Brief

<!-- HARNESS MIRROR — do not edit here. Canonical source: skills/ or commands/. After editing source, copy into cli/assets/<harness>/ and repo-root harness mirrors. -->

Context: this sub-skill is one lens of the broader ui-craft skill. If the ui-craft skill is also installed, read its SKILL.md first for Discovery + Anti-Slop + Craft Test, then apply the specific lens below.

Load references/brief.md for the brief format before proceeding.

Step 1: Detect existing brief

Check whether .ui-craft/brief.md exists. Use Read or ls on .ui-craft/.

If it exists: load its contents. If $ARGUMENTS names a specific update ("update principles", "shift target user", "add out of scope"), focus the session there and skip unchanged sections. Otherwise summarize what's in the brief and ask: "What do you want to change?"

If it doesn't exist: proceed to Step 2. Also check the repo root for a DESIGN.md or design-tokens.json (an ecosystem convention some teams already maintain) — if present, read it and pre-fill the brief's answers from it instead of re-asking; note the source. The brief complements an existing design contract, never contradicts it.

Step 2: Draft a new brief (absent case)

Walk the user through the five required sections in a single pass. Ask ONE compact question per section. Do not open five separate prompts unless the user asks for depth.

Compact prompt template:

"To write your design brief I need five things — answer as tersely as you like, I'll fill in structure:

1. Product purpose — what does it do, in one sentence?
2. Primary user — who, by role and context?
3. Principles — what does this product believe? Give me three to five stances it takes. (If you don't have these yet, say so — I'll run the principles workshop.)
4. Success metric — what does 'the user succeeded on this surface' look like in observable behavior?
5. Out of scope — three to five things this surface deliberately does NOT do."

Principles workshop case: if the user says "I don't have principles yet" or gives vague answers ("make it good", "keep it simple"), do NOT fabricate principles from vague input. Load references/principles-catalog.md first. The catalog has 42 worked example principles across 8 product categories — use them as conversation seeds, not as templates to adopt literally. Show 2-3 from the closest category to the user's product, then ask which resonate or which they'd flip. Then run the principles workshop from references/brief.md as a focused sub-flow: ask for three past design decisions that were debated, then derive candidate principles from the patterns. Refuse to accept platitudes — push back and prompt for substance.

Parsing long input: if the user provides a product description or PRD, parse it into the five sections rather than re-asking for information already given. State what you extracted and ask for confirmation or corrections.

Thin answers: if an answer is too vague to constrain a design decision, ask one targeted follow-up. Maximum two follow-ups per section before flagging it as incomplete and moving on.