Agent skill

Implement Feature

by janekbaraniewski in janekbaraniewski/openusage

Implement a feature from an existing design doc. An agent skill from janekbaraniewski/openusage.

MITAuto-check passedEducation

Install Implement Feature

skills CLI
$ npx skills add janekbaraniewski/openusage --skill implement-feature -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install janekbaraniewski/openusage implement-feature --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/janekbaraniewski/openusage.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/docs/skills/implement-feature .claude/skills/implement-feature && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
implement-feature
GitHub stars
217
Token cost
~2k tokens
SKILL.md length
971 words
Files
2 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
4
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Implement a feature from an existing design doc. An agent skill from janekbaraniewski/openusage.

  • Works in 7 steps: Load Design → Codebase Analysis → 5 — Pre-Implementation Quiz (MANDATORY) → …
  • Tasks that involve Architecture decision records
  • SKILL.md covers Phase 0 — Load Design, Phase 1 — Codebase Analysis, Phase 1.5 — Pre-Implementation… and Phase 2 — Execution Plan, plus 4 more sections
  • Calls go and make

What it does

Implement Feature is an agent skill from janekbaraniewski/openusage. Implement a feature from an existing design doc. Reads the design, analyzes the codebase, validates assumptions via interactive quiz, plans execution with parallelization, implements tasks, and validates. Use after running /design-feature.

Its SKILL.md is about 2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 2 other files, including reference files (for example `references/execution-checklist.md`).

It sits in Education, covering Architecture decision records. It works with OpenRouter. The repository describes itself as: The one dashboard you’ve been looking for — track spend and usage across Claude, Cursor, OpenRouter, Copilot, Gemini, Codex, and more. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Architecture decision records

Example prompts

  • “/implement-feature”

Workflow steps

7 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Load Design
  2. Codebase Analysis
  3. 5 — Pre-Implementation Quiz (MANDATORY)
  4. Execution Plan
  5. Implement
  6. Integration Check
  7. Summary

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit f76f3dd. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • go
    • make

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Implement Feature loads about 2k tokens when it runs, and up to ~2.8k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 64 tokens; SKILL.md has 971 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~64
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~2k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~2.8k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from janekbaraniewski/openusage at commit f76f3dd, republished under its MIT licence (© janekbaraniewski). 971 words, ~1,955 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/implement-feature/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 1 other file; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
implement-feature
description
Implement a feature from an existing design doc. Reads the design, analyzes the codebase, validates assumptions via interactive quiz, plans execution with parallelization, implements tasks, and validates. Use after running /design-feature.
scope
project
keywords
implement, build, code, execute, feature, tasks

OpenUsage Feature Implementer

Invocation: When a user wants to implement a feature that has a design doc in docs/*_DESIGN.md. Always requires a design doc — if none exists, tell the user to run /design-feature first.

Input: Design doc path or feature name (resolved to docs/<NAME>_DESIGN.md).


Phase 0 — Load Design

  1. Read the design doc. If the path wasn't given, search docs/*_DESIGN.md for a match.
  2. Extract and confirm with the user:
    • Problem statement
    • Affected subsystems (from Impact Analysis table)
    • Implementation tasks (Section 7)
    • Total task count
  3. Ask: "Implement all tasks, or a subset?" Proceed only after confirmation.

Phase 1 — Codebase Analysis

For each affected subsystem, read the primary files from docs/skills/design-feature/references/subsystem-map.md.

For each implementation task, read every file listed under Files:. Note:

  • Current state of types, functions, and interfaces the task will modify.
  • Existing test patterns in each package (use the same style).
  • Import conventions (stdlib / third-party / internal groups).

Summarize blockers or conflicts found (e.g., a type was renamed since the design was written). If any exist, flag them before proceeding.


Phase 1.5 — Pre-Implementation Quiz (MANDATORY)

After reading the codebase but before presenting the execution plan, surface ambiguities. Design docs cannot anticipate every integration detail. Present an interactive quiz covering:

  1. Ambiguous design choices: Where the design says "add X" but there are multiple valid locations or approaches in the code.
  2. Missing details: Decisions the design doc defers or doesn't address (e.g., UI placement, key bindings, exact data flow).
  3. Conflicting patterns: Where the codebase has evolved since the design was written and there's more than one way to reconcile.
  4. Scope boundaries: Confirm what's in vs. out — e.g., "Should this apply to both screens or just one?"

Format: Present numbered questions with options (A/B/C) where possible. For open-ended questions, propose a default and ask for confirmation.

After the quiz:

  • Update the design doc with the resolved answers (add notes inline or update the relevant sections). The design doc is living documentation — keep it accurate.
  • Proceed to Phase 2 only after all ambiguities are resolved.

Phase 2 — Execution Plan

Present a numbered execution plan derived from the design doc's tasks. For each task state:

Task N: <title>
  Depends on: <task numbers or "none">
  Files: <from design doc>
  Approach: <1-2 sentences: what you'll do, in order>
  Risk: <low/medium — flag anything non-trivial>
Parallelization analysis

After listing all tasks, identify parallel groups — sets of tasks with no mutual dependencies that can execute concurrently using agents:

Parallel group 1: Tasks 3, 4, 5 (all depend on Tasks 1-2 but not each other)
Sequential: Task 6 (depends on Tasks 3, 4) → Task 7 (depends on all)

Note: Parallel execution uses separate agents that cannot see each other's changes. Each agent must be given complete context for its task. Integration verification (Phase 3d) is mandatory after every parallel group.

Ask: "Proceed with this plan?" Adjust if the user requests changes.


Phase 3 — Implement

Execute tasks in dependency order. Tasks within the same parallel group MAY be executed concurrently using agents when the user requests it or when there are 3+ independent tasks.

3a. Code
  • Follow existing patterns exactly. Match naming, error wrapping, comment style.
  • Respect the project's code style rules from CLAUDE.md (gofmt, import groups, error prefix, JSON tags).
  • Add only what the design specifies. No extras, no refactors, no bonus features.
  • If the design doc shows type definitions, use them verbatim unless they conflict with current code.
3b. Test
  • Write tests for every task that specifies them.
  • Match the package's existing test patterns (table-driven, httptest servers, t.TempDir, etc.).
  • Run the tests for the changed packages: go test ./<package>/... -count=1
  • Do NOT run go test ./... unless explicitly asked.
3c. Validate (per-task)

After each task:

  1. Run go_diagnostics on all modified files.
  2. Fix any errors before moving to the next task.
  3. Run the package tests.
  4. Briefly report: task title, files changed, tests passing.

If a test fails, fix it before moving on. If a fix requires changing the design, flag it and ask the user.

Show full SKILL.md (364 more words)Show less
3d. Integration verification (after parallel groups)

After a parallel group completes, before starting the next group or task:

  1. Run go build ./... to verify all parallel changes compile together.
  2. Run go test for all packages touched by any agent in the group.
  3. Check for signature mismatches: when one agent changes a function/method signature, other callers (including test helpers) may need updating.
  4. Fix any issues. Common problems:
    • Test helpers not updated: An agent changed a function signature but a test file in the same package still uses the old signature.
    • Import conflicts: Two agents added the same import differently.
    • Duplicate code: Two agents solved overlapping concerns differently.
3e. Handling scope changes

If the user requests changes to scope during implementation (e.g., adding cases, expanding a type, changing behavior):

  1. Assess impact on the current task and remaining tasks.
  2. Implement the change in the current task.
  3. Update the design doc to reflect the new scope.
  4. Re-evaluate whether remaining tasks need adjustment.
  5. Do NOT silently absorb scope changes — acknowledge them and note the deviation.

Phase 4 — Integration Check

After all tasks are complete:

  1. Build: make build — must succeed.
  2. Full test suite for changed packages: go test <each changed package> -count=1 -race
  3. Lint (if available): make lint
  4. Vet: make vet

Report results. Fix any issues.


Phase 5 — Summary

Present a completion summary:

## Implementation Summary

Design doc: <path>
Tasks completed: N/N

### Changes
| File | Change |
|------|--------|
| <file> | <what changed — one line each> |

### Tests added
- <test file>: <what's covered>

### Design doc updates
- <any changes made to the design doc during implementation>

### Notes
- <anything the user should know: design deviations, scope changes, follow-up items, etc.>

Rules

  • Never skip Phase 0. The user must confirm which tasks to implement.
  • Never skip Phase 1.5. Surface ambiguities before coding. Even a "no questions" quiz is better than silent assumptions.
  • Never deviate from the design doc without flagging it and getting approval.
  • Never run go test ./... unless explicitly asked — test only changed packages.
  • Always run integration verification after parallel groups. Parallel agents can't see each other's changes — their work must be verified together.
  • Keep the design doc updated. When quiz answers, scope changes, or implementation discoveries change the design, update the doc. It's the source of truth for future reference.
  • If the design doc is stale (references files/types that don't exist), stop and tell the user. Don't guess.
  • No cleanup commits. Don't refactor surrounding code, add docstrings, or "improve" things not in the design.

© janekbaraniewski, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 1 other file (references) in docs/skills/implement-feature of janekbaraniewski/openusage.

  • SKILL.md
  • references/execution-checklist.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit f76f3dd

Compare with similar skills

Implement Feature next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Implement Feature compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Implement Feature this skilljanekbaraniewski/openusage217—~2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Subzeroclaw Contributegenlayerlabs/subzeroclaw137—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Yao Bayesian Skillyaojingang/yao-open-skills1.3k—~956Automated safety check: PassMIT
Doc Searchjellydn/my-ai-tools123—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
PR Design DocOpenHands/OpenHands90k—~2.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Cto AdvisorIbrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor3804 repos~2.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Subzeroclaw Contribute

    genlayerlabs/subzeroclaw

    Develop SubZeroClaw — the single-file ~550-line C agentic runtime.

    137 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    EducationAuto-check passed
  • Yao Bayesian Skill

    yaojingang/yao-open-skills

    Convert uncertain real-world choices into an auditable Bayesian evidence-to-action report with priors, evidence grading, posterior update, action thresholds, sensitivity checks, multi-turn decision…

    1.3k GitHub stars~956 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    EducationAuto-check passed
  • Doc Search

    jellydn/my-ai-tools

    Search project documentation — ADRs, wiki entries, conventions via ripgrep, qmd, fff, and ctx

    123 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Knowledge ManagementAuto-check passed
  • PR Design Doc

    OpenHands/OpenHands

    For a non-trivial pull request, write a self-contained HTML design doc under the temporary .pr/ directory and link a visibility-appropriate preview in the PR description, so maintainers grasp the…

    90k GitHub stars~2.4k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Cto Advisor

    Ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor

    Technical leadership guidance for engineering teams, architecture decisions, and technology strategy.

    380 GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~2.4k tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Improve Codebase Architecture

    ywwynm/EverythingDone

    Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/.

    144 GitHub starsUsed in 15 repos~1.3k tokens
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed

More from janekbaraniewski/openusage

  • Design Feature

    janekbaraniewski/openusage

    Design new features for OpenUsage with structured design docs and implementation tasks.

    217 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Review Design

    janekbaraniewski/openusage

    Review a design doc against the actual codebase, find inconsistencies, and quiz the user on needed fixes.

    217 GitHub stars~892 tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Openusage Provider

    janekbaraniewski/openusage

    Add new AI usage providers to the OpenUsage TUI dashboard. An agent skill from janekbaraniewski/openusage.

    217 GitHub stars~5.2k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Works with

Questions about Implement Feature

What does Implement Feature do?

Implement a feature from an existing design doc. An agent skill from janekbaraniewski/openusage. Implement Feature is an agent skill from janekbaraniewski/openusage. Implement a feature from an existing design doc.

When should I use Implement Feature?

Implement Feature fits situations like: tasks that involve Architecture decision records.

How do I install Implement Feature in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add janekbaraniewski/openusage --skill implement-feature -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (docs/skills/implement-feature in janekbaraniewski/openusage) into .claude/skills/implement-feature in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Implement Feature in Codex?

Run `npx skills add janekbaraniewski/openusage --skill implement-feature -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (docs/skills/implement-feature in janekbaraniewski/openusage) into .agents/skills/implement-feature in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Implement Feature in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add janekbaraniewski/openusage --skill implement-feature -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/implement-feature, .gemini/skills/implement-feature, .github/skills/implement-feature and .opencode/skills/implement-feature in your project.

What does Implement Feature need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Implement Feature needs the command-line tools its instructions call (go and make).

Does Implement Feature access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Implement Feature safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Implement Feature use?

Implement Feature is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Implement Feature use?

About 2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 817 tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Implement Feature?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Implement Feature: Subzeroclaw Contribute (genlayerlabs/subzeroclaw, 137 stars), Yao Bayesian Skill (yaojingang/yao-open-skills, 1.3k stars), Doc Search (jellydn/my-ai-tools, 123 stars) and PR Design Doc (OpenHands/OpenHands, 90k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Implement Feature?

janekbaraniewski (a GitHub user) maintains it in janekbaraniewski/openusage, which has 217 GitHub stars. The repository holds 4 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 5, 2026.

Source: janekbaraniewski/openusage on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.