Agent skill

Research Workflow

by jwynia in jwynia/agent-skills

Guide agents through structured research including planning, multi-query execution, source analysis, and synthesis.

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Research Workflow

skills CLI
$ npx skills add jwynia/agent-skills --skill research-workflow -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install jwynia/agent-skills research-workflow --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jwynia/agent-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/general/research/methodology/research-workflow .claude/skills/research-workflow && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
research-workflow
GitHub stars
169
Token cost
~2.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
714 words
Files
6 (incl. references, assets)
Skills in repo
111
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Guide agents through structured research including planning, multi-query execution, source analysis, and synthesis.

  • Works in 4 steps: Planning → Execution → Analysis → …
  • Comprehensive topic research
  • SKILL.md covers When to Use This Skill, Prerequisites, Research Phases Overview and Phase 1: Planning, plus 9 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Research Workflow is an agent skill from jwynia/agent-skills. Guide agents through structured research including planning, multi-query execution, source analysis, and synthesis. Use for comprehensive topic research, deep investigation, or creating research reports. Keywords: research, investigate, deep dive, comprehensive, analysis, synthesis, report.

Its SKILL.md is about 2.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 7 other files, including reference files and assets (for example `assets/research-plan-template.md`, `assets/research-report-template.md` and `assets/source-evaluation-checklist.md`). Compatibility notes: Designed for Claude Code and similar products. Web search capability required.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Deep research. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Comprehensive topic research
  • Deep investigation
  • Creating research reports

Example prompts

  • “/research-workflow”

Requirements

  • Compatibility (from SKILL.md): Designed for Claude Code and similar products. Web search capability required.

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Planning
  2. Execution
  3. Analysis
  4. Synthesis

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit e02ec7e. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are bash).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

  • Compatibility

    Designed for Claude Code and similar products. Web search capability required.

    From compatibility in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

Context cost

Research Workflow loads about 2.4k tokens when it runs, and up to ~4.9k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 77 tokens; SKILL.md has 714 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~77
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~2.4k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~4.9k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from jwynia/agent-skills at commit e02ec7e, republished under its MIT licence (© jwynia). 714 words, ~2,442 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/research-workflow/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 5 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
research-workflow
description
Guide agents through structured research including planning, multi-query execution, source analysis, and synthesis. Use for comprehensive topic research, deep investigation, or creating research reports. Keywords: research, investigate, deep dive, comprehensive, analysis, synthesis, report.
compatibility
Designed for Claude Code and similar products. Web search capability required.
license
MIT
metadata.author
agent-skills
metadata.version
1.0
metadata.type
orchestrator
metadata.mode
assistive
metadata.domain
research

Research Workflow

A structured methodology for conducting comprehensive research. This skill guides you through planning, executing, analyzing, and synthesizing research on any topic.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • The user needs comprehensive research on a topic
  • Multiple search queries are needed to fully answer a question
  • Source credibility and synthesis matter
  • A research report or documented findings are expected
  • Keywords mentioned: research, investigate, deep dive, comprehensive analysis

Do NOT use this skill when:

  • A single quick search will suffice (use web-search instead)
  • The user just wants a simple fact lookup
  • No synthesis or analysis is needed
  • Time is extremely limited

Prerequisites

Before using this skill, ensure:

  • Web search capability is available (web-search skill, WebSearch tool, or similar)
  • Sufficient time for multi-phase research process
  • Clear understanding of the research question or topic

Research Phases Overview

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    RESEARCH WORKFLOW                        │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                             │
│  1. PLANNING          2. EXECUTION                          │
│  ┌──────────────┐    ┌──────────────┐                       │
│  │ Define       │    │ Run searches │                       │
│  │ questions    │───>│ Evaluate     │                       │
│  │ Plan queries │    │ sources      │                       │
│  └──────────────┘    └──────────────┘                       │
│         │                   │                               │
│         v                   v                               │
│  3. ANALYSIS          4. SYNTHESIS                          │
│  ┌──────────────┐    ┌──────────────┐                       │
│  │ Organize     │    │ Create       │                       │
│  │ findings     │───>│ coherent     │                       │
│  │ Find patterns│    │ output       │                       │
│  └──────────────┘    └──────────────┘                       │
│                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Phase 1: Planning

Before any searches, establish a clear research plan.

Step 1: Define the Research Question

Convert the topic into specific, answerable questions.

Example:

  • Topic: "AI in healthcare"
  • Questions:
    1. What are the current applications of AI in healthcare?
    2. What are the main benefits and challenges?
    3. What regulations govern AI in healthcare?
    4. What are the latest developments (last 6 months)?
Step 2: Identify Sub-Topics

Break down the main topic into searchable components:

  • Core concepts and definitions
  • Current state and applications
  • Benefits and advantages
  • Challenges and limitations
  • Recent developments
  • Future trends
Step 3: Plan Search Strategy

Create a search plan with query progression:

  1. Broad queries first: Get overall landscape

    • "[topic] overview"
    • "[topic] introduction guide"
  2. Specific queries next: Dive into details

    • "[topic] specific aspect"
    • "[topic] case study"
  3. Verification queries last: Confirm findings

    • "[topic] criticism challenges"
    • "[topic] latest news [year]"

Use the template at assets/research-plan-template.md to document your plan.

Phase 2: Execution

Execute your search plan systematically.

Step 1: Run Searches

Execute queries in order, using appropriate search parameters:

bash
# Broad overview
web-search "AI in healthcare overview 2024"

# Specific deep dive
web-search "AI diagnostic imaging applications" --depth advanced

# Current news
web-search "AI healthcare regulations 2024" --topic news --time month

For each search, record:

  • Query used
  • Number of results reviewed
  • Key findings (2-3 bullet points)
  • Notable sources
  • New questions raised
Step 3: Evaluate Sources

Use the checklist at assets/source-evaluation-checklist.md to assess:

Credibility Indicators:

  • Author/organization expertise
  • Publication reputation
  • Date of publication
  • Citations and references

Quality Signals:

  • Evidence-based claims
  • Multiple perspectives
  • Clear methodology
Step 4: Iterate as Needed

Research is not linear. Based on findings:

  • Add new queries for gaps discovered
  • Verify surprising claims
  • Explore unexpected connections

Phase 3: Analysis

Organize and analyze your collected findings.

Step 1: Group Findings by Theme

Organize results into categories:

  • Core concepts
  • Current state
  • Benefits/opportunities
  • Challenges/risks
  • Recent developments
  • Expert opinions
Show full SKILL.md (294 more words)Show less
Step 2: Identify Patterns

Look for:

  • Consensus: Where do multiple sources agree?
  • Conflicts: Where do sources disagree?
  • Gaps: What questions remain unanswered?
  • Trends: What direction is the field moving?
Step 3: Assess Confidence

For each finding, determine confidence level:

  • High: Multiple authoritative sources agree
  • Medium: Some evidence, limited sources
  • Low: Single source or conflicting information
Step 4: Note Limitations

Document:

  • What couldn't be found
  • Areas needing more research
  • Potential biases in sources

Phase 4: Synthesis

Create coherent, useful output from your analysis.

Step 1: Structure the Output

Choose appropriate format based on use case:

  • Executive summary: Quick overview for decisions
  • Full report: Comprehensive documentation
  • Action items: Practical next steps

Use the template at assets/research-report-template.md.

Step 2: Write the Synthesis

Key principles:

  • Lead with most important findings
  • Connect related concepts
  • Note confidence levels
  • Acknowledge limitations
  • Cite sources
Step 3: Include Actionable Elements

End with practical outputs:

  • Key takeaways (3-5 points)
  • Recommendations
  • Further research suggestions
  • Decision points

Complete Example

Scenario: Research "Best practices for API versioning"

Phase 1 - Planning:

Research Question: What are the best practices for API versioning?

Sub-questions:
1. What versioning strategies exist?
2. What are pros/cons of each?
3. What do major companies use?
4. What do experts recommend?

Search Plan:
- "API versioning strategies comparison"
- "REST API versioning best practices 2024"
- "API versioning header vs URL vs query parameter"
- "large companies API versioning approach"

Phase 2 - Execution:

Query 1: "API versioning strategies comparison"
- Found: URL versioning, header versioning, query parameter
- Key insight: URL versioning most common, header more "RESTful"
- Sources: REST API tutorial, Martin Fowler blog

Query 2: "REST API versioning best practices 2024"
- Found: Semantic versioning principles apply
- Key insight: Version only when breaking changes
- Sources: API design guides, Stack Overflow discussions

Phase 3 - Analysis:

Consensus Points:
- Version only for breaking changes
- Be consistent within an API
- Document version lifecycle

Conflicts:
- URL vs header placement (no clear winner)
- When to deprecate old versions

Gaps:
- Limited data on performance impact
- Few studies on developer experience

Phase 4 - Synthesis:

Key Findings:
1. Three main strategies exist (URL, header, query param)
2. URL versioning is most common and discoverable
3. Header versioning is considered more "pure" REST
4. Version only on breaking changes
5. Major companies split between approaches

Recommendations:
- Use URL versioning for public APIs (discoverability)
- Consider header versioning for internal APIs
- Document deprecation timeline clearly
- Use semantic versioning principles

Quality Checklist

Before completing research, verify:

  • Clear research questions were defined
  • Multiple queries were executed (minimum 3-5)
  • Sources were evaluated for credibility
  • Findings are organized by theme
  • Consensus and conflicts are noted
  • Confidence levels are indicated
  • Limitations are acknowledged
  • Output is actionable

Reference Materials

For detailed guidance, see:

Templates

Limitations

This workflow has the following limitations:

  • Quality depends on available web search capability
  • Cannot access paywalled or restricted content
  • Time-intensive for comprehensive research
  • Synthesis quality depends on agent capabilities
  • May miss very recent developments not yet indexed
  • web-search: For executing individual web searches (used within this workflow)

© jwynia, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 5 other files (references, assets) in skills/general/research/methodology/research-workflow of jwynia/agent-skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • assets/research-plan-template.md
  • assets/research-report-template.md
  • assets/source-evaluation-checklist.md
  • references/methodology.md
  • references/output-formats.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit e02ec7e

Compare with similar skills

Research Workflow next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Research Workflow compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Research Workflow this skilljwynia/agent-skills169—~2.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
GitHub Deep Researchbytedance/deer-flow84k4 repos~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Deep Research WorkflowTokenRhythm/opensquilla7.1k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Deep Researchsanjay3290/ai-skills4319 repos~683Automated safety check: NotesApache-2.0
Horizontal-Vertical Deep ResearchKKKKhazix/khazix-skills21k—~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Academic Research PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~15kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence

Similar skills

  • GitHub Deep Research

    bytedance/deer-flow

    Researches a GitHub repository over four rounds using the GitHub API and web search, then writes a structured markdown report with timeline, metrics and Mermaid diagrams.

    84k GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~1.3k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Deep Research Workflow

    TokenRhythm/opensquilla

    Runs multi-round research in three stages with a persisted state file, evidence tracking and a long-form report with per-claim citations.

    7.1k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Deep Research

    sanjay3290/ai-skills

    Execute autonomous multi-step research using Google Gemini Deep Research Agent.

    431 GitHub starsUsed in 9 repos~683 tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Horizontal-Vertical Deep Research

    KKKKhazix/khazix-skills

    Runs a two-axis deep research method on a product, company, concept or person: its full history over time, compared with peers today, delivered as a typeset PDF report.

    21k GitHub stars~2.1k tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Academic Research Pipeline

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.

    51k GitHub stars~15k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Academic Research Suite for Codex

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex

    A router skill that sends academic work such as literature reviews, drafting, citation checks, peer review and revision to the right workflow in the ARS suite.

    12k GitHub stars~12k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from jwynia/agent-skills

All 111 skills in this repo
  • Devcontainer

    jwynia/agent-skills

    Diagnose devcontainer configuration problems and guide development environment setup.

    169 GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated 7 mo ago
    Auto-check: notes
  • Frontend Design

    jwynia/agent-skills

    Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality.

    169 GitHub stars~3.2k tokensUpdated 7 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Gitea Workflow

    jwynia/agent-skills

    Orchestrate agile development workflows for Gitea repositories using the tea CLI.

    169 GitHub stars~3.8k tokensUpdated 7 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Godot Asset Generator

    jwynia/agent-skills

    Generate game assets using AI image generation APIs (DALL-E, Replicate, fal.ai) and prepare them for Godot.

    169 GitHub stars~3.8k tokensUpdated 7 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Mastra Hono

    jwynia/agent-skills

    Develop AI agents, tools, and workflows with Mastra v1 Beta and Hono servers.

    169 GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated 7 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • PPTX Generator

    jwynia/agent-skills

    Create and manipulate PowerPoint PPTX files programmatically.

    169 GitHub stars~3.1k tokensUpdated 7 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Research Workflow

What does Research Workflow do?

Guide agents through structured research including planning, multi-query execution, source analysis, and synthesis. Research Workflow is an agent skill from jwynia/agent-skills. Guide agents through structured research including planning, multi-query execution, source analysis, and synthesis.

When should I use Research Workflow?

Research Workflow fits situations like: comprehensive topic research; deep investigation; creating research reports.

How do I install Research Workflow in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add jwynia/agent-skills --skill research-workflow -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/general/research/methodology/research-workflow in jwynia/agent-skills) into .claude/skills/research-workflow in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Research Workflow in Codex?

Run `npx skills add jwynia/agent-skills --skill research-workflow -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/general/research/methodology/research-workflow in jwynia/agent-skills) into .agents/skills/research-workflow in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Research Workflow in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add jwynia/agent-skills --skill research-workflow -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/research-workflow, .gemini/skills/research-workflow, .github/skills/research-workflow and .opencode/skills/research-workflow in your project.

What does Research Workflow need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Research Workflow is instructions for the agent only. Compatibility (from SKILL.md): Designed for Claude Code and similar products. Web search capability required..

Does Research Workflow access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Research Workflow safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Research Workflow use?

Research Workflow is published under the MIT licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Research Workflow use?

About 2.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 9.8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 2.4k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Research Workflow?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Research Workflow: GitHub Deep Research (bytedance/deer-flow, 84k stars), Deep Research Workflow (TokenRhythm/opensquilla, 7.1k stars), Deep Research (sanjay3290/ai-skills, 431 stars) and Horizontal-Vertical Deep Research (KKKKhazix/khazix-skills, 21k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Research Workflow?

jwynia (a GitHub user) maintains it in jwynia/agent-skills, which has 169 GitHub stars. The repository holds 111 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on February 24, 2026.

Source: jwynia/agent-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.