Written authorization from lead counsel
   - Confirmation that all proceedings (including appeals) are concluded
   - Confirmation that no related proceedings are anticipated
         │
         ▼
[Issue Hold Release Notice]
   - Formal written notice to all custodians
   - Notify IT to remove technical holds
   - Notify DPO to resume normal retention schedule
         │
         ▼
[Technical Hold Removal]
   - Remove litigation hold from email systems
   - Remove legal holds from cloud storage objects
   - Re-enable automated deletion for affected data categories
   - Remove hold exclusion from deletion orchestrator
   - Unfreeze backup rotation for affected backup sets
         │
         ▼
[Post-Release Retention Assessment]
   - For each data category previously under hold:
     ├── Has normal retention period expired during hold? ──► Schedule immediate deletion
     ├── Is normal retention period still active? ──► Resume normal retention countdown
     └── Were Art. 17 requests received during hold? ──► Process queued erasure requests
         │
         ▼
[Update Litigation Hold Register]
   - Record release date, authorizing counsel, matter outcome
   - Archive hold documentation (retain for 6 years)

Litigation Hold Register

Orion Data Vault Corp maintains a central register of all active and closed litigation holds:

LITIGATION HOLD REGISTER — Orion Data Vault Corp
(Extract — Active Holds as of 2026-03-14)

┌───────────────┬───────────────────────────┬────────────┬──────────────┬───────────┬──────────────────┐
│ Hold Ref      │ Matter Description        │ Date Issued│ Custodians   │ Systems   │ Next Review      │
├───────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┼──────────────┼───────────┼──────────────────┤
│ LH-2025-0018  │ Employment tribunal —     │ 2025-06-15 │ 4 custodians │ Email,    │ 2026-06-15       │
│               │ unfair dismissal claim    │            │              │ HR system │                  │
├───────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┼──────────────┼───────────┼──────────────────┤
│ LH-2025-0021  │ ICO investigation —       │ 2025-09-01 │ 7 custodians │ All       │ 2026-03-01       │
│               │ data breach notification  │            │              │ systems   │ (overdue —       │
│               │                           │            │              │           │  under review)   │
├───────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┼──────────────┼───────────┼──────────────────┤
│ LH-2026-0023  │ Commercial dispute —      │ 2026-03-14 │ 3 custodians │ Email,    │ 2026-06-14       │
│               │ contract breach claim     │            │              │ CRM, ERP, │                  │
│               │                           │            │              │ Finance   │                  │
└───────────────┴───────────────────────────┴────────────┴──────────────┴───────────┴──────────────────┘

Interaction with GDPR Rights

Art. 17 Erasure Requests During Active Hold

When an Art. 17 erasure request is received for data subject to a litigation hold:

  1. Acknowledge the request within normal timeline (30 days).
  2. Inform the data subject that an exception under Art. 17(3)(e) applies — the data is necessary for the establishment, exercise, or defence of legal claims.
  3. Do NOT disclose the specific litigation or investigation (legal privilege may apply).
  4. Queue the erasure request for processing upon hold release.
  5. Document the exception in the erasure request record and the litigation hold register.
  6. Periodic review: If the hold is subsequently released, process the queued erasure request promptly.
Art. 15 Access Requests During Active Hold

Access requests are generally NOT affected by litigation holds. The data subject retains the right to access their data. However:

  • Consult Legal counsel before disclosing data that is subject to legal privilege.
  • Redact information that could prejudice the litigation (Art. 15(4) — shall not adversely affect the rights and freedoms of others).
Retention Schedule Interaction

During an active hold:

  • The retention clock is paused for all in-scope data.
  • Automated deletion is suspended for in-scope data.
  • Upon hold release, the remaining retention period resumes (not resets).
  • If the normal retention period would have expired during the hold, deletion is scheduled promptly after release.

© mukul975, Apache-2.0. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 4 other files (scripts, references, assets) in skills/privacy/litigation-hold-mgmt of mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • assets/template.md
  • references/standards.md
  • references/workflows.md
  • scripts/process.py

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 9b2ef9e

Compare with similar skills

Litigation Hold Mgmt next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Litigation Hold Mgmt compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Litigation Hold Mgmt this skillmukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills301—~3.6kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Legal Compliancetravisjneuman/.claude100—~3.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Find Law Firmjeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.8k—~3.6kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Legal CogaAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team1051 repos~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
C15tc15t/c15t1.9k1 repos~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
HIPAA Safe Harbor Coverage Auditmaziyarpanahi/openmed5.5k—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0

Similar skills

  • Legal Compliance

    travisjneuman/.claude

    Legal and compliance expertise for corporate governance, contract analysis, regulatory compliance (SOX, GDPR, HIPAA), risk assessment, intellectual property, and litigation management.

    100 GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated today
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Find Law Firm

    jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace

    A skill your agent uses whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US B2B law firms — corporate, IP/patent, M&A and securities, employment, commercial litigation…

    2.8k GitHub stars~3.6k tokensUpdated today
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check: notes
  • Legal Cog

    aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team

    Legal demands two things: frontier-level reasoning and precision document generation.

    105 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.9k tokens
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • C15t

    c15t/c15t

    Work with c15t consent management docs, APIs, and integrations for Next.js, React, and JavaScript.

    1.9k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.6k tokens
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Checks OpenMed de-identified clinical text against the 18 HIPAA Safe Harbor identifier categories and reports gaps and residual re-identification risk.

    5.5k GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated today
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Tw Legal RAG

    aa0101181514/tw-legal-rag

    Retrieve real Taiwan court judgments with verifiable citations before answering any question about Taiwan law or case law.

    328 GitHub stars~580 tokensUpdated yesterday
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed

More from mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

All 280 skills in this repo
  • Age Gating Services

    mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

    Implements age-gating mechanisms for online services to restrict access based on user age.

    301 GitHub stars~3.7k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • AI Data Retention

    mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

    Manages AI model retention and machine unlearning requirements.

    301 GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • AI Dpia

    mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

    Conducts Data Protection Impact Assessments for AI and ML systems per EDPB Guidelines 04/2025 on AI processing.

    301 GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Dpia Mitigation Plan

    mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

    Structures risk mitigation planning and residual risk tracking for Data Protection Impact Assessments under GDPR Article 35(7)(d).

    301 GitHub stars~846 tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Gdpr Accountability

    mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

    Guides implementation of the GDPR accountability principle under Articles 5(2) and 24, including documentation requirements for policies, DPIAs, RoPA, training records, and breach logs.

    301 GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Pia Threshold Screening

    mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

    Conducts pre-DPIA threshold screening to determine whether a full Data Protection Impact Assessment is required under GDPR Article 35.

    301 GitHub stars~880 tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Litigation Hold Mgmt

What does Litigation Hold Mgmt do?

Manages legal hold and data preservation processes including triggering events, custodian notification, hold-in-place technical implementation, release procedures, and interaction with retention…. Litigation Hold Mgmt is an agent skill from mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills. Manages legal hold and data preservation processes including triggering events, custodian notification, hold-in-place technical implementation, release procedures, and interaction with retention schedules.

When should I use Litigation Hold Mgmt?

Litigation Hold Mgmt fits situations like: tasks that involve Legal research; tasks that involve Privacy and GDPR.

How do I install Litigation Hold Mgmt in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills --skill litigation-hold-mgmt -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/privacy/litigation-hold-mgmt in mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills) into .claude/skills/litigation-hold-mgmt in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Litigation Hold Mgmt in Codex?

Run `npx skills add mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills --skill litigation-hold-mgmt -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/privacy/litigation-hold-mgmt in mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills) into .agents/skills/litigation-hold-mgmt in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Litigation Hold Mgmt in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills --skill litigation-hold-mgmt -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/litigation-hold-mgmt, .gemini/skills/litigation-hold-mgmt, .github/skills/litigation-hold-mgmt and .opencode/skills/litigation-hold-mgmt in your project.

What does Litigation Hold Mgmt need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Litigation Hold Mgmt needs Python for the scripts in its folder and the command-line tools its instructions call (gcloud). Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Litigation Hold Mgmt access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Litigation Hold Mgmt safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. The check reads SKILL.md only: the scripts in the folder are not scanned, so read them before running anything.

What licence does Litigation Hold Mgmt use?

Litigation Hold Mgmt is published under the Apache-2.0 licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Litigation Hold Mgmt use?

About 3.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 14k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 1.5k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Litigation Hold Mgmt?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Litigation Hold Mgmt: Legal Compliance (travisjneuman/.claude, 100 stars), Find Law Firm (jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace, 2.8k stars), Legal Cog (aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team, 105 stars) and C15t (c15t/c15t, 1.9k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Litigation Hold Mgmt?

mukul975 (a GitHub user) maintains it in mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills, which has 301 GitHub stars. The repository holds 280 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on March 16, 2026.

Source: mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.