Responsive Units
thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist
A skill your agent uses when reviewing stylesheets, component styles, and responsive behavior related to Use relative units for responsive layouts.
A skill your agent uses when drafting UAI author responses during the OpenReview rebuttal window, turning reviewer objections about technical correctness, novelty, evidential backing, or clarity…
MITAuto-check passed
Install Uai Author Response
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill uai-author-response -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills uai-author-response --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/UAI-Skills/skills/uai-author-response .claude/skills/uai-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "uai-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/UAI-Skills/skills/uai-author-response into .claude/skills/uai-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "uai-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/UAI-Skills/skills/uai-author-responseType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill uai-author-response -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills uai-author-response --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/UAI-Skills/skills/uai-author-response .agents/skills/uai-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "uai-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/UAI-Skills/skills/uai-author-response into .agents/skills/uai-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "uai-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill uai-author-response -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills uai-author-response --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/UAI-Skills/skills/uai-author-response .cursor/skills/uai-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "uai-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/UAI-Skills/skills/uai-author-response into .cursor/skills/uai-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "uai-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path UAI-Skills/skills/uai-author-response--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill uai-author-response -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills uai-author-response --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/UAI-Skills/skills/uai-author-response .gemini/skills/uai-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "uai-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/UAI-Skills/skills/uai-author-response into .gemini/skills/uai-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "uai-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills uai-author-responseInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill uai-author-response -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/UAI-Skills/skills/uai-author-response .github/skills/uai-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "uai-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/UAI-Skills/skills/uai-author-response into .github/skills/uai-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "uai-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill uai-author-response -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills uai-author-response --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/UAI-Skills/skills/uai-author-response .opencode/skills/uai-author-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "uai-author-response" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/UAI-Skills/skills/uai-author-response into .opencode/skills/uai-author-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "uai-author-response", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
uai-author-response- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.8k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 940 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when drafting UAI author responses during the OpenReview rebuttal window, turning reviewer objections about technical correctness, novelty, evidential backing, or clarity…
- Drafting UAI author responses during the OpenReview rebuttal window
- SKILL.md covers The four axes, and what each…, Anchoring discipline, A skeleton that survives the… and Reading the review set before…, plus 5 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- Turning reviewer objections about technical correctness
What it does
Uai Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting UAI author responses during the OpenReview rebuttal window, turning reviewer objections about technical correctness, novelty, evidential backing, or clarity into anonymous, evidence-anchored replies that survive the reviewer-and-area-chair discussion phase that follows immediately after authors go quiet.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.8k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Drafting UAI author responses during the OpenReview rebuttal window
- Turning reviewer objections about technical correctness
- Evidential backing
- Clarity into anonymous
Example prompts
- “/uai-author-response”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Uai Author Response loads about 1.8k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 86 tokens; SKILL.md has 940 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 940 words, ~1,827 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/uai-author-response/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- uai-author-response
- description
- Use when drafting UAI author responses during the OpenReview rebuttal window, turning reviewer objections about technical correctness, novelty, evidential backing, or clarity into anonymous, evidence-anchored replies that survive the reviewer-and-area-chair discussion phase that follows immediately after authors go quiet.
UAI Author Response
Use this once reviews land. In the 2026 cycle the author response and discussion period ran April 23 – May 2, and the reviewers' discussion with area chairs followed on May 2 – 8 — meaning your reply is debated in a room you have already left. Write for that second room. Reconfirm the current cycle's response mechanics on the UAI pages and in the OpenReview forum instructions before drafting; formats change year to year.
The four axes, and what each objection is really about
UAI's posted review criteria are technical correctness, novelty, convincing backing of claims, and clarity of writing. Map every reviewer point onto one axis before answering; a reply that answers the wrong axis reads as evasion.
| Reviewer says | Axis it lives on | Reply move that works at UAI |
|---|---|---|
| "The proof of Prop. 2 assumes faithfulness implicitly" | Correctness | Quote the appendix line where the assumption is invoked, or concede and show which results stand without it |
| "This is a variant of [known algorithm]" | Novelty | State the precise technical delta — objective, identification condition, or complexity — not adjectives |
| "Gains could be noise; only one run is shown" | Backing | Point to the seed-replicated table in the appendix, or concede the missing variance honestly |
| "Notation switches between p(x) and P(X) mid-paper" | Clarity | Commit to a specific fix, listed section by section |
| "Why no comparison against exact inference on small graphs?" | Backing | Give the appendix result if it exists; otherwise explain the computational or scope reason in two sentences |
Anchoring discipline
- Every factual sentence in the response should point at something already submitted: a numbered equation, an appendix section, a table, or the supplementary ZIP.
- Never introduce a brand-new theorem or a fresh experimental campaign as if it were in the paper. You may sketch what a revision would add, clearly labeled as a revision promise.
- Stay anonymous. The double-blind rules do not expire at review release; institution hints, grant references, and identifying links remain forbidden in responses.
- Do not paste external URLs into the forum unless the current cycle's instructions explicitly allow them — assume they do not until verified.
A skeleton that survives the AC discussion
The area chair will compress your response into one line of meta-review. Hand them that line. A reliable shape for each reviewer:
R2, on the identifiability concern (their point 1, our Thm. 3):
1. The concern is correct as stated for arbitrary DAGs.
2. Thm. 3 is scoped to ancestral graphs — Assumption A2, restated in App. B.1.
3. Under A2 the counterexample in the review is excluded (App. B.1, Lemma 5).
4. Camera-ready commitment: we will restate A2 in the main text beside Thm. 3.Numbered, scoped, verifiable, and ending in a concrete commitment. Four lines like this outperform four paragraphs of context-setting.
Reading the review set before writing
- Identify the pivotal reviewer: usually the one whose objection, if upheld in the May discussion, decides the paper — not the one with the lowest score.
- Separate misreadings (fix by pointing at the record) from disagreements (fix by argument) from true gaps (fix by concession plus scoped promise). Each gets a different rhetorical mode, and mixing them within one answer muddies all three.
- Check whether reviewers already answered each other — one review praising the exact aspect another attacks is material you can quote neutrally.
- Note each reviewer's stated requests for clarification; the 2026 reviewer instructions explicitly asked them to articulate these, so unanswered explicit requests read as evasion.
Show full SKILL.md (432 more words)Show less
Prioritization under a short window
- Sort objections by decision weight, not by reviewer irritation. A correctness doubt from a low-confidence reviewer still outranks a style complaint from a hostile one.
- If two reviewers disagree with each other (one wants more theory, one wants more benchmarks), say so explicitly and state the trade-off you chose — area chairs reward authors who surface the tension instead of pandering to both.
- Concede real weaknesses in plain words. At a venue whose reviewer pool lives on calibrated uncertainty, hedged non-answers ("we believe this is not a major issue") are read as miscalibration about your own paper.
- Budget the window: draft everything by the midpoint, then spend the second half cutting. Responses shrink well and never grow well.
Working the ten-day window
A schedule that has held up in practice for a short response period like 2026's April 23 – May 2:
- Days 1–2 — read all reviews twice; the first read is for emotion disposal, the second for the axis map. Assign each objection an owner and an anchor.
- Days 3–5 — draft every reply in full. Where an anchor is missing, decide now between honest concession and a scoped camera-ready promise.
- Day 6 — external pass: a colleague who has not seen the reviews reads only your responses and guesses the objections. Where they guess wrong, the reply is unclear.
- Days 7–8 — cut by a third. Merge overlapping answers to different reviewers into consistent wording; ACs notice contradictions between per-reviewer replies.
- Day 9 — post. Late responses compete with reviewer fatigue, and the reviewer–AC discussion opens immediately after the window closes.
- Day 10 — buffer you should not need. If you are using it, cut more, not less.
Pre-send checklist
- Every reply opens with the objection restated in one neutral line.
- Every factual sentence carries an anchor to submitted material.
- No new theorems, no new experiments presented as if already in the paper.
- No links (unless the current instructions explicitly permit them).
- No identity signals — institution, grant, "as we showed in [3]" phrasing.
- Each reviewer can locate their answer without reading the others' sections.
- Commitments are specific enough to be checked at camera-ready.
What not to do
- Do not re-litigate novelty by listing how hard the work was.
- Do not answer a mathematical objection with an empirical table, or vice versa, without saying why the substitution is valid.
- Do not address the area chair over the reviewers' heads unless a review contains a factual error you can prove from the submission.
- Do not exceed whatever length or formatting cap the current forum enforces — check the live instructions, not last year's.
Output format
[Objection] <one-line restatement in the reviewer's own terms>
[Axis] correctness / novelty / backing / clarity
[Anchor] <equation, theorem, table, appendix, or ZIP path already submitted>
[Reply draft] <numbered, anonymous, ≤6 lines>
[Commitment] <camera-ready change offered, or "none needed" with reason>© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in UAI-Skills/skills/uai-author-response of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Uai Author Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uai Author Response this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Responsive Unitsthedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist | 74k | — | ~472 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Fast Author Responsebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Icassp Author Responsebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Mlsys Author Responsebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Icml Author Responsebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~843 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
Fast Author Response
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting USENIX FAST author responses, covering the short pre-notification rebuttal during the author-response period and — distinctively — the one-shot-revision change…
Icassp Author Response
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting an ICASSP rebuttal or author response to reviews, covering the recently added and short author-response window, the single-blind setting where reviewers already…
Mlsys Author Response
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting MLSys author responses on OpenReview under the venue's compressed rebuttal window, prioritizing systems-reviewer objections about workload representativeness…
Icml Author Response
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting ICML rebuttals and reviewer-author discussion replies under OpenReview double-blind constraints, where authors respond after initial reviews, reviewers may then…
Aaai Author Response
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance…
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Questions about Uai Author Response
What does Uai Author Response do?
A skill your agent uses when drafting UAI author responses during the OpenReview rebuttal window, turning reviewer objections about technical correctness, novelty, evidential backing, or clarity…. Uai Author Response is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting UAI author responses during the OpenReview rebuttal window, turning reviewer objections about technical correctness, novelty, evidential backing, or clarity into anonymous, evidence-anchored replies that survive the reviewer-and-area-chair discussion phase that follows immediately after authors go quiet.
When should I use Uai Author Response?
Uai Author Response fits situations like: drafting UAI author responses during the OpenReview rebuttal window; turning reviewer objections about technical correctness; evidential backing; clarity into anonymous.
How do I install Uai Author Response in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill uai-author-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (UAI-Skills/skills/uai-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/uai-author-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Uai Author Response in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill uai-author-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (UAI-Skills/skills/uai-author-response in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/uai-author-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Uai Author Response in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill uai-author-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/uai-author-response, .gemini/skills/uai-author-response, .github/skills/uai-author-response and .opencode/skills/uai-author-response in your project.
What does Uai Author Response need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Uai Author Response is instructions for the agent only.
Does Uai Author Response access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Uai Author Response safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Uai Author Response use?
Uai Author Response is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Uai Author Response use?
About 1.8k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Uai Author Response?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Uai Author Response: Responsive Units (thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist, 74k stars), Fast Author Response (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars), Icassp Author Response (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars) and Mlsys Author Response (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Uai Author Response?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.