Agent skill

Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings

by moshuying in moshuying/pitchcraft

Structures kickoffs, status updates, wrap-ups, investor pitches and solution selling on one five-part persuasion framework, with a pre-submit checklist.

Apache-2.0Auto-check passedWriting & Content

Install Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings

skills CLI
$ npx skills add moshuying/pitchcraft --skill pitchcraft -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install moshuying/pitchcraft pitchcraft --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
pitchcraft
GitHub stars
191
Used in
1 other repo
Token cost
~2.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
537 words
Files
14 (incl. scripts)
Skills in repo
1
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
Apache-2.0

At a glance

Structures kickoffs, status updates, wrap-ups, investor pitches and solution selling on one five-part persuasion framework, with a pre-submit checklist.

  • Works in 6 steps: Their concerns first, your story second → Risks need judgment → Acknowledge peer teams first → …
  • Preparing a project kickoff briefing for leadership
  • SKILL.md covers Essence, Users & scenarios, Core: 5-part persuasion… and Briefing types & templates, plus 3 more sections
  • Runs JavaScript scripts from its folder

What it does

Pitchcraft treats briefings as persuasion rather than activity logs: in limited time, help a specific audience understand the context, trust your judgment and give the support you need. Every briefing uses one five-part backbone, Hook, Context, Proposal, Evidence and Ask, with the emphasis shifting by scenario. Five scenarios are covered: project kickoff, status update, wrap-up or annual review, investor pitch and solution selling, aimed at tech leads, product managers, founders and pre-sales teams.

Each scenario has a template with its goal and section focus. A kickoff aims to get leadership to approve the start and allocate people and budget, using sections on background and opportunity, existing assets, goals and scope, differentiation, and resources and risks. A status update shows the work is on track with a one-line summary, period context, key progress, metrics, and risks and decisions needed. A wrap-up shows delivered value with goal attainment, original goals, quantified outcomes, and lessons and assets.

The skill prompts for missing materials and audience context and ends with a pre-submit checklist. It ships as a Claude Code plugin, with a command file, an install script and a universal prompt file for Cursor, Codex and plain chat, each also in Simplified Chinese.

When your agent uses it

  • Preparing a project kickoff briefing for leadership
  • Writing a status update that argues for continued investment
  • Structuring an investor pitch or a solution-selling presentation
  • Drafting a wrap-up or annual review with quantified outcomes

Example prompts

  • “Help me prepare a kickoff briefing for the payments migration for our CTO and PMO.”
  • “Turn my weekly notes into a status update for our VP, with risks and decisions needed.”
  • “Structure an investor pitch for our scheduling app using the five-part framework.”
  • “Write the annual review for the platform team and check it against the pre-submit list.”

Workflow steps

6 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Their concerns first, your story second
  2. Risks need judgment
  3. Acknowledge peer teams first
  4. Metrics need source and definition
  5. Bad news early when it matters
  6. No homework for the audience

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit e27ca8a. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Ships 1 file in scripts/ (JavaScript), which the agent can run.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings loads about 2.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 91 tokens; SKILL.md has 537 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~91
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~2.4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); the scripts in this folder are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from moshuying/pitchcraft at commit e27ca8a, republished under its Apache-2.0 licence (© moshuying). 537 words, ~2,409 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/pitchcraft/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 13 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
pitchcraft
description
Structured persuasion for tech leads, PMs, and founders—not activity logs. Five scenarios (kickoff, status update, wrap-up, investor pitch, solution selling) on one 5-part framework (Hook→Context→Proposal→Evidence→Ask). AI prompts for missing materials and audience context; pre-submit checklist. Claude Code plugin; Cursor, Codex, and chat via prompts.

Languages: English (this file) · 简体中文 → SKILL.zh-CN.md

Persuasive briefings · Workflow

Essence

This is not report writing—it is persuasion. In every scenario you do the same thing:

In limited time, help a specific audience understand context, trust your judgment, and provide the support you need.

Users & scenarios

RoleScenariosAudience
Tech lead / engineering managerKickoff, milestone review, wrap-upBusiness leaders, CTO, PMO
PM / product leadQuarterly review, annual summary, requirements reviewDirector, VP
Founder / business ownerInvestor pitchInvestors, partners
Pre-sales / solutionsSolution sellingCustomer execs, technical evaluators

Core: 5-part persuasion framework

All briefing types share one backbone; section emphasis differs.

Part 1 · Hook
  → Why should they keep listening?
  → Opportunity / pain / urgency

Part 2 · Context
  → What is the situation?
  → What we have done and what we have

Part 3 · Proposal
  → What we will do / did?
  → Scope, path, pace

Part 4 · Evidence
  → Why we can succeed / succeeded?
  → Data, moat, team, cases

Part 5 · Ask
  → What do we need from them?
  → Decision / resources / partnership / investment

Briefing types & templates

Each type is an instance of the 5-part framework.

Project kickoff

Goal: Get leadership to approve start and allocate people and budget.

PartSectionFocus
HookBackground & opportunityMarket, pain, competition, why now
ContextWhat we already haveTeam, tech, data, prior assets
ProposalGoals & scopeIn/out of scope, milestones
EvidenceWhy usDifferentiation, moat
AskResources & risksSupport needed, top risks and mitigation
# {Project} · Kickoff

## Background & opportunity

{Why now: market, pain, competition—2–4 sentences.

This is the persuasion entry—create “we should do this.”}

## What we already have

{Team, tech, data, business assets—not bragging, but trust.

Pattern: “We already have X, so this is not from zero.”}

## Goals & scope

**In scope**: {capabilities}
**Out of scope**: {explicit exclusions—prevent scope creep}

{Milestones and timeline}

## Why us

{Core difference vs alternatives. Moat: why others can’t or won’t match.}

## Resources & risks

{People / budget / cross-team needs
Top risk and mitigation}
Status update

Goal: Convince leaders and stakeholders the work is on track and worth continued investment.

PartSectionFocus
HookOne-line summary1–2 most important facts this period
ContextPeriod contextPosition vs last period
ProposalKey progressBy milestone or module
EvidenceKey metricsProgress, quality, efficiency
AskRisks & decisionsDecisions and coordination needed
# {Project} · Status update

## One-line summary

{1–2 facts; audience grasps core in 10 seconds}

## Key progress

{Completed items and metrics by milestone or module}

## Risks & response

Formula per item: {symptom} → {root cause} → {mitigation} → {status}

Decisions: options + recommendation—no open homework:
❌ "Dependency X uncertain—please advise"
✅ "Dependency X slipped 2 weeks. Option A (add people) vs B (move milestone). Recommend A; need Team Y support."

## Next phase

| Item | ETA | Dependencies | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
Wrap-up / annual review

Goal: Show delivered value and assets retained.

PartSectionFocus
HookGoal attainment overviewDid we succeed overall?
ContextOriginal goalsWhat we committed to
EvidenceQuantified outcomesData-led
ProposalLessons & assetsWhat remains
AskNext phase or handoffWhat happens next
# {Project} · Wrap-up / {Year} annual review

## Goal attainment

| Goal | Target | Actual | % | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|

Underperformance: root cause and improvement—say it before they ask.

## Core deliverables

3–5 items, each: {what} + {metric} + {business impact}

## Lessons

- **What worked**: reusable methods / architecture / process
- **What failed**: root cause + prevention
- **Assets left**: code / data / docs / team capability

## Next

If continuing → direction, goals, key results, resources
If ending → handoff so nothing is left unsupported
Investor pitch

Goal: Spark interest for a deeper conversation.

PartSectionFocus
HookOne-linerElevator pitch
ContextMarket opportunitySize, pain, why now
ProposalProductSolution, core features, stage
EvidenceMoat & tractionTech, data, growth, team
AskFunding / partnershipAmount, use, milestones
# {Project} · Pitch

## One-liner

{What we do, for whom, what value}

## Market opportunity

{Size, persona, pain, why now}

## Product

{How we solve, core features, architecture (brief), stage}

## Moat & traction

**Moat**: {tech / data / network / team—why others can’t}
**Metrics**: {users, growth, retention, revenue}
**Team**: {why this team can execute}

## Funding ask

{Amount, use of funds, milestones, next round goal}
Show full SKILL.md (229 more words)Show less
Solution selling

Goal: Convince customer executives your solution is the best fit.

PartSectionFocus
HookPain alignmentTheir problem in their words
ContextCurrent stateGaps in status quo
ProposalSolutionHow we solve
EvidenceCases & dataProof
AskPartnershipHow to start
# {Project} · Proposal

## Pain alignment

{Customer language for the problem—accuracy builds trust fast}

## Current state

{Why status quo fails: features, cost, efficiency, risk}

## Our solution

{How we solve; capabilities and differentiation}

## Proof

{Same-industry cases with metrics}
{If no case: POC plan or demo roadmap}

## Partnership

{Engagement model, timeline, what we need from them}

Writing rules

1. Their concerns first, your story second

❌ Five minutes on how hard the team worked and how clever the architecture is
✅ First sentence answers “why should I care?”

2. Risks need judgment

❌ "Servers occasionally timeout—please monitor"
✅ "Connection pool exhaustion; scaling in progress; expected recovery tomorrow"

3. Acknowledge peer teams first

❌ "We filled a gap no one else addressed"
✅ "Team X has a mature Y; we extend with Z"

4. Metrics need source and definition

❌ "Conversion improved 20%"
✅ "Conversion +20% (June vs May, same account pool)"

5. Bad news early when it matters

❌ Wins first, then buried "but we slipped"
✅ Lead with material risks, then progress

6. No homework for the audience

❌ "Next: keep pushing forward"
✅ "Integration Wed; risk is dependency Y—owner aligned"


Workflow

Step 1 — Load memory
  Read leader context, business positioning, format prefs.
  Missing → ask user to supply.

Step 2 — Scenario & audience
  User picks type (kickoff / status / wrap-up·annual / pitch / solution selling).
  Probe audience:
  □ Role and level?
  □ How much do they already know?
  □ Top concerns (tech / business / cost / time)?

Step 3 — Material intake
  Check completeness by type; ask for gaps:

  Kickoff:
  □ Background / market analysis
  □ Competitive landscape
  □ Team capabilities
  □ Goals and KPIs
  □ Resources and budget
  □ Timeline

  Status:
  □ Completed work this period
  □ Key metrics (progress / quality / efficiency)
  □ Risk list with judgment and mitigation
  □ Next-phase plan
  □ Decisions needed from leadership

  Wrap-up / annual:
  □ Original goals
  □ Quantified outcomes
  □ Lessons learned
  □ Next plan or handoff

  Pitch:
  □ Market data and reports
  □ Product demo or MVP status
  □ Competition
  □ Team intro
  □ Financials and forecast
  □ Funding ask and use of funds

  Solution selling:
  □ Customer background and pain
  □ Alternative solutions
  □ Our solution and capabilities
  □ Cases or POC plan
  □ Pricing or engagement model

  If user says "you know everything—just write":
  → Pull from memory and prior context
  → Open with "Based on available info; may be missing XX"

Step 4 — Draft to template
  Pick template; apply writing rules.
  After each part, ask: "Does this answer what they care about?"

Step 5 — Final check
  □ First 10 seconds feel relevant?
  □ Every number sourced and defined?
  □ Every risk has root cause + response?
  □ No vague "needs attention" without judgment?
  □ Cross-team mentions acknowledge others first?

Step 6 — User confirmation
  Present → "What should we adjust?"
  Format issues → add to format memory

Cross-scenario migration

From → ToChangeKeep
Kickoff → PitchHook: business pain → market opportunity; Evidence: tech moat → traction5-part structure, risk logic
Status → Kickoff (next phase)Progress becomes Context; accumulated risks feed RiskMetric definitions, team narrative
Wrap-up → Case studyDe-identify internals; emphasize customer valueQuant methods, acceptance criteria
Solution selling → KickoffCustomer pain → market opportunity; cases → evidenceStructure, risk foresight

© moshuying, Apache-2.0. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 13 other files (scripts) in the repository root of moshuying/pitchcraft.

  • SKILL.md
  • .claude-plugin/marketplace.json
  • .claude-plugin/plugin.json
  • .claude/skills
  • .gitignore
  • LICENSE
  • README.md
  • README.zh-CN.md
  • commands/pitchcraft.md
  • commands/pitchcraft.zh-CN.md
  • package.json
  • prompts/universal.md
  • prompts/universal.zh-CN.md
  • scripts/install.js

Open the folder on GitHubat commit e27ca8a

Used in 1 other repository

We found 2 copies of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 1 other GitHub owner. This page covers the copy in moshuying/pitchcraft, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.

Compare with similar skills

Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings this skillmoshuying/pitchcraft1911 repos~2.4kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Internal Narrativealirezarezvani/claude-skills28k1 repos~2.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Data Researchinbrainfun/inbrain1421 repos~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Executive Communicationw95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills244—~3.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Ceo Advisordavila7/claude-code-templates33k1 repos~2.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Ceo Advisoralirezarezvani/claude-skills28k1 repos~2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Internal Narrative

    alirezarezvani/claude-skills

    Build and maintain one coherent company story across all audiences — employees, investors, customers, candidates, and partners.

    28k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.6k tokens
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Data Research

    inbrainfun/inbrain

    Structured data research: search sources, extract structured data, archive raw sources, maintain canonical tracker pages, deduplicate.

    142 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.2k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Executive Communication

    w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills

    ACTIVATE when drafting all-hands speeches, investor updates, quarterly letters to stakeholders, press statements, CEO announcements, crisis communications, customer updates, or any mission-critical…

    244 GitHub stars~3.8k tokensUpdated 7 mo ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Ceo Advisor

    davila7/claude-code-templates

    Executive leadership guidance for strategic decision-making, organizational development, and stakeholder management.

    33k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.8k tokens
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Ceo Advisor

    alirezarezvani/claude-skills

    Executive leadership guidance for strategic decision-making, organizational development, and stakeholder management.

    28k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2k tokens
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Ceo Advisor

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Executive leadership guidance for strategic decisions, org development, and stakeholder management.

    891 GitHub stars~3.9k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed

Questions about Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings

What does Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings do?

Structures kickoffs, status updates, wrap-ups, investor pitches and solution selling on one five-part persuasion framework, with a pre-submit checklist. Pitchcraft treats briefings as persuasion rather than activity logs: in limited time, help a specific audience understand the context, trust your judgment and give the support you need. Every briefing uses one five-part backbone, Hook, Context, Proposal, Evidence and Ask, with the emphasis shifting by scenario.

When should I use Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings?

Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings fits situations like: preparing a project kickoff briefing for leadership; writing a status update that argues for continued investment; structuring an investor pitch or a solution-selling presentation; drafting a wrap-up or annual review with quantified outcomes.

How do I install Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add moshuying/pitchcraft --skill pitchcraft -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (the moshuying/pitchcraft repository) into .claude/skills/pitchcraft in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings in Codex?

Run `npx skills add moshuying/pitchcraft --skill pitchcraft -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (the moshuying/pitchcraft repository) into .agents/skills/pitchcraft in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add moshuying/pitchcraft --skill pitchcraft -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/pitchcraft, .gemini/skills/pitchcraft, .github/skills/pitchcraft and .opencode/skills/pitchcraft in your project.

What does Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings needs JavaScript for the scripts in its folder.

Does Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. The check reads SKILL.md only: the scripts in the folder are not scanned, so read them before running anything.

What licence does Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings use?

Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings is published under the Apache-2.0 licence (from the LICENSE file in the skill folder). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings use?

About 2.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 9.6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings: Internal Narrative (alirezarezvani/claude-skills, 28k stars), Data Research (inbrainfun/inbrain, 142 stars), Executive Communication (w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills, 244 stars) and Ceo Advisor (davila7/claude-code-templates, 33k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Pitchcraft Persuasive Briefings?

moshuying (a GitHub user) maintains it in moshuying/pitchcraft, which has 191 GitHub stars. The repository was last updated on June 29, 2026.

Source: moshuying/pitchcraft on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.