Agent skill

Wacv Artifact Evaluation

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when packaging code, data, and models for a WACV paper, covering the anonymous review artifact versus the public post-acceptance release, reproducing constraint-based…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Wacv Artifact Evaluation

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wacv-artifact-evaluation -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills wacv-artifact-evaluation --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/WACV-Skills/skills/wacv-artifact-evaluation .claude/skills/wacv-artifact-evaluation && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
wacv-artifact-evaluation
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~938 tokens
SKILL.md length
370 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when packaging code, data, and models for a WACV paper, covering the anonymous review artifact versus the public post-acceptance release, reproducing constraint-based…

  • Models for a WACV paper
  • SKILL.md covers Two artifacts, two audiences, Reproduce the claim, not just…, Datasets and licensing and Sync across the two rounds, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Covering the anonymous review artifact versus the public post-acceptance release

What it does

Wacv Artifact Evaluation is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when packaging code, data, and models for a WACV paper, covering the anonymous review artifact versus the public post-acceptance release, reproducing constraint-based applications claims (latency, power, robustness) not just accuracy, dataset licensing and release, and keeping the artifact in sync across the two-round Revise-and-Resubmit lap.

Its SKILL.md is about 940 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Models for a WACV paper
  • Covering the anonymous review artifact versus the public post-acceptance release
  • Reproducing constraint-based applications claims (latency
  • Robustness) not just accuracy

Example prompts

  • “/wacv-artifact-evaluation”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Wacv Artifact Evaluation loads about 938 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 93 tokens; SKILL.md has 370 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~93
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~938

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 370 words, ~938 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/wacv-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
wacv-artifact-evaluation
description
Use when packaging code, data, and models for a WACV paper, covering the anonymous review artifact versus the public post-acceptance release, reproducing constraint-based applications claims (latency, power, robustness) not just accuracy, dataset licensing and release, and keeping the artifact in sync across the two-round Revise-and-Resubmit lap.

WACV Artifact Evaluation

Use this to build the two artifacts a WACV paper needs: a sealed anonymous package for review and a public release after acceptance. WACV's applications framing means the artifact must let a reviewer reproduce a deployed claim, and the two-round model means the artifact must survive a revision. Facts are the WACV 2026/2027 cycles as read on 2026-07-09.

Two artifacts, two audiences

Anonymous review artifactPublic post-acceptance release
AudienceDouble-blind reviewersThe community, via CVF open access + IEEE Xplore paper
IdentityFully anonymized: no author names, repos, or org stringsDe-anonymized; real repo, license, and citation
ContentsEnough to reproduce the headline claimsFull code, weights, and dataset (or access instructions)
TimingWith the submission / supplementBy the camera-ready obligation (see wacv-camera-ready)

Do not ship the review artifact with a link to a named GitHub repo or a project page — that breaks double-blind. Ship the code and a runnable path inside the anonymized package.

Reproduce the claim, not just the metric

For an Applications-track paper the headline is usually a constraint ("runs at 2 W on device D under sub-10-lux"), and an artifact that only reproduces an accuracy number does not support that claim. Include what a reviewer needs to check the systems result:

text
Applications artifact must let a reviewer:
  1. Run the model and reproduce the headline metric within the stated spread.
  2. Measure (or see logged) the constraint: latency/wattage/memory on the named device.
  3. Re-run at least one baseline under the same constraint, to confirm the comparison.
  4. Do all of this without learning who the authors are.
Show full SKILL.md (163 more words)Show less

Datasets and licensing

If a dataset is a claimed contribution, plan its public availability for the release and state the license (and any collection/consent basis for field or human data). In the anonymous artifact, provide the data or a de-identified sample that reproduces the reported rows without revealing the collecting institution. Do not defer the license decision to the last day — an unlicensed dataset is not really released.

Sync across the two rounds

A Revise-and-Resubmit revision often adds an experiment or re-tunes a baseline; the artifact must move with it. Before resubmitting to Round 2, re-run the reproduction on the revised claims and diff the artifact's outputs against the revised paper. A reviewer who finds the Round 2 artifact reproducing the Round 1 numbers will read it as an unfinished revision.

Reverify each cycle

  • The camera-ready dataset/code-release obligation and its deadline.
  • Anonymity rules for artifacts submitted with review (待核实 size/format caps for 2026).
  • Any license or ethics requirements for released data.

Output format

text
[Artifact stage] anonymous review / public release
[Anonymized] no names/repos/org strings in review artifact: yes/no
[Claim reproducible] headline metric within spread: yes/no
[Constraint reproducible] latency/power/memory checkable on named device: yes/no
[Baseline] at least one baseline re-runnable under the constraint: yes/no
[Dataset] license + public-availability plan set: yes/no
[Round sync] artifact matches revised paper: yes/no

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in WACV-Skills/skills/wacv-artifact-evaluation of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Wacv Artifact Evaluation next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Wacv Artifact Evaluation compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Wacv Artifact Evaluation this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~938Automated safety check: PassMIT
Arize Evaluatorgithub/awesome-copilot40k1 repos~8.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Artifacts Buildernexu-io/open-design100k—~347Automated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Ccs Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~969Automated safety check: PassMIT
Mobisys Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Fast Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Arize Evaluator

    github/awesome-copilot

    Official

    Handles LLM-as-judge evaluation workflows on Arize including creating/updating evaluators, running evaluations on spans or experiments, managing tasks, trigger-run operations, column mapping, and…

    40k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~8.1k tokens
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check: notes
  • Artifacts Builder

    nexu-io/open-design

    Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui).

    100k GitHub stars~347 tokensUpdated yesterday
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Ccs Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging ACM CCS artifacts for the artifact-evaluation committee and the ACM badges — Artifacts Available, Artifacts Evaluated Functional, Artifacts Evaluated Reusable…

    1.2k GitHub stars~969 tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Mobisys Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging a MobiSys artifact for the Artifact Evaluation Committee — choosing among the three independent ACM badges (Available, Evaluated–Functional, Results…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Fast Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging a USENIX FAST artifact for the USENIX Artifact Evaluation scheme (Artifacts Available, Artifacts Functional, Results Reproduced), covering what a storage AEC…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Issta Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging an ISSTA tool, benchmark, and results for the artifact-evaluation track, covering the ACM badges (Artifacts Available via Zenodo, Evaluated Functional and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Wacv Artifact Evaluation

What does Wacv Artifact Evaluation do?

A skill your agent uses when packaging code, data, and models for a WACV paper, covering the anonymous review artifact versus the public post-acceptance release, reproducing constraint-based…. Wacv Artifact Evaluation is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when packaging code, data, and models for a WACV paper, covering the anonymous review artifact versus the public post-acceptance release, reproducing constraint-based applications claims (latency, power, robustness) not just accuracy, dataset licensing and release, and keeping the artifact in sync across the two-round Revise-and-Resubmit lap.

When should I use Wacv Artifact Evaluation?

Wacv Artifact Evaluation fits situations like: models for a WACV paper; covering the anonymous review artifact versus the public post-acceptance release; reproducing constraint-based applications claims (latency; robustness) not just accuracy.

How do I install Wacv Artifact Evaluation in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wacv-artifact-evaluation -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (WACV-Skills/skills/wacv-artifact-evaluation in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/wacv-artifact-evaluation in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Wacv Artifact Evaluation in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wacv-artifact-evaluation -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (WACV-Skills/skills/wacv-artifact-evaluation in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/wacv-artifact-evaluation in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Wacv Artifact Evaluation in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wacv-artifact-evaluation -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/wacv-artifact-evaluation, .gemini/skills/wacv-artifact-evaluation, .github/skills/wacv-artifact-evaluation and .opencode/skills/wacv-artifact-evaluation in your project.

What does Wacv Artifact Evaluation need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Wacv Artifact Evaluation is instructions for the agent only.

Does Wacv Artifact Evaluation access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Wacv Artifact Evaluation safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Wacv Artifact Evaluation use?

Wacv Artifact Evaluation is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Wacv Artifact Evaluation use?

About 938 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 3.8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Wacv Artifact Evaluation?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Wacv Artifact Evaluation: Arize Evaluator (github/awesome-copilot, 40k stars), Artifacts Builder (nexu-io/open-design, 100k stars), Ccs Artifact Evaluation (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars) and Mobisys Artifact Evaluation (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Wacv Artifact Evaluation?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.