A skill your agent uses when designing or auditing IEEE VIS evaluations, covering how to match evidence to the contribution type (perceptual study, controlled user study, algorithm benchmark…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Vis Experiments

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill vis-experiments -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills vis-experiments --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/VIS-Skills/skills/vis-experiments .claude/skills/vis-experiments && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
vis-experiments
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
532 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when designing or auditing IEEE VIS evaluations, covering how to match evidence to the contribution type (perceptual study, controlled user study, algorithm benchmark…

  • Auditing IEEE VIS evaluations
  • SKILL.md covers Evaluation audit, Contribution-type to evidence…, Controlled-study design floor and Perceptual and accessibility…, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Covering how to match evidence to the contribution type (perceptual study

What it does

Vis Experiments is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when designing or auditing IEEE VIS evaluations, covering how to match evidence to the contribution type (perceptual study, controlled user study, algorithm benchmark, design-study validation, qualitative work), controlled experiment design with power and effect sizes, CVD-safe and perceptually grounded encoding choices, task taxonomies, and provenance so a TVCG reviewer trusts the result.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Experimental design. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Auditing IEEE VIS evaluations
  • Covering how to match evidence to the contribution type (perceptual study
  • Controlled user study
  • Algorithm benchmark

Example prompts

  • “/vis-experiments”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Vis Experiments loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 103 tokens; SKILL.md has 532 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~103
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 532 words, ~1,390 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/vis-experiments/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
vis-experiments
description
Use when designing or auditing IEEE VIS evaluations, covering how to match evidence to the contribution type (perceptual study, controlled user study, algorithm benchmark, design-study validation, qualitative work), controlled experiment design with power and effect sizes, CVD-safe and perceptually grounded encoding choices, task taxonomies, and provenance so a TVCG reviewer trusts the result.

VIS Experiments

Use this before submission when the evaluation is not yet locked. IEEE VIS reviewers judge whether the evidence matches the contribution type — and visualization has several distinct contribution types, each with its own evidence standard. The organizing principle is evaluate the claim you actually make: a claim about perception needs a controlled study, a claim about scale needs a benchmark, a claim about real-world usefulness needs a design-study validation or a deployment.

Evaluation audit

  • Pick the evaluation to the contribution type, not by habit (see the table). The classic VIS reject is a system paper "evaluated" only by an accuracy number, or a perceptual claim backed only by author intuition.
  • Design controlled studies properly: state hypotheses, a within/between design, a task from a recognized task taxonomy, a power analysis justifying N, and report effect sizes with confidence intervals, not just p-values. Consider preregistration for confirmatory studies (vis-reproducibility).
  • Justify encodings perceptually: color choices should be CVD-safe and appropriate to the data type (sequential/diverging/categorical); channel choices should follow known effectiveness rankings for the task. Reviewers check this explicitly.
  • Benchmark techniques fairly: compare against the strongest existing technique and a reasonable baseline on realistic data sizes, with runtime/quality reported and the code available.
  • Hold qualitative and design-study work to method: coding schemes, multiple coders, reflection across abstraction levels, and an audit trail — design studies are a first-class VIS contribution, not a weak substitute for a controlled study.
  • Pin provenance for datasets, stimuli, and rendering so the evaluation reproduces rather than re-samples.

Contribution-type to evidence table

Contribution typeMatching evidenceReject pattern avoided
Perceptual/cognitive claimControlled experiment: real stimuli, power analysis, effect sizes + CIs"Author intuition stands in for a perception result"
New encoding/interaction techniqueControlled study and/or task-based comparison vs. the conventional design"Prettier, but no evidence it helps a task"
System / toolDemonstration of real use, expert feedback, or a usage study"Feature list with no evaluation of use"
Design studyReflection + validation across data/task/encoding/algorithm levels"A one-off tool with no transferable lesson"
Algorithm (layout/rendering)Benchmark: quality + runtime vs. strong baselines on realistic sizes"Toy inputs only; no comparison"
Data/model contributionCharacterization + a task the data enables, with the data shared"Dataset dumped with no analysis or task"
Show full SKILL.md (164 more words)Show less

Controlled-study design floor

text
[Hypotheses]  stated before analysis; confirmatory vs. exploratory labeled
[Design]      within/between justified; counterbalancing; the task from a known taxonomy
[Power]       an a-priori power analysis justifies N; do not stop at "we recruited 20"
[Stimuli]     real or realistic; the exact stimuli archived
[Measures]    accuracy AND time AND (where relevant) preference/confidence; define each
[Statistics]  effect sizes + CIs; appropriate tests; corrections for multiple comparisons
[Reporting]   report what you found, including null and exploratory results, honestly

Perceptual and accessibility checks

  • Color: use CVD-safe palettes; match palette type to data (sequential for ordered, diverging for a meaningful midpoint, categorical for nominal); never encode magnitude on hue alone.
  • Channel effectiveness: prefer position/length for quantitative comparison; justify any use of area, angle, or color for a precise task.
  • Legibility: ensure figures read in grayscale and at print size; a result a reviewer cannot see is a result you cannot claim.

Vignette: evaluating a new time-series encoding

Suppose the paper claims a new encoding reads trends faster than a line chart. The matching plan: a controlled within-subjects study; trend-reading tasks drawn from a task taxonomy; real time-series stimuli, archived; an a-priori power analysis fixing N; accuracy and completion-time as measures; effect sizes with CIs comparing the new encoding to a tuned line-chart baseline; a CVD-safe palette justified against the task; and honest reporting of any task where the line chart won — every number traceable to the archived analysis notebook.

Output format

text
[Evaluation readiness] strong / adequate / weak
[Contribution type] perceptual / technique / system / design-study / algorithm / data
[Evidence match] <contribution type -> evidence chosen -> appropriate? yes/no>
[Study rigor] <hypotheses? power analysis? effect sizes + CIs? preregistered?>
[Encoding validity] <CVD-safe? channel matched to task? grayscale-legible?>
[Provenance] <stimuli/data/rendering archived and reproducible? yes/no>
[Decision-critical next run] <one study or benchmark to add>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in VIS-Skills/skills/vis-experiments of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Vis Experiments next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Vis Experiments compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Vis Experiments this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Data Scientistmagnus919/hermes-profiles281—~3.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Scenario Experiment Benchmark MiningDrchronx/ai-agent-research-starter-kit135—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Data Scientistmagnus919/agent-skills113—~4.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Light Experiment CodingLight0305/Light-skills641—~2.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Experiment DesignGRIND-Lab-Core/night_owl_research_agent106—~3.3kAutomated safety check: WarnNone

Similar skills

  • Data Scientist

    magnus919/hermes-profiles

    PhD-level expertise in data science, statistics, and machine learning.

    281 GitHub stars~3.3k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Scenario Experiment Benchmark Mining

    Drchronx/ai-agent-research-starter-kit

    Mine and synthesize real top-journal scenario/vignette experiment patterns for behavioral research.

    135 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Data Scientist

    magnus919/agent-skills

    A skill your agent uses for PhD-level expertise in data science, statistics, and machine learning: rigorous statistical analysis, experimental design, causal inference, advanced modeling, research…

    113 GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Light Experiment Coding

    Light0305/Light-skills

    Builds the code for a frozen research experiment test-first, with leakage controls, seed handling and saved evidence so results can be rerun and audited.

    641 GitHub stars~2.3k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Experiment Design

    GRIND-Lab-Core/night_owl_research_agent

    Turn a refined GIScience / remote sensing / spatial data science proposal into a detailed, claim-driven experiment roadmap.

    106 GitHub stars~3.3k tokensUpdated 5 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: warnings
  • Statistical Power

    K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

    Calculates sample sizes and statistical power for study planning.

    48k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~4.4k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Vis Experiments

What does Vis Experiments do?

A skill your agent uses when designing or auditing IEEE VIS evaluations, covering how to match evidence to the contribution type (perceptual study, controlled user study, algorithm benchmark…. Vis Experiments is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when designing or auditing IEEE VIS evaluations, covering how to match evidence to the contribution type (perceptual study, controlled user study, algorithm benchmark, design-study validation, qualitative work), controlled experiment design with power and effect sizes, CVD-safe and perceptually grounded encoding choices, task taxonomies, and provenance so a TVCG reviewer trusts the result.

When should I use Vis Experiments?

Vis Experiments fits situations like: auditing IEEE VIS evaluations; covering how to match evidence to the contribution type (perceptual study; controlled user study; algorithm benchmark.

How do I install Vis Experiments in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill vis-experiments -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (VIS-Skills/skills/vis-experiments in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/vis-experiments in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Vis Experiments in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill vis-experiments -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (VIS-Skills/skills/vis-experiments in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/vis-experiments in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Vis Experiments in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill vis-experiments -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/vis-experiments, .gemini/skills/vis-experiments, .github/skills/vis-experiments and .opencode/skills/vis-experiments in your project.

What does Vis Experiments need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Vis Experiments is instructions for the agent only.

Does Vis Experiments access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Vis Experiments safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Vis Experiments use?

Vis Experiments is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Vis Experiments use?

About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Vis Experiments?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Vis Experiments: Data Scientist (magnus919/hermes-profiles, 281 stars), Scenario Experiment Benchmark Mining (Drchronx/ai-agent-research-starter-kit, 135 stars), Data Scientist (magnus919/agent-skills, 113 stars) and Light Experiment Coding (Light0305/Light-skills, 641 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Vis Experiments?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,219 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.