Production Audit
affaan-m/ECC
Local-evidence production readiness audit for shipped apps, pre-launch reviews, post-merge checks, and "what breaks in prod?" questions without sending repo data to an external audit service.
A skill your agent uses when auditing a WSDM submission before the August deadlines - EasyChair setup, the abstract-then-paper week, the appendix-inclusive page budget, the required…
MITAuto-check passed
Install Wsdm Submission
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wsdm-submission -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills wsdm-submission --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-submission .claude/skills/wsdm-submission && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "wsdm-submission" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-submission into .claude/skills/wsdm-submission/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "wsdm-submission", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-submissionType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wsdm-submission -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills wsdm-submission --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-submission .agents/skills/wsdm-submission && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "wsdm-submission" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-submission into .agents/skills/wsdm-submission/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "wsdm-submission", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wsdm-submission -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills wsdm-submission --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-submission .cursor/skills/wsdm-submission && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "wsdm-submission" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-submission into .cursor/skills/wsdm-submission/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "wsdm-submission", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-submission--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wsdm-submission -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills wsdm-submission --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-submission .gemini/skills/wsdm-submission && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "wsdm-submission" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-submission into .gemini/skills/wsdm-submission/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "wsdm-submission", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills wsdm-submissionInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wsdm-submission -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-submission .github/skills/wsdm-submission && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "wsdm-submission" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-submission into .github/skills/wsdm-submission/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "wsdm-submission", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wsdm-submission -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills wsdm-submission --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-submission .opencode/skills/wsdm-submission && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "wsdm-submission" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-submission into .opencode/skills/wsdm-submission/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "wsdm-submission", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
wsdm-submission- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.8k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 859 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when auditing a WSDM submission before the August deadlines - EasyChair setup, the abstract-then-paper week, the appendix-inclusive page budget, the required…
- Works in 2 steps: There is no unlimited appendix to absorb… → The only uncounted prose you control is…
- Auditing a WSDM submission before the August deadlines - EasyChair setup
- SKILL.md covers The two-deadline week, Page-budget arithmetic:…, Anonymization under hybrid… and Desk-level exposure table, plus 3 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Wsdm Submission is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when auditing a WSDM submission before the August deadlines - EasyChair setup, the abstract-then-paper week, the appendix-inclusive page budget, the required ethical-considerations section, anonymization that survives Associate-Chair metadata visibility, and desk-reject exposure at a no-rebuttal venue.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.8k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Auditing a WSDM submission before the August deadlines - EasyChair setup
- The abstract-then-paper week
- The appendix-inclusive page budget
- The required ethical-considerations section
Example prompts
- “/wsdm-submission”
Workflow steps
2 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- There is no unlimited appendix to absorb overflow. A proof, a prompt listing,
- The only uncounted prose you control is the ethics section - and chairs read
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are latex).
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Wsdm Submission loads about 1.8k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 81 tokens; SKILL.md has 859 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 859 words, ~1,781 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/wsdm-submission/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- wsdm-submission
- description
- Use when auditing a WSDM submission before the August deadlines - EasyChair setup, the abstract-then-paper week, the appendix-inclusive page budget, the required ethical-considerations section, anonymization that survives Associate-Chair metadata visibility, and desk-reject exposure at a no-rebuttal venue.
WSDM Submission
Audit a paper headed for WSDM's single annual deadline. The stakes are unusual: WSDM historically runs no rebuttal, so whatever enters EasyChair in August is the entire case reviewers will ever see. A fixable-in-rebuttal weakness at other venues is a terminal weakness here. Every number below is a 2026-edition anchor (19th WSDM, Boise); reopen the current edition's CFP before quoting any of it.
The two-deadline week
WSDM pairs an abstract registration with a full-paper deadline one week later (2026: abstracts August 7, papers August 14, 2025, both 23:59 AoE, EasyChair). Use the gap deliberately:
- The abstract you register steers bidding at a venue with a compact, expert PC. A vague abstract lands the paper with the wrong specialists; at a no-rebuttal venue you cannot later explain what the paper "really" meant.
- Placeholder titles or abstracts ("TBD") were an explicit desk-reject trigger in the 2026 short-paper call - assume the same hygiene standard everywhere.
- Author lists and orderings should be final at abstract time. Confirm every coauthor's EasyChair account and conflict declarations that week, not on deadline night.
Page-budget arithmetic: appendices live inside the cap
The 2026 long-paper rule: 9 pages including diagrams, tables, and appendices, with unrestricted space only for references and the ethical-considerations section. The 2025 rule was 8 pages plus at most 2 shared by references and ethics. Two consequences that surprise people arriving from KDD or NeurIPS:
- There is no unlimited appendix to absorb overflow. A proof, a prompt listing, or a hyperparameter table "moved to the appendix" still spends the same budget.
- The only uncounted prose you control is the ethics section - and chairs read it as ethics, not as a smuggling route for extra experiments. Abusing it is a credibility hit in front of the same SPC who writes your meta-review.
% WSDM 2025-cycle documented setting - verify options against the current CFP
\documentclass[sigconf,anonymous,review]{acmart}
% sigconf : ACM two-column conference layout (WSDM is an ACM conference)
% anonymous : suppresses the author block for double-blind review
% review : line numbers for reviewer reference
% Never patch \baselineskip, margins, or fonts: a tampered acmart is visible
% to any chair who compiles the reference template next to your PDF.Budget the 9 pages backwards: fix the space for the evaluation section first (WSDM reviewers weigh it heaviest), then the method, then shrink the introduction to what remains. Cutting evaluation to preserve a long method narrative is the classic losing trade at this venue.
Anonymization under hybrid blinding
WSDM's CFP describes "a combination of single-blind reviewing and double-blind reviewing": the PDF must be fully anonymized for PC and senior PC members, while Associate Chairs can see submission metadata (including authorship) to check conflicts. Practical readings:
- Do not treat AC metadata visibility as permission to be sloppy - the people scoring the paper still must not be able to guess the authors.
- Industry papers leak identity through infrastructure nouns: an internal system name, a proprietary metric, a "our platform serves X million queries" figure that uniquely identifies one company. Rewrite to role descriptions ("a large commercial search engine") and round figures that fingerprint you.
- Self-citations go in third person; a cited anonymous repository must have a history-free remote, no institutional paths, and no author handles in configs.
- WSDM's anonymization seriousness is not folklore: the venue hosted the 2017 controlled experiment showing single-blind reviewers favor famous affiliations, and its policy is written in that shadow.
Show full SKILL.md (358 more words)Show less
Desk-level exposure table
| Failure | Why it is severe at WSDM | Recoverable? |
|---|---|---|
| Over the 9-page inclusive cap | Explicit CFP bound; appendices count | No, after AoE |
| Missing ethical-considerations section | Required element of the submission | No |
| Identity leak in PDF or linked repo | Hybrid-blind policy with an experimental rationale | No |
| Wrong or "TBD" registered abstract | Bad bidding + placeholder desk-reject rule | Only in the abstract-paper gap |
| Claim answerable only "in rebuttal" | There is no rebuttal to answer it in | Only by rewriting before the deadline |
| Ethics section used as overflow appendix | Read by SPC as bad faith | Only before the deadline |
Vignette: the platform paper that fingerprinted itself
A search-quality team anonymizes diligently - author block gone, citations in third person, repository scrubbed - and still gets flagged. The leak chain: the paper reports "our engine's 2.3 billion daily queries in 41 languages," names an internal experiment platform in a figure caption, and evaluates on a locale mix only one company serves. No single item names the employer; the conjunction does. The repair pass that would have caught it:
- Read the paper asking "how many organizations could have written this sentence?" - any sentence with answer "one" gets generalized or rounded.
- Rename internal systems to functional labels ("the interleaving platform").
- Report locale/scale details in buckets wide enough to cover several plausible platforms, with exact values deferred to the camera-ready.
This is also why the audit below schedules the anonymity sweep after the content freeze: anonymity is a property of the final text, and every late paragraph reopens it.
Final-week order of operations
- Freeze scope: anything not already in the evaluation cannot be promised later. Delete forward-looking claims ("we will additionally verify...").
- Recompile from a clean
acmartcheckout; check the page count with references and ethics excluded from the 9, everything else included. - Run the self-containment pass: for each likely reviewer objection, verify the
answer is physically in the PDF (see
wsdm-author-responsefor the objection inventory method). - Sweep metadata: PDF author fields, figure-embedded usernames, dataset paths, acknowledgements, grant numbers, repository history.
- Submit the PDF with hours of AoE margin. EasyChair accepts resubmissions until the deadline - upload early, replace often.
Output format
[WSDM submission audit] Ready / Needs fixes / Blocked
[Budget] 9-page-inclusive check: pass / over by N (appendices counted?)
[Ethics section] present and substantive: yes / no
[Anonymity] PDF / repo / metadata / infrastructure-noun leaks found: <list>
[Self-containment] objections lacking in-PDF answers: <list>
[Abstract-week actions] <items only fixable before the paper deadline>© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-submission of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Wsdm Submission next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wsdm Submission this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Production Auditaffaan-m/ECC | 277k | 1 repos | ~1.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Aims Auditalirezarezvani/claude-skills | 28k | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Geo Auditsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills | 47k | 1 repos | ~3.4k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| OmniRoute Audit and Policy CLIdiegosouzapw/OmniRoute | 75k | — | ~733 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Audit Preparationsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills | 47k | 1 repos | ~5.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
Aims Audit
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
/cs:aims-audit <scope — ISO/IEC 42001 AIMS internal-audit 6-question forcing interrogation.
Geo Audit
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
Full website GEO+SEO audit with parallel subagent delegation.
OmniRoute Audit and Policy CLI
diegosouzapw/OmniRoute
Command reference for omniroute's audit, logs, policy and telemetry commands: search and export audit trails, manage access policies and review request history for compliance work.
Audit Preparation
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
Audit preparation register: required document, period covered, request and receipt dates, preparer and reviewer, auditor queries and adjustments.
Qms Audit Expert
davila7/claude-code-templates
Senior QMS Audit Expert for internal and external quality management system auditing.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Questions about Wsdm Submission
What does Wsdm Submission do?
A skill your agent uses when auditing a WSDM submission before the August deadlines - EasyChair setup, the abstract-then-paper week, the appendix-inclusive page budget, the required…. Wsdm Submission is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when auditing a WSDM submission before the August deadlines - EasyChair setup, the abstract-then-paper week, the appendix-inclusive page budget, the required ethical-considerations section, anonymization that survives Associate-Chair metadata visibility, and desk-reject exposure at a no-rebuttal venue.
When should I use Wsdm Submission?
Wsdm Submission fits situations like: auditing a WSDM submission before the August deadlines - EasyChair setup; the abstract-then-paper week; the appendix-inclusive page budget; the required ethical-considerations section.
How do I install Wsdm Submission in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wsdm-submission -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-submission in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/wsdm-submission in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Wsdm Submission in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wsdm-submission -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-submission in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/wsdm-submission in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Wsdm Submission in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wsdm-submission -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/wsdm-submission, .gemini/skills/wsdm-submission, .github/skills/wsdm-submission and .opencode/skills/wsdm-submission in your project.
What does Wsdm Submission need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Wsdm Submission is instructions for the agent only.
Does Wsdm Submission access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Wsdm Submission safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Wsdm Submission use?
Wsdm Submission is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Wsdm Submission use?
About 1.8k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.1k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Wsdm Submission?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Wsdm Submission: Production Audit (affaan-m/ECC, 277k stars), Aims Audit (alirezarezvani/claude-skills, 28k stars), Geo Audit (sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, 47k stars) and OmniRoute Audit and Policy CLI (diegosouzapw/OmniRoute, 75k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Wsdm Submission?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.