A skill your agent uses when revising a TACAS (ETAPS) paper for a clear construction-or-analysis contribution on the first page, a stated soundness/completeness claim, honest benchmark evidence…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Tacas Writing Style

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill tacas-writing-style -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills tacas-writing-style --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/TACAS-Skills/skills/tacas-writing-style .claude/skills/tacas-writing-style && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
tacas-writing-style
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
596 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when revising a TACAS (ETAPS) paper for a clear construction-or-analysis contribution on the first page, a stated soundness/completeness claim, honest benchmark evidence…

  • Revising a TACAS (ETAPS) paper for a clear construction-or-analysis contribution on the first page
  • SKILL.md covers Revision rules (all categories), Category skeletons, Sentence-level rewrites and Soundness-and-evidence…, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • A stated soundness/completeness claim

What it does

Tacas Writing Style is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when revising a TACAS (ETAPS) paper for a clear construction-or-analysis contribution on the first page, a stated soundness/completeness claim, honest benchmark evidence, category-appropriate structure (research vs tool vs case-study vs tool-demo), disciplined use of the 16-page (or 6-page) LNCS budget, and correct handling of double-blind wording for research papers.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Brand voice and tone. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Revising a TACAS (ETAPS) paper for a clear construction-or-analysis contribution on the first page
  • A stated soundness/completeness claim
  • Honest benchmark evidence
  • Category-appropriate structure (research vs tool vs case-study vs tool-demo)

Example prompts

  • “/tacas-writing-style”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Tacas Writing Style loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 99 tokens; SKILL.md has 596 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~99
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 596 words, ~1,393 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/tacas-writing-style/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
tacas-writing-style
description
Use when revising a TACAS (ETAPS) paper for a clear construction-or-analysis contribution on the first page, a stated soundness/completeness claim, honest benchmark evidence, category-appropriate structure (research vs tool vs case-study vs tool-demo), disciplined use of the 16-page (or 6-page) LNCS budget, and correct handling of double-blind wording for research papers.

TACAS Writing Style

Use this when revising the main paper. TACAS papers are LNCS articles read by verification experts, so they need the contribution stated precisely on the first page and claims a reviewer can check — a soundness argument for a research paper, a working tool with reproducible numbers for a tool paper. The failure this skill prevents is a paper that gestures at "efficiency" and "novelty" without a crisp algorithmic claim or an honest evaluation.

Revision rules (all categories)

  • Lead with the construction/analysis problem and the contribution. State what the paper builds or decides, on what inputs, and how — before any adjective. A verification reader wants the object of study (a property, a system model, a decision problem) named immediately.
  • State the soundness claim explicitly. "Sound," "sound and complete," "complete up to bound k," or "unsound but effective, and here is why that is acceptable" — say which, and point to the argument. An unstated correctness posture is the first thing a TACAS reviewer probes.
  • Pair every empirical claim with honest evidence — named benchmarks, a fair baseline, wall-clock time on stated hardware, and solved/unsolved counts — not "outperforms."
  • Match structure to category. A research paper foregrounds the algorithm and its proof; a tool paper foregrounds the tool, its architecture, and its artifact; a case study foregrounds the system and the lessons; a tool-demo foregrounds a reproducible demonstration in six pages.
  • Respect the page budget as a design constraint. 16 pages (or 6 for a tool-demo) in llncs.cls, excluding references and appendix — a contribution that only fits by compressing the soundness argument is over-scoped for the category.
  • For a research (double-blind) paper, maintain anonymity in prose: third-person self-citation, no tool name that identifies you, no identifying acknowledgements. A tool/case-study paper is single-blind and names itself.

Category skeletons

CategoryFirst-page jobBackbone sectionsCommon failure
ResearchProblem, algorithm, soundness claim, evidence previewPreliminaries; algorithm; correctness; evaluationLeads with a trend, hides the algorithm and its guarantee
Regular toolWhat the tool does, how, availabilityArchitecture; technique realized; evaluation on benchmarks; artifactAdjectives instead of an architecture and a fair comparison
Case studyThe real system and the questionSystem; method applied; results; lessons and threatsAnecdote instead of transferable, honestly bounded lessons
Tool-demoA concrete demonstration in 6 pagesWhat is shown; how a user drives it; what is reproducibleCompressed research paper instead of a genuine demonstration
Show full SKILL.md (201 more words)Show less

Sentence-level rewrites

Draft patternTACAS-safe rewrite
"Our tool is very efficient and novel.""solves N/120 benchmarks vs M/120 for <baseline>, median 3.1x less wall-clock time (same hardware, equal timeout)"
"We prove the approach is correct.""Theorem 1: the encoding is sound and complete up to bound k (proof in §3.2 / appendix)"
"We outperform existing approaches.""against <named baseline> configured with an equal time budget, on <named benchmark set>"
"The tool scales well.""runtime grows sub-linearly to inputs of 10^6 states; the largest solved instance is stated in Table 2"
"Extensive experiments show...""we evaluate on <benchmark set> (N tasks); results, hardware, and timeouts are in §4 and the artifact"

Soundness-and-evidence discipline

text
[Guarantee]   sound? complete? bounded? unsound-but-useful? -> state it and cite the argument
[Baseline]    the strongest available tool, configured fairly, on the same benchmarks and hardware
[Reporting]   solved/unsolved, wall-clock with timeouts, memory; no single hidden headline ratio
[Reproduce]   every reported number traces to a script/log in the artifact (mandatory for tools)
-> place the guarantee near the algorithm and the evidence near the claim it supports

Vignette: compressing a research paper to 16 pages

A draft with a full proof, three optimizations, and a sprawling background: keep the algorithm, the soundness theorem with a proof sketch (full proof to the appendix), the one optimization that carries the speedup, and the benchmark comparison; move the secondary optimizations and extended proofs to the appendix with forward references; cut background to what the argument needs. The test of a good cut: a reviewer can state your guarantee and reproduce your headline benchmark result from the body alone.

Output format

text
[Writing diagnosis] clear / under-specified / over-claimed / evidence-thin / wrong-category-shape
[First-page fix] <new framing: problem -> contribution -> guarantee -> evidence>
[Guarantee audit] <soundness/completeness/bound stated? where argued?>
[Evidence audit] <claim -> benchmark -> baseline -> fair? reproducible? yes/no>
[Anonymity edits] (research only) <tool names / self-citations / acks to rewrite>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in TACAS-Skills/skills/tacas-writing-style of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Tacas Writing Style next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Tacas Writing Style compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Tacas Writing Style this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Academic Venue Researchjoshua-zyy/academic-paper-writer115—~626Automated safety check: PassMIT
Agsy Writing Stylefranklee16/academic-research-skills2231 repos~1kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Artbull Writing Style And Citationfranklee16/academic-research-skills2231 repos~848Automated safety check: PassNone
Ectheory Writing Stylefranklee16/academic-research-skills2231 repos~874Automated safety check: PassNone
Io Writing Stylefranklee16/academic-research-skills2231 repos~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassNone

Similar skills

  • Academic Venue Research

    joshua-zyy/academic-paper-writer

    Research target venue requirements and writing style for CS/AI/ML papers.

    115 GitHub stars~626 tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Agsy Writing Style

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    A skill your agent uses when drafting or polishing an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript so it reads clearly for a systems-science audience, follows the journal's format, and meets front-matter…

    223 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Artbull Writing Style And Citation

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    A skill your agent uses when polishing prose and formatting citations for an Art Bulletin article to The Chicago Manual of Style — endnotes (not author-date), full credit-line captions, and…

    223 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~848 tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Ectheory Writing Style

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    A skill your agent uses to polish the prose, notation, and proof exposition of an Econometric Theory (ET) manuscript — theorem-proof clarity, consistent notation, APA author-date references, and ET…

    223 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~874 tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Io Writing Style

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    A skill your agent uses when drafting or polishing an International Organization (IO) manuscript so it reads for international-relations scholars across paradigms, fits the word caps (Research…

    223 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Jape Writing Style

    franklee16/academic-research-skills

    A skill your agent uses when drafting or polishing prose for a Journal of Applied Econometrics (JAE) manuscript to its house conventions — a 100-word citation-free summary, up to six keywords…

    223 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~598 tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Tacas Writing Style

What does Tacas Writing Style do?

A skill your agent uses when revising a TACAS (ETAPS) paper for a clear construction-or-analysis contribution on the first page, a stated soundness/completeness claim, honest benchmark evidence…. Tacas Writing Style is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when revising a TACAS (ETAPS) paper for a clear construction-or-analysis contribution on the first page, a stated soundness/completeness claim, honest benchmark evidence, category-appropriate structure (research vs tool vs case-study vs tool-demo), disciplined use of the 16-page (or 6-page) LNCS budget, and correct handling of double-blind wording for research papers.

When should I use Tacas Writing Style?

Tacas Writing Style fits situations like: revising a TACAS (ETAPS) paper for a clear construction-or-analysis contribution on the first page; A stated soundness/completeness claim; honest benchmark evidence; category-appropriate structure (research vs tool vs case-study vs tool-demo).

How do I install Tacas Writing Style in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill tacas-writing-style -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (TACAS-Skills/skills/tacas-writing-style in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/tacas-writing-style in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Tacas Writing Style in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill tacas-writing-style -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (TACAS-Skills/skills/tacas-writing-style in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/tacas-writing-style in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Tacas Writing Style in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill tacas-writing-style -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/tacas-writing-style, .gemini/skills/tacas-writing-style, .github/skills/tacas-writing-style and .opencode/skills/tacas-writing-style in your project.

What does Tacas Writing Style need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Tacas Writing Style is instructions for the agent only.

Does Tacas Writing Style access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Tacas Writing Style safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Tacas Writing Style use?

Tacas Writing Style is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Tacas Writing Style use?

About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Tacas Writing Style?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Tacas Writing Style: Academic Venue Research (joshua-zyy/academic-paper-writer, 115 stars), Agsy Writing Style (franklee16/academic-research-skills, 223 stars), Artbull Writing Style And Citation (franklee16/academic-research-skills, 223 stars) and Ectheory Writing Style (franklee16/academic-research-skills, 223 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Tacas Writing Style?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.