Agent skill

Uai Artifact Evaluation

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when packaging code, data, samplers, solvers, and logs for a UAI submission's 50 MB supplementary ZIP or a public post-acceptance release, making probabilistic-inference…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Uai Artifact Evaluation

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill uai-artifact-evaluation -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills uai-artifact-evaluation --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/UAI-Skills/skills/uai-artifact-evaluation .claude/skills/uai-artifact-evaluation && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
uai-artifact-evaluation
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.6k tokens
SKILL.md length
626 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when packaging code, data, samplers, solvers, and logs for a UAI submission's 50 MB supplementary ZIP or a public post-acceptance release, making probabilistic-inference…

  • Logs for a UAI submissions 50 MB supplementary ZIP
  • SKILL.md covers Design for the five-minute…, What inference artifacts must…, Anonymity inside the archive and README skeleton for the archive, plus 4 more sections
  • Calls git
  • A public post-acceptance release

What it does

Uai Artifact Evaluation is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when packaging code, data, samplers, solvers, and logs for a UAI submission's 50 MB supplementary ZIP or a public post-acceptance release, making probabilistic-inference claims independently runnable while keeping every file double-blind, given that UAI reviewers may open the archive but are not obliged to read it.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Logs for a UAI submissions 50 MB supplementary ZIP
  • A public post-acceptance release
  • Making probabilistic-inference claims independently runnable while keeping every file double-blind
  • Given that UAI reviewers may open the archive but are not obliged to read it

Example prompts

  • “/uai-artifact-evaluation”

Requirements

  • Python 3

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • git

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md. Its commands use git, which can reach the network depending on how they are called.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Uai Artifact Evaluation loads about 1.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 86 tokens; SKILL.md has 626 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~86
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.6k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 626 words, ~1,596 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/uai-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
uai-artifact-evaluation
description
Use when packaging code, data, samplers, solvers, and logs for a UAI submission's 50 MB supplementary ZIP or a public post-acceptance release, making probabilistic-inference claims independently runnable while keeping every file double-blind, given that UAI reviewers may open the archive but are not obliged to read it.

UAI Artifact Evaluation

UAI posted no separate artifact-evaluation track or badge system for the 2026 cycle (existence of one in later cycles: 待核实). What it did post is sharper than a badge: code and data release is strongly encouraged, a 50 MB anonymous ZIP rides with the submission, and reviewers judge whether claims are "backed up convincingly." The artifact's job is to convert a skeptical probabilistic-ML reviewer's spot-check into confirmation.

Design for the five-minute skeptic

Because reviewers are explicitly not required to consult supplementary material, assume whoever opens the ZIP gives it five minutes. Optimize for that reader:

  • A top-level README that states, in its first ten lines, what claim each script reproduces and how long it takes.
  • One command per headline result, each with a small-scale mode that finishes on a laptop: a reviewer who reproduces Figure 2 at n=500 in ninety seconds will extend you trust for the n=50,000 version.
  • Pinned dependencies and one canonical entry point. A Makefile or single driver script beats a directory of loose notebooks.
  • Expected outputs stored beside the scripts, so "did it work?" needs no judgment.

What inference artifacts must expose

Probabilistic-modeling papers fail reproduction in venue-specific ways. Package accordingly:

Contribution typeMust be in the artifactSpot-check the reviewer will try
MCMC / SMC samplerSeeds, chain configs, convergence diagnostics codeRe-run short chains; compare R-hat and ESS to reported
Variational methodELBO logging, initialization scheme, optimizer settingsReproduce the ELBO trace shape, not just the endpoint
Causal discoveryGraph-generation scripts, SHD/SID evaluation codeRegenerate synthetic graphs; verify metrics on one seed
Calibration / conformalScore functions, split definitions, coverage computationRecompute empirical coverage at one α
Probabilistic programming / PGM inferenceModel source, query set, exact-baseline harnessRun the exact baseline on the smallest instance
Theory with simulationsEvery constant used to instantiate the boundCheck simulation matches theorem conditions

Anonymity inside the archive

The double-blind requirement covers all supplementary material explicitly. Archive leaks are quieter than PDF leaks, so build from a clean export:

bash
# Build an anonymous artifact from a clean tree, never from the working repo
git archive --format=tar HEAD | tar -x -C /tmp/uai-artifact
cd /tmp/uai-artifact
grep -rniE 'university|\.edu|author|thanks|grant' --include='*.py' --include='*.md' . | head
find . -name '*.ipynb' -exec grep -l '"authors"' {} \;      # notebook metadata
rm -rf .git .github; find . -name '.DS_Store' -delete
zip -r ../supplement.zip . && du -h ../supplement.zip        # must be ≤ 50 MB (2026 cap)

Watch for: license headers with names, pyproject.toml author fields, conda environment exports embedding usernames, wandb/MLflow run URLs tied to an account, dataset paths containing /home/<name>/, and model checkpoints whose training config JSON names a cluster.

Show full SKILL.md (259 more words)Show less

README skeleton for the archive

The archive's README is the artifact's abstract. A shape that fits the five-minute reader:

markdown
# Supplementary code for submission #<OpenReview number>

## Claim → command map (small-scale modes; full-scale flags noted)
| Paper claim | Command | Runtime (laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| Fig. 2 (coverage vs n) | `make fig2-small`  | ~2 min |
| Table 1 (SHD, 10 seeds) | `make table1-small` | ~4 min |
| Thm. 3 simulation | `make thm3-check` | ~1 min |

## Environment
- `pip install -r requirements.txt` (pinned versions; Python 3.11)
- No GPU required for small-scale modes.

## Expected outputs
- `expected/` holds reference CSVs; each command prints PASS/FAIL against them.

## Full-scale reproduction
- Flags, hardware used, and total runtime per experiment in `FULL_RUNS.md`.

Everything above stays anonymous by construction — no names, no lab conventions in paths, no acknowledgement of infrastructure that identifies an institution.

Data that cannot ship

  • Under the 50 MB cap, ship generators, not corpora: the script that produces the synthetic SCMs or the subsampled benchmark, plus checksums for the full data.
  • For licensed or private datasets, include the loader, the preprocessing pipeline, the schema, and summary statistics, and state access terms in the README.
  • Never bypass a data-use agreement to help reviewers; explain the constraint instead. A stated limitation is a clarity point, a violated license is misconduct under the AUAI code of conduct.

Licensing notes

  • The review-time ZIP needs no license drama, but the post-acceptance release does: choose deliberately between permissive (MIT/BSD/Apache-2.0) and copyleft, and check employer policy before the camera-ready deadline forces a rushed default.
  • Third-party code vendored into the archive keeps its own license; verify compatibility now, since reviewers occasionally notice a GPL file inside an "MIT" archive and read it as carelessness.
  • Data licensing is separate from code licensing; a permissive code license does not launder a restricted dataset.

After acceptance

Convert the anonymous ZIP into a public artifact worth citing: a tagged repository, an archival DOI where your institution supports one, a license chosen deliberately, and the README rewritten from "reviewer instructions" to "user instructions." Link it from the camera-ready — post-acceptance is when the CFP's release encouragement costs you nothing and earns citations.

Output format

text
[Artifact scope] supplement ZIP / public release / both
[Five-minute path] <command a reviewer runs first, and its runtime>
[Claim coverage] <headline results reproducible / total>
[Anonymity scan] clean / leaks: <files>
[Size] <ZIP size vs current cap>
[Data strategy] shipped / generated / loader-plus-terms

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in UAI-Skills/skills/uai-artifact-evaluation of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Uai Artifact Evaluation next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Uai Artifact Evaluation compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Uai Artifact Evaluation this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Extracting Windows Event Logs Artifactsmukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34k—~3.3kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Arize Evaluatorgithub/awesome-copilot40k1 repos~8.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Artifacts Buildernexu-io/open-design100k—~347Automated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Ccs Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~969Automated safety check: PassMIT
Mobisys Artifact Evaluationbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Extracting Windows Event Logs Artifacts

    mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

    Extract, parse, and analyze Windows Event Logs (EVTX) using Chainsaw, Hayabusa, and EvtxECmd to detect lateral movement, persistence, and privilege escalation.

    34k GitHub stars~3.3k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    SecurityAuto-check passed
  • Arize Evaluator

    github/awesome-copilot

    Official

    Handles LLM-as-judge evaluation workflows on Arize including creating/updating evaluators, running evaluations on spans or experiments, managing tasks, trigger-run operations, column mapping, and…

    40k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~8.1k tokens
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check: notes
  • Artifacts Builder

    nexu-io/open-design

    Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui).

    100k GitHub stars~347 tokensUpdated yesterday
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Ccs Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging ACM CCS artifacts for the artifact-evaluation committee and the ACM badges — Artifacts Available, Artifacts Evaluated Functional, Artifacts Evaluated Reusable…

    1.2k GitHub stars~969 tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Mobisys Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging a MobiSys artifact for the Artifact Evaluation Committee — choosing among the three independent ACM badges (Available, Evaluated–Functional, Results…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Fast Artifact Evaluation

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when packaging a USENIX FAST artifact for the USENIX Artifact Evaluation scheme (Artifacts Available, Artifacts Functional, Results Reproduced), covering what a storage AEC…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Uai Artifact Evaluation

What does Uai Artifact Evaluation do?

A skill your agent uses when packaging code, data, samplers, solvers, and logs for a UAI submission's 50 MB supplementary ZIP or a public post-acceptance release, making probabilistic-inference…. Uai Artifact Evaluation is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when packaging code, data, samplers, solvers, and logs for a UAI submission's 50 MB supplementary ZIP or a public post-acceptance release, making probabilistic-inference claims independently runnable while keeping every file double-blind, given that UAI reviewers may open the archive but are not obliged to read it.

When should I use Uai Artifact Evaluation?

Uai Artifact Evaluation fits situations like: logs for a UAI submissions 50 MB supplementary ZIP; A public post-acceptance release; making probabilistic-inference claims independently runnable while keeping every file double-blind; given that UAI reviewers may open the archive but are not obliged to read it.

How do I install Uai Artifact Evaluation in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill uai-artifact-evaluation -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (UAI-Skills/skills/uai-artifact-evaluation in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/uai-artifact-evaluation in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Uai Artifact Evaluation in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill uai-artifact-evaluation -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (UAI-Skills/skills/uai-artifact-evaluation in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/uai-artifact-evaluation in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Uai Artifact Evaluation in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill uai-artifact-evaluation -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/uai-artifact-evaluation, .gemini/skills/uai-artifact-evaluation, .github/skills/uai-artifact-evaluation and .opencode/skills/uai-artifact-evaluation in your project.

What does Uai Artifact Evaluation need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Uai Artifact Evaluation needs the command-line tools its instructions call (git). Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Uai Artifact Evaluation access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Its commands use git, which can reach the network depending on how they are called. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Uai Artifact Evaluation safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Uai Artifact Evaluation use?

Uai Artifact Evaluation is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Uai Artifact Evaluation use?

About 1.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.4k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Uai Artifact Evaluation?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Uai Artifact Evaluation: Extracting Windows Event Logs Artifacts (mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills, 34k stars), Arize Evaluator (github/awesome-copilot, 40k stars), Artifacts Builder (nexu-io/open-design, 100k stars) and Ccs Artifact Evaluation (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, 1.2k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Uai Artifact Evaluation?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.