Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses to understand how a Global Change Biology (GCB) manuscript is judged — high desk-rejection screening for scope and significance, expert single-anonymous peer review with 2–3…
Install Gcb Review Process
$ npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill gcb-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install franklee16/academic-research-skills gcb-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Global-Change-Biology-Skills/skills/gcb-review-process .claude/skills/gcb-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "gcb-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills/tree/master/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Global-Change-Biology-Skills/skills/gcb-review-process into .claude/skills/gcb-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "gcb-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills/tree/master/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Global-Change-Biology-Skills/skills/gcb-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill gcb-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install franklee16/academic-research-skills gcb-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Global-Change-Biology-Skills/skills/gcb-review-process .agents/skills/gcb-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "gcb-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills/tree/master/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Global-Change-Biology-Skills/skills/gcb-review-process into .agents/skills/gcb-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "gcb-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill gcb-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install franklee16/academic-research-skills gcb-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Global-Change-Biology-Skills/skills/gcb-review-process .cursor/skills/gcb-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "gcb-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills/tree/master/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Global-Change-Biology-Skills/skills/gcb-review-process into .cursor/skills/gcb-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "gcb-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills.git --path Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Global-Change-Biology-Skills/skills/gcb-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill gcb-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install franklee16/academic-research-skills gcb-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Global-Change-Biology-Skills/skills/gcb-review-process .gemini/skills/gcb-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "gcb-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills/tree/master/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Global-Change-Biology-Skills/skills/gcb-review-process into .gemini/skills/gcb-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "gcb-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install franklee16/academic-research-skills gcb-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill gcb-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Global-Change-Biology-Skills/skills/gcb-review-process .github/skills/gcb-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "gcb-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills/tree/master/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Global-Change-Biology-Skills/skills/gcb-review-process into .github/skills/gcb-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "gcb-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill gcb-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install franklee16/academic-research-skills gcb-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Global-Change-Biology-Skills/skills/gcb-review-process .opencode/skills/gcb-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "gcb-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skills/tree/master/Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Global-Change-Biology-Skills/skills/gcb-review-process into .opencode/skills/gcb-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "gcb-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
gcb-review-process- GitHub stars
- 223
- Used in
- 1 other repo
- Token cost
- ~812 tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 300 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 1,617
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- None found
At a glance
A skill your agent uses to understand how a Global Change Biology (GCB) manuscript is judged — high desk-rejection screening for scope and significance, expert single-anonymous peer review with 2–3…
- Works in 4 steps: Editorial / desk screening (high bar).… → Expert peer review. Typically 2–3… → Reviewer access to data. Reviewers may… → …
- Understand how a Global Change Biology (GCB) manuscript is judged — high desk-rejection screening for scope and significance
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, How GCB judges a paper, Prepare for the way it is judged and Anti-patterns, plus 2 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Gcb Review Process is an agent skill from franklee16/academic-research-skills. Use to understand how a Global Change Biology (GCB) manuscript is judged — high desk-rejection screening for scope and significance, expert single-anonymous peer review with 2–3 reviewers, and the decision categories. Sets expectations and informs preparation; it does not contact editors or predict outcomes.
Its SKILL.md is about 810 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Comprehensive collection of Claude Code skills for academic research in economics, finance, and social sciences.
When your agent uses it
- Understand how a Global Change Biology (GCB) manuscript is judged — high desk-rejection screening for scope and significance
- Expert single-anonymous peer review with 2–3 reviewers
- The decision categories
Example prompts
- “/gcb-review-process”
Workflow steps
4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Editorial / desk screening (high bar). Editors screen first for scope fit (a mechanistic
- Expert peer review. Typically 2–3 reviewers with matched expertise assess mechanism,
- Reviewer access to data. Reviewers may request access to data during evaluation — have the
- Decision categories. Accept (rare on first pass), minor / major revision, or reject;
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 9a4b2db. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Gcb Review Process loads about 812 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 82 tokens; SKILL.md has 300 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
Without a licence we can't republish the file, so here is its outline and opening line. It has 300 words (~812 tokens).
“GCB is selective and desk-rejects a large share of submissions before review. Knowing how it is judged — what triggers desk rejection, who reviews, and what decisions look like — lets you prepare a manuscript that survives screening and convinces…”
- name
- gcb-review-process
Files
Just SKILL.md in Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Global-Change-Biology-Skills/skills/gcb-review-process of franklee16/academic-research-skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 9a4b2db
Used in 1 other repository
We found 1 copy of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 1 other GitHub owner. This page covers the copy in franklee16/academic-research-skills, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.
Compare with similar skills
Gcb Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gcb Review Process this skillfranklee16/academic-research-skills | 223 | 1 repos | ~812 | Automated safety check: Pass | None | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from franklee16/academic-research-skills
All 1,617 skills in this repoEconometric Research Writing
franklee16/academic-research-skills
End-to-end econometric analysis and economics/management paper-writing workflow.
Paper Revision
franklee16/academic-research-skills
Comprehensive workflow for handling journal Revise and Resubmit (R&R) decisions.
Sci Ssci Polishing
franklee16/academic-research-skills
A skill your agent uses when researchers need Chinese academic prose translated into publication-oriented English or English manuscript paragraphs and complete sections polished for SCI, SSCI, or…
Research Defense Radar
franklee16/academic-research-skills
Assess and monitor an ongoing research project's competitor landscape, novelty risk, and method/data opportunities from a proposal, paper, research question, data or method notes, or a suspected…
Academic Grant
franklee16/academic-research-skills
Generate or fill in academic grant application forms (project statement, education plan, pathway to impact, references) using draft research material.
Chinese Reference Formatter Skill
franklee16/academic-research-skills
A skill your agent uses when a user needs通用中文参考文献、GB/T 7714-style bibliography entries, Chinese academic reference formatting, or BibTeX completion from Chinese or English literature titles…
Related
Categories
Questions about Gcb Review Process
What does Gcb Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses to understand how a Global Change Biology (GCB) manuscript is judged — high desk-rejection screening for scope and significance, expert single-anonymous peer review with 2–3…. Gcb Review Process is an agent skill from franklee16/academic-research-skills. Use to understand how a Global Change Biology (GCB) manuscript is judged — high desk-rejection screening for scope and significance, expert single-anonymous peer review with 2–3 reviewers, and the decision categories.
When should I use Gcb Review Process?
Gcb Review Process fits situations like: understand how a Global Change Biology (GCB) manuscript is judged — high desk-rejection screening for scope and significance; expert single-anonymous peer review with 2–3 reviewers; the decision categories.
How do I install Gcb Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill gcb-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Global-Change-Biology-Skills/skills/gcb-review-process in franklee16/academic-research-skills) into .claude/skills/gcb-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Gcb Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill gcb-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Awesome-Journal-Skills-main/Global-Change-Biology-Skills/skills/gcb-review-process in franklee16/academic-research-skills) into .agents/skills/gcb-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Gcb Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill gcb-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/gcb-review-process, .gemini/skills/gcb-review-process, .github/skills/gcb-review-process and .opencode/skills/gcb-review-process in your project.
What does Gcb Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Gcb Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Gcb Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Gcb Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Gcb Review Process use?
No licence was found for Gcb Review Process or its repository. Without one, default copyright applies: ask the author before reusing or redistributing it.
How many tokens does Gcb Review Process use?
About 812 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 3.2k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Gcb Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Gcb Review Process: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Gcb Review Process?
franklee16 (a GitHub user) maintains it in franklee16/academic-research-skills, which has 223 GitHub stars. The repository holds 1,617 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 18, 2026.
Source: franklee16/academic-research-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.