Responsive Units
thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist
A skill your agent uses when reviewing stylesheets, component styles, and responsive behavior related to Use relative units for responsive layouts.
Agent skill
Webconf Author Response
by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting the Web Conference (WWW) rebuttal inside its one-week window, triaging reviews from the venue's mixed systems/mining/social-science reviewer pool, answering…
MITAuto-check passed
Install Webconf Author Response
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill webconf-author-response -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills webconf-author-response --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/The-Web-Conference-Skills/skills/webconf-author-response .claude/skills/webconf-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "webconf-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/The-Web-Conference-Skills/skills/webconf-author-response into .claude/skills/webconf-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "webconf-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/The-Web-Conference-Skills/skills/webconf-author-responseType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill webconf-author-response -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills webconf-author-response --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/The-Web-Conference-Skills/skills/webconf-author-response .agents/skills/webconf-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "webconf-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/The-Web-Conference-Skills/skills/webconf-author-response into .agents/skills/webconf-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "webconf-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill webconf-author-response -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills webconf-author-response --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/The-Web-Conference-Skills/skills/webconf-author-response .cursor/skills/webconf-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "webconf-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/The-Web-Conference-Skills/skills/webconf-author-response into .cursor/skills/webconf-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "webconf-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path The-Web-Conference-Skills/skills/webconf-author-response--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill webconf-author-response -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills webconf-author-response --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/The-Web-Conference-Skills/skills/webconf-author-response .gemini/skills/webconf-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "webconf-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/The-Web-Conference-Skills/skills/webconf-author-response into .gemini/skills/webconf-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "webconf-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills webconf-author-responseInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill webconf-author-response -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/The-Web-Conference-Skills/skills/webconf-author-response .github/skills/webconf-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "webconf-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/The-Web-Conference-Skills/skills/webconf-author-response into .github/skills/webconf-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "webconf-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill webconf-author-response -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills webconf-author-response --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/The-Web-Conference-Skills/skills/webconf-author-response .opencode/skills/webconf-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "webconf-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/The-Web-Conference-Skills/skills/webconf-author-response into .opencode/skills/webconf-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "webconf-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
webconf-author-response- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.7k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 714 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when drafting the Web Conference (WWW) rebuttal inside its one-week window, triaging reviews from the venue's mixed systems/mining/social-science reviewer pool, answering…
- Works in 4 steps: Answer every factual error, however… → Answer the objection most repeated… → Answer the lowest-scoring reviewer's… → …
- Drafting the Web Conference (WWW) rebuttal inside its one-week window
- SKILL.md covers Read the packet as a track…, Evidence rules inside the window, Rebuttal skeleton and Triage when everything cannot…, plus 3 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Webconf Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting the Web Conference (WWW) rebuttal inside its one-week window, triaging reviews from the venue's mixed systems/mining/social-science reviewer pool, answering misread-track objections, protecting anonymity, and deciding what can honestly be promised for the camera-ready versus what needs new evidence.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.7k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Drafting the Web Conference (WWW) rebuttal inside its one-week window
- Triaging reviews from the venues mixed systems/mining/social-science reviewer pool
- Answering misread-track objections
- Protecting anonymity
Example prompts
- “/webconf-author-response”
Workflow steps
4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Answer every factual error, however small — uncorrected errors become
- Answer the objection most repeated across reviews with the common-thread block.
- Answer the lowest-scoring reviewer's strongest point, not their longest one.
- Concede real limitations explicitly and say what the camera-ready will state.
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Webconf Author Response loads about 1.7k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 86 tokens; SKILL.md has 714 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 714 words, ~1,665 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/webconf-author-response/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- webconf-author-response
- description
- Use when drafting the Web Conference (WWW) rebuttal inside its one-week window, triaging reviews from the venue's mixed systems/mining/social-science reviewer pool, answering misread-track objections, protecting anonymity, and deciding what can honestly be promised for the camera-ready versus what needs new evidence.
Web Conference Author Response
The 2026 rebuttal window ran November 24 - December 1, 2025 — seven days, scheduled over a major holiday week in North America, between the October 7 paper deadline and the January 13 notification. Plan writing capacity for that specific week the moment the paper goes in. Exact mechanics (length caps, per-review vs. single response, revised-PDF permission) were not published in the sources this pack could verify; confirm them in the review platform the day reviews arrive, before drafting.
Read the packet as a track artifact
Web Conference reviews come from a track-scoped pool, and the venue's defining property is that neighboring tracks read the same paper differently. A recommendation paper reviewed in "User modeling, personalization and recommendation" gets offline-metric and baseline questions; the same paper in "Social networks and social media" gets construct-validity and user-harm questions. Before answering anything, classify each review:
| Reviewer stance | Diagnostic signal | Response strategy |
|---|---|---|
| In-track expert | Names specific baselines/datasets you skipped | Concede or supply numbers; never hand-wave |
| Adjacent-track lens | Questions assume a different evidence standard | Restate the track's contribution type, then answer on their terms |
| Web-fit skeptic | "Why is this a WWW paper?" | Point to the web-native element: platform data, web-scale constraint, user behavior |
| Feasibility doubter | "Would this survive real traffic / real crawls?" | Cite the appendix's systems details by section number |
The "why is this a WWW paper" objection is the venue's signature rejection reason and deserves its own paragraph in almost every rebuttal: name the property of the Web (openness, adversarial content, platform incentives, hyperlink structure, live user feedback) without which the contribution would not exist.
Evidence rules inside the window
- New numbers are credible only if small and directly responsive: one extra baseline, one ablation cell, one robustness split. A brand-new experiment campaign announced in a rebuttal reads as an admission the paper was premature.
- Anything already in the submission beats anything new. Cite by page, section, and
line number (the
reviewclass option prints line numbers for exactly this). - Keep anonymity intact: no links to freshly pushed repositories or dashboards whose
accounts identify you, no "as we showed at
<company>." - Never promise the camera-ready something the 12-page proceedings budget cannot hold. "We will add a full new user study" is a promise reviewers know is either false or destined for an appendix nobody must read.
Rebuttal skeleton
[Common thread] (2-4 sentences shared across reviewers)
All reviewers asked about X; the short answer is Y (Sec 4.2, lines 512-530).
[R1 - in-track]
Q: missing baseline B. A: added; B underperforms ours by <delta> on the same
split (protocol identical to Table 2). Will appear in Table 2.
Q: dataset freshness. A: crawl window and snapshot date are in App. A; we will
surface them in Sec 3.1.
[R2 - adjacent track]
Your reading applies the <other-track> bar of <standard>. Our claim is a
<contribution type> claim; under the track's CFP scope, the evidence in Sec 5
addresses it because <reason>. On your specific concern: <direct answer>.
[R3 - web-fit skeptic]
The method exploits <web-native property>; without it, <what breaks>. Non-web
analogues (e.g., <venue>) do not face <constraint>.One discipline per answer: quote the reviewer's actual sentence, answer it in the first line, then justify. Reviewers reread rebuttals in minutes, not hours.
Show full SKILL.md (303 more words)Show less
Triage when everything cannot be answered
- Answer every factual error, however small — uncorrected errors become meta-review facts.
- Answer the objection most repeated across reviews with the common-thread block.
- Answer the lowest-scoring reviewer's strongest point, not their longest one.
- Concede real limitations explicitly and say what the camera-ready will state. At this venue, a clean concession on scope routinely outperforms a defensive paragraph, because track chairs read rebuttals for calibration as much as content.
Micro-example: the same objection, answered twice
Reviewer sentence: "The improvements may come from the larger embedding table rather than the proposed crawl-time signal."
Weak answer (defensive, unfalsifiable):
We respectfully disagree. Our method is fundamentally different from simply increasing capacity, as explained in Section 4. The crawl-time signal is a key novel contribution and the results clearly demonstrate its effectiveness.
Strong answer (evidence-anchored, one new number, page-cited):
Table 3 row 4 already controls for this: the parameter-matched ablation (identical embedding budget, signal removed) loses 3.8 points (p. 7, lines 689-702). We add one cell for completeness: doubling the baseline's embedding table recovers only 0.4 of those points. We will fold this cell into Table 3 and state the parameter counts in the caption.
The differences that matter: the strong answer names the existing evidence by coordinates, adds the smallest experiment that decides the question, and ends with a concrete, budget-compatible camera-ready commitment. It also never uses "novel," "fundamentally," or "clearly" — calibration words that track chairs discount automatically.
After the window
Nothing can be added between December 1 and the January 13 notification; do not
email chairs with supplements. If the outcome is rejection, the same cycle still
offered later routes in 2026 — short papers (November deadlines) closed before
notification, but the next edition's research tracks and the current edition's
workshop calls remain; route via webconf-workflow.
Output format
[Rebuttal plan] <n> reviews: <in-track/adjacent/web-fit/feasibility counts>
[Common thread] <the one issue answered once for everyone>
[New evidence] <small additions only, with source of numbers>
[Concessions] <what is admitted and how the camera-ready will phrase it>
[Anonymity check] pass / fail
[Unverified mechanics] <length cap / format items confirmed in-platform>© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in The-Web-Conference-Skills/skills/webconf-author-response of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Webconf Author Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Webconf Author Response this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Responsive Unitsthedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist | 74k | — | ~472 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Fast Author Responsebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Icassp Author Responsebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Aaai Author Responsebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~924 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Socc Author Responsebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
Fast Author Response
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting USENIX FAST author responses, covering the short pre-notification rebuttal during the author-response period and — distinctively — the one-shot-revision change…
Icassp Author Response
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting an ICASSP rebuttal or author response to reviews, covering the recently added and short author-response window, the single-blind setting where reviewers already…
Aaai Author Response
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance…
Socc Author Response
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting an ACM SoCC author response (rebuttal) during a round's response window, covering the single written turn, answering both the systems and the data/measurement…
Tacas Author Response
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting a TACAS (ETAPS) author response for the rebuttal window, covering the short single-round rebuttal, answering soundness and benchmark-fairness objections with…
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Questions about Webconf Author Response
What does Webconf Author Response do?
A skill your agent uses when drafting the Web Conference (WWW) rebuttal inside its one-week window, triaging reviews from the venue's mixed systems/mining/social-science reviewer pool, answering…. Webconf Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting the Web Conference (WWW) rebuttal inside its one-week window, triaging reviews from the venue's mixed systems/mining/social-science reviewer pool, answering misread-track objections, protecting anonymity, and deciding what can honestly be promised for the camera-ready versus what needs new evidence.
When should I use Webconf Author Response?
Webconf Author Response fits situations like: drafting the Web Conference (WWW) rebuttal inside its one-week window; triaging reviews from the venues mixed systems/mining/social-science reviewer pool; answering misread-track objections; protecting anonymity.
How do I install Webconf Author Response in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill webconf-author-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (The-Web-Conference-Skills/skills/webconf-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/webconf-author-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Webconf Author Response in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill webconf-author-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (The-Web-Conference-Skills/skills/webconf-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/webconf-author-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Webconf Author Response in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill webconf-author-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/webconf-author-response, .gemini/skills/webconf-author-response, .github/skills/webconf-author-response and .opencode/skills/webconf-author-response in your project.
What does Webconf Author Response need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Webconf Author Response is instructions for the agent only.
Does Webconf Author Response access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Webconf Author Response safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Webconf Author Response use?
Webconf Author Response is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Webconf Author Response use?
About 1.7k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.7k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Webconf Author Response?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Webconf Author Response: Responsive Units (thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist, 74k stars), Fast Author Response (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars), Icassp Author Response (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars) and Aaai Author Response (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Webconf Author Response?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.