Analytics Tracking
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Set up, audit, and debug analytics tracking implementation — GA4, Google Tag Manager, event taxonomy, conversion tracking, and data quality.
Agent skill
The Philosophical Review
by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when targeting The Philosophical Review or deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue.
MITAuto-check passed
Install The Philosophical Review
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill the-philosophical-review -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills the-philosophical-review --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/the-philosophical-review .claude/skills/the-philosophical-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "the-philosophical-review" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/the-philosophical-review into .claude/skills/the-philosophical-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "the-philosophical-review", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/the-philosophical-reviewType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill the-philosophical-review -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills the-philosophical-review --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/the-philosophical-review .agents/skills/the-philosophical-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "the-philosophical-review" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/the-philosophical-review into .agents/skills/the-philosophical-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "the-philosophical-review", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill the-philosophical-review -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills the-philosophical-review --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/the-philosophical-review .cursor/skills/the-philosophical-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "the-philosophical-review" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/the-philosophical-review into .cursor/skills/the-philosophical-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "the-philosophical-review", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/the-philosophical-review--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill the-philosophical-review -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills the-philosophical-review --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/the-philosophical-review .gemini/skills/the-philosophical-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "the-philosophical-review" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/the-philosophical-review into .gemini/skills/the-philosophical-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "the-philosophical-review", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills the-philosophical-reviewInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill the-philosophical-review -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/the-philosophical-review .github/skills/the-philosophical-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "the-philosophical-review" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/the-philosophical-review into .github/skills/the-philosophical-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "the-philosophical-review", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill the-philosophical-review -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills the-philosophical-review --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/the-philosophical-review .opencode/skills/the-philosophical-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "the-philosophical-review" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/the-philosophical-review into .opencode/skills/the-philosophical-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "the-philosophical-review", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
the-philosophical-review- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.6k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 692 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when targeting The Philosophical Review or deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue.
- Targeting The Philosophical Review
- SKILL.md covers Journal positioning, When to trigger, Scope & topic fit and Method & evidence bar, plus 6 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- Deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue
What it does
The Philosophical Review is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when targeting The Philosophical Review or deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the argument-rigor and originality bar, dialectical-engagement expectations, house style and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Targeting The Philosophical Review
- Deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue
Example prompts
- “/the-philosophical-review”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
The Philosophical Review loads about 1.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 84 tokens; SKILL.md has 692 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 692 words, ~1,570 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/the-philosophical-review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- the-philosophical-review
- description
- Use when targeting The Philosophical Review or deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the argument-rigor and originality bar, dialectical-engagement expectations, house style and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
The Philosophical Review (the-philosophical-review)
Journal positioning
The Philosophical Review is one of the most selective generalist journals in analytic philosophy, publishing full-length articles of the highest quality across all core areas — metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of mind and language, ethics, and the history of philosophy treated philosophically. Its defining expectation is a rigorous, original argument that advances a live debate: a clearly stated thesis, a valid and carefully defended line of reasoning, and decisive engagement with the strongest opposing positions. A competent survey, a small variation on a known move, or a paper that does not engage the best objections is a poor fit. This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing aid. It does not replace the journal's current submission guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the live Philosophical Review author instructions.
When to trigger
- The author names The Philosophical Review for an analytic-philosophy article and wants a fit/framing check.
- An argument must be sharpened — thesis, structure, and engagement with the strongest objections — to meet a top generalist venue's bar.
- The author is choosing between The Philosophical Review and Noûs, The Journal of Philosophy, or a sub-area specialist journal.
- The author needs the journal's originality/rigor bar and desk-reject heuristics.
Scope & topic fit
- Core analytic philosophy: metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of mind, philosophy of language, logic, and their intersections.
- Ethics and metaethics, and political philosophy treated with analytic rigor.
- History of philosophy when it makes a philosophical (not merely exegetical) contribution to a current debate.
- Foundational work in philosophy of science, mathematics, or action when the argument is of general philosophical interest.
- Articles that introduce or decisively advance a distinction, argument, or position.
Method & evidence bar
- The contribution is an original thesis defended by a valid, carefully structured argument; the central claim and its dialectical stakes are stated early and clearly.
- The strongest objections and rival views are engaged head-on, not deflected; the paper earns its conclusion against the best opposition.
- Distinctions are drawn precisely; key terms are defined; the argument's logical form is transparent and its premises independently motivated.
- Scholarly engagement is current and fair, situating the contribution in the live literature without padding.
- Examples and thought experiments do real argumentative work and are not merely illustrative.
Structure & house style
- Full-length analytic article with a sustained argument; re-check current length expectations and article types on the live guide.
- The thesis and roadmap appear early; sections build the argument step by step; objections-and-replies are integral, not appended.
- Citation follows the journal's current style (typically author-date with a reference list); footnotes carry qualifications and secondary dialectic.
- Double-blind review: anonymize the manuscript (self-citations and acknowledgements) per current policy.
- Prose is precise and economical; technical apparatus is used only where it earns its keep.
Show full SKILL.md (246 more words)Show less
Official-submission checklist
- Before giving submission-ready advice, read
../../resources/source-basis.mdand../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the press/society anchors, then cite the current Philosophical Review page you checked. - Search the live site for "The Philosophical Review submission guidelines" and follow the current version.
- Re-check article types, length expectations, and the abstract requirement.
- Confirm the citation/style format and anonymization for double-blind review.
- Re-check the journal's policy on prior presentation/preprints, simultaneous submission, and AI-use disclosure.
- If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win.
Pre-submission self-check
- There is a single, clearly stated, original thesis with explicit dialectical stakes.
- The argument is valid and each premise is independently motivated and defined.
- The strongest objections and rival positions are engaged and answered, not deflected.
- Engagement with the current literature is fair, current, and non-padding.
- The manuscript is anonymized and follows the current citation style.
- Examples/thought experiments do genuine argumentative work.
Common desk-reject triggers
- A survey or a small variation on a familiar move with no original advance.
- An argument that ignores or only gestures at the strongest objections.
- Imprecise theses, undefined key terms, or an argument whose logical form is unclear.
- Narrow sub-area interest with no general philosophical stake (better at a specialist venue).
- Exegesis with no philosophical contribution to a live debate.
Re-routing decision
- Equally strong generalist analytic article →
nous/the-journal-of-philosophy. - Moral, political, or normative-ethics focus →
ethics/philosophy-and-public-affairs. - Broad philosophy, especially in the UK tradition →
mind. - Short, focused argument or counterexample →
analysis. - Aesthetics / philosophy of art →
the-journal-of-aesthetics-and-art-criticism.
Output format
[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] The Philosophical Review
[Area] <closest philosophical sub-area>
[Thesis] <the original claim in one line>
[Argument/engagement] <does the rigor + objection-handling clear a top generalist bar?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <length / citation style / anonymization / preprint policy>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/the-philosophical-review of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
The Philosophical Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Philosophical Review this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Analytics Trackingalirezarezvani/claude-skills | 28k | 1 repos | ~3.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Analyticsgetsentry/sentry | 46k | — | ~2.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Debugging MCP AnalyticsPostHog/posthog | 40k | — | ~7.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Opik Analytics Instrumentationcomet-ml/opik | 22k | — | ~4.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Telemetry AnalyticsOpenHands/OpenHands | 91k | — | ~305 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
- Official
Analytics
getsentry/sentry
Instrument and discover analytics events in Sentry's frontend UI.
- Official
Debugging MCP Analytics
PostHog/posthog
Debug, support, and build PostHog MCP Analytics — product analytics for MCP servers (the @posthog/mcp and posthog.mcp SDKs plus the mcpanalytics product).
Opik Analytics Instrumentation
comet-ml/opik
Shows how to add product analytics events to Opik's frontend, Java backend and Python SDK, all reporting through Segment to PostHog with an opik_ name prefix.
Telemetry Analytics
OpenHands/OpenHands
This skill should be used when the user asks to "add tracking", "add a PostHog event", "change telemetry consent", "instrument onboarding", "debug analytics", or changes telemetry.ts…
Analytics
Nexus-JPF/note-companion
When the user wants to set up, improve, or audit analytics tracking and measurement.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Questions about The Philosophical Review
What does The Philosophical Review do?
A skill your agent uses when targeting The Philosophical Review or deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue. The Philosophical Review is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when targeting The Philosophical Review or deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue.
When should I use The Philosophical Review?
The Philosophical Review fits situations like: targeting The Philosophical Review; deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue.
How do I install The Philosophical Review in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill the-philosophical-review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/the-philosophical-review in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/the-philosophical-review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install The Philosophical Review in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill the-philosophical-review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/the-philosophical-review in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/the-philosophical-review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use The Philosophical Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill the-philosophical-review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/the-philosophical-review, .gemini/skills/the-philosophical-review, .github/skills/the-philosophical-review and .opencode/skills/the-philosophical-review in your project.
What does The Philosophical Review need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: The Philosophical Review is instructions for the agent only.
Does The Philosophical Review access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is The Philosophical Review safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does The Philosophical Review use?
The Philosophical Review is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does The Philosophical Review use?
About 1.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to The Philosophical Review?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with The Philosophical Review: Analytics Tracking (alirezarezvani/claude-skills, 28k stars), Analytics (getsentry/sentry, 46k stars), Debugging MCP Analytics (PostHog/posthog, 40k stars) and Opik Analytics Instrumentation (comet-ml/opik, 22k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains The Philosophical Review?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.