Validates business ideas through customer conversations using Rob Fitzpatrick's Mom Test framework.

MITAuto-check passedAgent Workflows

Install Mom Test

skills CLI
$ npx skills add getagentseal/founder-playbook --skill mom-test -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install getagentseal/founder-playbook mom-test --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/getagentseal/founder-playbook.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/mom-test .claude/skills/mom-test && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
mom-test
GitHub stars
729
Token cost
~2.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,167 words
Files
5
Skills in repo
16
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Validates business ideas through customer conversations using Rob Fitzpatrick's Mom Test framework.

  • Works in 3 steps: Talk about their life, not your idea → Ask about specifics in the past, not… → Talk less, listen more
  • Planning user interviews
  • SKILL.md covers The 3 Core Rules, Decision Tree, Bad Questions (Never Ask) and Good Questions (Use These), plus 16 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Mom Test is an agent skill from getagentseal/founder-playbook. Validates business ideas through customer conversations using Rob Fitzpatrick's Mom Test framework. Use when planning user interviews, getting product feedback, validating ideas, designing discovery questions, or extracting honest signal from biased customer responses. Covers good vs bad questions, deflecting compliments, anchoring fluff, pressing for commitment, and customer slicing.

Its SKILL.md is about 2.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 4 other files (for example `cases.md`, `examples.md` and `frameworks.md`).

It sits in Agent Workflows, covering Requirements gathering and User research. The repository describes itself as: 15 proven business books distilled into AI-native skills. Works with Claude Code, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Planning user interviews
  • Getting product feedback
  • Validating ideas
  • Designing discovery questions

Example prompts

  • “Use the mom-test skill to validate business ideas through customer conversations using Rob Fitzpatrick's Mom Test framework”
  • “/mom-test”

Workflow steps

3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Talk about their life, not your idea
  2. Ask about specifics in the past, not generics or opinions about the future
  3. Talk less, listen more

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit e811e63. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Mom Test loads about 2.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 99 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,167 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~99
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~2.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from getagentseal/founder-playbook at commit e811e63, republished under its MIT licence (© getagentseal). 1,167 words, ~2,284 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/mom-test/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 4 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
mom-test
description
Validates business ideas through customer conversations using Rob Fitzpatrick's Mom Test framework. Use when planning user interviews, getting product feedback, validating ideas, designing discovery questions, or extracting honest signal from biased customer responses. Covers good vs bad questions, deflecting compliments, anchoring fluff, pressing for commitment, and customer slicing.

Note: This skill is independent analysis and commentary, not a reproduction of the original text. It synthesizes the book's core ideas with modern startup practice, surfaces where frameworks are outdated or incomplete, and integrates perspectives from adjacent disciplines. For the full argument and context, read the original book.

The Mom Test

"How to talk to customers and learn if your business is a good idea when everyone is lying to you" - Rob Fitzpatrick

The 3 Core Rules

  1. Talk about their life, not your idea
  2. Ask about specifics in the past, not generics or opinions about the future
  3. Talk less, listen more

Decision Tree

Need customer feedback?
├─ Pre-product, no idea what to build → Mom Test (this skill)
├─ Have validated market, packaging product → 100m-offers
├─ Have offer, need traffic → 100m-leads
└─ Selling enterprise → spin-selling
In a customer conversation?
├─ They're complimenting you → DEFLECT to current behavior
├─ They're speaking in generics ("usually", "always") → ANCHOR to last specific instance
├─ They're requesting features → DIG to underlying motivation
└─ They're committing nothing → PRESS for time/reputation/money

Bad Questions (Never Ask)

QuestionWhy It Fails
"Do you think it's a good idea?"Only the market can tell. Opinions are worthless.
"Would you buy a product which did X?"Everyone says yes. Hypotheticals are lies.
"How much would you pay for X?"Numbers feel rigorous but are still lies.
"Do you ever..." / "Would you ever..."Invites fluff and future-tense promises.

Good Questions (Use These)

QuestionWhat It Reveals
"Why do you bother?"Real motivation behind perceived problem
"What are the implications?"Must-solve vs nice-to-have
"Talk me through the last time that happened."Concrete past behavior
"What else have you tried?"Whether they care enough to search
"How are you dealing with it now?"Current solution + price anchor
"Where does the money come from?"Budget and purchasing process
"Who else should I talk to?"Tests if they care enough to make intros
"Is there anything else I should have asked?"Catches missed points

Three Types of Bad Data + Responses

Bad DataExampleResponse
Compliments"That's really cool, I love it.""Thanks - but how are you dealing with this stuff at the moment?"
Fluff"I usually..." / "I would definitely buy that.""When's the last time that happened? Walk me through it."
Ideas/Features"Can you add X feature?""Why do you want that? What would it let you do? How are you coping without it?"

Commitment Currencies

Real interest = giving up something valuable. Compliments cost nothing.

CurrencyExamples
TimeClear next meeting, using trial for real, sitting down for feedback
ReputationIntro to peers, intro to boss, public testimonial
MoneyLetter of intent, pre-order, deposit
Good Meeting Endings
  • "What are the next steps?"
  • "When can we start the trial?"
  • "Can I buy the prototype?"
  • "When can you come back to talk to the rest of the team?"
Polite Rejections (Bad Endings)
  • "That's so cool, I love it!"
  • "Let me know when it launches."
  • "I would definitely buy that."

Critical Principle

They own the problem. You own the solution.

You aren't allowed to tell them what their problem is. They aren't allowed to tell you what to build.

The Filter Test

If they haven't even Googled for a solution, they don't actually care enough to pay for yours.

Customer Slicing

Signs Your Segment Is Too Broad
  • 10+ conversations, results all over the map
  • Everything "sort of works" but nothing breaks through
  • Cannot prove yourself right or wrong
  • Every feature is someone's favorite
  • Massive price variance ($10 vs $10,000)
The Slicing Process
  1. Within this group, who would want it MOST?
  2. Why do they want it? What's their specific problem?
  3. What are they already doing to solve it?
  4. Where can we find them?

Good segment test: A segment is useful only if you know WHERE to find them.

Conversation Length Guide

DurationGoal
5 minDoes problem exist? Is it important?
10-15 minWorkflow details, what they've tried
1+ hourIndustry deep-dives with experts

Keep It Casual

  • Strip the formality - reduce "meeting" to "chat"
  • Pop your most important question immediately
  • Goal: they don't even realize they've "had a meeting"
  • 5-10 minute casual conversations yield as much as formal meetings

Process Checklist

Before
  • Choose focused, findable segment
  • Decide 3 big learning goals with team
  • Decide ideal next steps and commitments
  • Do basic desk research first
During
  • Frame the conversation
  • Keep it casual
  • Ask questions that pass The Mom Test
  • Deflect compliments, anchor fluff, dig beneath signals
  • Take good notes
  • Press for commitment and next steps
After
  • Review notes and key quotes with team
  • Update beliefs and plans
  • Decide next 3 big questions
Show full SKILL.md (470 more words)Show less

Signs You're Doing It Wrong

  • You're talking more than they are
  • They're complimenting you or your idea
  • You don't have notes
  • You got an unexpected answer and didn't change anything
  • You weren't scared of any question you asked
  • You don't know what happens next
  • Meeting "went well" but no concrete commitments

Quick Rules

Rules not already captured in the tables and checklists above:

  1. Customer conversations are bad by default. Your job to fix them.
  2. People know problems but not solutions. Don't ask what to build.
  3. You should be terrified of at least one question you're asking (terrified of the answer, not the asking).
  4. There's more reliable information in a "meh" than a "Wow!"
  5. It's not a real lead until you've given them a concrete chance to reject you.

Timeline

Spend a week, maybe two. Get your bearings, then give them something to commit to. Don't spend months theorizing.

Context: Founders vs. Product Teams

This framework is written for founders validating whether a new idea is worth pursuing at all. If you're a product manager at an established company, your situation is different: you already know customers want the product. Your interviews are doing problem discovery (what's broken?) or feature discovery (which direction next?) with existing users - not testing whether a market exists. The "press for commitment" and customer-slicing sections are largely irrelevant. The core questioning mechanics (past behavior, avoid hypotheticals, anchor fluff) still apply directly.

When This Doesn't Apply

  • Formal B2B/Enterprise: Some contexts require formal protocols
  • Regulated industries: Healthcare, finance may need different approaches
  • Truly novel innovations: Customers can't imagine what they want until they see it
  • Cultural contexts: Japan, Germany, formal corporate cultures expect different protocols
  • Domain experts: Expert opinions about THEIR domain carry weight (the rule is about opinions on YOUR IDEA)

Red Flags (Customers to Avoid)

Even enthusiastic, paying customers can derail you:

  • Needs so specific they'll pull you off-course
  • Demand custom work that doesn't generalize
  • "Visionaries" who want something completely different from your vision
  • Will only commit if you build their pet feature first

Supporting Files

  • frameworks.md - VFWPA email template, ACA framework, deeper question hierarchy, finding-conversations playbook
  • cases.md - Earlyvangelist concept (Steve Blank's term, used by Fitzpatrick), case-style examples
  • examples.md - Note-taking symbols, full email scripts, conversation walk-throughs
  • integration.md - How Mom Test feeds 100m-offers, 100m-leads, spin-selling, obviously-awesome; conflicts with hypothesis-testing approaches

The Nuance

  • "Talk less" means don't pitch your solution, not don't talk at all. Strategic questions and redirections are talking.
  • "Be terrified of a question" means terrified of the ANSWER (it might invalidate your idea), not asking aggressive questions.
  • "Press for commitment" doesn't mean be pushy. Know when to back off. Burning a contact is worse than no commitment.
  • "They can't tell you what to build" doesn't mean ignore domain experts. Sophisticated users may know implementation better than you - understand the WHY.

© getagentseal, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 4 other files in skills/mom-test of getagentseal/founder-playbook.

  • SKILL.md
  • cases.md
  • examples.md
  • frameworks.md
  • integration.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit e811e63

Compare with similar skills

Mom Test next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Mom Test compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Mom Test this skillgetagentseal/founder-playbook729—~2.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Product Discovery Brief Builderopen-mercato/skills231—~3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
CE BrainstormEveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin25k—~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Extracting Requirementsprime-radiant-inc/iterative-development181—~2.7kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Foreman Grill DocsVisionForge-OU/foreman443—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Multi-Role Spec and Task Breakdownmylukin/agent-foreman250—~5.1kAutomated safety check: NotesNone

Similar skills

  • Guides a product discovery conversation and writes product-brief.md with the problem, evidence, scope, decisions and the next open question, for existing, client or own ideas.

    231 GitHub stars~3k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed
  • CE Brainstorm

    EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin

    Turns a vague or ambitious feature idea into a requirements-only plan through dialogue with you, sized to the work, before any code is written.

    25k GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Extracting Requirements

    prime-radiant-inc/iterative-development

    Reads human-written spec documents and produces per-epic requirement files with proof obligations plus behavior scenarios with stable IDs, using parallel chunked extraction.

    181 GitHub stars~2.7k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Foreman Grill Docs

    VisionForge-OU/foreman

    Headless grilling pass that challenges an approved implementation plan against the existing codebase and domain model, then writes an ADR draft and a PRD draft into the Foreman feature directory.

    443 GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Runs a requirement through four research-backed specialist agents, a PM, a UX designer, a tech architect and QA, to produce implementable tasks.

    250 GitHub stars~5.1k tokensUpdated 8 mo ago
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check: notes
  • Feature Brainstorm

    VeryGoodOpenSource/vgv-wingspan

    Clarifies what to build before how, by asking one question at a time about a feature idea and then handing the result on to planning.

    109 GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed

More from getagentseal/founder-playbook

All 16 skills in this repo
  • 100m Leads

    getagentseal/founder-playbook

    Builds lead generation systems using Alex Hormozi's Core Four framework (warm outreach, content, cold outreach, paid ads), lead magnets, and Rule of 100.

    729 GitHub stars~2.3k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • 100m Offers

    getagentseal/founder-playbook

    Designs irresistible Grand Slam Offers using Alex Hormozi's value equation, obstacle-solution mapping, value-cost trim/stack, and offer-naming patterns.

    729 GitHub stars~2.7k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Blue Ocean Strategy

    getagentseal/founder-playbook

    Frameworks from Kim & Mauborgne for creating uncontested market space and making competition irrelevant.

    729 GitHub stars~3.1k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Diagnose

    getagentseal/founder-playbook

    Startup diagnostic router. An agent skill from getagentseal/founder-playbook.

    729 GitHub stars~2.6k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Influence

    getagentseal/founder-playbook

    Cialdini's seven principles of compliance (the classic six — reciprocation, commitment-consistency, social proof, liking, authority, scarcity — plus Unity, added 2016) and Pre-Suasion.

    729 GitHub stars~3.8k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Lean Startup

    getagentseal/founder-playbook

    Applies Eric Ries's Lean Startup methodology for building products under extreme uncertainty.

    729 GitHub stars~4.6k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Mom Test

What does Mom Test do?

Validates business ideas through customer conversations using Rob Fitzpatrick's Mom Test framework. Mom Test is an agent skill from getagentseal/founder-playbook. Validates business ideas through customer conversations using Rob Fitzpatrick's Mom Test framework.

When should I use Mom Test?

Mom Test fits situations like: planning user interviews; getting product feedback; validating ideas; designing discovery questions.

How do I install Mom Test in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add getagentseal/founder-playbook --skill mom-test -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/mom-test in getagentseal/founder-playbook) into .claude/skills/mom-test in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Mom Test in Codex?

Run `npx skills add getagentseal/founder-playbook --skill mom-test -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/mom-test in getagentseal/founder-playbook) into .agents/skills/mom-test in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Mom Test in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add getagentseal/founder-playbook --skill mom-test -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/mom-test, .gemini/skills/mom-test, .github/skills/mom-test and .opencode/skills/mom-test in your project.

What does Mom Test need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Mom Test is instructions for the agent only.

Does Mom Test access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Mom Test safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Mom Test use?

Mom Test is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Mom Test use?

About 2.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 9.1k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Mom Test?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Mom Test: Product Discovery Brief Builder (open-mercato/skills, 231 stars), CE Brainstorm (EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin, 25k stars), Extracting Requirements (prime-radiant-inc/iterative-development, 181 stars) and Foreman Grill Docs (VisionForge-OU/foreman, 443 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Mom Test?

getagentseal (a GitHub organization) maintains it in getagentseal/founder-playbook, which has 729 GitHub stars. The repository holds 16 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 6, 2026.

Source: getagentseal/founder-playbook on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.