A skill your agent uses when strengthening ACM SoCC reproducibility, covering the testbed and workload description, released code and traces, provenance pinning for measurement studies, reproducing…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Socc Reproducibility

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill socc-reproducibility -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills socc-reproducibility --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/SoCC-Skills/skills/socc-reproducibility .claude/skills/socc-reproducibility && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
socc-reproducibility
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
591 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when strengthening ACM SoCC reproducibility, covering the testbed and workload description, released code and traces, provenance pinning for measurement studies, reproducing…

  • Strengthening ACM SoCC reproducibility
  • SKILL.md covers Evidence map, Reproducibility statement audit, Provenance pinning and Degrees of reproducibility…, plus 3 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Covering the testbed and workload description

What it does

Socc Reproducibility is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when strengthening ACM SoCC reproducibility, covering the testbed and workload description, released code and traces, provenance pinning for measurement studies, reproducing tail-latency and cost (not just the mean), claim-to-evidence mapping, honest degrees of reproducibility, and consistency between what the paper reports and what the artifact regenerates.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Reproducible research. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Strengthening ACM SoCC reproducibility
  • Covering the testbed and workload description
  • Released code and traces
  • Provenance pinning for measurement studies

Example prompts

  • “/socc-reproducibility”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Socc Reproducibility loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 96 tokens; SKILL.md has 591 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~96
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 591 words, ~1,412 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/socc-reproducibility/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
socc-reproducibility
description
Use when strengthening ACM SoCC reproducibility, covering the testbed and workload description, released code and traces, provenance pinning for measurement studies, reproducing tail-latency and cost (not just the mean), claim-to-evidence mapping, honest degrees of reproducibility, and consistency between what the paper reports and what the artifact regenerates.

SoCC Reproducibility

Use this before submission and again before camera-ready. SoCC — the joint SIGMOD+SIGOPS cloud symposium — is read by reviewers who expect an inspectable measurement trail: the SIGOPS half wants to believe the system runs, and the SIGMOD half wants to believe the numbers. The goal is that a competent reader with a comparable testbed could rebuild your evidence and reach your conclusions — including the tail latency and cost, not just the average.

Evidence map

  • Map each cloud claim and reported number to a verifiable location — a paper section, a figure generated from logged runs, or a script in the artifact.
  • For systems, give enough of the mechanism, configuration, and testbed (node counts, instance types, OS/kernel, network) that a reader could re-deploy and re-measure.
  • For measurement/trace studies, report the trace provenance, extraction date, filtering, the workload replay, metrics, and the analysis scripts.
  • Reproduce tail and cost: percentiles (p95/p99/p99.9), the pricing model behind any cost claim, and the number of runs and variance — the mean alone is not a cloud result.
  • Keep the paper and the artifact consistent: a number in the PDF that no script regenerates is the contradiction reviewers read as carelessness.

Reproducibility statement audit

Claim in the paperWeak answerSoCC-ready answer
"We evaluate on a production trace""Trace available on request"Anonymized (then released) trace + the replay harness and extraction date
"Our system improves throughput""Code will be released"Anonymized, runnable system with a testbed description and a small demo
"We cut cost by X"A single cost numberThe pricing model, the instance-seconds logged, and the script that computes it
"p99 stays within target"Mean latency onlyPer-run tail percentiles with variance and run count
"Scales to N nodes"One large runA scaled reproduction path plus the full-scale logs

"Available on request" is treated as not available; convert every such line into a concrete, anonymized (then released) artifact or an explicit, justified exception (e.g., a confidential production trace, with a synthetic generator provided instead).

Provenance pinning

text
[Measurement] pin commit SHAs; record trace extraction dates; archive the replayed trace or a
              faithful generator, not just a query or a pointer
[Testbed]     record node counts, instance types, OS/kernel versions, network, and the run count;
              a cloud result that cannot be re-deployed cannot be reproduced
[Cost]        state the pricing model and the source of every cost figure so a reader can recompute
[Tail]        log per-request or per-run latency distributions, not only aggregates
[Randomness]  log seeds for stochastic components; say what is and is not deterministic
Show full SKILL.md (260 more words)Show less

Degrees of reproducibility (state the one you achieved)

  • Turnkey: one documented command regenerates each figure (including tail and cost) from logged runs, at least at reduced scale.
  • Scripted: scripts exist but require a specific testbed, documented manual steps, or restricted trace access.
  • Descriptive: prose and configuration detailed enough that a competent reader could rebuild the deployment and measurement pipeline.

For SoCC, aim turnkey for anything an evaluator could rerun at small scale (a short trace replay, a tail/cost plot from logged runs); full-cluster or proprietary-trace results may stay scripted with access clearly documented. Stating the achieved level honestly beats promising turnkey behavior that fails on someone else's testbed.

Vignette: a scheduling measurement paper

Consider a paper measuring a new scheduler on a replayed production trace. Its reproducibility spine: the scheduler code with pinned SHAs; the replay harness and the (anonymized, then released) trace with its extraction date; the testbed description (nodes, instance types, kernel); the measurement scripts that turn raw logs into the throughput, p99, and cost figures; the run count and variance; and one honest sentence about the parts (a confidential production trace, the full cluster) that cannot be shared and what synthetic or scaled substitute is provided.

Consistency and camera-ready pass

  • Before submission: every reported number traces to the artifact; the reproducibility statement matches reality; the artifact is anonymized (no cluster names, provider hints, or trace provenance that reveals identity).
  • Before camera-ready: swap anonymized links for permanent, DOI-issuing archives, and align the statement with the ACM badges you are pursuing if the edition offers evaluation (socc-artifact-evaluation).

Output format

text
[Claim inventory] <claim -> evidence location>
[Reproducibility statement] concrete / vague / missing
[Provenance gaps] <trace SHAs+dates / testbed description / cost model / tail logging / seeds>
[Tail + cost] reproducible, not just the mean? yes/no
[Reproducibility level] turnkey / scripted / descriptive, stated honestly
[Paper fixes] <must appear in the PDF>
[Artifact fixes] <additions before upload>

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in SoCC-Skills/skills/socc-reproducibility of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Socc Reproducibility next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Socc Reproducibility compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Socc Reproducibility this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer2.4k2 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
CHARLS Paper Reproduction Guidexjtulyc/MedgeClaw6171 repos~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Compute Environment Setupaipoch/open-science5.5k—~2.6kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Figure Styleaipoch/open-science5.5k—~5.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Add Bactopia Toolbactopia/bactopia522—~4.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Peer Review

    K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer

    Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.

    2.4k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Guides an agent through reproducing papers built on the CHARLS health and retirement survey, from variable mapping to cognition, depression and isolation scores.

    617 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.8k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Compute Environment Setup

    aipoch/open-science

    Prepares setup instructions and a named activation file for a user-managed software environment on an Open-Science SSH or Slurm compute host.

    5.5k GitHub stars~2.6k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Figure Style

    aipoch/open-science

    Publication-grade correctness and legibility rules for final-deliverable scientific figures, not exploratory plots.

    5.5k GitHub stars~5.1k tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Add Bactopia Tool

    bactopia/bactopia

    Scaffold a complete Bactopia Tool across all three tiers -- module, subworkflow, and workflow entry point under workflows/bactopia-tools/.

    522 GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Modeling Code and Result Contracts

    yushui2022/MathModel-Skill

    Generates result-evidence contracts, tables and runnable q1 to q3 modeling code scaffolds for a math modeling paper from a model route, a data plan and cleaned data.

    454 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Socc Reproducibility

What does Socc Reproducibility do?

A skill your agent uses when strengthening ACM SoCC reproducibility, covering the testbed and workload description, released code and traces, provenance pinning for measurement studies, reproducing…. Socc Reproducibility is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when strengthening ACM SoCC reproducibility, covering the testbed and workload description, released code and traces, provenance pinning for measurement studies, reproducing tail-latency and cost (not just the mean), claim-to-evidence mapping, honest degrees of reproducibility, and consistency between what the paper reports and what the artifact regenerates.

When should I use Socc Reproducibility?

Socc Reproducibility fits situations like: strengthening ACM SoCC reproducibility; covering the testbed and workload description; released code and traces; provenance pinning for measurement studies.

How do I install Socc Reproducibility in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill socc-reproducibility -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (SoCC-Skills/skills/socc-reproducibility in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/socc-reproducibility in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Socc Reproducibility in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill socc-reproducibility -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (SoCC-Skills/skills/socc-reproducibility in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/socc-reproducibility in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Socc Reproducibility in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill socc-reproducibility -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/socc-reproducibility, .gemini/skills/socc-reproducibility, .github/skills/socc-reproducibility and .opencode/skills/socc-reproducibility in your project.

What does Socc Reproducibility need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Socc Reproducibility is instructions for the agent only.

Does Socc Reproducibility access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Socc Reproducibility safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Socc Reproducibility use?

Socc Reproducibility is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Socc Reproducibility use?

About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Socc Reproducibility?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Socc Reproducibility: Peer Review (K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer, 2.4k stars), CHARLS Paper Reproduction Guide (xjtulyc/MedgeClaw, 617 stars), Compute Environment Setup (aipoch/open-science, 5.5k stars) and Figure Style (aipoch/open-science, 5.5k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Socc Reproducibility?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.