A skill your agent uses when designing or auditing the evaluation of a SIGMOD paper, covering workload realism and standard benchmark usage, baseline tuning fairness, scalability and tail-latency…

MITAuto-check passed

Install Sigmod Experiments

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill sigmod-experiments -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills sigmod-experiments --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/SIGMOD-Skills/skills/sigmod-experiments .claude/skills/sigmod-experiments && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
sigmod-experiments
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
585 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when designing or auditing the evaluation of a SIGMOD paper, covering workload realism and standard benchmark usage, baseline tuning fairness, scalability and tail-latency…

  • Auditing the evaluation of a SIGMOD paper
  • SKILL.md covers The setup table comes first, Workload realism ladder, Baseline fairness protocol and Curves, not points, plus 5 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Covering workload realism and standard benchmark usage

What it does

Sigmod Experiments is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when designing or auditing the evaluation of a SIGMOD paper, covering workload realism and standard benchmark usage, baseline tuning fairness, scalability and tail-latency methodology, ablations that isolate the mechanism, and the setup disclosure a data-systems PC demands before trusting any speedup.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Auditing the evaluation of a SIGMOD paper
  • Covering workload realism and standard benchmark usage
  • Baseline tuning fairness
  • Scalability and tail-latency methodology

Example prompts

  • “/sigmod-experiments”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Sigmod Experiments loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 81 tokens; SKILL.md has 585 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~81
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 585 words, ~1,379 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/sigmod-experiments/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
sigmod-experiments
description
Use when designing or auditing the evaluation of a SIGMOD paper, covering workload realism and standard benchmark usage, baseline tuning fairness, scalability and tail-latency methodology, ablations that isolate the mechanism, and the setup disclosure a data-systems PC demands before trusting any speedup.

SIGMOD Experiments

The evaluation section decides most SIGMOD verdicts. A data-systems PC does not ask whether your system is fast; it asks whether the experiments would convince the person who built the baseline you beat. Design the evaluation to survive that specific reader.

The setup table comes first

Before any result, the paper owes a complete experimental contract: hardware (CPU, memory, storage class, network), software versions, datasets with scale, workloads with skew and mix parameters, baseline versions and tuning provenance, repetition counts, and warm-up policy. At SIGMOD this is not appendix material — reviewers skim to it before reading the design.

Workload realism ladder

RungExampleEvidentiary weight
MicrobenchmarkSingle-operator stress loopExplains mechanisms; proves little alone
Standard benchmarkTPC-style, YCSB-style suites at stated scaleComparable across papers; known blind spots
Trace-derivedPublic or characterized production tracesHigh, if provenance is disclosed
End-to-end applicationFull query mix on realistic schemaHighest, rarely achieved

A SIGMOD-strong evaluation climbs the ladder: microbenchmarks to expose the mechanism, a standard suite for comparability, and at least one workload that argues real deployments look like this. An evaluation living entirely on rung one gets the "toy workloads" objection regardless of speedups.

Baseline fairness protocol

The evaluation's credibility ceiling is the weakest baseline treatment:

  • Use current versions, compiled with the same optimization effort as your system, configured per their documentation or authors.
  • Enable the competitor's relevant features — comparing your tuned build against a default-config rival is the field's best-known foul.
  • Where a baseline's own paper reports numbers on similar hardware, reconcile: if you measure it slower than its authors did, say why.
  • Include the boring-but-strong baseline (a mature engine, a well-indexed Postgres, a hand-tuned flat scan); beating only research prototypes invites the question you least want.

Curves, not points

  • Scalability: sweep threads/cores/nodes and show the shape; a single-point "64-core" result hides the knee reviewers care about.
  • Data size: sweep scale factors; crossover points against baselines are more informative than any fixed-size win.
  • Skew and contention: sweep the skew parameter; uniform-only evaluation of a concurrency or caching contribution is near-disqualifying.
  • Latency: percentiles across the sweep, since p99 behavior under load is frequently where the contribution actually lives (or dies).
Show full SKILL.md (224 more words)Show less

Ablations that isolate the mechanism

If the system adds three techniques, the evaluation must attribute the gain: a cumulative build-up (base, +A, +A+B, full) or leave-one-out grid. The review question being preempted is "is the win just the rewrite?" — so where feasible, include the strongest possible your-system-minus-the-idea configuration as its own baseline.

Run hygiene

text
For every plotted point:
  runs >= 5 (or stated justification), report median + spread
  cold vs. warm state declared; caches handled identically across systems
  same measurement harness for all systems; harness in the artifact
  seeds pinned for generated data and workload shuffles
  outlier policy stated before running, not after seeing results

Numbers that move between the submitted and revised versions without an explained cause are a specific, remembered failure mode in multi-round review — hygiene at first submission protects the revision.

Matching metrics to contribution type

  • Storage/index structures: throughput plus space amplification plus build/maintenance cost — one without the others invites the "what did it cost" question.
  • Transaction/concurrency work: abort rates and tail latency under contention, not just committed-throughput peaks.
  • Query processing: per-query breakdowns alongside suite totals; a suite geomean can hide one catastrophic regression reviewers will find.
  • Distributed systems: report behavior during failures and rebalancing, not only steady state.
  • ML-for-systems: include the training/adaptation cost and the stale-model regime; the "what happens when the workload shifts" question is now standard at this venue.

Negative-result honesty

Show where the system loses: the workload regime where the incumbent wins, the overhead paid on the unfavorable mix. A measured, explained loss buys more trust with this PC than any additional win, and it pre-writes the limitations paragraph reviewers will otherwise draft as an objection.

Output format

text
[Setup contract] complete / missing items listed
[Ladder position] rungs covered; realism gap
[Baseline audit] versions, tuning, features, reconciliation
[Curve coverage] scalability / size / skew / percentile sweeps present
[Attribution] ablation design isolates each claimed technique yes/no
[Loss map] regimes where the system loses, disclosed or hidden
[Decisive missing run] the one experiment to add before the round

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in SIGMOD-Skills/skills/sigmod-experiments of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Sigmod Experiments next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Sigmod Experiments compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Sigmod Experiments this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Design Audit Against Rams' Principlesthedotmack/claude-mem99k—~4.6kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Experiment Auditwanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep17k1 repos~2.7kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Experiment Auditwanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep17k—~3.2kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Experiment Designeralirezarezvani/claude-skills28k1 repos~783Automated safety check: PassMIT
OpenClaw Design Auditopenclaw/clawhub9.5k—~498Automated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Audits a design against Dieter Rams' ten principles of good design, scores each with evidence, and hands off a make-plan prompt for a new, refined or redesigned outcome.

    99k GitHub stars~4.6k tokensUpdated today
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Experiment Audit

    wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep

    Audit experiment integrity before claiming results. An agent skill from wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep.

    17k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.7k tokens
    DatabasesAuto-check: notes
  • Experiment Audit

    wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep

    Audit experiment integrity before claiming results. An agent skill from wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep.

    17k GitHub stars~3.2k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    DatabasesAuto-check: notes
  • Experiment Designer

    alirezarezvani/claude-skills

    A skill your agent uses when planning product experiments, writing testable hypotheses, estimating sample size, prioritizing tests, or interpreting A/B outcomes with practical statistical rigor.

    28k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~783 tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • OpenClaw Design Audit

    openclaw/clawhub

    Audits OpenClaw frontend code and rendered pages for token misuse, reimplemented primitives, accessibility and responsive defects and off-brand copy, with an evidence-based report.

    9.5k GitHub stars~498 tokensUpdated today
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Design System

    affaan-m/ECC

    Generate a design system from an existing codebase or audit one for visual consistency: extract tokens (colors, typography, spacing, shadows) into design-tokens.json and CSS custom properties with…

    276k GitHub stars~698 tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 12 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Sigmod Experiments

What does Sigmod Experiments do?

A skill your agent uses when designing or auditing the evaluation of a SIGMOD paper, covering workload realism and standard benchmark usage, baseline tuning fairness, scalability and tail-latency…. Sigmod Experiments is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when designing or auditing the evaluation of a SIGMOD paper, covering workload realism and standard benchmark usage, baseline tuning fairness, scalability and tail-latency methodology, ablations that isolate the mechanism, and the setup disclosure a data-systems PC demands before trusting any speedup.

When should I use Sigmod Experiments?

Sigmod Experiments fits situations like: auditing the evaluation of a SIGMOD paper; covering workload realism and standard benchmark usage; baseline tuning fairness; scalability and tail-latency methodology.

How do I install Sigmod Experiments in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill sigmod-experiments -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (SIGMOD-Skills/skills/sigmod-experiments in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/sigmod-experiments in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Sigmod Experiments in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill sigmod-experiments -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (SIGMOD-Skills/skills/sigmod-experiments in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/sigmod-experiments in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Sigmod Experiments in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill sigmod-experiments -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/sigmod-experiments, .gemini/skills/sigmod-experiments, .github/skills/sigmod-experiments and .opencode/skills/sigmod-experiments in your project.

What does Sigmod Experiments need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Sigmod Experiments is instructions for the agent only.

Does Sigmod Experiments access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Sigmod Experiments safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Sigmod Experiments use?

Sigmod Experiments is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Sigmod Experiments use?

About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Sigmod Experiments?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Sigmod Experiments: Design Audit Against Rams' Principles (thedotmack/claude-mem, 99k stars), Experiment Audit (wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep, 17k stars), Experiment Audit (wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep, 17k stars) and Experiment Designer (alirezarezvani/claude-skills, 28k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Sigmod Experiments?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,228 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.